100% found this document useful (2 votes)
462 views3 pages

Guro 21 Course 2 Assignment

This document contains the author's self-assessment of their skills in various areas of thinking and a plan for improvement. In a table, the author rates their critical, creative, self-regulated, convergent analytical, and divergent thinking skills on a scale and lists actions to enhance each. Overall, the author feels they can improve self-regulated thinking the most. The author reflects on how completing the first module has helped them become a more holistic facilitator by improving various thinking techniques. They recognize the need for continuous learning and improvement. The module also helped the author better cater to different learner types and apply various teaching approaches.

Uploaded by

Pauljam Onamor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
462 views3 pages

Guro 21 Course 2 Assignment

This document contains the author's self-assessment of their skills in various areas of thinking and a plan for improvement. In a table, the author rates their critical, creative, self-regulated, convergent analytical, and divergent thinking skills on a scale and lists actions to enhance each. Overall, the author feels they can improve self-regulated thinking the most. The author reflects on how completing the first module has helped them become a more holistic facilitator by improving various thinking techniques. They recognize the need for continuous learning and improvement. The module also helped the author better cater to different learner types and apply various teaching approaches.

Uploaded by

Pauljam Onamor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Guro 21 Course 2 Assignment 1

Thinking Area How Do I rate my skills in this What can I do to improve or


area? (Storng, Adequate, enhance my skill in this area?
needs Improvement)

1. Critical Thinking Strong 1. Being aware of my mental


processes.
2. Reverse Things or Ideas to
get the best solutions
3. Evaluate the existing
Evidences.
4. Learning through related
experiences.

2. Creative Thinking Adequate 1. Improve mind mapping


and apply it in my class.
2. Keep on learning. Making
it a life long learning.
3.Exploring different
creativity theories like
Mental Illness theory,
Humanistic theory.

3. Self – Regulated Thinking Needs improvement 1. Being aware of what I


formulate in my mind, in that
way, I could also regulate my
actions.
2. Accept feedback whether
positive or negative and learn
on how to improve feedback.
4. Convergent Analytical Adequate As what I read,
Thinking
1. you improve your memory
skills as it is factual.
2. developing your logical
skills.

5. Divergent Thinking Adequate Based on what I had read, I


find to:
1. Thinking of beyond the
box.
2. Brainstorming of the facts
presented.
3. Keeping a journal.
4. Mind or subject mapping.

Upon filling up this form, I found myself where I could improve myself based on the
different thinking skills, I had jotted down to improve myself being a facilitator of learning. I
made a lot of reading over the web of the different thinking areas and chose the best suited on
me. As a 21st century facilitator after having done with Module 1, I had made notes of where I
could improve myself as a n effective facilitator of learning. It made me a holistic facilitator.
From LOTS of blooms taxonomy to HOTS. A lot of learning was imparted to me from the shared
ideas of my colleagues and to you as my FLT Doc Emma Lingas. As the proverb’s states that
“there should be always a room for improvement” and I am open for negative or positive
comments. Being as a Tech Voc trainer, it is usually called as a Kiss and Kick strategy, meaning
you always starts with the positive comments and ends with a negative comment. In Hots of
the revised Bloom's Taxonomy identified as analyzing, evaluating and creating, it always
involves scrutinizing, evaluating then experimenting to prove that the objectives of the given
theory is whether application to a given situation or not.
Being also as a Facilitator, different approaches were also applied as we cater multi-
intelligences To our learners. As Senior High School teachers, we also cater students of different
walks of life, from farm workers to well off students, from slow learner to fas learner students,
from psychomotor type of student to academic type of learner. Different approaches were also
applied. Therefore, as facilitators of learning, we should be flexible to our recipients and
profiling is needed so that we can implement what we want to be.

Through this module, I was able to improve myself on how I am going to cater my
learners. Form the traditional LOTS to most improve HOTS of Bloom's taxonomy. In that way, I
could prepare my learners to a bigger battle whether they would pursue Higher Education or to
work. They are now ready to face the challenges in the chosen field. They already knew how to
analyze, evaluate and create or innovate things that would improve their status in life. As for
me, if I can see my students improve their lives, I would be happy enough as I am an effective
facilitator of learning as they had learned a lot from me.

You might also like