Regulation of

Disposable Plastic Tableware

Public
Consultation 9 July - 8 September
2021

Disposable plastic tableware for a meal creates harm for hundreds of years
Table of Content
Foreword ��
Chapter 1

��
Background

��
Chapter 2
Considerations
Chapter 3
Scheme On ��
Regulation Of Chapter 4
Disposable Plastic Share Your Views
With Us
��
Tableware

Appendices (1)
Brief Descriptions
of Plastic Control
Policies in

��
Various Regions

�� (3) ��
(2) Characteristics (4)
Government’s of Tableware Response Form
Efforts in Using Various on “Scheme
Promoting on Regulation
��
Common Materials
“Plastic-free” of Disposable
in Recent Year Plastic Tableware”

1
Foreword
Having three meals a day is a norm for many of us, but have you ever imagined that you are not only eating
food but also plastics at the same time?

While it appears that disposable plastic tableware brings much convenience to our lives, it also poses
unprecedented challenges to our ecosystem. “Disposable plastic tableware for a meal creates harm for
hundreds of years”. Not only is used disposable plastic tableware difficult to decompose, much of such
tableware entering the ocean will also have adverse impacts on our environment and ecology. For instance,
if marine plastic waste is ingested accidentally by marine animals, it can cause intestinal blockage in these
animals that may lead to death. During coastal clean-up events, it is common to find that disposable plastic
tableware, such as plastic straws, spoons, forks, knives, cups and plates, scattered everywhere. Countless
waste plastics enter the natural environment, including the ocean, each year. They will eventually be
fragmented into microplastics and enter the human food chain.

As explained in the Waste Blueprint for Hong Kong 2035 just announced by the Environment Bureau,
practising “plastic-free” at source is the most fundamental way to achieve “waste free seas”. The
Government is now conducting a public consultation on the “Scheme on Regulation of Disposable Plastic
Tableware” to collate views from the public, the trades and relevant stakeholders, with a view to mapping
out the way forward.

I sincerely invite your views on the proposals in this consultation document. Let us join hands to reduce
waste and carbon emissions in our daily lives, protect the marine environment and safeguard the health of
the community!

KS Wong
Secretary for the Environment
June 2021

2
 Chapter

Background

3
1. 1
Given the potential impacts of plastic waste on global marine ecology, human health, climate change and
many other aspects, plastic waste has become an imminent problem worldwide. In recent years, places
around the world have been committed to discouraging the use of single-use plastic products (including
disposable plastic tableware), exploring the use of other alternatives, and gradually strengthening the
regulation of disposable plastic tableware through legislation or other measures (see Appendix 1 for
details).

1. 2
As a coastal city, Hong Kong has to pay extra
attention to the problem of plastic pollution
and adopt suitable measures to reduce the
impacts of plastic waste on marine ecology
and human health. As early as in 2009, the
Government has taken the lead in
implementing the Plastic Shopping Bag
Charging Scheme, and was well ahead of
certain neighbouring regions. Regarding
disposable plastic tableware, we have also set
an example by implementing different policies
(see Appendix 2 for details) to promote a
“plastic-free” culture proactively and bring
about changes in public behaviour
progressively.

1. 3
We have conducted a study on the feasibility, scope and mechanism of regulating disposable plastic
tableware. By making reference to overseas experience and giving consideration to the local situations, the
study report suggests introducing legislation to regulate various types of disposable plastic tableware
commonly used by the catering sector with exclusions under special circumstances.

1. 4
As members of the public have been more willing to practise “plastic-free” in recent years, we believe that
it is now an opportune time to move forward and seek public views on how to regulate disposable plastic
tableware.

4
Chapter

Considerations

5
What is disposable plastic tableware?

2.1
Disposable plastic tableware, as its name suggests, refers
to single-use catering utensils made of plastics. Common
examples include various kinds of expanded polystyrene
(EPS) tableware and other plastic straws, stirrers, forks,
knives, spoons, cups, bowls, plates, etc.

2.2
Disposable plastic tableware materials in Hong Kong are
divided into two main groups1, namely EPS and
non-expanded polystyrene (non-EPS).

2.3
Disposable plastic tableware is relatively low-cost,
heat-resistant and waterproof, and is widely used in our
daily lives in recent decades. According to the findings of a
survey2, Hong Kong citizens dine out four to five times and
buy takeaway meals about four times on average every
week, when a large quantity of disposable plastic tableware
is often used.

2.4
Moreover, recycling and recovering disposable plastic tableware has posed many challenges to us as these
various types of tableware are made of different materials, and they are also difficult to clean with food
remnants on them, thus making the cost of recycling very high. Hence, massive use of disposable plastic
tableware is extremely non-environmentally friendly.

1
EPS tableware is mainly made of expanded polystyrene, while non-EPS tableware is mainly made of plastic materials including
polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS).
2
Nielsen (28 April 2020). Nielsen: Eating at Home Will Remain the New Reality for Asian Consumers, Especially Hong Kong, Post
COVID-19. Retrieved from https://en.prnasia.com/releases/apac/nielsen-eating-at-home-will-remain-the-new-reality-for-asian-
consumers- especially-hong-kong-post-covid-19-278643.shtml

6
 Of the around 200 tonnes plastic tableware discarded each day,
the majority was disposable plastic tableware.

14,600,000,000
Equivalent to

pieces of plastic cutlery

being disposed of
throughout the year
Environmental impacts of
disposable plastic tableware

2.5
Disposable plastic tableware places a heavy burden on our landfills. According to statistics in 2019, the
average daily disposal quantity of waste plastics was about 2 320 tonnes, accounting for about 21% of
municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal quantity at Hong Kong landfills. Most of these waste plastics were
plastic bags, followed by discarded plastic tableware, which amounted to around 200 tonnes each day. Of the
discarded plastic tableware, the majority was disposable plastic tableware. It is equivalent to roughly about
14.6 billion pieces of plastic cutlery being disposed of throughout the year, representing about 1 940 pieces
per person.

2.6
Disposable plastic tableware is harmful to our marine environment. The top ten prevalent types of marine
refuse in Hong Kong mostly come from plastic pieces and foam plastic fragments3. Plastics are difficult to
decompose naturally. The process may take over a hundred years, during which the plastics will be
fragmented into plastic particles. If disposable plastic tableware accidentally enter the sea, it will
continuously pose threats to the marine ecosystem.

2.7
Waste plastics will enter the human food chain and affect human health. This is because waste plastics will
be eventually fragmented into microplastics. If these microplastics are drifted into the sea, not only will they
affect the marine ecosystem, they will also enter the human food chain if absorbed by marine organisms,
thereby threatening human health.

2.8
Use less, waste less, including using less disposable products, can also help reduce carbon emissions and
mitigate climate change.

3
The Refuse Characteristics Survey conducted by the Environmental Protection Department (from April 2013 to March 2014)
https://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/clean_shorelines/files/common2015/en/Top10RefuseType.pdf

7
 40
Difficulties in recycling

2.9
EPS tableware accounts for about 20% of the plastic
tableware being disposed of in Hong Kong every day,
or about 40 tonnes per day. In general, EPS products
are composed of 98% air and only 2% plastic
materials. Due to their light weight and bulky
volume, EPS products have low recycling value,
making it more challenging to recycle EPS
products than other plastic tableware.

2.10
Besides, EPS is light and fragile,
rendering it easier to be carried into the
ecosystem by wind and water if being
disposed of wantonly, thus affecting the environment. In
tonnes
view of this, many countries (such as the Mainland and
European Union) have generally inclined to adopt the being disposed of
approach of “prohibition of sale” in recent years, so as to
cut the use of disposable EPS tableware at source. per day
2.11
In addition, among the non-EPS tableware, many countries are also inclined to accord priority to formulation
of regulatory measures for those tableware that is small in size and difficult to be recycled or has proven
alternatives, such as straws, stirrers, forks, knives, spoons and plates, etc.

8
Market for alternatives

2.12
As there is a growing concern over the
issue of disposable plastics and an
increasing awareness of environmental
protection across the world, the market for
reusable tableware and greener non-plastic
disposable tableware alternatives has
developed rapidly in recent years, driving down
the prices continuously to levels that are
becoming competitive as compared with those of
conventional disposable plastic tableware.

2.13
At present, the more common non-plastic disposable tableware alternatives available in the market are
mainly those made of paper, bamboo, soft wood, aluminium foil, plant fibre materials (e.g. wood pulp, straw
pulp, bagasse) (see Appendix 3 for details). These products have their unique characteristics and are
suitable for different purposes. Among them, the development of alternatives for straws, stirrers, forks,
knives, spoons and plates is more mature, and a wide application has gradually been seen in the market.

2.14
Although the cost of non-plastic disposable tableware is now slightly higher than that of similar plastic ones,
when such products are widely accepted in the market, economic benefits arising from mass production will
continuously narrow the price difference.

9
Public participation

2.15
In recent years, as various sectors of the community have strived to promote a “plastic-free” culture, many
eateries and members of the public have actively practised a “plastic-free” lifestyle by avoiding the use and
distribution of disposable plastic tableware for dine-in and takeaway services in eateries. There is already a
common consensus in the community that disposable plastic tableware is one of the many single-use plastic
products that need to be regulated. Reducing the use of disposable plastic tableware also helps promote
low-carbon transformation and the development of a circular economy in our society.

2.16
Therefore, we propose taking forward a “Scheme on Regulation of Disposable Plastic Tableware”
(“Regulation Scheme”) and introducing legislation to regulate the use of disposable plastic tableware.

�
Question

Do you support in principle the introduction of

legislation to regulate disposable plastic tableware?

10
Chapter

Scheme on
Regulation of
Disposable
Plastic
Tableware

11
Disposable plastic tableware to be brought under regulation

3.1
In view of the diverse culinary culture of Hong Kong, we propose that the Regulation Scheme should cover
various types of disposable plastic tableware, including

Straws Stirrers Cutlery

(such as forks, knives and spoons)

Plates Cups Cup lids

Food containers Food container EPS tableware

(such as bowls and boxes)
covers

3.2
In recent years, quite a number of “plastic substitutes” (e.g. oxo-degradable plastics, biodegradable plastics,
etc.) which claim to be degradable or biodegradable are available in the market. These “plastic” products
mostly can only accelerate their fragmentation into microplastic flakes or be biodegraded under specific
conditions, such as exposure to ultraviolet radiation or heat, and those required conditions are often absent
in the natural marine environment. Since there has not been sufficient evidence to prove that such products
can be completely biodegraded in a reasonable time in the marine environment, we suggest that the
Regulation Scheme should cover disposable tableware made of all kinds of plastics, including oxo-degradable
plastics and biodegradable plastics.

12
3.3
Nevertheless, as a matter of principle, we should
reduce waste at source and avoid using
disposable tableware. If the use of disposable
tableware is unavoidable, more environmentally
friendly tableware made of non-plastic materials
should be used.

�
問題
Question

a: Do you agree that the Regulation Scheme should

cover all types of disposable plastic tableware listed
in Section 3.1?

b: Do you agree that the Regulation Scheme should

cover “plastic substitutes” (e.g. oxo-degradable
plastics, biodegradable plastics, etc.) that claim to be
degradable or biodegradable?

13
Prohibition of the sale of EPS tableware

3.4
Since the end of 2020, the Mainland has banned the
production and sale of disposable EPS tableware. Other
regions, such as Europe, the United States of America and
Australia, have also implemented different measures to ban
the sale or use of EPS tableware.

3.5
In view of the serious potential impacts of EPS tableware on
global marine ecosystem, Hong Kong has the responsibility
to work with the Mainland and the international community to
join the fight against this “white” pollution.

3.6
We propose that the Regulation Scheme should
comprehensively regulate disposable EPS tableware in the
first place by imposing a ban on the local sale of disposable
EPS tableware to local end-consumers (including catering
premises).

�
Question

Do you agree that the sale of disposable EPS

tableware to local end-consumers (including
catering premises) should be banned?

14
Regulation of premises using disposable plastic tableware
Starting from Dine-in Services

3.7
Currently, there are about 30 000+ catering premises
in Hong Kong, with about 55% providing dine-in
services. Undoubtedly, the disposable plastic
tableware used is mostly generated from dine-in and
takeaway services of the catering sector.

3.8
For dine-in services in general, not only do the catering operators sell or supply food or beverages, they also
provide a dining setting for customers, such as seats or tables. Common catering premises operating dine-in
services include restaurants, fast-food shops, Chinese restaurants, congee shops, staff canteens, school
canteens, cooked food stalls operating in markets, etc.

3.9
In general, most of the catering premises providing dine-in services have been equipped with tableware
washing facilities or arranged for a third party to provide tableware cleaning services. As such, they are
capable of providing reusable tableware for dine-in customers, thus avoiding the use of disposable plastic
tableware, or even all disposable tableware.

3.10
In fact, the Government has set an example by taking the
lead in requesting the restaurants within government
venues not to provide any types of disposable tableware to
dine-in customers since 2019, so as to bring a demonstrative
effect. The arrangement has received positive response from
the customers since its implementation.

3.11
As such, in order to reduce the use of disposable plastic
tableware at source, we consider that this is an opportune
time to impose a complete ban on the provision of various
types of disposable plastic tableware by the catering
premises to customers for dine-in services in the first place.

3.12
Regarding the catering services provided for some private
events4, as their nature is similar to that of dine-in services,
it is also proposed that they should be included in the scope
of dine-in services.

4
Including the provision of food & beverages and catering staff

15
Takeaway
Services

3.13
Takeaway services generally refer to the preparation of food or beverages by the catering operators for sale
to customers for consumption off their business premises. There are different types of catering premises
providing takeaway services. Besides the common catering premises operating dine-in services mentioned
above, they also include snack shops, tea shops, bakeries, cooked food counters in supermarkets, ice-cream
shops, lo-mei shops, etc.

3.14
Compared with dine-in services, food & beverage takeaway services rely more on the use of disposable
plastic tableware. Taking into account the difficulties in recycling the tableware and the availability of proven
alternatives, we suggest that for food & beverage takeaway services, it is more appropriate to adopt a
progressive approach to regulate different types of disposable plastic tableware at this stage.

�
Question

Do you agree that the Regulation Scheme should cover all catering
premises?

�
Question

Do you agree that provision of disposable plastic tableware by

catering premises to customers for dine-in services should be
completely banned in the first place?

�
Question

Given that catering services provided for private events and dine-in
services are similar in nature, do you agree that catering services
provided for private events (including the provision of food & beverages
and catering staff) should be included in the scope of dine-in services?

16
Regulation of disposable plastic tableware in phases

3.15
We propose that disposable plastic tableware should be regulated progressively in two phases.

Phase One Phase Two

Regulating takeaway services

3.16 A comprehensive regulation

of disposable EPS tableware
We propose imposing a comprehensive regulation
3.19 in the same manner as dine-in
services
We propose regulating takeaway services in the
of disposable EPS tableware by banning the local same manner as dine-in services, i.e. imposing a
sale of disposable EPS tableware, as well as the complete ban on the provision of all types of
provision of EPS tableware by catering premises to disposable plastic tableware for dine-in and
customers for both dine-in and takeaway services. takeaway services. Currently, some disposable
A ban on the provision of plastic tableware, such as cups, cup lids, food

3.17 disposable plastic tableware

for dine-in services
We propose imposing a complete ban on the
containers and food container covers, has only a
few types of non-plastic alternatives or is more
expensive. We believe that with the advancements
provision of disposable plastic tableware (including in technologies and the rising global demand, more
disposable EPS and non-EPS tableware) by economical, reliable and eco-friendly alternatives
catering premises to customers for dine-in services for all types of disposable plastic tableware should
in the first place. be available in the market when the second phase

3.18
A ban on the provision of straws, commences.
stirrers, forks, knives, spoons,
and plates for takeaway services
As for takeaway services, we propose regulating
disposable plastic tableware that is small in size
and difficult to be recycled or has proven
alternatives, including straws, stirrers, forks,
knives, spoons, plates, etc. by imposing a ban on
the provision of such disposable plastic tableware
by catering premises to customers for takeaway
services. As far as we know, there are already
many suppliers in the market that can provide
various types of non-plastic alternatives to
such plastic tableware.

�
Question

Do you agree that a ban on the provision of disposable

plastic tableware by catering premises to customers
for takeaway services should be imposed in phases?

17
Timetable

3.20
Taking into account the needs to amend the relevant legislation and to provide members of the public with an
adaptation period, especially for the catering sector which requires more time to adjust the supply chain amid
the pandemic, subject to the views received and the ensuing legislative procedures, the first phase of the
Regulation Scheme can be implemented in around 2025.

3.21
Subject to the outcome of the first phase as well as the maturity of the market for alternatives in future, the
launch date of the second phase will be reviewed and determined about 12 to 18 months upon the
implementation of the first phase. It is also initially proposed to provide the second phase with a similar
preparatory period.

Types of disposable
plastic tableware Phase One Phase Two
Prohibits the sale to local end-consumers
(including catering premises)
EPS tableware
Prohibits the provision by catering premises
to customers for dine-in and takeaway services
Straws Prohibits the provision
Stirrers by catering premises
Cutlery (e.g. forks, knives, spoons) to customers for dine-in
Prohibits the provision
and takeaway services
Plates by catering premises
Cups to customers for dine-in
Prohibits the provision and takeaway services
Cup lids by catering premises
Food containers to customers for
Food container covers dine-inservices

�
Question

What are your views on the timetable for

implementing the Regulation Scheme in a progressive
manner as proposed in the Regulation Scheme?

18
Exclusions
Medical reasons

3.22
Some persons with special needs (e.g. patients or persons
with disabilities) who dine in or order takeaway at
catering premises may have the need to use
disposable plastic straws for medical care reasons.

3.23
As such, drawing on the experience of other
regions, we consider that the provision of
disposable plastic straws by catering
premises on request by persons with
special needs due to their medical
needs or physical conditions should
not be covered by the Regulation
Scheme to be implemented.

Food products pre-packaged outside catering premises

3.24
Besides, we propose that the Regulation Scheme to be implemented should
exclude disposable plastic tableware that forms part of pre-packaged food
products prepared outside catering premises.

3.25
As this kind of disposable plastic tableware is part of a commodity in nature and is usually manufactured by
local or even overseas food manufacturers in factories outside catering premises, we consider that this kind
of disposable plastic tableware should not fall within the scope of disposable plastic tableware to be provided
by catering premises. However, takeaway food & beverage products filled and sealed (e.g. beverages
contained in plastic cups and sealed with plastic films) on the spot at catering premises before being sold do
not fall within the scope of exclusion

�
Question

Do you agree to the exclusions proposed in Sections

3.22 to 3.25?

19
Turning risks into opportunities

3.26
It is an international trend to “regulate disposable plastic tableware”, which is considered as a challenge but
also an opportunity. Exploring non-plastic alternatives helps promote low-carbon transformation and the
development of a circular economy. As long as the government, members of the public and people from all
sectors work together, we are confident that we can realise our vision of living a “plastic-free” life
progressively.

��
Question

Do you have any other opinions on the “Scheme

on Regulation of Disposable Plastic Tableware”
and other relevant issues?

20
Chapter

Share
Your Views
with Us

21
Share your views with us

4.1
We invite different sectors of society and members of the public to give their views on the implementation of
the “Scheme on Regulation of Disposable Plastic Tableware”. This can help us formulate an effective and
practicable proposal after considering the views from different perspectives.

4.2
For the ease of responding to this consultation document and facilitating the subsequent analysis, please visit
the dedicated website below for filling in and submitting “Online View Collection Form” direct. You may also
fill in the “Response Form” provided at Appendix 4 and send it to the Environmental Protection Department
(EPD) by email, post or fax.

Deadline and Ways of Submission

Please submit your views and comments on or before
8 September 2021 via the following channels:

Website: www.rdpt.hk Website

Email: [email protected]
Post: Waste Reduction and Recycling Group
Environmental Protection Department
2/F., East Wing, Island West Transfer Station,
88 Victoria Road,
Kennedy Town, Hong Kong
Fax No.: 2872 0389
Please scan

Important Disclaimer
Please note that the Government would wish, either in discussion with others or in any subsequent report,
whether privately or publicly, to be able to refer to and attribute views submitted in response to this
consultation paper. Any request to treat all or part of a response in confidence will be respected, but if no such
request is made, it will be assumed that the response and the identity for submitting such response is not
intended to be confidential.

The names and comments (except personal data) provided by individuals or groups to the EPD in the course
of the public consultation will be disclosed, either wholly or partly, to the public (including disclosure on the
relevant websites). If you do not wish such information to be disclosed, please advise us at the time of
submission.

Personal Information Collection Statement

1. The personal data provided by means of this form will only be used for the above public consultation
conducted by the EPD and any directly related purpose.
2. You have the right of access and correction with respect to personal data as provided by means of this
form. For enquiries or making correction concerning the personal data, please email to [email protected].

 Thank you for your views and support!

22
Appendix 1
Brief Descriptions of Plastic Control Policies in Various Regions

Region Brief descriptions of Plastic Control policies

Since 2021, the sale of disposable plastic straws, cutlery and stirrers has been
South Australia, banned; the sale of EPS cups, bowls, plates and clamshell containers, etc. will
Australia be banned from 2022.

Since 2020, the use of EPS food containers and cups as well as plastic straws in
Vancouver, Canada the catering sector has been banned. Provision of disposable cutlery for dine-in
or takeaway services has been prohibited unless requested by customers.

The European Parliament has endorsed the Single-use Plastic Directive. All
member states of the European Union must impose a complete ban on
European Union single-use plastic products (such as plastic straws, cotton bud sticks, plastic
trays, plastic knives and forks) and EPS food containers and cups by 2021.

Since 2020, the sale of single-use plastic cups and plates has been banned;
since 2021, the sale of plastic straws, stirrers, disposable cutlery and EPS
France meal boxes etc. has been banned; the provision of single-use tableware to
dine-in customers by the catering sector (including fast food chains) will be
banned from 2023.

Since 2021, the production and sale of single-use EPS tableware have been
banned, the use of non-degradable single-use plastic straws in the catering
sector across the country has been banned, and the use of non-degradable
Mainland China single-use plastic tableware for dine-in services will be banned in a
progressive manner. By 2025, such consumption in respect of takeaway
services in major cities will have decreased by 30%.

Since 2019, the use of disposable plastic straws and disposable plastic
tableware for certain dine-in services in the catering sector has been banned,
Taiwan and the measures to control single-use takeaway beverage cups have been
enhanced; a comprehensive plastic ban to be implemented by 2030.

Since 2009, the use of EPS food service products in the catering sector has
Seattle, been banned; since 2010, the use of non-recyclable or non-compostable
United States disposable food packaging and service ware in the catering sector has been
banned; since 2018, the use of plastic straws and cutlery etc. in the catering
sector has been banned.

23
Appendix 2
Government’s Efforts in Promoting
“Plastic-free” in Recent Years
Measures taken to reduce disposable plastic
tableware
2018
 Education and publicity: In 2018 and 2019, two territory-wide promotional campaigns, namely “Plastic-Free
Takeaway, Use Reusable Tableware” and “Plastic-Free Beach, Tableware First”, were launched in collaboration
with about 700 local eateries of different sizes. About 2.4 million sets of disposable plastic tableware were saved
during the campaigns. In addition, the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and the Environmental
Campaign Committee have taken forward various promotion initiatives since 2020 through different channels
such as tram and bus bodies, bus and railway stations, outdoor advertisements, news and social media online
platforms and mobile applications, etc., to appeal to the public to minimise the use of disposable plastic
tableware while fighting the pandemic.

2019
 Consultancy study: In order to tackle the issue of disposable plastic tableware in the long run, the EPD
commissioned a consultancy study on feasibility, scope and mechanism of regulating disposable plastic
tableware the in 2019.

 “Take the lead in going plastic-free”: Since 2019, we have progressively ceased the provision of plastic straws
and EPS food containers in most government premises and canteens, and we have also stipulated the relevant
requirement on the avoidance of using disposable tableware when awarding new contracts or renewing existing
contracts. We expect that 90% of the restaurants at government venues will cease using all disposable plastic
tableware completely by the end of this year.

2020
 Pilot scheme on central collection service of waste plastics: In 2020, we
rolled out a two-year Pilot Scheme on Collection and Recycling Services of
Plastic Recyclable Materials (the Pilot Scheme) in Eastern District, Kwun Tong
and Sha Tin successively to collect all types of waste plastics from
non-commercial and non-industrial sources for proper handling. Contractors
engaged for the Pilot Scheme have also participated actively in the “trial
scheme on recycling disposable tableware in housing estates” organised by
green groups. We are planning to extend the Pilot Scheme from the current
three districts to nine districts progressively.

 “Plastic-free” School Lunch: We provide the “Four Treasures” (refrigerators,

steam cabinets, dishwashers and disinfection machines) for primary and
secondary schools to encourage students to bring their own lunches using
reusable food containers. “Plastic-free” School Lunch Pilot Scheme will be run
for three school years, and was open for applications from all primary and
secondary schools from September to November 2020.

2021
 “Plastic-Free” Takeaway: In early 2021, we provided the catering sector and food delivery platforms with
guidelines to encourage the eateries to adopt various measures to minimise the use of disposable plastic
tableware.

24
Other major work to promote “plastic-free”

Plastic Shopping Bag Charging:

Plastic Shopping Bag Charging Scheme is the first Mandatory Producer Full Implementation of the
Responsibility Scheme introduced in Hong Kong. The first phase of the Plastic Shopping Bag Charging
Scheme was implemented on 7 July 2009 and the full implementation of
the Scheme in the entire retail sector has taken effect since 1 April 2015.

Installing more water dispensers:

More water dispensers have been progressively installed in
government venues with public access since 2018 to inculcate the
“bring your own bottle” and “use less, waste less” culture; and the sale
of plastic bottled water measuring 1 litre or less at the automatic
vending machines of government premises has been ceased
progressively.

Producer Responsibility Scheme (PRS) on Plastic

Beverage Containers:
The Government will take forward the PRS on plastic beverage
containers that requires relevant stakeholders to jointly share their
eco-responsibilities. The Government conducted a public consultation
on the PRS in the first half of 2021. Subject to the views collected in the
public consultation and the legislative procedures required for putting
forward the final proposal, it is expected that the PRS can be
implemented by 2025 the earliest.
The Government has also commenced a one-year pilot scheme on
reverse vending machines, and will decide the way forward for
the application of reverse vending machines in Hong Kong after
taking into account the outcome of the pilot scheme and the
relevant data collected.

Voluntary scheme for phasing out personal

care and cosmetic products (PCCPs)
containing microbeads:
The Government is planning to launch a two-year voluntary
scheme for phasing out PCCPs containing microbeads in 2021,
aiming to encourage the trade to stop the production,
importation and sale of these products, and to assist
consumers in choosing microbead-free products.

25
Appendix 3
Characteristics of Tableware Using Various Common Materials

Types of tableware Characteristics

It is made of durable materials such as metals and ceramics, and

1 Reusable tableware it can be washed and reused.

2 Edible tableware (e.g. rice)

It is a more eco-friendly alternative which is made of natural
3 Paper/plant-fibre tableware
materials and is degradable.

4 Bamboo/wooden tableware

It is synthesised from renewable resources (e.g. corn starch,

cassava roots and sugarcane), and a common example is
Biodegradable plastic polylactic acid (PLA). Biodegradable plastic tableware is
5 tableware* degradable only under certain conditions. The quality of the
recycled plastics will be affected if biodegradable plastic
tableware is added in the existing recycling system.

It is produced by adding additives to conventional plastics, which

can accelerate the process of fragmentation when the plastics
Oxo-degradable plastic are exposed to UV radiation or heat. However, tiny plastic
6 tableware* fragments will still remain after degradation. The quality of
recycled plastics will also be affected if oxo-degradable plastic
tableware is added in the existing recycling system.

It is made of non-renewable petrochemicals, and is difficult to

7 General plastic tableware*
recycle and degrade.

It is made of a mixture of different raw materials and plastics,

8 Composite plastic tableware*
and is difficult to degrade and non-recyclable.

＊
The proposed Regulation Scheme will cover these types of disposable plastic tableware.

26
Appendix 4
Response Form “Scheme on Regulation of Disposable Plastic Tableware”
Email: [email protected]
Post: Waste Reduction and Recycling Group, Environmental Protection Department
2/F, East Wing, Island West Transfer Station, 88 Victoria Road, Kennedy Town, Hong Kong
Fax: 2872 0389

Part I: Basic Information

Which of the following identities are you using to respond to this response form? (Please select one option)
 Professional Bodies / Academic Institutions  Public Organisations  Green Groups

 Industry Associations  Companies  Others

Name of Organisations / Companies:

 Individuals

Email Address:

Part II: Consultation Questions

Question 1: Do you support in principle the introduction of legislation to regulate disposable plastic tableware?

 Strongly
Support  Support  Neutral  Oppose  Strongly
Oppose

If oppose, the reason is:

Question 2a: Do you agree that the Regulation Scheme should cover all types of disposable plastic tableware listed
in Section 3.1?

(i) EPS Tableware  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(ii) Straws  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(iii) Stirrers  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(iv) Cutlery (such as fork, knife and spoon)  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(v) Plates  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(vi) Cups  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(vii) Cup Lids  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(viii) Food Containers  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(ix) Food Container Covers  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

Others (please specify):

27
Question 2b: Do you agree that the Regulation Scheme should cover “plastic substitutes” (e.g. oxo-degradable
plastics, biodegradable plastics, etc.) that claim to be degradable or biodegradable?
 Strongly
Agree  Agree  Neutral  Disagree  Strongly
Disagree

If disagree, the reason is :

Question 3: Do you agree that the sale of disposable EPS tableware to local end-consumers (including catering
premises) should be banned?

 Strongly
Agree  Agree  Neutral  Disagree  Strongly
Disagree

If disagree, the reason is :

Question 4: Do you agree that the Regulation Scheme should cover all catering premises? (Note: Catering premises
refer to any premises where a catering business is carried out by selling or supplying food or
beverages to customers for immediate consumption within or outside the premises.)

 Strongly
Agree  Agree  Neutral  Disagree  Strongly
Disagree

If disagree, the reason is :

Question 5: Do you agree that provision of disposable plastic tableware by catering premises to customers for
dine-in services should be completely banned in the first place?

 Strongly
Agree  Agree  Neutral  Disagree  Strongly
Disagree

If disagree, the reason is :

Question 6: Given that catering services provided for private events and dine-in services are similar in nature,
do you agree that catering services provided for private events (including the provision of food &
beverages and catering staff) should be included in the scope of dine-in services?

 Strongly
Agree  Agree  Neutral  Disagree  Strongly
Disagree

If disagree, the reason is :

28
Question 7: Do you agree that the ban on the provision of the following disposable plastic tableware by catering
premises to customers for takeaway services should be imposed in phases?
Phase One
(i) EPS Tableware  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(ii) Straws  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(iii) Stirrers  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(iv) Cutlery (such as fork, knife and spoon)  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(v) Plates  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

Others (Please specify):

Phase Two

(i) Cups  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(ii) Cup Lids  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(iii) Food Containers  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(iv) Food Container Covers  Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

Others (Please specify):

Question 8: What are your views on the timetable for implementing the Regulation Scheme in a progressive
manner as proposed in the Regulation Scheme?
(i) Phase One
EPS tableware: a complete ban on the sale and provision of EPS tableware to customers for dine-in and takeaway services;
Dine-in: a complete ban on the provision of all types of disposable plastic tableware; Subject to the views received and the ensuing
legislative procedures, the first phase of the Regulation
Takeaway: a ban on the provision of certain types of disposable plastic tableware Scheme can be implemented in around 2025.

 Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

Subject to the outcome of the first phase as well as the

(ii) Phase Two maturity of the market for alternatives in future, the
launch date of the second phase will be reviewed and
EPS tableware: a complete ban on the sale and provision of EPS tableware to customers determined about 12 to 18 months upon the
for dine-in and takeaway services; implementation of the first phase. It is also initially
proposed to provide the second phase with a similar
Dine-in and takeaway: a complete ban on the provision of all types of disposable plastic tableware preparatory period.

 Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

Or

Disagree that the Regulation Scheme is to be implemented in phases. All the measures should be implemented
(iii) 
at the same time.

Others (Please specify):

29
Question 9: Do you agree to the exclusions proposed in Sections 3.22 to 3.25?
(i) Disposable plastic straws provided by catering premises on request by persons with special needs due to their health
needs or physical conditions

 Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

(ii) Disposable plastic tableware that forms part of pre-packaged food products prepared outside catering premises

 Agree  Neutral  Disagree, the reason is:

Others (Please specify):

Question 10: Do you have any other opinions on the “Scheme on Regulation of Disposable Plastic Tableware” and
other relevant issues?

 Thank you for your views 

After completion, please send the response form to the Environmental Protection Department by
email, post or fax on or before 8 September 2021.

30