Paradigm Multi-Paradigm: Appeared in Designed by
Paradigm Multi-Paradigm: Appeared in Designed by
SQL ( /ˌsiːkwəl/, often /ˈɛs kjuː ˈɛl/),[3] often referred to as Structured Query Language,
is a database computer language designed for managing data in relational database management
systems (RDBMS), and originally based upon relational algebra and calculus.[4] Its scope
includes data insert, query, update and delete, schema creation and modification, and data access
control. SQL was one of the first commercial languages for Edgar F. Codd's relational model, as
described in his influential 1970 paper, "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data
Banks".[5] Despite not adhering to the relational model as described by Codd, it became the most
widely used database language.[6][7]
Contents
1 History
2 Language elements
o 2.1 Queries
2.1.1 Null and three-valued logic (3VL)
o 2.2 Data manipulation
o 2.3 Transaction controls
o 2.4 Data definition
o 2.5 Data types
2.5.1 Character strings
2.5.2 Bit strings
2.5.3 Numbers
2.5.4 Date and time
o 2.6 Data control
o 2.7 Procedural extensions
3 Criticism
o 3.1 Cross-vendor portability
4 Standardization
o 4.1 Standard structure
5 Alternatives
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
[edit] History
SQL was developed at IBM by Donald D. Chamberlin and Raymond F. Boyce in the early
1970s. This version, initially called SEQUEL (Structured English Query Language), was
designed to manipulate and retrieve data stored in IBM's original quasi-relational database
management system, System R, which a group at IBM San Jose Research Laboratory had
developed during the 1970s.[8] The acronym SEQUEL was later changed to SQL because
"SEQUEL" was a trademark of the UK-based Hawker Siddeley aircraft company.[9]
The first Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) was RDMS, developed at MIT in
the early 1970s, soon followed by Ingres, developed in 1974 at U.C. Berkeley. Ingres
implemented a query language known as QUEL, which was later supplanted in the marketplace
by SQL.[9]
In the late 1970s, Relational Software, Inc. (now Oracle Corporation) saw the potential of the
concepts described by Codd, Chamberlin, and Boyce and developed their own SQL-based
RDBMS with aspirations of selling it to the U.S. Navy, Central Intelligence Agency, and other
U.S. government agencies. In June 1979, Relational Software, Inc. introduced the first
commercially available implementation of SQL, Oracle V2 (Version2) for VAX computers.
Oracle V2 beat IBM's August release of the System/38 RDBMS to market by a few weeks.[citation
needed]
After testing SQL at customer test sites to determine the usefulness and practicality of the
system, IBM began developing commercial products based on their System R prototype
including System/38, SQL/DS, and DB2, which were commercially available in 1979, 1981, and
1983, respectively.[10]
This chart shows several of the SQL language elements that compose a single statement.
Clauses, which are constituent components of statements and queries. (In some cases,
these are optional.)[11]
Expressions, which can produce either scalar values or tables consisting of columns and
rows of data.
Predicates, which specify conditions that can be evaluated to SQL three-valued logic
(3VL) or Boolean (true/false/unknown) truth values and which are used to limit the
effects of statements and queries, or to change program flow.
Queries, which retrieve the data based on specific criteria. This is the most important
element of SQL.
Statements, which may have a persistent effect on schemata and data, or which may
control transactions, program flow, connections, sessions, or diagnostics.
o SQL statements also include the semicolon (";") statement terminator. Though not
required on every platform, it is defined as a standard part of the SQL grammar.
Insignificant whitespace is generally ignored in SQL statements and queries, making it
easier to format SQL code for readability.
[edit] Queries
The most common operation in SQL is the query, which is performed with the declarative
SELECT statement. SELECT retrieves data from one or more tables, or expressions. Standard
SELECT statements have no persistent effects on the database. Some non-standard
implementations of SELECT can have persistent effects, such as the SELECT INTO syntax that
exists in some databases.[12]
Queries allow the user to describe desired data, leaving the database management system
(DBMS) responsible for planning, optimizing, and performing the physical operations necessary
to produce that result as it chooses.
A query includes a list of columns to be included in the final result immediately following the
SELECT keyword. An asterisk ("*") can also be used to specify that the query should return all
columns of the queried tables. SELECT is the most complex statement in SQL, with optional
keywords and clauses that include:
The FROM clause which indicates the table(s) from which data is to be retrieved. The FROM
clause can include optional JOIN subclauses to specify the rules for joining tables.
The WHERE clause includes a comparison predicate, which restricts the rows returned by
the query. The WHERE clause eliminates all rows from the result set for which the
comparison predicate does not evaluate to True.
The GROUP BY clause is used to project rows having common values into a smaller set of
rows. GROUP BY is often used in conjunction with SQL aggregation functions or to
eliminate duplicate rows from a result set. The WHERE clause is applied before the GROUP
BY clause.
The HAVING clause includes a predicate used to filter rows resulting from the GROUP BY
clause. Because it acts on the results of the GROUP BY clause, aggregation functions can
be used in the HAVING clause predicate.
The ORDER BY clause identifies which columns are used to sort the resulting data, and in
which direction they should be sorted (options are ascending or descending). Without an
ORDER BY clause, the order of rows returned by an SQL query is undefined.
The following is an example of a SELECT query that returns a list of expensive books. The query
retrieves all rows from the Book table in which the price column contains a value greater than
100.00. The result is sorted in ascending order by title. The asterisk (*) in the select list indicates
that all columns of the Book table should be included in the result set.
SELECT *
FROM Book
WHERE price > 100.00
ORDER BY title;
The example below demonstrates a query of multiple tables, grouping, and aggregation, by
returning a list of books and the number of authors associated with each book.
SELECT Book.title,
COUNT(*) AS Authors
FROM Book JOIN Book_author
ON Book.isbn = Book_author.isbn
GROUP BY Book.title;
Title Authors
---------------------- -------
SQL Examples and Guide 4
The Joy of SQL 1
An Introduction to SQL 2
Pitfalls of SQL 1
Under the precondition that isbn is the only common column name of the two tables and that a
column named title only exists in the Books table, the above query could be rewritten in the
following form:
SELECT title,
COUNT(*) AS Authors
FROM Book NATURAL JOIN Book_author
GROUP BY title;
However, many vendors either do not support this approach, or require certain column naming
conventions in order for natural joins to work effectively.
SQL includes operators and functions for calculating values on stored values. SQL allows the
use of expressions in the select list to project data, as in the following example which returns a
list of books that cost more than 100.00 with an additional sales_tax column containing a sales
tax figure calculated at 6% of the price.
SELECT isbn,
title,
price,
price * 0.06 AS sales_tax
FROM Book
WHERE price > 100.00
ORDER BY title;
The idea of Null was introduced into SQL to handle missing information in the relational model.
The introduction of Null (or Unknown) along with True and False is the foundation of three-
valued logic. Null does not have a value (and is not a member of any data domain) but is rather a
placeholder or "mark" for missing information. Therefore comparisons with Null can never result
in either True or False but always in the third logical result.[13]
SQL uses Null to handle missing information. It supports three-valued logic (3VL) and the rules
governing SQL three-valued logic are shown below (p and q represent logical states).[14] The
word NULL is also a reserved keyword in SQL, used to identify the Null special marker.
Additionally, since SQL operators return Unknown when comparing anything with Null, SQL
provides two Null-specific comparison predicates: IS NULL and IS NOT NULL test whether data
is or is not Null.[13]
Note that SQL returns only results for which the WHERE clause returns a value of True; i.e. it
excludes results with values of False, but also those whose value is Unknown.
p p
p AND q p OR q
True False Unknown True False Unknown
True True False Unknown True True True True
q False False False False q False True False Unknown
Unknown Unknown False Unknown Unknown True Unknown Unknown
p NOT p p
p=q
True False True False Unknown
False True True True False Unknown
Unknown Unknown q False False True Unknown
Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
Universal quantification is not explicitly supported by SQL, and must be worked out as a negated
existential quantification.[15][16][17]
There is also the "<row value expression> IS DISTINCT FROM <row value expression>"
infixed comparison operator which returns TRUE unless both operands are equal or both are
NULL. Likewise, IS NOT DISTINCT FROM is defined as "NOT (<row value expression> IS
DISTINCT FROM <row value expression>)".
The Data Manipulation Language (DML) is the subset of SQL used to add, update and delete
data:
UPDATE My_table
SET field1 = 'updated value'
WHERE field2 = 'N';
MERGE is used to combine the data of multiple tables. It combines the INSERT and UPDATE
elements. It is defined in the SQL:2003 standard; prior to that, some databases provided
similar functionality via different syntax, sometimes called "upsert".
Once the COMMIT statement completes, the transaction's changes cannot be rolled back.
COMMIT and ROLLBACK terminate the current transaction and release data locks. In the absence of
a START TRANSACTION or similar statement, the semantics of SQL are implementation-
dependent. Example: A classic bank transfer of funds transaction.
START TRANSACTION;
UPDATE Account SET amount=amount-200 WHERE account_number=1234;
UPDATE Account SET amount=amount+200 WHERE account_number=2345;
IF ERRORS=0 COMMIT;
IF ERRORS<>0 ROLLBACK;
The Data Definition Language (DDL) manages table and index structure. The most basic items
of DDL are the CREATE, ALTER, RENAME, DROP and TRUNCATE statements:
ALTER modifies the structure of an existing object in various ways, for example, adding a
column to an existing table or a constraint, e.g.,:
TRUNCATE deletes all data from a table in a very fast way, deleting the data inside the
table and not the table itself. It usually implies a subsequent COMMIT operation, i.e., it
cannot be rolled back.
DROP deletes an object in the database, usually irretrievably, i.e., it cannot be rolled back,
e.g.,:
Each column in an SQL table declares the type(s) that column may contain. ANSI SQL includes
the following datatypes.[18]
[edit] Numbers
SQL provides a function to round numerics or dates, called TRUNC (in Informix, DB2,
PostgreSQL, Oracle and MySQL) or ROUND (in Informix, Sybase, Oracle, PostgreSQL and
Microsoft SQL Server)[19]
SQL provides several functions for generating a date / time variable out of a date / time string
(TO_DATE, TO_TIME, TO_TIMESTAMP), as well as for extracting the respective members (seconds,
for instance) of such variables. The current system date / time of the database server can be
called by using functions like NOW.
The Data Control Language (DCL) authorizes users and groups of users to access and
manipulate data. Its two main statements are:
Example:
SQL is designed for a specific purpose: to query data contained in a relational database. SQL is a
set-based, declarative query language, not an imperative language such as C or BASIC.
However, there are extensions to Standard SQL which add procedural programming language
functionality, such as control-of-flow constructs. These include:
Common
Source Full Name
Name
ANSI/ISO
SQL/PSM SQL/Persistent Stored Modules
Standard
Interbase/
PSQL Procedural SQL
Firebird
IBM SQL PL SQL Procedural Language (implements SQL/PSM)
Microsoft/
T-SQL Transact-SQL
Sybase
Mimer SQL SQL/PSM SQL/Persistent Stored Module (implements SQL/PSM)
MySQL SQL/PSM SQL/Persistent Stored Module (implements SQL/PSM)
Oracle PL/SQL Procedural Language/SQL (based on Ada)
Procedural Language/PostgreSQL Structured Query Language
PostgreSQL PL/pgSQL
(based on Oracle PL/SQL)
Procedural Language/Persistent Stored Modules (implements
PostgreSQL PL/PSM
SQL/PSM)
In addition to the standard SQL/PSM extensions and proprietary SQL extensions, procedural and
object-oriented programmability is available on many SQL platforms via DBMS integration with
other languages. The SQL standard defines SQL/JRT extensions (SQL Routines and Types for
the Java Programming Language) to support Java code in SQL databases. SQL Server 2005 uses
the SQLCLR (SQL Server Common Language Runtime) to host managed .NET assemblies in
the database, while prior versions of SQL Server were restricted to using unmanaged extended
stored procedures which were primarily written in C. Other database platforms, like MySQL and
Postgres, allow functions to be written in a wide variety of languages including Perl, Python, Tcl,
and C.
[edit] Criticism
SQL is a declarative computer language intended for use with relational databases. Many of the
original SQL features were inspired by, but violated, the semantics of the relational model and its
tuple calculus realization. Recent extensions to SQL achieved relational completeness, but have
worsened the violations, as documented in The Third Manifesto. Therefore, it cannot be
considered relational in any significant sense, but is still widely called relational due to
differentiation to other, pre-relational database languages which never intended to implement the
relational model; due to its historical origin; and due to the use of the relational term as
propaganda by product vendors.
Implementations are inconsistent with the standard and, usually, incompatible between
vendors. In particular date and time syntax, string concatenation, NULLs, and comparison
case sensitivity vary from vendor to vendor. A particular exception is PostgreSQL, which
strives for compliance, and SQLite, which strives to follow PostgreSQL.
The language makes it too easy to do a Cartesian join (joining all possible combinations),
which results in "run-away" result sets when WHERE clauses are mistyped. Cartesian joins
are so rarely used in practice that requiring an explicit CARTESIAN keyword may be
warranted. (SQL 1992 introduced the CROSS JOIN keyword that allows the user to make
clear that a Cartesian join is intended, but the shorthand "comma-join" with no predicate
is still acceptable syntax, which still invites the same mistake.)
It is also possible to misconstruct a WHERE on an update or delete, thereby affecting more
rows in a table than desired. (A work-around is to use transactions or habitually type in
the WHERE clause first, then fill in the rest later.)
The grammar of SQL is perhaps unnecessarily complex, borrowing a COBOL-like
keyword approach, when a function-influenced syntax could result in more re-use of
fewer grammar and syntax rules.
The non-compliance of SQL to the relational model, and specifically to the 0th rule of
Codd’s twelve rules, is another source of complexity and incompatibility.
Popular implementations of SQL commonly omit support for basic features of Standard SQL,
such as the DATE or TIME data types. The most obvious such examples, and incidentally the most
popular commercial, proprietary SQL DBMSs, are Oracle (whose DATE behaves as DATETIME,[20]
[21]
and lacks a TIME type[22]) and the MS SQL Server. As a result, SQL code can rarely be ported
between database systems without modifications.
There are several reasons for this lack of portability between database systems:
The complexity and size of the SQL standard means that most implementors do not
support the entire standard.
The standard does not specify database behavior in several important areas (e.g., indexes,
file storage…), leaving implementations to decide how to behave.
The SQL standard precisely specifies the syntax that a conforming database system must
implement. However, the standard's specification of the semantics of language constructs
is less well-defined, leading to ambiguity.
Many database vendors have large existing customer bases; where the SQL standard
conflicts with the prior behavior of the vendor's database, the vendor may be unwilling to
break backward compatibility.
Software vendors often desire to create incompatibilities with other products, as it
provides a strong incentive for their existing users to remain loyal (see vendor lock-in).
[edit] Standardization
SQL was adopted as a standard by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1986 as
SQL-86[23] and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 1987. The original
SQL standard declared that the official pronunciation for SQL is "es queue el".[6] Many English-
speaking database professionals still use the nonstandard[24] pronunciation /ˈsiːkwəl/ (like the
word "sequel").
Until 1996, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) data management
standards program certified SQL DBMS compliance with the SQL standard. Vendors now self-
certify the compliance of their products.[25]
The SQL standard has gone through a number of revisions, as shown below:
[edit] Alternatives
A distinction should be made between alternatives to relational query languages and alternatives
to SQL. Below are proposed relational alternatives to SQL. See navigational database for
alternatives to relational:
[edit] References
1. ^ Paul, Ryan. "A guided tour of the Microsoft Command Shell". Ars Technica.
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2005/10/msh.ars/4. Retrieved 10 April 2011.
2. ^ ISO/IEC 9075-1:2008: Information technology – Database languages – SQL –
Part 1: Framework (SQL/Framework), http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?
csnumber=45498
3. ^ Beaulieu, Alan (April 2009). Mary E Treseler. ed. Learning SQL (2nd ed.).
Sebastapol, CA, USA: O'Reilly. ISBN 978-0-596-52083-0.
4. ^ ɛ _ s, "Database Debunkings"
5. ^ Codd, Edgar F (June 1970). "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data
Banks". Communications of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) 13 (6):
377–87. doi:10.1145/362384.362685. http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html.
Retrieved 2007-06-09.
6. ^ a b Chapple, Mike. "SQL Fundamentals". Databases. About.com.
http://databases.about.com/od/sql/a/sqlfundamentals.htm. Retrieved 2009-01-28.
7. ^ "Structured Query Language (SQL)". International Business Machines. October
27, 2006. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v9/index.jsp?
topic=/com.ibm.db2.udb.admin.doc/doc/c0004100.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
8. ^ Chamberlin, Donald D; Boyce, Raymond F (1974). "SEQUEL: A Structured
English Query Language" (PDF). Proceedings of the 1974 ACM SIGFIDET Workshop
on Data Description, Access and Control (Association for Computing Machinery): 249–
64. http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/chamberlin/sequel-1974.pdf. Retrieved
2007-06-09.
9. ^ a b Oppel, Andy (February 27, 2004). Databases Demystified. San Francisco,
CA: McGraw-Hill Osborne Media. pp. 90–1. ISBN 0-07-146960-5.
http://www.mhprofessional.com/product.php?cat=112&isbn=0071469605.
10. ^ "History of IBM, 1978". IBM Archives. IBM. http://www-
03.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1978.html. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
11. ^ ANSI/ISO/IEC International Standard (IS). Database Language SQL—Part 2:
Foundation (SQL/Foundation). 1999.
12. ^ "Transact-SQL Reference", SQL Server Language Reference, SQL Server 2005
Books Online, Microsoft, 2007-09-15, http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-
us/library/ms188029(SQL.90).aspx, retrieved 2007-06-17
13. ^ a b ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003, "SQL/Foundation". ISO/IEC.
14. ^ Coles, Michael (2005-06-27). "Four Rules for Nulls". SQL Server Central (Red
Gate Software).
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/mcoles/fourrulesfornulls.asp.
15. ^ M. Negri, G. Pelagatti, L. Sbattella (1989) Semantics and problems of universal
quantification in SQL.
16. ^ Fratarcangeli, Claudio (1991). Technique for universal quantification in SQL.
Retrieved from ACM.org.
17. ^ Kawash, Jalal (2004). Complex quantification in Structured Query Language
(SQL): a tutorial using relational calculus - Journal of Computers in Mathematics and
Science Teaching ISSN 0731-9258 Volume 23, Issue 2, 2004 AACE Norfolk, Virginia.
Retrieved from Thefreelibrary.com.
18. ^ Information Technology — Database Language SQL, CMU,
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt (proposed revised text of
DIS 9075)].
19. ^ Arie Jones, Ryan K. Stephens, Ronald R. Plew, Alex Kriegel, Robert F. Garrett
(2005), SQL Functions Programmer's Reference. Wiley, 127 pages.
20. ^ Lorentz, Diana; Roeser, Mary Beth; Abraham, Sundeep; Amor, Angela; Arora,
Geeta; Arora, Vikas; Ashdown, Lance; Baer, Hermann et al. (2010-10) [1996], "Basic
Elements of Oracle SQL: Data Types", Oracle® Database SQL Language Reference 11g
Release 2 (11.2), Oracle Database Documentation Library, Redwood City, CA: Oracle
USA, Inc.,
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17118/sql_elements001.htm
#sthref154, retrieved 2010-12-29, "For each DATE value, Oracle stores the following
information: century, year, month, date, hour, minute, and second".
21. ^ Lorentz, Diana; Roeser, Mary Beth; Abraham, Sundeep; Amor, Angela; Arora,
Geeta; Arora, Vikas; Ashdown, Lance; Baer, Hermann et al. (2010-10) [1996], "Basic
Elements of Oracle SQL: Data Types", Oracle® Database SQL Language Reference 11g
Release 2 (11.2), Oracle Database Documentation Library, Redwood City, CA: Oracle
USA, Inc.,
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17118/sql_elements001.htm
#sthref154, retrieved 2010-12-29, "The datetime data types are DATE…".
22. ^ Lorentz, Diana; Roeser, Mary Beth; Abraham, Sundeep; Amor, Angela; Arora,
Geeta; Arora, Vikas; Ashdown, Lance; Baer, Hermann et al. (2010-10) [1996], "Basic
Elements of Oracle SQL: Data Types", Oracle® Database SQL Language Reference 11g
Release 2 (11.2), Oracle Database Documentation Library, Redwood City, CA: Oracle
USA, Inc.,
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17118/sql_elements001.htm
#i54335, retrieved 2010-12-29, "Do not define columns with the following SQL/DS and
DB2 data types, because they have no corresponding Oracle data type:… TIME".
23. ^ "Finding Aid", X3H2 Records, 1978–95, American National Standards Institute,
http://special.lib.umn.edu/findaid/xml/cbi00168.xml.
24. ^ Melton, Jim; Alan R Simon (1993). "1.2. What is SQL?". Understanding the
New SQL: A Complete Guide. Morgan Kaufmann. p. 536. ISBN 1558602453. "SQL
(correctly pronounced "ess cue ell," instead of the somewhat common "sequel")…"
25. ^ Doll, Shelley (June 19, 2002). "Is SQL a Standard Anymore?". TechRepublic's
Builder.com. TechRepublic. http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-
1046268.html. Retrieved 2010-01-07.
26. ^ a b Wagner, Michael (2010). SQL/XML:2006 - Evaluierung der
Standardkonformität ausgewählter Datenbanksysteme. Diplomica Verlag. p. 100.
ISBN 3836696096.
27. ^ SQL:2008 now an approved ISO international standard, Sybase, 2008-7.
28. ^ (Zip) SQL:2008 draft, Whitemarsh Information Systems Corporation,
http://www.wiscorp.com/sql200n.zip.
29. ^ ISO/IEC 9075-11:2008: Information and Definition Schemas (SQL/Schemata).
2008. p. 1.
Codd, Edgar F (June 1970), "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks",
Communications of the ACM 13 (6): 377–87,
http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html.
Discussion on alleged SQL flaws (C2 wiki)
1995 SQL Reunion: People, Projects, and Politics, by Paul McJones (ed.): transcript of a
reunion meeting devoted to the personal history of relational databases and SQL.
American National Standards Institute. X3H2 Records, 1978-1995 Charles Babbage
Institute Collection documents the H2 committee’s development of the NDL and SQL
standards.
Oral history interview with Donald D. Chamberlin Charles Babbage Institute In this oral
history Chamberlin recounts his early life, his education at Harvey Mudd College and
Stanford University, and his work on relational database technology. Chamberlin was a
member of the System R research team and, with Raymond F. Boyce, developed the SQL
database language. Chamberlin also briefly discusses his more recent research on XML
query languages.
Comparison of Different SQL Implementations This comparison of various SQL
implementations is intended to serve as a guide to those interested in porting SQL code
between various RDBMS products, and includes comparisons between SQL:2008,
PostgreSQL, DB2, MS SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, and Informix.
v · d · eSQL
Versions SQL-86 · SQL-89 · SQL-92 · SQL:1999 · SQL:2003 · SQL:2008
Keyword Delete · From · Having · Insert · Join · Merge · Null · Order by · Prepare ·
s Select · Truncate · Union · Update · Where
v · d · eDatabase management systems
Database models · Database normalization · Database storage · Distributed DBMS · Federated
database system · Referential integrity · Relational algebra · Relational calculus · Relational
database · Relational DBMS · Relational model · Object-relational database · Transaction
processing
Database · ACID · CRUD · Null · Candidate key · Foreign key · Primary key ·
Concepts
Superkey · Surrogate key · Armstrong's axioms
Relation (Table) · View · Transaction · Log · Trigger · Index · Stored procedure ·
Objects
Cursor · Partition
Concurrency control · Data dictionary · JDBC · ODBC · Query language · Query
Components
optimizer · Query plan
Database products: Object-oriented (comparison) · Relational (comparison) · Document-
oriented
v · d · eQuery languages
.QL · CQL · CODASYL · COQL · D · DMX · Datalog · ERROL · ISBL · LDAP · MQL ·
MDX · OQL · OCL · Poliqarp Query Language · QUEL · SMARTS · SPARQL · SQL ·
SuprTool · TMQL · XQuery · XPath · XSQL · YQL
v · d · eIBM
History Thomas J. Watson · M&As · Think · Smarter Planet · CEOs · International
Cell microprocessor · Mainframe · Personal Computer · POWER · Information
Management · Lotus · Rational · SPSS · ILOG · Tivoli: Service Automation
Products
Manager · WebSphere · alphaWorks · Criminal Reduction Utilising Statistical
History · Mashup Center · PureQuery · Lotus Software · Redbooks · FORTRAN
Business
Global Services · jStart · Research · Sterling Commerce
entities
Towers (Montreal, Paris, Atlanta) · Software Labs (Rome, Toronto) · IBM
Buildings (Chicago, Johannesburg, Seattle) · Research Labs (China, Tokyo, Zurich,
Facilities Haifa, India, Almaden) · Facilities (Hakozaki, Yamato) · IBM Scientific Center ·
Hursley House · Canada Head Office Building · Thomas J. Watson Research
Center · IBM Rochester · Somers Office Complex
Extreme Blue Internship · Academy of Technology · Centers for Advanced
Studies: CASCON · Deep Thunder · IBM Fellow · IBM Distinguished Engineer ·
Initiatives
Pulse conference · The Great Mind Challenge · DeveloperWorks: Develothon ·
ITUP · Linux Technology Center · IBM Virtual Universe Community
Inventions Financial swaps · Universal Product Code
Terminolog Globally Integrated Enterprise · Commercial Processing Workload ·
y Consumability · Technology dividend · e-business
Deep Thought (chess computer) · Watson (artificial intelligence software) ·
Common Public License · Customer engineer · Dynamic infrastructure · IBM
Other
international chess tournament · International DB2 Users Group · Lucifer cipher ·
Mathematica · IBM Public License · SHARE computing · ScicomP