ICS 143 - Principles of

Operating Systems

Lectures Set 5- Deadlocks

Prof. Nalini Venkatasubramanian
[email protected]
Outline

■ System Model
■ Deadlock Characterization
■ Methods for handling deadlocks
■ Deadlock Prevention
■ Deadlock Avoidance
■ Deadlock Detection
■ Recovery from Deadlock
■ Combined Approach to Deadlock Handling
The Deadlock Problem

■ A set of blocked processes each holding a

resource and waiting to acquire a resource
held by another process in the set.
❑ Example 1
❑ System has 2 tape drives. P1 and P2 each hold one tape
drive and each needs the other one.
❑ Example 2
❑ Semaphores A and B each initialized to 1
P0 P1
wait(A) wait(B)
wait(B) wait(A)
Definitions

■ A process is deadlocked if it is waiting for an

event that will never occur.
Typically, more than one process will be involved in a
deadlock (the deadly embrace).
■ A process is indefinitely postponed if it is
delayed repeatedly over a long period of time
while the attention of the system is given to
other processes,
■ i.e. the process is ready to proceed but never gets the
CPU.
Example - Bridge Crossing

❑ Assume traffic in one direction.

■ Each section of the bridge is viewed as a resource.
❑ If a deadlock occurs, it can be resolved only if one
car backs up (preempt resources and rollback).
■ Several cars may have to be backed up if a deadlock
occurs.
■ Starvation is possible
Resources

■ Resource
■ commodity required by a process to execute
■ Resources can be of several types
■ Serially Reusable Resources
❑ CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices, files
❑ acquire -> use -> release
■ Consumable Resources
❑ Produced by a process, needed by a process - e.g.
Messages, buffers of information, interrupts
❑ create ->acquire ->use
❑ Resource ceases to exist after it has been used
System Model

■ Resource types
❑ R1, R2,….Rm
■ Each resource type Ri has Wi instances
■ Assume serially reusable resources
■ request -> use -> release
Conditions for Deadlock
❑ The following 4 conditions are necessary and sufficient for
deadlock (must hold simultaneously)
■ Mutual Exclusion:
❑ Only one process at a time can use the resource.
■ Hold and Wait:
❑ Processes hold resources already allocated to them while
waiting for other resources.
■ No preemption:
❑ Resources are released by processes holding them only after
that process has completed its task.
■ Circular wait:
❑ A circular chain of processes exists in which each process waits
for one or more resources held by the next process in the
chain.
Resource Allocation Graph

■ A set of vertices V and a set of edges E

■ V is partitioned into 2 types
■ P = {P1, P2,…,Pn} - the set of processes in the system
■ R = {R1, R2,…,Rn} - the set of resource types in the
system
■ Two kinds of edges
■ Request edge - Directed edge Pi ---> Rj
■ Assignment edge - Directed edge Rj ----> Pi
Resource Allocation Graph

■ Process

■ Resource type with 4 instances

■ Pi requests instance of Rj

■ Pi is holding an instance of Rj
Graph with no cycles

R1 R2

P1 P2 P3

R3 R4
Graph with cycles

R1 P2

P1 P3

R2 P4
Graph with cycles and deadlock
R1 R2

P1 P2 P3

R3 R4
Basic facts

■ If graph contains no cycles

❑ NO DEADLOCK
■ If graph contains a cycle
❑ if only one instance per resource type, then
deadlock
❑ if several instances per resource type, possibility
of deadlock.
Methods for handling deadlocks

■ Ensure that the system will never enter a

deadlock state.
■ Allow the system to potentially enter a
deadlock state, detect it and then recover
■ Ignore the problem and pretend that
deadlocks never occur in the system;
❑ Used by many operating systems, e.g. UNIX
Deadlock Management

❑ Prevention
❑ Design the system in such a way that deadlocks can never
occur
❑ Avoidance
❑ Impose less stringent conditions than for prevention, allowing
the possibility of deadlock but sidestepping it as it occurs.
❑ Detection
❑ Allow possibility of deadlock, determine if deadlock has
occurred and which processes and resources are involved.
❑ Recovery
❑ After detection, clear the problem, allow processes to complete
and resources to be reused. May involve destroying and
restarting processes.
Deadlock Prevention
❑ If any one of the conditions for deadlock (with
reusable resources) is denied, deadlock is
impossible.
❑ Restrain ways in which requests can be made
■ Mutual Exclusion
❑ non-issue for sharable resources
❑ cannot deny this for non-sharable resources (important)
■ Hold and Wait - guarantee that when a process requests
a resource, it does not hold other resources.
❑ Force each process to acquire all the required resources at
once. Process cannot proceed until all resources have
been acquired.
❑ Low resource utilization, starvation possible
Deadlock Prevention (cont.)

■ No Preemption
❑ If a process that is holding some resources requests
another resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it,
the process releases the resources currently being held.
❑ Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for
which the process is waiting.
❑ Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old
resources as well as the new ones that it is requesting.
■ Circular Wait
❑ Impose a total ordering of all resource types.
❑ Require that processes request resources in increasing
order of enumeration; if a resource of type N is held,
process can only request resources of types > N.
Deadlock Avoidance

■ Set of resources, set of customers, banker

■ Rules
❑ Each customer tells banker maximum number of resources
it needs.
❑ Customer borrows resources from banker.
❑ Customer returns resources to banker.
❑ Customer eventually pays back loan.
■ Banker only lends resources if the system
will be in a safe state after the loan.
Deadlock Avoidance

■ Requires that the system has some additional

apriori information available.
❑ Simplest and most useful model requires that each process
declare the maximum number of resources of each type
that it may need.
❑ The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines
the resource-allocation state to ensure that there can never
be a circular-wait condition.
❑ Resource allocation state is defined by the number of
available and allocated resources, and the maximum
demands of the processes.
Safe state
■ When a process requests an available resource, system must
decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe
state.
■ System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all
processes.
■ Sequence <P1, P2, …Pn> is safe, if for each Pi, the resources
that Pi can still request can be satisfied by currently available
resources + resources held by Pj with j<i.
❑ If Pi resource needs are not available, Pi can wait until all Pj have
finished.
❑ When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources, execute,
return allocated resources, and terminate.
❑ When Pi terminates, Pi+1 can obtain its needed resources...
Basic Facts

■ If a system is in a safe state ⇒ no

deadlocks.
■ If a system is in unsafe state ⇒ possibility of
deadlock.
■ Avoidance ⇒ ensure that a system will never
reach an unsafe state.
Resource Allocation Graph Algorithm

■ Used for deadlock avoidance when there is

only one instance of each resource type.
❑ Claim edge: Pi → Rj indicates that process Pi may request
resource Rj; represented by a dashed line.
❑ Claim edge converts to request edge when a process
requests a resource.
❑ When a resource is released by a process, assignment
edge reconverts to claim edge.
❑ Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
■ If request assignment does not result in the formation of
a cycle in the resource allocation graph - safe state, else
unsafe state.
Claim Graph

Process claims resource

Process requests resource

Process is assigned resource

Process releases resource

Claim Graph
1 2

Possible Deadlock!! 3
6

5 4
Banker’s Algorithm
■ Used for deadlock avoidance with multiple
instances of each resource type.
■ Each process must a priori claim maximum
use of each resource type.
■ When a process requests a resource it may
have to wait.
■ When a process gets all its resources it must
return them in a finite amount of time.
Data Structures for the Banker’s
Algorithm
■ Let n = number of processes and m =
number of resource types.
❑ Available: Vector of length m. If Available[j] = k, there are k
instances of resource type Rj available.
❑ Max: n × m matrix. If Max[i,j] = k, then process Pi may
request at most k instances of resource type Rj.
❑ Allocation: n × m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k, then process
Pi is currently allocated k instances of resource type Rj.
❑ Need: n × m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then process Pi may
need k more instances of resource type Rj to complete its
task.

Need[i,j] = Max[i,j] - Allocation[i,j]

Example: Banker’s Algorithm

■ 5 processes
❑ P0 - P4;
■ 3 resource types
❑ A(10 instances), B (5 instances), C (7 instances)
■ Snapshot at time T0
Example (cont.)

■ The content of the matrix Need is defined to

be Max - Allocation.
■ The system is in a safe state since the
sequence <P1,P3,P4,P2,P0> satisfies safety
criteria.
Safety Algorithm
■ Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n,
respectively. Initialize
❑ Work := Available
❑ Finish[i] := false for i = 1,2,…,n.
■ Find an i (i.e. process Pi) such that both:
❑ Finish[i] = false
❑ Need_i <= Work
❑ If no such i exists, go to step 4.
■ Work := Work + Allocation_i
❑ Finish[i] := true
❑ go to step 2
■ If Finish[i] = true for all i, then the system is in a safe
state.
 Safety Algorithm
Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n,
respectively. Initialize Work (initialized to Available)
● Work := Available
● Finish[i] := false for i = 1,2,…,n. 3 3 2
■ Find an i (i.e. process Pi) such that both:
❑ Finish[i] = false Finish vector (initialized to False for all processes)
❑ Need_i <= Work
❑ If no such i exists, go to step 4.
F
■ Work := Work + Allocation_i
❑ Finish[i] := true
❑ go to step 2 F
■ If Finish[i] = true for all i, then the system
is in a safe state. F

A Safe sequence <P1,P3,P4,P2,P0>

Resource-Request Algorithm for
Process Pi
■ Request_i = request vector for process Pi. If
Request_i[j] = k, then process Pi wants k instances of
resource type Rj.
❑ STEP 1: If Request(i) ≤ Need(i), go to step 2. Otherwise, raise
error condition, since process has exceeded its maximum
claim.
❑ STEP 2: If Request(i) ≤ Available, go to step 3. Otherwise, Pi
must wait since resources are not available.
❑ STEP 3: Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi by
modifying the state as follows:
Available := Available - Request (i);
Allocation (i) := Allocation (i) + Request (i);
Need (i) := Need (i) - Request (i);
❑ If safe ⇒ resources are allocated to Pi.
❑ If unsafe ⇒ Pi must wait and the old resource-allocation state
is restored.
Example of Banker’s Algorithm

■ 5 processes
❑ P0 - P4;
■ 3 resource types
❑ A(10 instances), B (5 instances), C (7 instances)
■ Snapshot at time T0
Example (cont.)

■ The content of the matrix Need is defined to

be Max - Allocation.
■ The system is in a safe state since the
sequence <P1,P3,P4,P2,P0> satisfies safety
criteria.
Example: P1 requests (1,0,2)

■ Check to see that Request ≤ Available

❑ ((1,0,2) ≤ (3,3,2)) ⇒ true.
Example (cont.)

■ Executing the safety algorithm shows that

sequence <P1, P3, P4, P0, P2> satisfies
safety requirement.
■ Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted?
■ Can request for (0,2,0) by P0 be granted?
Deadlock Detection

■ Allow system to enter deadlock state

■ Detection Algorithm
■ Recovery Scheme
Single Instance of each resource type

■ Maintain wait-for graph

■ Nodes are processes
■ Pi → Pj if Pi is waiting for Pj.
■ Periodically invoke an algorithm that
searches for a cycle in the graph.
■ An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph
requires an order of n^2 operations, where n
is the number of vertices in the graph.
Recovery from Deadlock: Process
Termination
❑ Abort all deadlocked processes.
❑ Abort one process at a time until the deadlock
cycle is eliminated.
❑ In which order should we choose to abort?
❑ Priority of the process
❑ How long the process has computed, and how much longer
to completion.
❑ Resources the process has used.
❑ Resources process needs to complete.
❑ How many processes will need to be terminated.
❑ Is process interactive or batch?
Recovery from Deadlock: Resource
Preemption
■ Selecting a victim - minimize cost.
■ Rollback
■ return to some safe state, restart process from that state.
■ Starvation
■ same process may always be picked as victim; include
number of rollback in cost factor.
Combined approach to deadlock
handling
■ Combine the three basic approaches
■ Prevention
■ Avoidance

■ Detection

allowing the use of the optimal approach for each class of

resources in the system.
■ Partition resources into hierarchically ordered
classes.
❑ Use most appropriate technique for handling
deadlocks within each class.
EXTRA SLIDES For Deadlock
Detection (only for your information)
Deadlock Detection -
Several instances of a resource type
■ Data structures similar to Banker’s algorithm.
■ Data Structures
❑ Available: Vector of length m. If Available[j] = k, there are k
instances of resource type Rj available.
❑ Allocation: n × m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k, then process
Pi is currently allocated k instances of resource type Rj.
❑ Request : An n × m matrix indicates the current request of
each process. If Request [i,j] = k, then process Pi is
requesting k more instances of resource type Rj .
Deadlock Detection Algorithm

■ Step 1: Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and

n, respectively. Initialize
❑ Work := Available
❑ For i = 1,2,…,n, if Allocation(i) ≠ 0, then Finish[i] := false,
otherwise Finish[i] := true.
■ Step 2: Find an index i such that both:
❑ Finish[i] = false
❑ Request (i) ≤ Work
❑ If no such i exists, go to step 4.
Deadlock Detection Algorithm

■ Step 3: Work := Work + Allocation(i)

❑ Finish[i] := true
❑ go to step 2
■ Step 4: If Finish[i] = false for some i, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then the
system is in a deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] =
false, then Pi is deadlocked.

Algorithm requires an order of m × (n^2) operations

to detect whether the system is in a deadlocked
state.
Example of Detection Algorithm

■ 5 processes - P0 - P4; 3 resource types - A(7

instances), B(2 instances), C(6 instances)
■ Snapshot at time T 0: <P0,P2,P3,P1,P4> will result in
Finish[i] = true for all i.
Example (cont.)
■ P2 requests an additional instance of type C.
■ State of system
❑ Can reclaim resources held by process P0, but insufficient
resources to fulfill other processes’ requests.
❑ Deadlock exists, consisting of P 1,P 2,P 3 and P 4.
Detection-Algorithm Use

❑ When, and how often to invoke depends on:

■ How often a deadlock is likely to occur?
■ How many processes will need to be rolled back?
❑ One for each disjoint cycle
❑ How often --
■ Every time a request for allocation cannot be granted
immediately
❑ Allows us to detect set of deadlocked processes and process
that “caused” deadlock. Extra overhead.
❑ Every hour or whenever CPU utilization drops.
■ With arbitrary invocation there may be many cycles in the
resource graph and we would not be able to tell which of the
many deadlocked processes “caused” the deadlock.