Test Plan For SCCM Implementation
Test Plan For SCCM Implementation
Version 1.0
Author: UGSI
Test Plan for SCCM Implementation
Statement of Confidentially
Confidentiality of customer information is the paramount objective of Unisys. The information
contained in this document is proprietary and confidential in nature. This specifically includes
pricing information, methodology, materials, and consulting documents as may be described.
Trademarks
Unisys is a registered trademark of the Unisys Corporation.
I. Document information
II. Version
V. Sign off
TABLE OF CONTENTS
5. CHANGE CONTROL 10
2. Software Configuration
SQL 2005 SP2
SCCM R2 Version
SQL Std edition 2005 64bit
Windows Server 2008
Windows Server 2003
Virtual Server 2005
Planning Checklist
The Test feature team must determine specific aspects of the test process. These include the test
strategy, the required tests for their environment, creating a test plan, and preparing a test
schedule to keep things in line with the overall timeline of the project.
Author : UGSI Status: Yet to Approve
Version: 1.0
1. Unit testing: The first test type focuses on the analysis of a single deployment component.
As they prepare to build the overall deployment project, team members from each feature
team begin analyzing the components for which they are responsible. At this point, team
members often install these components in isolated environments to validate the
components’ capabilities. This test type is often performed by individuals on a single
computer.
Note: Unit testing will carried out per application basis like SCCM, Application Server in our
lab environment
2. Functional testing: After the individual teams become more familiar with the technological
components for which they are responsible, they move on to functional testing—validation
that products and components work as designed. Guidance for this test type is derived from
the functional specifications of the overall project.
Note: This will be carried out for Multipurpose Server Testing during our testing process
3. Pilot and production testing: The final stage of testing often involves the same components
used in production. When the teams implement the deployment project in an actual
production environment, they begin with a pilot deployment—targeting a small, representative
population of users in the production environment to perform a final validation of all of the
implementation strategies and procedures before deploying the system to the entire
production environment. This test type focuses more on training, communications, and
support strategies than on actual technological strategies, although these are also validated.
Pilot testing is linked to production testing, because if all goes well, the technologies and
components introduced for the pilot program become the components used in full production.
Note: This will be carried during first phase of implementation in the production environment
This test plan involve of implementation team which is segregated into sub teams:
requests Processed
SMS Discovery Data Total Bad DDRs Bad Configuration Manager discovery data record
Manager Processed processing rates.
Files Processed
SMS State System Total Invalid State system processing.
Message Records
Processed
SMS Status System Processed/sec : Status message processing.
Total
SMS Status System Corrupt : Total Status message processing.
SMS Status System Written to SMS Status message processing.
Database : Total
5. Change Control
Change control ensures that the core team is aware of and agrees to any changes to lab hardware or
software. The Test feature team follows the change control process established by the lead team and
that is used . The test lead must post the status of hardware and software in the lab, in addition to the
testing schedules, so that the various feature teams are aware of all lab activity. The test lead must
also have procedures in place to restore the lab to its original state at the completion of the project.
Lab requirements, based on the development plan, might exceed the Test feature team’s budget and
time allocations. The test lab build might not have been completed by the start of the Stabilizing
Phase because of an inability to procure and install all of the lab equipment. The test lab does not
properly reflect the production environment. For example, it might not include proper firewall
configurations or even all of the Group Policy objects (GPOs) found in production. The goal is to
make the test lab as similar to production as possible.
Note: In our environment we can’t identify any risk till we do test implement and if any sort of risk
or dependencies required that will be updated to the management team after doing proper
analysis