Epsilon-Delta Limit Definition, Continuity
Epsilon-Delta Limit Definition, Continuity
Suppose we have a function f (x). If we let f (x) become arbitrarily close to a single number L as
x approaches a constant c from either side, then the limit of f (x) as x approaches c is L, which we
write as,
lim f (x) = L
x→c
But then again, we haven’t precisely defined the phrases “f (x) becomes arbitrarily close to L” and
“x approaches c”. This is where the ε-δ definition of the limit comes into play.
Let ε be a small positive real number. The part which says “f (x) becomes arbitrarily close to L”
indicates that f (x) lies in the interval (L − ε, L + ε). In absolute value notation we express this as,
|f (x) − L| < ε
Likewise, “x approaches c” indicates that there is a positive real number δ such that x lies in either
the interval (c − δ, c) or (c, c + δ). This can be expressed in absolute value notation as,
0 < |x − c| < δ
Thus, we are now ready to define the limit formally. Let f be a function defined on an open interval
containing c (except possibly at c) and let L ∈ R. The statement
lim f (x) = L
x→c
is equivalent to saying that for every ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that
Next, we define the notion of continuity. For continuity at a point, a particular function f is said
to be continuous at c if the following three conditions are satisfied:
For continuity on an open interval, a function f is said to be continuous on an open interval (a, b)
if it is continuous at each point in that interval. A function that is continuous on the entire real
line (−∞, +∞) is said to be continuous everywhere.’
For continuity on a closed interval, a function f is said to be continuous on the closed interval [a, b]
if it is continuous on the open interval (a, b) and,
Solution:
First, we need to find a suitable value for our delta so we work backwards. We want to show
that |(2x − 1) − 3| < ε whenever 0 < |x − 2| < δ. So we have,
|(2x − 1) − 3| < ε
|2x − 4| < ε
2|x − 2| < ε
This implies that a suitable value for δ is 2ε . We then proceed with the formal proof as follows:
ε
Let ε > 0 and take δ = 2
> 0 so that whenever we have 0 < |x − 2| < δ,
|(2x − 1) − 3| = |2x − 4|
= 2|x − 2|
ε
<2 =ε
2
Therefore, by definition, we have shown that lim (2x − 1) = 3.
x→2
Solution:
|x + 2|
lim − f (x) = lim −
x→−2 x→−2 x2 + x − 2
−(x + 2)
= lim −
x→−2 (x + 2)(x − 1)
1
= lim − −
x→−2 (x − 1)
1
=−
−2 − 1
1
=
3
|x + 2|
lim + f (x) = lim +
x→−2 x→−2 x2
+x−2
x+2
= lim +
x→−2 (x + 2)(x − 1)
1
= lim +
x→−2 (x − 1)
1
=
−2 − 1
1
=−
3
Since lim − f (x) 6= lim + f (x), the function has a jump essential discontinuity at x = 0.
x→−2 x→−2