IELTS SAMPLE TASK2 ESSAYS From The Official Cambridge Guide
IELTS SAMPLE TASK2 ESSAYS From The Official Cambridge Guide
IELTS SAMPLE TASK2 ESSAYS From The Official Cambridge Guide
For most people, when they get their first job they have little idea whether or
not they will remain in the same organisation throughout their working life. If
they decide to change, they need to consider how this will impact on their
career overall.
People who stay with the same organisation have the advantage of
thoroughly understanding how it works and also becoming familiar with the
staff and processes. If they work hard, their promotion prospects are good
and there is likely to be greater job security, with the promise of a good
pension when they retire. Employers value loyalty and may offer additional
incentives to long-term employees, including bonuses and reward schemes.
However, one of the drawbacks of staying with the same organisation is that
the person may get stuck doing the same job year after year. In some cases,
this can lead to boredom and disillusionment. Moving from one organisation to
another can be a strategic decision in order to have variety and acquire a
range of skills and experience. A friend of my father started out as a sociology
teacher, he then joined the Social Services and is currently managing a care
home in Western Australia, This has made him incredibly knowledgeable in a
range of related fields and, in my view, has provided him with a much more
interesting working life.
Although there are benefits to working for one organisation, I feel that it is also
valuable for an employee to be able to offer a wide range of experience
having worked for different companies. As long as it is planned carefully, I feel
that change is good and will ultimately benefit the employee and the employer.
(281 words)
Over the past 50 years, people have become used to the idea that they will
probably live longer than their grandparents did. However, a longer life is only
desirable if you can look after yourself and be independent, otherwise there
can be disadvantages for everyone.
If you walk into a hospital in my country, you are likely to see a lot more
elderly people than you did in the past. In fact, this is causing significant
problems as there is a shortage of beds. Medical treatment is keeping the
elderly alive, but at what cost to others?
On top of this, one of the biggest medical problems these days is dementia.
Even if old people are still fit, they may not be able to look after themselves.
They may have to live with their children or be cared for in a home, which can
be expensive. Elderly people do not like to be a burden, but their children can
feel obliged to care for them.
Obviously, not all old people become ill. Those who remain healthy can enjoy
a happy old age as long as they have saved enough money. People are much
more active in their sixties and seventies than they used to be and this can
only be a good thing. They have time to enjoy their retirement and do a range
of activities that they could not do when they were at work. They can also help
look after their grandchildren, which is a great benefit for working parents.
To sum up, I believe that we should aim to keep people as healthy as possible
so that they can enjoy their old age without having to rely on others. A longer
life expectancy is obviously advantageous, but no one wants to live to be 100
if they only cause problems for their family and society.
(308 words)
Most people would agree that car ownership has increased in recent years
and is causing a range of problems, particularly in built-up areas. I think there
are a number of ways that governments can aim to deal with this.
Many big cities in the world have traffic problems but these problems vary. For
example, it is reasonably easy to drive around my city after 10 am and before
5 pm. However, outside these hours, you have to allow double the usual time
to reach your destination. In some other cities, traffic is congested at all times,
and there is the continual sound of car horns as people try to get wherever
they want to go.
Clearly we all have a responsibility to look after our cities, Governments can
do a lot to improve the situation and part of what they do should involve
encouraging individuals to consider alternatives to driving.
(299 words)
The growth of the fast food industry has, without doubt, impacted on the
eating habits and the health of many societies around the world. Diabetes,
high cholesterol, heart and respiratory problems are all on the rise due to fatty
and sugar rich food. However, the question is whether higher tax would
improve this situation or not.
From an economic point of view, higher tax might seem sensible. In countries
such as the USA, Australia and Britain the healthcare system spends a large
part of its budget on people with diet-related health problems. It could be
argued that these people have caused their own illnesses because of their
choice of food. In this case, why should they expect the state to pay for their
treatment? The tax could help fund the healthcare system.
In conclusion, imposing a higher tax on fast food does not seem to be the
answer. If the government chose to do this, it would only lead to greater
poverty and families facing further hardship.
(278 words)
In recent years, advances in technology have allowed governments, the
police and privately owned companies to keep the public under constant
surveillance. In many major cities and towns, security cameras are recording
the movements of ordinary citizens. Whenever a cellphone is used, the call is
logged, so the service provider knows exactly when and where the user made
the call. Invisible satellites orbit the Earth, watching us whether we like it or
not. Is this, however, a development we should welcome?
Certainly there are benefits. In areas where there is a high crime rate, the use
of security cameras may act as a deterrent to criminals: if they can see a
camera, they may think twice about breaking into a building or stealing a car.
If a crime is carried out, then a camera may provide useful evidence. The
same is true for a cellphone; the police sometimes rely on call logs to help
them trace the whereabouts of suspects or victims.
It seems inevitable that there will be more and more ways to monitor society
in the future. However, it is our responsibility to evaluate new technology and
decide whether it will do more harm than good. Surely our freedom is more
valuable than technological progress?
(307 words)
The pursuit of knowledge is a concept that is valued by most cultures. In the
21st century, we now have many more options regarding how and where to
find that knowledge. If you are a French national, you can apply to do an
economics degree in the USA, and likewise an American citizen can take a
course in linguistics in France. Indeed, most universities across the world now
have a good proportion of foreign students enrolled in their programmes.