Assumption of Risk Doctrine of

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Assumption of Risk Doctrine of

The doctrine of assumption of risk means that one who voluntarily


exposes himself to an obvious, known and appreciated danger
assumes the risk of injury that may result therefrom.

It rests on the fact that the person injured has consented to relieve the
defendant of an obligation of conduct toward him and to take his chance of
injury from a known risk, and whether the former has exercised
proper caution or not is immaterial.

In other words, it is based on voluntary consent, express or implied, to


accept danger of a known and appreciated risk; it may sometimes include
acceptance of risk arising from the defendant's negligence, but one does
not ordinarily assume risk of any negligence which he does not know and
appreciate.

As a defense in negligence cases, therefore, the doctrine requires the


concurrence of three elements, namely:

(1) the plaintiff must know that the risk is present;

(2) he must further understand its nature; and

(3) his choice to incur it must be free and voluntary.

According to Prosser: "Knowledge of the risk is the watchword of


assumption of risk."

"The general principle underlying the defense of assumption of risk is that


a plaintiff who voluntarily assumes a risk of harm arising from the
negligent or reckless conduct of the defendant cannot recover for such
harm. The defense may arise where a plaintiff, by contract or otherwise,
expressly agrees to accept a risk or harm arising from the defendant's
conduct, or where a plaintiff who fully understands a risk or harm caused
by the defendant's conduct, or by a condition created by the defendant,
voluntarily chooses to enter or remain, or to permit his property to enter
or remain, within the area of such risk, under circumstances manifesting
his willingness to accept the risk.

xxxx

"Assumption of the risk in its primary sense arises by assuming through


contract, which may be implied, the risk of a known danger. Its essence is
venturousness. It implies intentional exposure to a known danger; It
embraces a mental state of willingness; It pertains to the preliminary
conduct of getting into a dangerous employment or relationship, it means
voluntary incurring the risk of an accident, which may or may not occur,
and which the person assuming the risk may be careful to avoid; and it
defeats recovery because it is a previous abandonment of the right to
complain if an accident occurs.

"Of course, if the defense is predicated upon an express agreement the


agreement must be valid, and in the light of this qualification the rule has
been stated that a plaintiff who, by contract or otherwise, expressly
agreed to accept a risk of harm arising from the defendant's negligent or
reckless conduct, cannot recover for such harm unless the agreement is
invalid as contrary to public policy.

xxxx

"The defense of assumption of risk presupposes: (1) that the plaintiff had
actual knowledge of the danger; (2) that he understood and appreciated
the risk from the danger; and (3) that he voluntarily exposed himself to
such risk.

xxx

"The term 'risk' as used in this connection applies to known dangers, and
not to things from which danger may possibly flow. The risk referred to is
the particular risk, or one of the risks, which the plaintiff accepted within
the context of the situation in which he placed himself and the question is
whether the specific conduct or condition which caused the injury was
such a risk."

You might also like