Chapter 3-Frequency Analysis

Engineering Hydrology Lecture Note
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3 Frequency Analysis..........................................................................................................2
3.1 General......................................................................................................................2
3.2 Flow Frequency........................................................................................................2
3.3 Flood Probability.....................................................................................................4
3.3.1 Selection of Data..............................................................................................4
3.3.2 Plotting Positions.............................................................................................5
3.3.3 Theoretical Distributions of Floods................................................................6
3.3.4 Extreme-Value Type I Distribution (Gumbel’s Method).............................7
3.3.5 Gumbel's Equation for Practical Use............................................................8
3.3.6 Confidence Limits for the fitted data...........................................................10
3.3.7 Log-Pearson Type III Distribution..............................................................11
3.4 Precipitation Probability.......................................................................................13
3.5 Low Flow Analysis.................................................................................................13
3.5.1 Definitions and Basic Concepts....................................................................13
3.5.2 Low flow frequency analysis.........................................................................14
3.5.3 Drought analysis............................................................................................15
3.6 Risk, Reliability and Safety factor.......................................................................17
ADDIS ABABA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY (AASTU )
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
1
4. Frequency Analysis
4. General
Water resource systems must be planned for future events for which no exact time of
occurrence can be forecasted. Hence, the hydrologist must give a statement of the
probability of the stream flows (or other hydrologic factors) will equal or exceed (or be less
than) a specified value. These probabilities are important to the economic and social
evaluation of a project. In most cases, absolute control of the floods or droughts is
impossible. Planning to control a flood of a specific probability recognizes that a project will
be overtaxed occasionally and damages will be incurred. However, repair of the damages
should be less costly in the long run than building initially to protect against the worst
possible event. The planning goal is not to eliminate all floods but to reduce the frequency of
flooding, and hence the resulting damages. If the socio-economic analysis is to be correct,
the probability of flooding must be eliminated accurately. For major projects, the failure of
which seriously threatens human life, a more extreme event, the probable maximum flood,
has become the standard for designing the spillway.
This chapter deals with techniques for defining probability from a given set of data and with
special methods employed for determining design flood for major hydraulic structures.
Frequency analysis is the hydrologic term used to describe the probability of occurrence of a
particular hydrologic event (e.g. rainfall, flood, drought, etc.). Therefore, basic knowledge
about probability (e.g. distribution functions) and statistics (e.g. measure of location,
measure of spread, measure of skewness, etc) is essential. Frequency analysis usually
requires recorded hydrological data.
Hydrological data are recorded either as a continuous record (e.g. water level or stage,
rainfall, etc.) or in discrete series form (e.g. mean daily/monthly/annual flows or rainfall,
annual series, partial series, etc.).
For planning and designing of water resources development projects, the important
parameters are river discharges and related questions on the frequency & duration of
normal flows (e.g. for hydropower production or for water availability) and extreme flows
(floods and droughts).
4.1 Flow Frequency

The question a planner or decision maker would ask a hydrologist concerning normal flows
is the length of time (duration) that a certain river flow is expected to be exceeded. An
answer to this question is provided by the flow duration curve (FDC) that is the relationship
between any given discharge and the percentage of time that the discharge is exceeded.
Taking the n-years of flow records from a river gauging stations, there are 365(6)n daily
mean discharges. The discharge is compiled, starting with the highest values. If N number
of data points are used for analysis, the plotting position of any discharge (or class value) Q
is:
Pp = m / (N+1) (3.1)
2
Where, m = is the order number of the discharge (or class value)

Pp = percentage probability of the flow magnitude being equalled or exceeded.
The FDC only applies for the period for which it was derived. If this is a long period, say
more than 10 to 20 years, the FDC may be regarded as a probability curve or flow frequency
curve, which may be used to estimate the percentage of time that a specified discharge will
be equalled or exceeded in the future. An example is demonstrated in table 4.1 below.
Table 4.1: Flow records
3
Qmean
Figure 3.1: Flow Duration Curve
The shape of the flow-duration curve gives a good indication of a catchment’s

characteristics response to its average rainfall history. An initially steeply sloped curve
results from a very variable discharge, usually from small catchments with little storage
where the stream flow reflects directly the rainfall pattern. Flow duration curves that
have very flat slope indicate little variation in flow regime, the resultant of the damping
effects of large storages.
4.2 Flood Probability

4.2.1 Selection of Data
If probability analysis is to provide reliable answers, it must start with a data series that
is relevant, adequate, and accurate. Relevance implies that the data must deal with the
problem. Most flood studies are concerned with peak flows, and the data series will
consist of selected observed peaks. However, if the problem is duration of flooding, e.g.,
for what periods of time a highway adjacent to a stream is likely to be flooded, the data
series should represent duration of flows in excess of some critical value. If the problem
is one of interior drainage of a leveed area, the data required may consist of those flood
volumes occurring when the main river is too high to permit gravity drainage.
Adequacy refers primarily to length of record, but sparisty of data collecting stations is
often a problem. The observed record is merely a sample of the total population of
floods that have occurred and may occur again. If the sample is too small, the
probabilities derived cannot be expected to be reliable. Available stream flow records
4
are too short to provide an answer to the question: How long must a record be to define
flood probabilities within acceptable tolerances?
Accuracy refers primarily to the problem of homogeneity. Most flow records are
satisfactory in terms of intrinsic accuracy, and if they are not, there is little that can be
done with them. If the reported flows are unreliable, they are not a satisfactory basis for
frequency analysis. Even though reported flows are accurate, they may be unsuitable for
probability analysis if changes in the catchment have caused a change in the hydrologic
characteristics, i.e., if the record is not internally homogenous. Dams, levees, diversions,
urbanization, and other land use changes may introduce inconsistencies. Such records
should be adjusted before use to current conditions or to natural conditions. There are
two data series of floods:
(i) The annual series, and
(ii) The partial duration series.
The annual series constitutes the data series that the values of the single maximum
daily/monthly/annually discharge in each year of record so that the number of data
values equals the record length in years. For statistical purposes, it is necessary to
ensure that the selected peak discharges are independent of one another. This data
series is necessary if the analysis is concerned with probability less than 0.5. However
as the interest are limited to relatively rare events, the analysis could have been carried
out for a partial duration series to have more frequent events.
.
The partial duration series constitutes the data series with those values that exceed
some arbitrary level. All the peaks above a selected level of discharge (a threshold) are
included in the series and hence the series is often called the Peaks Over Threshold
(POT) series. There are generally more data values for analysis in this series than in the
annual series, but there is more chance of the peaks being related and the assumption
of true independence is less valid.
4.2.2 Plotting Positions

Probability analysis seeks to define the flood flow with probability of p being equaled or
exceed in any year. Return period T r is often used instead of probability to describe a
design flood. Return period and probability are reciprocals, i.e,
p = 1/Tr (3.2)
To plot a series of peak flows as a cumulative frequency curves it is necessary to decide
on a probability or return period to associate with each peak. There are various formulas
for defining this value as shown in table 3.2.
The probability of occurrence of the event r times in n successive years can be obtained
from:
(3.3)
Where q
= 1 - P.
Table 3.2 Plotting position
5
Consider, for example, a list of flood magnitudes of a river arranged in descending order as
shown in Table 3.3. The length of record is 50 years.
Table 3.3 Calculation of frequency T
The last column shows the return period T of various flood magnitude, Q. A plot of Q Vs T
yields the probability distribution. For small return periods (i.e. for interpolation) or where
limited extrapolation is required, a simple best-fitting curve through plotted points can be
used as the probability distribution. A logarithmic scale for T is often advantageous.
However, when larger extrapolations of T are involved, theoretical probability distributions
(e.g. Gumbel extreme-value, Log- Pearson Type III, and log normal distributions) have to be
used. In frequency analysis of floods the usual problem is to predict extreme flood events.
Towards this, specific extreme-value distributions are assumed and the required statistical
parameters calculated from the available data. Using these flood magnitude for a specific
return period is estimated.
4.2.3 Theoretical Distributions of Floods

Statistical distributions are usually demonstrated by use of samples numbering in the
thousands. No such samples are available for stream flow and it is not possible to state
with certainty that a specific distribution applies to flood peaks. Numerous distributions
have been suggested on the basis of their ability to “fit” the plotted data from streams.
Chow has shown that most frequency-distribution functions applicable in hydrologic

studies can be expressed by the following equation known as the general equation of
hydrologic frequency analysis:
(3.4)
6
Where x = value of the variate X of a random hydrologic series with a return period T, x
T
= mean of the variate, σ = standard deviation of the variate, K =frequency factor which
depends upon the return period, T and the assumed frequency distribution.
4.2.4 Extreme-Value Type I Distribution (Gumbel’s Method)

This extreme value distribution was introduced by Gumbel (1941) and is commonly known
as Gumbel's distribution. It is one of the most widely used probability distribution functions
for extreme values in hydrologic and meteorological studies for prediction of flood peaks,
maximum rainfalls, and maximum wind speed, etc. Therefore, this extreme value theory of
Gumbel is only applicable to annual extremes. In the Gumbel method the data are ranked in
ascending order and it makes use of the probability of non-exceedence q=1-P (the
probability that the annual maximum flow is less than a certain magnitude). The return
period T is therefore given by T = 1 / P = 1 / (1-q).
Gumbel makes use of a reduced variate y as a function of q, which allows the plotting of the
distribution as a linear function between y and X (the maximum flow in this case). Gumbel
also defined a flood as the largest of the 365 daily flows and the annual series of flood flows
constitute a series of largest values of flow. According to his theory of extreme events, the
probability of occurrence of an event equal to or larger than a value x0 is
(3.5)
(3.6)
(3.7)
In practice it is the value of X for a given P that is required as such Eq. (3.7) is
transposed as
(3.8)
(3.9)
(3.10)
Now rearranging Eq. (3.7) the value of the variate X with a return period T is
(3.11)
7 (3.12)
Note that Eq. (3.12) is of the same form as the general equation of hydrologic frequency
analysis, Eq. (3.4). Further eqs (3.11) and (3.12) constitute the basic Gumbel's equations
and are applicable to an infinite sample size (i.e. N → ∞).
Since practical annual data series of extreme events such as floods, maximum rainfall
depths, etc., all have finite lengths of record; Eq. (3.12) is modified to account for finite N as
given below for practical use.
4.2.5 Gumbel's Equation for Practical Use

Equation (3.11) giving the variate X with the return period T is used as
(3.13)
(3.14)
(3.15)
mean, a function of sample size N and is given in Table 3.4
Table
3.5; for N→∞, Sn→ 1.2825
These equations are used under the following procedure to estimate the flood magnitude
corresponding to a given return period based on annual flood series.
1. Assemble the discharge data and note the sample size N. Here the annual flood
value is the variate X. Find x and σn-1 for the given data.
2. Using Tables 3.4 and 4.5 determine yn and Sn appropriate to given N
3. Find yT for a given T by Eq.(3.15).
4. Find K by Eq.(3.14).
5. Determine the required xT by Eq.(3.13).
8
To verify whether the given data follow the assumed Gumbel's distribution, the following
procedure may be adopted. The value of x for some return periods T<N are calculated by
T
using Gumbel's formula and plotted as x Vs T on a convenient paper such as a semi-log,

T
log-log or Gumbel probability paper. The use of Gumbel probability paper results in a
straight line for x Vs T plot. Gumbel's distribution has the property which gives T = 2.33
T
years for the average of the annual series when N is very large. Thus the value of a flood
with T = 2.33 years is called the mean annual flood. In graphical plots this gives a
mandatory point through which the line showing variation of x with T must pass. For the
T
given data, values of return periods (plotting positions) for various recorded values, x of the
variate are obtained by the relation T = (N+1)/m and plotted on the graph described above.
A good fit of observed data with the theoretical variation line indicates the applicability of
Gumbel's distribution to the given data series. By extrapolation of the straight-line x Vs T, T
values of x > N can be determined easily.

T
The Gumbel (or extreme-value) probability paper is a paper that consists of an abscissa
specially marked for various convenient values of the return period T (or corresponding
reduced variate y in arithmetic scale). The ordinate of a Gumbel paper represent x (flood
T T
discharge, maximum rainfall depth, etc.), which may have either arithmetic scale or
logarithmic scale.
Table 3.4: Reduced mean in Gumbel’s extreme value distribution, N= sample size
Table 3.5: Reduced standard deviation Sn in Gumbel’s extreme value distribution, N=sample
size
9
4.2.6 Confidence Limits for the fitted data

Since the value of the variate for a given return period, x T determined by Gumbel's
method can have errors due to the limited sample data used; an estimate of the
confidence limits of the estimate is desirable. The confidence interval indicates the limits
about the calculated value between which the true value can be said to lie with a specific
probability based on sampling errors only. For a confidence probability c, the confidence
interval of the variate xT is bound by value x1 and x2 given by
x = x ± f (c) Se
1/2 T (3.16)
Where f(c) = function of the confidence probability c determined by using the table of
normal variate as
(3.16a)
K= frequency factor given by Eq. (3.14)
It is seen that for a given sample and T, 80% confidence limits are twice as large as the
50% limits and 95% limits are thrice as large as 50% limits.
In addition to the analysis of maximum extreme events, there also is a need to analyze
minimum extreme events; e.g. the occurrence of droughts. The probability distribution of
Gumbel, similarly to the Gaussian probability distribution, does not have a lower limit;
meaning that negative values of events may occur. As rainfall or river flows do have a
lower limit of zero, neither the Gumbel nor Gaussian distribution is an appropriate tool to
analyze minimum values. Because the logarithmic function has a lower limit of zero, it is
often useful to first transform the series to its logarithmic value before applying the
theory. Appropriate tools for analyzing minimum flows or rainfall amounts are the Log-
Normal, Log-Gumbel, or Log-Pearson distributions.
10
4.2.7 Log-Pearson Type III Distribution

This distribution is widely used in USA. In this distribution the variate is first transformed
into logarithmic form (base 10) and the transformed data is then analysed. If X is the
variate of a random hydrologic series, then the series of Z variates where
Z = log x (3.18)
are first obtained. For this z series, for any recurrence interval T, equation (3.4) gives
zT z Kz z = + σ (3.19)
Where Kz = a frequency factor which is a function of recurrence interval T and the
coefficient of skew Cs,
(3.20)
The variations of Kz = f(Cs, T) is given in Table 3.6. After finding z by Eq.(3.19), the
T
corresponding value of x is obtained by Eq.(3.18) as x = antilog(z ). Sometimes, the

T T T
coefficient of skew Cs, is adjusted to account for the size of the sample by using the
following relation proposed by Hazen (1930)
(3.21)
Where s Cˆ = adjusted coefficient of skew. However the standard procedure for use of
Log-Pearson Type III distribution adopted by U.S. Water Resources Council does not
include this adjustment for skew. When the skew is zero, i.e. C s = 0, the Log-Pearson
Type III distribution reduces to Log-normal distribution. The Log-normal distribution plots
as a straight line
on logarithmic probability paper.
Table 3.6 Kz=F(Cs,T) for use in Log-Pearson Type III Distribution
11
The flood-frequency analysis described above is a direct means of estimating the

desired flood based upon the available flood-flow data of the catchment. The results of
the frequency analysis depend upon the length of data. The minimum number of years
of record required to obtain satisfactory estimates depends upon the variability of data
and hence on the physical and climatological characteristics of the basin. Generally a
minimum of 30 years of data is considered as essential. Smaller lengths of records are
also used when it is unavoidable. However, frequency analysis should not be adopted if
the length of records is less than 10 years.
Flood-frequency studies are most reliable in climates that are uniform from year to year.
In such cases a relatively short record gives a reliable picture of the frequency
distribution. With increasing lengths of flood records, it affords a viable alternative
method of flood-flow estimation in most cases.
A final remark of caution should be made regarding to frequency analysis. None of the
frequency distribution functions have a real physical background. The only information
having physical meaning are the measurements themselves. Extrapolation beyond the
period of observation is dangerous. It requires a good engineer to judge the value of
extrapolated events of high return periods. A good impression of the relativity of
frequency analysis can be acquired through the comparison of result obtained from
different statistical methods. Generally they differ considerably.
12
4.3 Precipitation Probability

The preceding discussions on flood probability apply generally to precipitation. Annual
maximum hourly or daily amounts ordinarily conform to Gumbel Type I, Log-Pearson or
Log-Normal distribution. In humid areas, where the mean is high, monthly, seasonal, or
annual totals will approximate a normal distribution. In drier areas a skew distribution
such as the Log-Pearson, Log-Normal may give a better fit.
4.4 Low Flow Analysis

Characterization of the magnitude, frequency, and duration of low stream flows and
droughts is vital for assessing the reliability of flows for all in-stream and withdrawal uses
and for defining resource shortages and drought.
4.4.1 Definitions and Basic Concepts

Low Stream flows
The objective of low-flow analysis is to estimate the frequency or probability with which
stream flow in a given reach will be less than various levels. Thus the flow-duration
curve; is an important tool of low-flow analysis; from it one can readily determine the
flow associated with any exceedence or non-exceedence probability. Most of the time,
the flow exceeded 95% of the time, q 95, is a useful index of water availability that is often
used for design purposes.
For purposes of statistical analysis, low flows are defined as annual minimum flows
averaged over consecutive-day periods of varying length. The most commonly used
averaging period is d = 7days, but analyses are often carried out for d = 1,3, 15, 30, 60,
90 and 180 days as well. Low-flow quantile values are cited as "dQp," where p is now
the annual non-exceedence probability (in percent) for the flow averaged over d-days.
The 7-day average flow that has an annual non-exceedence probability of 0.10 (a
recurrence interval of 10 yr),
called "7QI0," is commonly used as a low-flow design value. the “7Q10” value is
interpreted as follows:
In any year there is a 10% probability that the lowest 7-consecutive-day average
flow will be less than the 7QIO value.
Droughts
Droughts are extended severe dry periods. To qualify as a drought, a dry period must
have duration of at least a few months and be a significant departure from normal.
Drought must be expected as part of the natural climate, even in the absence of any
long term climate change. However, “permanent” droughts due to natural climate shifts
do occur, and appear to have been responsible for large scale migrations and declines
of civilizations through human history. The possibility of regional droughts associated
with climatic shifts due to warming
cannot be excluded. As shown in Figure 3.3, droughts begin with a deficit in precipitation
that is unusually extreme and prolonged relative to the usual climatic conditions
13
(meteorological drought). This is often, but not always, accompanied by unusually

high temperatures, high winds, low humidity, and high solar radiation that result in
increased evapotranspiration.
These conditions commonly produce extended periods of unusually low soil moisture,
which affect agriculture and natural plant growth and the moisture of forest floor
(Agricultural drought). As the precipitation deficit continues, stream discharge, lake,
wetland, and reservoir levels, and water-table decline to unusually low levels
(Hydrological drought). When precipitation returns to more normal values, drought
recovery follows the same sequence: meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological.
Meteorological drought is usually characterized as a precipitation deficit.
4.4.2 Low flow frequency analysis

As noted earlier, the objective of low flow frequency analysis is to estimate quantiles of
annual d-day-average minimum flows. As with floods, such estimates are usually
required for reaches without long-term stream flow records. These estimates are first
developed by analyzing low flows at gauging stations.
Low flow analysis at gauging stations:
For gauged reach, low flow analysis involves development of a time series of annual d-
day low flows, where d is the averaging period. As shown in the table below, the
analysis begins with a time series of average daily flows for each year. Then the
overlapping d-day averages are computed for the d values of interest. For each value of
d, this creates 365-(d-1) values of consecutive d-day averages for each year. The
smallest of these values is then selected to produce an annual time series of minimum
d-day flows. It is this time series that is then subjected to frequency analysis to estimate
the quantiles of the annual d-day flows.
Low flow analysis at un-gauged stations:

As with floods, estimates of low flow quantiles are usually required for stream reaches
where there are no long-term gauging station records. There are two basic approaches
to developing such estimates:
1. Relate dQp values to drainage-basins characteristics via regression analysis.
2. During the low flow season, make a number of spot measurements of
discharge at the un-gauged stream reach where the dQp estimate is needed. Then
relate those flows to concurrent flows at a nearby gauging station using
qu = a + bqg (3.22)
where:
qu is the flow at the un-gauged site, qg is the concurrent flow at the gauged site,
and a and b are estimated via regression anlysis. Then estimate the dQp at the un-
gauged site, dQpu, as:
dQpu = a + b.dQg (3.23)
where:
dQqg is the dQp value established by frequency analysis at the gauged site. In order to
minimize errors when using this procedure, each pair of flows used to establish equation
14
(3.22) should be from a separate hydrograph recession, the r 2 value for the relation of
equation (3.22) should be at least 0.70 and the two basins should be similar in size,
geology, topography, and climate.
4.4.3 Drought analysis

The objective of drought analysis is to characterize the magnitude, duration, and
severity of meteorological, agricultural, or hydrological drought in a region of interest.
The analysis process can be structured in terms of five questions:
1. What type of drought of interest?
2. What averaging period will be used?
3. How will “drought” be quantitatively defined?
4. What are the magnitude-frequency relations of drought characteristics?
5. How are regional aspects of drought addressed?
Drought type:
As noted, one may be interested in one or more of the basic types of drought, each
reflected in time series of particular types of data: meteorological (precipitation);
agricultural (soil moisture); or hydrological (stream flow, reservoir levels, or ground water
levels)
Figure 3.3: Sequence of drought impacts
Averaging Period:
As with time-series analysis generally, drought analysis requires selection of an
averaging period (dt). Since drought by definition have significant duration, one would
15
usually select dt = 1 month, 3 months, or 1 yr, with the choice depending on the
available data and the purposes of the analysis. For a given record length the selection
of dt involves a trade-off in uncertainty of the analysis:
Drought definition:
Figure 3.4 shows a time series of a selected quantity, X (e.g., precipitation, stream flow,
ground water level), averaged over an appropriate dt. The quantitative definition of
drought is determined by the truncation level, X 0, selected by the analyst: Values of X <
X0 are defined as droughts. Typical values for X 0 might be:
Dracup et al. (1980) suggested choosing because it standardizes the analysis

and gives more significance to extreme events, which are usually of most interest.
Once X0 is determined, each period for which X < X0 constitutes a “drought” and each
“drought” is characterized by the following measures:
Duration, D = length of period for which X < X0;
Severity, S = cumulative deviation from X0;
Intensity (or magnitude), I = S/D.
Note that if X is stream flow [L3T-1], then the dimensions of S are [L3T-1]x[T]=[L3] and
the dimensions of I are [L3T-1]
Magnitude- Frequency Relations:

Once the severities, durations, and intensities of “drought” have been determined for a
given time series, the magnitude-frequency characteristics of each of those quantities
can be analyzed.
16
Figure 3.4: Quantitative definition of droughts. X is a drought measure, X 0 is the

truncation level. D1, D2, D3 are durations of droughts 1, 2 and 3. The areas S 1, S2, S3 are
severities of droughts 1, 2 and 3.
4.5 Risk, Reliability and Safety factor

Risk and Reliability: The designer of a hydraulic structure always faces a nagging
doubt about the risk of failure of his structure. This is because the estimation of the
hydrologic design values (such as the design flood discharge and the river stage during
the design flood) involve a natural or inbuilt uncertainty and as such a hydrological risk
of failure. As an example, consider a weir with an expected life of 50 years and designed
for a flood magnitude of return period T=100 years. This weir may fail if a flood
magnitude greater than the design flood occurs within the life period (50 years) of the
weir.
The probability of occurrence of an event (x≥x T) at least once over a period of n

successive years is called the risk, R . Thus the risk is given by R = 1 -(probability of
non-occurrence of the event x≥xT in n years)
(3.24)
(3.25)
It can be seen that the return period for which a structure should be designed depends
upon the acceptable level of risk. In practice, the acceptable risk is governed by
economic and policy considerations.
17
Safety Factor: In addition to the hydrologic uncertainty, as mentioned above, a water

resource development project will have many other uncertainties. These may arise out
of structural, constructional, operational and environmental causes as well as from non-
technological considerations such as economic, sociological and political causes. As
such, any water resource development project will have a safety factor for a given
hydrological parameter M as defined below.
Safety factor (for the parameter M) = (SF) m=
(3.26)
The parameter M includes such items as flood discharge magnitude, maximum river
stage, reservoir capacity and free board. The difference (C am - Chm) is known as Safety
Margin.
18

Chapter 3-Frequency Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 3-Frequency Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 3-Frequency Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Engineering Hydrology Lecture Note

4.1 Flow Frequency

Where, m = is the order number of the discharge (or class value)

Table 4.1: Flow records

Figure 3.1: Flow Duration Curve

The shape of the flow-duration curve gives a good indication of a catchment’s

4.2 Flood Probability

4.2.2 Plotting Positions

Table 3.2 Plotting position

Table 3.3 Calculation of frequency T

4.2.3 Theoretical Distributions of Floods

Chow has shown that most frequency-distribution functions applicable in hydrologic

4.2.4 Extreme-Value Type I Distribution (Gumbel’s Method)

4.2.5 Gumbel's Equation for Practical Use

mean, a function of sample size N and is given in Table 3.4

using Gumbel's formula and plotted as x Vs T on a convenient paper such as a semi-log,

values of x > N can be determined easily.

4.2.6 Confidence Limits for the fitted data

4.2.7 Log-Pearson Type III Distribution

corresponding value of x is obtained by Eq.(3.18) as x = antilog(z ). Sometimes, the

Table 3.6 Kz=F(Cs,T) for use in Log-Pearson Type III Distribution

The flood-frequency analysis described above is a direct means of estimating the

4.3 Precipitation Probability

4.4 Low Flow Analysis

4.4.1 Definitions and Basic Concepts

(meteorological drought). This is often, but not always, accompanied by unusually

4.4.2 Low flow frequency analysis

Low flow analysis at un-gauged stations:

dQpu = a + b.dQg (3.23)

4.4.3 Drought analysis

Figure 3.3: Sequence of drought impacts

Dracup et al. (1980) suggested choosing because it standardizes the analysis

Magnitude- Frequency Relations:

Figure 3.4: Quantitative definition of droughts. X is a drought measure, X 0 is the

4.5 Risk, Reliability and Safety factor

The probability of occurrence of an event (x≥x T) at least once over a period of n

Safety Factor: In addition to the hydrologic uncertainty, as mentioned above, a water

Safety factor (for the parameter M) = (SF) m=

You might also like