Tos 3
Tos 3
Fixed Support: A Fixed Support offers all the three Reactions i.e. Horizontal Reaction, Vertical Reaction and
Moment Reaction. The fixed support does not allow the rotation and translation motion to the structural
members. It is also called a Built In Support
The fixed support is also called as rigid support.
It provides the greater stability to the structure as compared to all other supports.
A flagpole fixed in the concrete base is the best example of fixed support.
The reactions acting in the fixed support is shown in the figure given below
Statical Determinacy: Any structure with 3 or lesser than 3 unknowns can be resolved using the 3
equations of Equilibrium i.e. ΣFV= 0, ΣFH= 0 and ΣFM= 0. Such Structures are called Statically
Determinate Structures. Any structure with more than 3 unknowns cannot be resolved for the
Unknown Reactions using only these 3 equations. Such Structures are called Statically In-
Determinate Structures.
Degree of Indeterminacy: The difference between the number of Unknown Reactions and
3(Number of equations) is called Degree of Indeterminacy.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
3
1.a.2 Definitions:
1. A Simple Supported Beam is one with a single Span with Simple Supports at Both Ends
2. A Fixed Beam is one with a single Span with Fixed Supports at Both Ends
Reactions Only one vertical reaction at each end = Total Three reactions at each end. Horizontal, Vertical
2 Reactions and Moment. Total 6 Reactions
Deflection The deflection curve begins right at the The deflection curve begins a little away from
and supports and hence maximum deflection the supports because of fixity at supports and
Deflection greater than that of a fixed Beam; deflection at hence maximum deflection lesser than that of a
Curve the center of a simple supported beam with simple supported Beam. Deflection at the center
full UDL wkN/m is 5wl⁴/384EI of a fixed beam with full UDL w kN/m is
I.e. five times the deflection for a fixed beam. wl⁴/384EI i.e. 5 times lesser than that for a
s.s.beam
Bending The Beam is acted upon by only by Positive As there are negative Bending Moments over
Moments Bending Moments e.g. A simple supported the supports the + ive B.M at the center of span l
beam with an u.d.l of w over a span of I will of a fixed beam with an u.d.l is much reduced =
Compression have a B.M max of wl²/8 at the center wl²/24. Negative B.M at supports
and
Tension
Across the
Length of the
Beam
This Positive B.M Causes Compression at the This Positive B.M Causes Compression at the top
top and Tension at the Bottom through-out and Tension at the Bottom in the middle portion
the length of the Beam of the span and Tension at Top and Compression
at Bottom near the Supports
Depth As the Depth required to support the load is As the Depth required to support the load is
Required directly proportionate to the B.M max, the directly proportionate to the B.M max, the depth
depth required is greater than that for a Fixed required is lesser than that for a Simple
Beam Supported Beam
d α M Hence d α wl²/8 (See page no 15) d α M Hence d α wl²/12 (See page no 15)
R.C.C Beams In case of R.C.C Beams this means that In case of R.C.C Beams this means that
reinforcement needs be provided only at reinforcement needs to be provided at top near
bottom in case of such a beam the supports till point of contra- flexure.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
4
1.a.3 Solution of a Fixed Beam: Method: Solving as a Fixed Beam from Scratch.
Many text books solve a fixed beam as a Simple Supported Beam and then Super-impose the Negative B.M on the
positive B.M.D to get the solution of a fixed beam. However we are going to solve a fixed beam from scratch.
Well these are the steps we are going to follow.
1. Find F.E.M as follows and Redraw the Diagram Showing F.E.M as per the following conditions.
2. Calculate Vertical Reactions by Computing Moments about any one support. Remember
Clockwise Moments are positive and Anti-Clockwise Moments are Negative.
Problem.1 (UDL over entire span + 1 eccentric point load) (The point load is near rhs)
A Fixed Beam of span 9m is subjected to a UDL of 24kN/m over its entire span. It is carrying a point load
of 60kN at a distance of 2.0m from R.H.S. support. Find Fixed End Moments and Draw S.F.D and B.M.D for
the Beam.
Solution:
1. Find F.E.M: For eccentric point load shown here a = 7m and b = 2m
Eccentric Point Load 60x7x2²/9²= 20.7 60x7²x2/9²= 72.59 Eccentric Point Load
=Wab²/l² =Wa²b/l²
MA =182.7kNm MB =234.6kNm
3. Find S.F Values and Draw S.F.D and find point of Zero Shear.
LHS RHS
A 0 +115.57
C +115.57 -(24 x 7) = -52.43 -52.53 - 60 = -112.43
B -112.43 -(24 x2) = -160.43 -160.43 +160.43 = 0
To Find Point of Zero Shear, Let p be the distance of Zero Shear point from A (See SFD on next page)
At point of Zero Shear Upward Force = Downward Force will give us (Refer Diagram on Adjacent Page)
115.57 = 24 x p (Considering lhs of point p)
Hence p = 4.815m
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
6
4. Find B.M Values and Draw B.M.D (Sagging Moment +ive, Hogging Moment –ve)
1. B.M at point A = -182.7kNm
2. B.Mmax +ve at point of Zero Shear = - 182.7 – (24 x 4.815 x 4.815/2) + (115.57 x 4.815) (From lhs)
(From lhs) = - 182.7 - 278.21 – 556.46 = +95.55 kNm
3. B.M at point C (From rhs) = - 234.6 – (24 x 2 x 1) + (160.43 x 2) = +38.26kNm
4. B.M at point B = -234.6kNm = B.Mmax -ve
(Notice that B.M values have been worked out from the side which has minimum forces)
Let us Calculate B.M values using Area of SFD and subtracting –ve B.M
B.M max at point of Zero Shear = Area of triangle pqr – MA (lhs of S.F.D at point of Zero Shear)
= ½ (115.57 x 4.815) – 182.7 = 278.23 – 182.7 = 95.53kNm
B.M at point C = Area of wxyz – MB (rhs of S.F.D at point C)
= ½ (160.43+112.43) x 2 – 234.6 = 38.26kNm
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
7
Problem.2 (UDL over entire span + 1 central point load) TOS III October 2016
A Fixed Beam of span 7m is subjected to a UDL of 15kN/m over its entire span. It is carrying a central point load of
22kN. Solve the Fixed Beam.
1. Find F.E.M
3. Find S.F Values and Draw S.F.D and find point of Zero Shear.
LHS RHS
A 0 +63.5
C +63.5 –(15 x 3.5) =+11 +11 – 22 = -11
B -11 – (15 x 3.5 ) = -63.5 -63.5 +63.5 = 0
Point of Zero Shear is at Point C i.e. under the central point load.
4. Find B.M Values and Draw B.M.D
1. B.M at point A = -80.5kNm
2. B.M max at point C = -80.5 – 15 X 3.5 X 1.75 + 63.5 X 3.5
= -80.5 – 91.875 + 222.25 = 49.875kNm
3. B.M at point B = -80.5kNm
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
8
Notice that:
1. The SFD and BMD both
are symmetrical
2. The Shear Force at the
central point load is half
the value of the point load
and the Drop is equal to
the Point Load
1.a.4 Example of a fixed beam – A RCC lintel: Courtesy Ar. Prashant Joshi.
If the lintel would have been simply supported- before brick masonry above
Simply supported beam is a beam which is
1) Either resting on two walls or columns. I.e. offering only vertical reaction no matter what the load is. Such a
beam would not be able to effectively resist a horizontal load like earthquake load.
2) A beam with one end hinged and the other end roller, which can offer horizontal reactions at hinged support,
thus resisting horizontal loads effectively and allowing horizontal expansion at the other as roller is provided at the
other support.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
9
RCC Lintel acting likes a fixed beam – after brick masonry above
Note: Deformation / deflection in the illustrations are exaggerated for conceptual understanding.
Problem.3 (UDL over entire span + 1 eccentric point load) (The point load is near lhs)
A Fixed Beam of span 8m is subjected to a UDL of 36kN/m over its entire span. It is carrying a point load
of 80kN at a distance of 3.0m from lhs support. Find Fixing End Moments and Draw S.F.D and B.M.D for
the Beam.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
2. Calculate Reactions
10
1 ΣFV = 0 VA + VB = 36 x 8 + 80 + 0 = 368 kN
2 ΣFM = 0 Take Moments @ point A
-285.75 + 36 x 8 x 4.0 + 80 x 3 + 248.25 = VB x 8
-285.75 + 1152 + 240 + 248.25 = VB x 8
VB = 169.31 kN
VA = 368 - 169.31 = 198.69 kN
3. Calculate Shear Forces
lhs rhs
A 0 kN 198.69 kN
C 198.69 - 36 x 3.0 = 90.688 kN 90.688 + -80 = 10.69 kN
B 10.688 + -36 x 5.0 = -169.31 kN -169.31 + 169.31 = 0.00 kN
To Calculate Point of Zero Shear Downward Force = Upward Force
Let P be the Distance from of the point 36 x p = 169.31
of Zero Shear from RHS Support p = 4.703 m
4. Calculate Bending Moment
B.M at A = -285.75 kNm
B.M at C = -248.25 + 169.31 x 5.0 - 36 x 5.0 x 2.5 = 148.31 kNm
considering rhs 2
B.M at Zero Shear = -248.25 + 169.31 x 4.703 - 36 x 4.703 = 149.90 kNm
considering rhs 2
B.M at B = -248.25 kNm
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
11
Examples of Simple Supported Multiple Spans and the S.F.D and B.M.D therein are as illustrated below.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
12
In this sort of structure each Span acts independently and is subject to a B.Mmax of wl²/8 with a full udl and the
depth needs to be designed for this B.Mmax.
1.b.2 Definition of Continuous Beam: A Continuous Beam is one with as many spans as would be required in
the structure, continuous over the supports, with a fixed or simple supported end at either end or one end or
even a free end as shown below.
Continuous Beams are statically In-Determinate Structures as the number of reactions are more than 3.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
13
Negative Bending Moments will be created at a fixed end or at a continuous support leading to reductions in
positive B.M towards center of spans. The Shear Forces or the reactions at the supports will also change as per rate
of change of B.M.
1.b.4 Advantages and Disadvantages of Continuity
The Advantages of a continuous beam as compared to a simply supported beam are as follows.
1. For the same span and section, vertical load capacity is more.
2. Mid span deflection is less.
3. The depth at a section can be less than that of a simply supported beam for the same span. Else we can easily
say that for the same depth the span can be more than that of a simply supported beam and it follows that, the
continuous beam is economical in material.
4. A continuous beam provides an alternate load path in the case of failure at a section. The load which tends to
cause failure at a section is redistributed to some other parts of the Beam which then take up more load.
There are of course several Disadvantages of a continuous beam as compared to a simply supported beam.
1. Difficulty in the analysis and the design procedures.
2. Difficulties in construction, especially for precast members.
The system many a times will have more than 3 unknowns and hence will be a statically indeterminate structure.
Methods will have to be devised to calculate Support Moments and Support Reactions. The support moments are
calculated by methods listed below.
where W is the total design load and I is the effective span, or such other restraining moment as may be shown to
be applicable. For such a condition shear coefficient given in Table 13 at the end support may be increased by 0.05
Table 12 and 13 are shown below the S.F.D and B.M.D
Accordingly the S.F.D and B.M.D for a three span continuous Beam is as given below.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
15
The B.M.D can also be shown as a single (not superimposed) as shown below.
1.b.5 One Actual Application to explain how the B.M.D influences the Shape of a Structure:
The Actual Constructed Bridge is a 4 Span Continuous Bridge, End Spans are small and Middle Spans are Long
The Depth is based on the B.M.D Shown Below and Arch Shapes are used to Change Depth Profiles in graceful
Curves. Notice the depths are greater where the B.M is greater
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
16
1.b.6 One Practical Application how Fixity Affects the depth of a beam.
Imagine a beam as shown in Problem 2
Let us find the depth of this beam from our study in TOS 2 Bending Stresses. Let us assume that we are using Indian
Oak with a permissible stress value of 14.52N/mm² with a width of 200mm.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
17
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
18
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
19
Suggested Theory Questions: TOS 3 Unit 1 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous
Beams and Torsion:
1. Differentiate between a simple supported beam and a Fixed Beam w.r.t the following points
a. Deflection
b. Rigidity
c. Bending Moments
d. Bending Moments at Supports.
e. Statically Determinate Structure.
f. Reactions at Supports.
g. Depth of the Beam
2. By two Examples show how a continuous beam is a Statically Indeterminate Structure. Also mention 3 methods
of Solving Continuous Beams
4. Draw the B.M Diagram for a 3 equal span continuous Beam Showing Max Values of Positive and Negative B.M
at Mid Span and over Supports.
TOS 3 Unit 1 Fixed Beams & Continuous Beams and Torsion Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
69
Ultimate load Method and its Limitations leading to Limit State Method.
1. In this method, the structural elements are proportioned to withstand the Ultimate Load (obtained by
multiplying the Service load by Load factor).
2. It uses actual Stress Strain Curve and not the Linear Part only and hence uses the Plastic region of the
Curve and uses additional Reserve Capacity of the Material.
3. It not only takes into consideration the strength of the constituent materials (concrete and steel) but also
the composite action of both the materials.
I will not discuss this Method in more Detail but directly go to its Limitations that being
1. This method gives Slender Sections. This leads to excessive deformations and cracking. The structure
loses its functional utility and serviceability shown by excessive sagging of slabs and beams and cracking
of partition walls.
2. The method does not take into account effects of creep and shrinkage in concrete. This influences
deflections.
The above discussions lead to the conclusion that the ideal approach to design of a structure is one which
recognizes and takes into consideration all the states like Cracked, Un-cracked, Elastic, Plastic and Ultimate
State through which all parts of a structure and its materials pass through from Service Load to Ultimate Load
so that neither the safety at service load nor the serviceability at Service loads are put into danger. A new
concept of “fitness” of structure to perform its function satisfactorily for its life span emerged.
The State at which any Structure becomes Unfit for the use it was intended for is called Limit State.
TOS 3 Unit 3b Limit State Design in R.C.C. Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
70
3b.2. The Design philosophy based on this concept is called Limit State Philosophy.
1. This method takes into consideration the different states and conditions of material and structure i.e.
actual behavior from loading to collapse.
2. It introduces multiple criterion of safety and introduces multiple criteria of Limit States with the
acceptance that any one criterion can be critical for a structure.
3. Instead of ad-hoc judgment the Philosophy uses Classical Reliability Theory and Statistical Probability
Theory for its mathematical Computations
4. Herein it must be admitted that the Limit State Philosophy even though Logical, Realistic and
Mathematically Sound, is yet to come into full implementation on ideal lines because of lack of sufficient
Statistical Data especially in case of Steel Design (Plastic Theory). However, its real merit lies in its
generality of accepting more data that would be available in the future and incorporating the same in
design for improving the outcome.
3b.3. Various Limit States: The various Limit States that need to be taken into account when designing a
structure are
1. Limit States of Collapse
2. Limit States of Serviceability
3. Limit States of Durability
1. Limit State of Collapse: Design to this limit state ensures safety of structures from Collapse. The structural
failure can be of the following types.
i. Flexure
iii. Axial Compression exceeding its strength to be studied in the subsequent chapters
v. Torsion
vi. Sliding
The above Limit States and Design Based on these Limit States shall be explained in the next few chapters.
2. Limit State of Serviceability: These relate to performance or behavior of structure at Service Load Levels
I. Limit State of Deflection – Taken care of by Span to Depth Ratios
II. Limit State of Cracking – Taken care of by specifying maximum crack width
III. Limit State of Vibration – Not within the purview of our syllabus
TOS 3 Unit 3b Limit State Design in R.C.C. Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
71
ii. Limit State of Cracking: Effects of excessive cracking are as given below
Mars the appearance of the exposed surface
Creates feeling of lack of safety
Creates leakage problems and renders Water tanks unserviceable
Leads to corrosion of steel
It creates maintenance problems
TOS 3 Unit 3b Limit State Design in R.C.C. Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
72
This Limit State is taken care of by: This Limit state is attended to by specifying maximum crack width. It can also
be attained by detailing rules and restrictions on bar diameter, Spacing, Cover etc. for common structures.
Remedial measures to control crack width include the following 7 points
1. Using more number of smaller diameter bars than less number of larger diameter bars
2. Decreasing Stress in the bars at Working Loads
3. Increasing Grade of concrete
4. Providing Sufficient cover
5. Providing Minimum Percentage of steel as Reinforcement
6. Satisfying rules of Splicing, Curtailing, End Anchorage
7. Maintaining quality control over Mixing, Placing and Curing
Some Detailing is given below
Percentage of Reinforcement
Minimum Reinforcement for Beam is given by Ast/b x d < 0.85/fy
Minimum Reinforcement for slabs is 0.15% of Cross Sectional Area for Fe250 and 0.12% for Fe 415
and Fe 500
Minimum Reinforcement in Walls of a Water Tank is 0.3%
Providing Proper Cover: We talked in detail about covers out in the last chapter
Spacing of Reinforcement: We will detail this out in the chapter on Beams, Slabs etc.
iii. Limit State of Vibration: This Limit state is applicable to structures subjected to Dynamic loads and out of
purview of our syllabus.
3. Limit State of Durability: These Limit State relates to Durability of a structure against actions and forces of
Nature such as Fire, Rain, Water, Floods, Earthquake, Weathering and Chemical Resistance
Limit State of Fire Resistance: This Limit State is critical in Structures like Godowns storing inflammable
Material also in ordinary structures to get some time for fire fighting and evacuation before collapse so that
lives may be rescued.
This Limit State is taken care of by: This is attended to by providing minimum cover to steel as it is
deformation in steel due to rise in temperature that is going to cause the failure. We have already talked
about covers on the last page of last chapter and provided I.S. Code for the same.
Limit State of Resistance to Chemical and Environmental Actions: This Limit state is applicable to
structures used for storing chemicals and or subjected to permanent environmental actions like Piles, Earth
retaining structures, Dams, Jetties, and Docks etc.
This Limit State is taken care of by: This Limit state is attended to by increasing durability of concrete by
paying attention to material specification, quality control, good workmanship, meticulous supervision, also by
minimum cover standards and minimum cement contents
Limit State of Resistance to Accidental Catastrophe: This is in case of Special Structures like Dams
Bridges Balcony Girders in Assembly Halls, Large Span Stadiums where collapse could mean loss of human life
on large scale, affecting the economy of a region etc. etc.
This Limit State is taken care of by: This Limit State is attended to by increasing the partial factor of safety for
loads by introducing a Modification factor to increase Durability and reduce probability of Failure.
TOS 3 Unit 3b Limit State Design in R.C.C. Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
73
Now that we have discussed various Limit States let us discuss two important terms before we go ahead.
Characteristic Load and Design Load: Characteristic Load is defined as that value of load, which has 95%
probability of not being exceeded during the service life span of the structure. The Characteristic Load Fk is
multiplied by a Partial Factor of Safety to get Design Load Fd
Design Load (Fd) = Fk (Characteristic Load) x Load Factor (Partial Safety Factor)Ϋf
Different factors of safety are applied to Dead Loads, Live Loads, Imposed Loads, Wind Loads etc. etc.
However, for sake of Simplicity we shall apply a Partial Safety Factor of 1.5 to the total of dead load and live load in
our calculations
Thus Fd = Fk x 1.5
Characteristic Strength and Design Strength: Characteristic strength would be that strength below which not
more than 5% of the samples are expected to fail.
The Design Strength (fd) of a material is calculated by dividing the Characteristic Strength (fk) by a Partial Safety
Factor Ϋm.
So Design Strength = Characteristic Strength / Partial Safety Factor
TOS 3 Unit 3b Limit State Design in R.C.C. Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
74
3b.4. Limit State of Collapse – Flexure - Stress Block Diagram and M.R of Section:
Assumptions and Explanations
1. A normal section plane before bending remains plane after bending right up to collapse. This implies strain
varies linearly from the neutral axis till failure.
2. The Ultimate state of collapse is said to have reached in flexure when the maximum compressive strain in
concrete in the outermost fiber reaches the ultimate crushing strain e , which as per I.S. Code is 0.0035.
This is reflected in the strain diagram. The corresponding stress diagram shows a parabola emerging from the
neutral axis up to a strain of 0.0022 and a rectangle in the region beyond that point up to compressive face.
The division of the stress diagram is 4/7 Xu and 3/7 Xu
A partial factor of safety of 1.5 applied to the idealized stress got by multiplying the fck value by 0.67 makes
the maximum compressive stress =0 .67/1.5 = 0.446 fck as shown
3. Concrete under tension is ignored and Tension is entire carried by the reinforcement.
4. The distribution of compressive strain in concrete across the section is defined by an idealized stress strain
curve of concrete.
5. Perfect bond exists between steel and concrete up to collapse
6. The design stress in steel reinforcement is obtained by respective stress strain curve for the type of steel used
and is applied a factor of safety of 1/1.15 = 0.87fy
7. According to I.S. Code the maximum strain in steel in Tension shall not be less than
0.002 + fy/(1.15Es) at collapse.
TOS 3 Unit 3b Limit State Design in R.C.C. Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
75
Suggested Theory Questions: TOS 3: Unit 3b: Limit State Design in R.C.C
Answer the Following Questions
1. Define Limit State and explain the L.S. Philosophy in brief.
2. List of Various Limit States and sub Limit States
3. Explain Limit State of Service-ability and how it is taken care of
4. Explain Span to Depth Ratios and Limit State of Service-ability
5. Explain Limit State of Cracking how it is taken care of
6. Explain Limit State of Durability how it is taken care of
7. Define: Characteristic Load and Design Load/ Characteristic Strength and Design Strength
8. Draw Stress Block Diagram for a Flexural Member in R.C.C in L.S.M
TOS 3 Unit 3b Limit State Design in R.C.C. Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
78
Let the total of dead and live load on the slab be w. Let wx be load taken along x direction and wy be load taken
along y direction
Δx = 5wx lx⁴/384 E I ----------①Δx = deflection max along X direction
Δy = 5wy ly⁴/384 E I ----------②Δy = deflection max along Y direction
As Δx = Δy that is deflection max along X axis will be at the center along both axis and equal to deflection max
along Y axis
5wx lx⁴/384 E I = 5wy ly⁴/384 E I
Hence wx lx⁴ = wy ly⁴ equating ① and ②
wx = wy {ly/lx}⁴
Case 1: ly=lx hence ly/lx = 1 Hence wx = wy (1)⁴ = wy. This is a two-way slab.
In a Two Way Slab
1. The load is distributed along both directions
2. We Provide Main steel along both directions.
Load Distribution in a Two Way Slab
If ly/lx = r then wx = wy r⁴
wx + wy = w Hence wy x r⁴ + wy = w or
1. wy = w/(1+r⁴)
2. wx = w- wy
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
79
Case 2: ly=2lx hence ly/lx = 2 Hence wx = 2⁴wy = 16wy. This means the load taken along the X direction is 16
times the load along the y direction.
Hence as per I.S.456 a slab wherein ly/lx>2 is called a One Way Slab
1. The maximum load is along the shorter span
2. Main steel is provided along this direction i.e. along the shorter span
3. Along the longer span, We provide bars of smaller diameter. This reinforcement is called Distribution
Steel.
There are many other functions of the distribution steel. These are as follows
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
80
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
81
Note: The above plan is an Architectural Plan. No Framing i.e. Beams or Columns has not been shown
Problem 1. Design the Floor Slab of the Dormitory Room 1 of the Hostel Building
Let me reproduce an enlarged part of
the Dormitory Room 1
A Hostel Building is like a Residential
Building but being commercial I will
use a live load of 3kN/m²
ly = 7200mm, lx = 3450mm
ly/lx = 2.09 > 2 Hence One way Slab
I have already shown a symbol of a
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
82
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
83
How do we write answers to theory questions? E.G. (Try to give your answers in the point form)
The reasons why Alternate bars are bent up in a Simple Supported Slab are as follows.
The Slab is Simply Supported. Hence we expect only Positive B.M throughout i.e. Compression at the top
and Tension at the Bottom. However Negative Bending Moment develops at the support because of the
following reasons
1. Monolithic Construction: Slab being cast monolithically with the beam
2. Weight at Supports: We build Parapet Walls or Full Walls on the Slab at the Supports
To take care of this negative B.M or partial fixity at supports, creating Tension at top and Compression at bottom,
we bend alternate main bars at a distance of Le/7 and take them to the top. This takes care of the Partial Fixity
Created.
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
84
Note: Any Slab or Beam is a bending Member and has to be designed for
1. Bending Stress which is taken care of by M.R=0.134fck bd² and Ast = M.R/(0.87fyX0.81de)
2. Deflection which is taken care of by Span to Depth Ratios
3. Shear Stress: Slabs are not designed for shear stress as the value of shear stress will be quite low because
we have taken width as 1000 mm. Beams however need to be designed for Shear
E.g.1 Shear Force max in Slab S1 = Fd X le/2 = 11.63 x 3.62/2 = 21.05kN = 21.05 x 10³ N = Vu
Hence Shear Stress = Vu/b x de = 21050/1000x120 = 0.17N/mm² < 0.29 N/mm² (0.29 N/mm² is the Design Shear
Strength for M25 for 0.15% Steel. The Design Shear Strength Table is on page no 73 of I.S.456
For a Similar Problem on One Way Slab Go to page number 95 and See the
Solution of Slab S1 from Plan 1
Let us now look at a very small span slab like the Passage Slab of the Hostel Building, in these slabs you
will notice that the minimum standards need to be followed.
Problem 2. Design the Passage Slab S2 of the Hostel Building. Consider Live Load as
3kN/m².
As is mentioned in the problem let us not refer to the table of live loads but take Live Load as mentioned in the
Problem. There is not much point in proving that it is a one-way slab. We shall use 8mm as Main Steel Dia.
1 Calculate do and de for Deflection Control
do = Smaller Span 1500 60 ≈ 100 Hence do = 100 mm
= =
25 25 (Rounded off to the nearest higher mul tipl e of 5mm)
de = do - cover - Main Steel Ø = 100 - 15 - 8 = 81
2 2
Hence de = 81 mm
N.B: Notice that we have used here a much larger depth i.e. 100mm instead of 60mm as the depth 60mm is not
practicable
2 Calculate Le = Effective Span of the Slab as Least of the Following
1 c/c Between Supports = 1500 + 230 = 1730 Hence Le = 1581 mm
2 Clear Span + de = 1500 + 81 = 1581 = 1.581 m
3 Calculate Loading on the Slab Density is in kN/m ³ so all dimension in m, width of slab = 1000mm = 1m
1 Slab Self Weight = 1m x do x 25 = 1m x 0.100 x 25 = 2.5 kN/m
2 Floor Finish = 1m x 1.25 if given take given value otherwise take 1.25kN/m ² = 1.25 kN/m
3 Live Load = 1m x 3 if Given take given value otherwise as per chart of L.L = 3.00 kN/m
w = 6.75 kN/m
Fd = 1.5 x w = 1.5 x 6.75 = 10.13 Hence Fd = 10.13 kN/m
4 Calculate B.Mmax
2 2 6
B.Mmax = Fd x Le 10.13 x 1.581 = 3.16 kNm = 3.16 x 10 Nmm
=
8 8
5 Check for depth i.e. Design of Depth for Flexure
2
B.Mmax = M.R = 0.134 x fck x b x de
6 2
3.16 x 10 = 0.134 x 25 x 1000 x de
Hence de = 30.73 < 81 (de assumed for deflection) Hence Safe for Depth Assumed
Hence Provide de = 81 mm and do = 100 mm
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
85
N.B: Notice that we have provided Main Steel at spacing of 240mm (3 x de) and not the calculated one (450mm)
N.B: Notice that we have provided distribution Steel at spacing of 405mm (5 x de) and not the calculated one
(415mm)
N.B: Notice that the minimum amount of steel in a slab (0.12% of cross sectional area (120mm²) is greater than
the Area of Main Steel Calculated (110.8mm²)
4.4. Design of a Two Way Slab: If ly/lx < 2 we design a two way slab: Steps in Design of Two-Way Slab:
Load Distribution in a Two Way Slab: We have already seen that if ly/lx< 2 we design a two way slab
1. Economics: In Actual Practice, however a two-way slab is an uneconomical proposition for ly/lx ratios >
1.4 or as per some structural designers 1.5. In Slabs exceeding these ratios the load carried along the
longer span is too small and providing main steel in both directions could prove costly
2. Load Distribution:
We have already studied the load distribution in two-slabs as wy = w/(1 + r⁴) and wx = w – wy,
This is the method that we shall follow.
However I.S.456 gives us the following table for calculating B.M along the shorter and the longer
span
Steps in Design of a Two-Way Slab
1. Calculate do and de for Deflection Control. We shall call this de assumed
Calculate do = Clear Shorter Span/30 and round it off to the higher multiple of 5mm (e.g. 120mm, 125mm…)
•We shall use a minimum depth of 100mm from the practical point of view of concreting
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
86
In case of two-way slabs we have main steel we will have to calculate dexx and deyy
dexx = do –15mm– ½
(Dia)
deyy = dexx – 1 x Dia
15mm = Clear Cover
Diameter of Main Steel =
10mm most of the times,
sometimes 8mm as seen
earlier for very small spans
Dia = Diameter
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
87
Problem 3. Design the Slab S3 over the Reception cum Recreation Room of the Hostel
Building. Consider Live Load as 5kN/m², Also Consider it as a terrace slab with 75mm thick water
proofing of Brick Bat Coba and a Floor Finish Load of 1.25kN/m²
ly = 5500mm
lx = 4400mm
ly/lx = 1.25 < 2
Hence Two-Way Slab
We have used a symbol to indicate that the slab is a two-way
slab and the direction of the Main Steel Reinforcement
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
88
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
89
4.4.1: Torsion Reinforcement : Some Special Provisions for Simply Supported Two-Way Slabs
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
90
The essential differences between a One – Way Slab and a Cantilever Slab are as follows
1. do = Clear Span/10
2. B.Mmax = Fd x Le²/2,
3. Le is Overhang + de/2 for stand-alone slab and Le = Overhang + ½ Support for Slab extending inside
4. The Steel will have to be provided at the top face as the Tension Zone for a Cantilever Slab is at the top
I have reproduced the relevant clauses for Effective span from I.S.456.
Problem 4. Design Slab S5 of the Balcony adjoining Dormitory Room 1 from The Hostel
Building. Consider Floor Finish of 2kN/m² and Live Load as 4kN/m².
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
91
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
92
The Red Bars are the Bottom Bars of Slab S1. They are cranked or taken up at the other support
THE Black Bars are the alternate bars of Slab S1 Cranked at this support and taken up and then taken as
top steel into the cantilever
The Grey Bars are the alternate top bars in the cantilever taken upto a distance of 1500 (cantilever span)
into the Slab S1
The Following is a section of the same for understanding.
Section Showing Arrangement of Steel Bars in the Cantilever Portion Slab S5. Spacing of the Cantilver Portion
Modified to suit slab S1, Similarly both slabs can have same depth of 150mm for ease of construction. (Slab s1 as
per Schedule is ony 140mm.
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
93
An Example of a Structural Drawing: However please restrict reading of this drawing to reading of
slabs only. (Here Floor Beams marked as FB1 etc etc for supporting the slabs)
Slab Schedule: (Slab S1,S2,S3 and S5 calculations done in this chapter but, S4 calculations not done here)
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
94
Problem 5. Design the Slab S1 of the Office Block Shown in the Sketch Plan1 : Consider
Floor Finish of 1.25kN/m² and Live Load of 3kN/m²
ly = 6530mm , lx = 2900mm ly/lx = 6530/2900 = 2.25 > 2 Hence One Way Slab
1 Calculate do and de for Deflection Control
do = Smaller Span 2900 116 ≈ 120 Hence do = 120 mm
= =
25 25 (Rounded off to the nearest higher multiple of 5mm)
de = do - cover - Main Steel Ø = 120 - 15 - 10 = 100
2 2
Hence de = 100 mm
2 Calculate Le = Effective Span of the Slab as Least of the Following
1 c/c Between Supports = 2900 + 230 = 3130 Hence Le = 3000 mm
2 Clear Span + de = 2900 + 100 = 3000 = 3.000 m
3 Calculate Loading on the Slab Density is in kN/m ³ so all dimension in m, width of slab = 1000mm = 1m
1 Slab Self Weight = 1m x do x 25 = 1m x 0.120 x 25 = 3.00 kN/m
2 Floor Finish = 1m x 1.25 if given take given value otherwise take 1.25kN/m ² = 1.25 kN/m
3 Live Load = 1m x 3 if Given take given value otherwise as per chart of L.L = 3.00 kN/m
w = 7.25 kN/m
Fd = 1.5 x w = 1.5 x 7.25 = 10.88 Hence Fd = 10.88 kN/m
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
95
Problem 6. Design the Slab S2 of the Office Block Shown in the Sketch Plan1: Consider
Floor Finish of 1.25kN/m² and Live Load of 3kN/m². Use 8mm as main steel
1 Calculate do and dexx and deyy for Deflection Control
do = Smaller Span 3230 108 ≈ 110 do = 110 mm
= =
30 30 (Rounded off to the nearest higher multiple of 5mm)
dexx = do - cover - Main Steel Ø = 110 - 15 - 8 = 91 dexx = 91 mm
2 2
deyy = dexx - Main Steel Ø = 91 - 8 = 83 deyy = 83 mm
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
96
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
97
Problem 7. Design the Slab S5 of the Office Block Shown in the Sketch Plan1: Consider
Floor Finish of 2.5kN/m² and Live Load as 4kN/m².
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
98
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
99
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
101
6. Explain the difference in reinforcement placement between a Simple Supported slab and a Cantilever Slab.
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
102
Standard Hook and Bend shall be provided as follows. This is as per I.S.2502 1963
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
103
And
Second Limit State of Serviceability: Limit State of Deflection
TOS 3 Unit 4 Design of R.C.C. Slabs L.S. for Flexure Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
105
1. Bottom Main Steel or Tension Steel at the Bottom may be in one, two, or more layers. The de is to be
calculated up-to the centre of the Reinforcement as shown in the adjoining diagram
2. Main Steel in the second layer placed vertically above the first row of steel
3. Pins are placed above the first layer at intervals along the length of the Beam to separate the First and
Second Layer.
4. Anchor Bars usually 2no 10mm to act as anchors for Shear Stirrups
5. Shear Stirrups are provided to take care of Limit State of Shear. These are closely spaced at the supports
where Shear Force or Diagonal Shear action is maximum and spaced farther near the centre of the beam
where Shear Force tends towards the minimum.
6. Top Main Steel is provided at the supports to take care of Negative Bending Moment leading to Tension at top
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
106
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
107
b. Transfer of load to an Intermediate Beam and to an End Beam: Consider the following plan
The following Section XX shows the loading on FB1 AND FB2 (FB stands for floor Beam)
ds = depth of slab
dw = depth of beam
below the slab w=web
h1 = height of wall
t1 = thickness of
internal wall
t2 = thickness of
external wall
Load on Beam FB3 is to be calculated for distance q. Load on Beam FB2 is to be calculated for distance p
1. Slab Load = q x 1m x ds x density of concrete 1. Slab Load = p x 1m x ds x density
2. Floor Finish Load = q x 1.25kN/m² 2. Floor Finish Load = p x 1.25kN/m²
3. Live Load = q x Live Load 3. Live Load = p x Live Load
4. Brick Wall Load = t2 x h1 x density of brick 4. Brick Wall Load = t1 x h1 x density of brick
5. Beam Self Weight = b x dw x density of concrete 5. Beam Self Weight = b x dw x density of concrete
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
108
c. Transfer of load from Beams to Beams. This we will see when we study more complicated structural
configuration in the next semesters.
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
109
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
110
Problem 1. Design the Beam FB2 from the plan 1 shown below. Assume depth of slab S1 as
120mm, standard floor finish of 1.25kN/m². The Beam supports a brick wall 150thick.floor to
floor Height = 3.0m. Consider Live Load as 4kN/m²
Let us first draw a sketch of the Section XX to understand the loading pattern.
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
111
1 Calculate do and de for Deflection Control
Clear Span 6530 do = 550 mm
do = = = 544 ≈ 550
12 12
de = do - Cover - Main Steel - Pin Dia Use 20 mm dia Main Bars
1 2 Use 2 Rows of Bars
= 550 - 25 - 20 - 20
= 495
1 2 de = 495 mm
2 Calculate Le as least of the following
1 c/c between supports = 6530 + 230 = 6760 mm
as per I.S.456
2 Clear Span + de = 6530 + 495 = 7025 mm
Le = 6.760 m
3 Calculate Loading on the Beam m m kN/m³
Slab Load = 3.09 x 0.12 x 25 = 09.27 kN/m
Floor Finish = 3.09 x 1.25 kN/m² = 03.86 kN/m
Live Load = 3.09 x 4.00 kN/m² = 12.36 kN/m
Self Weight = 0.23 x 0.43 x 25 = 02.47 kN/m
Brick Wall = 0.15 x 2.45 x 19 = 06.98 kN/m
Height of Brick wall = 3.00 - 0.55 = 2.45 m w = 34.95 kN/m
= Floor to Floor Height - Beam Depth
2.94 2.94
Distance for load Cal = + 0.15 + = 3.09 m
2 2
= slab on one side/2 + Support + cantilver slab or (slab on other side/2)
Fd = 1.5 x 34.95 = 52.42 kN/m
4 Calculate B.Mmax
2 2
Fd x Le 52.42 x 6.76
B.M = = = 299.44 kNm
8 8
6
B.Mmax = 299.44 x 10 Nmm
5 Check For Depth i.e. Design Depth for Flexure
2
M.R = 0.134 x fck x b x de
6 2 Round off Depth to a
299.44 x 10 = 0.134 x 25 x 230 x de higher multiple of
de = 623.4 > 495 = de assumed in 1st Step Revise Depth 25mm
do = 623.4 + 25 + 20 + 20 = 678.4 = 700 mm
1 2
de = 700 - 25 - 20 - 20 = 645 do ≈ 700 mm
1 2 de ≈ 645 mm
6 Calculate Area of Steel
6
M.R 299.4 x 10
Ast = =
0.87 x fy x 0.81 x de 0.87 x 500 x 0.81 x 645
= 1317.58 mm²
Provide 2 no 16 Tor + 3 no 20 Tor
= 2 x 201 + 3 x 314 = 1344 Ast = 1344 mm²
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
112
Note:
1. The assumed depth for deflection control failed in flexure and we had to revise it to a much higher value
2. In case of beams, the bars are of higher diameters so it is tough task cranking these bars. So some bars are
discontinued at Le/7 from the supports. At the top are two anchor bars of 10mm. In addition at the
supports reinforcement that was curtailed at Le/7 is provided at the top up-to Le/7 + Ld. (Ld is the
development length required to develop full bond with concrete)
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
113
Problem 2. Design the Beam FB1 from the plan 1. All assumptions are as per the previous problem
1 Calculate do and de for Deflection Control
Clear Span 6530 do = 550 mm
do = = = 544 ≈ 550
12 12
de = do - Cover - Main Steel - Pin Dia Use 20 mm dia Main Bars
1 2 Use 2 Rows of Bars
= 550 - 25 - 20 - 20
= 495
1 2 de = 495 mm
2 Calculate Le as least of the following
1 c/c between supports = 6530 + 230 = 6760 mm
as per I.S.456
2 Clear Span + de = 6530 + 495 = 7025 mm
Le = 6.760 m
3 Calculate Loading on the Beam m m kN/m³
Slab Load = 1.70 x 0.12 x 25 = 05.10 kN/m
Floor Finish = 1.70 x 1.25 kN/m² = 02.13 kN/m
Live Load = 1.70 x 4.00 kN/m² = 06.80 kN/m
Self Weight = 0.23 x 0.43 x 25 = 02.47 kN/m
Brick Wall = 0.23 x 2.45 x 19 = 10.71 kN/m
Height of Brick wall = 3.00 - 0.55 = 2.45 m w = 27.20 kN/m
= Floor to Floor Height - Beam Depth
2.94 0
Distance for load Cal = + 0.23 + = 1.70 m
2 1
= slab on one side/2 + Support + cantilver slab or (slab on other side/2)
Fd = 1.5 x 27.20 = 40.81 kN/m
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
114
4 Calculate B.Mmax
2 2
Fd x Le 40.81 x 6.76
B.M = = = 233.09 kNm
8 8
6
B.Mmax = 233.09 x 10 Nmm
5 Check For Depth i.e. Design Depth for Flexure
2
M.R = 0.134 x fck x b x de
6 2 Round off Depth to a
233.09 x 10 = 0.134 x 25 x 230 x de higher multiple of
de = 550.0 > 495 = de assumed in 1st Step Revise Depth 25mm
do = 550.0 + 25 + 20 + 20 = 605.0 = 625 mm
1 2
de = 625 - 25 - 20 - 20 = 570 do ≈ 625 mm
1 2 de ≈ 570 mm
6 Calculate Area of Steel
6
M.R 233.1 x 10
Ast = =
0.87 x fy x 0.81 x de 0.87 x 500 x 0.81 x 570
= 1160.59 mm²
Provide 0 no 16 Tor + 4 no 20 Tor
= 0 x 201 + 4 x 314 = 1256 Ast = 1256 mm²
7 Design for Shear
7.a Calculating Vu = Shear Force Ultimate
Fd x Le 40.81 x 6.76
Vu = = = 137.92 kN
2 2
3
Vu = 137.92 x 10 N
7.b Calculating Actual Shear Stress to Compare it with τcmax
τ Vu 137.9 x 1000
= = = 1.05 < 3.1 N/mm²(τcmax)
actual b x de 230 x 570 Safe For Size
7.c Calculate % of Steel and Design Shear Strength τc
100 x Ast = 100 x 1256 = Interpolate for 0.96 %
0.96 %
b x de 230 x 570 0.57 + 0.64 - 0.57 x 0.21
From τc Tables % ζc N/mm² 0.25
0.75 0.57
1.00 0.64 Design Shear Strength τc = 0.629 N/mm²
7.d Calculate Vuc and Find if Vuc < Vu or Vuc > Vu
Vuc = τc x b x de = 0.629 x 230 x 570 = 82436 N
Vuc < Vu = 82.436 kN
if Vuc < Vu
Calculate Vus = Vu - Vuc = 137.92 - 82.4 = 55.489 kN = 55489 N
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
115
Notice that Columns are numbered C1, C2, C3 etc. while similar beams are given same names. FB1 spans across C1,
C2 with clear span 7080mm & due to Column C4 placed in between C3, and C5, FB3 has clear span of 3425mm
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
116
1 Calculate do and de for Deflection Control
Clear Span 7080 do = 600 mm
do = = = 590 ≈ 600
12 12
de = do - Cover - Main Steel - Pin Dia Use 20 mm dia Main Bars
1 2 Use 2 Rows of Bars
= 600 - 25 - 20 - 20
= 545
1 2 de = 545 mm
2 Calculate Le as least of the following
1 c/c between supports = 7080 + 350 = 7430 mm
as per I.S.456
2 Clear Span + de = 7080 + 545 = 7625 mm
Le = 7.430 m
3 Calculate Loading on the Beam m m kN/m³
Slab Load = 3.46 x 0.15 x 25 = 12.96 kN/m
Floor Finish = 3.46 x 1.25 kN/m² = 04.32 kN/m
Live Load = 3.46 x 3.00 kN/m² = 10.37 kN/m
Self Weight = 0.23 x 0.45 x 25 = 02.59 kN/m
Brick Wall = 0.23 x 2.90 x 19 = 12.67 kN/m
Height of Brick wall = 3.50 - 0.6 = 2.90 m w = 42.90 kN/m
= Floor to Floor Height - Beam Depth
3.45 1.5
Distance for load Cal = + 0.23 + = 3.46 m
2 1
= slab on one side/2 + Support + cantilver slab or (slab on other side/2)
Fd = 1.5 x 42.90 = 64.35 kN/m
4 Calculate B.Mmax
2 2
Fd x Le 64.35 x 7.43
B.M = = = 444.06 kNm
8 8
6
B.Mmax = 444.06 x 10 Nmm
5 Check For Depth i.e. Design Depth for Flexure
2
M.R = 0.134 x fck x b x de
6 2 Round off Depth to a
444.06 x 10 = 0.134 x 25 x 230 x de higher multiple of
de = 759.2 > 545 = de assumed in 1st Step Revise Depth 25mm
do = 759.2 + 25 + 20 + 20 = 814.2 = 825 mm
1 2
de = 825 - 25 - 20 - 20 = 770 do ≈ 825 mm
1 2 de ≈ 770 mm
6 Calculate Area of Steel
6
M.R 444.1 x 10
Ast = =
0.87 x fy x 0.81 x de 0.87 x 500 x 0.81 x 770
= 1636.73 mm²
Provide 2 no 16 Tor + 4 no 20 Tor
= 2 x 201 + 4 x 314 = 1658 Ast = 1658 mm²
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
117
IS.456 page no 47 States that where the depth of the web in a beam exceeds 750 mm, side face reinforcement
shall be provided along the two faces. The total area of such reinforcement shall be not less than 0.1 percent
of the web area and shall be distributed equally on two faces at a spacing not exceeding 300 mm or web
thickness whichever is less. (In this case 0.1/100 x 230 x 770 @ 178mm² i.e.2 bars of 10mm extra on each side)
How do we reduce the depth?
One way is to increase the width. In this case if we make it 300mm then the following situation arises
441.4 x 106 = 0.134 x 25 x 300 x de²
Hence de = 662.72. do = 662.72 + 25 + 20 + ½ (20) ≈ 725mm < 825mm
The other way is to reduce span. Add Column C4 in between C3 and C5 to reduce span to 3425mm
Let us now solve Beam FB3 with that reduced span
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
118
Problem 4. Design the Beam FB3 from the Hostel Building with the same assumptions. Clear span of
Beam = 3425mm with 350 wide supports on each side.
Let us assume only one row of main bars as the Beam Span is small and hence depth required is also small.
1 Calculate do and de for Deflection Control
Clear Span 3425 do = 350 mm
do = = = 343 ≈ 350
10 10
de = do - Cover - Main Steel - Pin Dia Use 20 mm dia Main Bars
2 1 Use 1 Rows of Bars
= 350 - 25 - 20 - 0
= 315
2 1 de = 315 mm
2 Calculate Le as least of the following
1 c/c between supports = 3425 + 350 = 3775 mm
as per I.S.456
2 Clear Span + de = 3425 + 315 = 3740 mm
Le = 3.740 m
3 Calculate Loading on the Beam m m kN/m³
Slab Load = 3.46 x 0.15 x 25 = 12.96 kN/m
Floor Finish = 3.46 x 1.25 kN/m² = 04.32 kN/m
Live Load = 3.46 x 3.00 kN/m² = 10.37 kN/m
Self Weight = 0.23 x 0.2 x 25 = 01.15 kN/m
Brick Wall = 0.23 x 3.15 x 19 = 13.77 kN/m
Height of Brick wall = 3.50 - 0.35 = 3.15 m w = 42.56 kN/m
= Floor to Floor Height - Beam Depth
3.45 1.5
Distance for load Cal = + 0.23 + = 3.46 m
2 1
= slab on one side/2 + Support + cantilver slab or (slab on other side/2)
Fd = 1.5 x 42.56 = 63.83 kN/m
4 Calculate B.Mmax
2 2
Fd x Le 63.83 x 3.74
B.M = = = 111.61 kNm
8 8
6
B.Mmax = 111.61 x 10 Nmm
5 Check For Depth i.e. Design Depth for Flexure
2
M.R = 0.134 x fck x b x de
6 2 Round off Depth to a
111.61 x 10 = 0.134 x 25 x 230 x de higher multiple of
de = 380.6 > 315 = de assumed in 1st Step Revise Depth 25mm
do = 380.6 + 25 + 20 + 0 = 415.6 = 425 mm
2 1
de = 425 - 25 - 20 - 0 = 390 do ≈ 425 mm
2 1 de ≈ 390 mm
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
119
1. Reduction of Depth of Beams: If we want to restrict the depth of the Beam , we will have to restrict
the span by providing intermediary columns:
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
120
2. Span the Slabs to avoid large depths of slabs: It is important to note how the framing plan is worked
out. In the Sketch below of the Dormitory Room 3, The Room has been divided into 2 small slabs
supported on Beams FB7 and FB8. The slabs S4 are supported on these Beams. In the Balcony Portion S4
is supported across Cantilever Beams FB6.
3. Cantilever to One Way: The Balcony Slab is no longer a Cantilever but the Supporting Beams are
Cantilevers
Problem 5. Design the End Beam FB6 from the Hostel Building. Assume Slab S6 of depth 120mm,
Live Load = 4kN/m², Floor Finish of 1.5kN/m². End Beam F6 supports a Parapet wall 1.2m high
and 230thk. (Hint: FB6 is a Cantilever Beam)
1 Calculate do and de for Deflection Control
Clear Span 2800 do = 400 mm
do = = = 400 ≈ 400
7 7
de = do - Cover - Mai n Steel - Pin Dia Use 20 mm dia Main Bars
2 1 Use 1 Rows of Bars
= 400 - 25 - 20 - 0
= 365
2 1 de = 365 mm
2 Calculate Le As
1 Clear Span + 1/2 Support = 2800 + 115 = 2915 mm
Le = 2.915 m
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
121
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho
123
And
Second Limit State of Serviceability: Limit State of Deflection
TOS 3 Unit 5 Design of R.C.C. Beams L.S. for Flexure and Shear Compiled by Ar. Arthur Cutinho