It Is Earth and Not Mercury Presession of 43 Arc Dec Per Century

joenahhas1958@yahoo.
com
You have to ask yourself the question Alfred: Do I feel lucky? Do ya Alfred?
Modern physics is based on time travel and time travel is not physics
nor can NASA's astronomers read a telescope. A Gypsy with a gold cap tooth
can tell more about time travel than all of Alfred Nobel Apes and NASA
scientists are not only Apes to say the least but dumb Apes to be exact doing
crimes for the few bankers interested in controlling the world through science.
Controlling the world and science can be Nobel but there is nothing Nobel about
Alfred Nobel or NASA because time travel is a crippled and crippling make -
believe silly ideas sold to humanity by evil bankers who control the press as
science. The New York Times or Washington post or wall street journal
minimum brains and not minimum wages reporters should be able to tell
science from fiction and who are continuously talking about great science
somewhere out there with Nobel Prizes for time travel Apes physics and dumb
Einstein!.......for 11 past decades
Here is I Joe Nahhas not only the greatest physicists of all time but the only
physicists alive because I am the one and only one who figured out before the
age of puberty that Modern physics is a crime and not a science. I am the only
one who can tell the difference between Alfred Nobel Apes physics and Apes
astronomy from physics and astronomy. I am the one and only one who can
prove NASA scientists are Apes to say the least and dumb Apes to be exact and it
is the subject of this article. At age 11, year 1969, in 5th grade, I wondered how
I can figure out the size of a car from two different distances because the same
car looks as different size from two different distances.
Page 1
In 1969 it was the year a man landed on the moon and a child dream to be
nuked into deep space in a space ship was interesting for me to try to find out
how to find from the different sizes of the same object how far they are or from
the different distances of objects to know the exact size of the object. Space
travelling in the dark is spooky and it is good to know what I am up to in deep
space and I played distance game in real time.
I played this real time distance game with 3 numbers 10, 100, and 1000. If
an object has a size 10 at 100 meters, then what is the size of the object at
distance 1000 meters?
100 = 100; add and subtract 1000, then:
100 = 1000 - (1000 - 100); divide by 1000
100/1000 = 1000/1000 - (1000 - 100)/1000
100/1000 = 1- (1000 - 100)/1000; multiply by 10
(100/1000) x 10 = 10 - [(1000 - 100)/1000] x 10
(1/10) x 10 = 10 - (9/10) x 10
What I see at distance 1000 = what I see at distance 100 + visual difference
1 = 10 - 9
The answer was very simple (100/1000) x 10 = 1
The visual difference is 10 - 1 = 9
(100/1000) x 10 = 10 - [(1000 - 100)/1000] x 10
I played the same real time distance game with 3 letters instead of three
numbers A, B, and C
A= A
A= B + (A - B)
A/B = B/B + (A - B)/B
A/B = 1 + (A - B)/B
(A/B) C = C + [(A - B)/B] C

This formula gives Einstein's numbers and said Einstein is an idiot and NASA is
not needed and not wanted and Alfred Nobel modern physicists can be sent to
work at Macdonald's without loss of subject.
Angular velocity θ’0 = 2 π /T0; T0 = orbital period
For Planet Mercury T0 = 88 days x 24 x 3600
Angular velocity accumulation in arc second per century
Is: δ θ’0 = (2 π /T0) [(180/π) (3600) (26526daysx24 hrs x 3600sec/T0)]
And δ θ’0 (Mercury) = 70.75 arc second per century
NASA Ass - Tronomers use the Sun as reference point and measure from
Earth. The meaning of all of this that everything NASA said about space
is all wrong!
Page 2
Everything NASA said about space is all wrong because measuring a planet
motion from two different distances is not the same and it is like seeing a car
from two different distances is not the same. This equation
(A/B) C = C + [(A - B)/B] C

And (A/B) C - C = [(A - B)/B] C
Said: NASA is committing crimes and the crime is a visual effect in the value
of: [(A - B)/B] C that have/had crippled science used by time travelers
to use it as the magic sock to claim all these stupid things about space
If C = δ θ’0 = 70.75; A = Mercury - Sun distance = 58.2 x 109 km/sec

And B = Earth - Sun distance then = 149.6 x 109 km/sec, then
[(A - B)/B] C = ([(58.2 x 109) - (149.6 x 109)]/ (149.6 x 109)] x 70.75
= 43 arc sec per century
Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier the French Ass - Tronomer made

the same mistake
Levier said
The angular velocity of Mercury around the Sun is: θ m' = v m /r m

And δ θ’0 = (v m /r m) (180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm); Tm = 88 days
And δ θ’0 = 70.75; v m = Mercury orbital velocity around the Sun

And v m = 48.1 km/sec; r m = Mercury - Sun distance
If Planet Mercury angular speed is measured for planet Mercury from

the sun then, then it is θ m' = v m /r m
But Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier lethal mistake is
If planet Mercury around the sun measured from earth:
Then θ m' (Earth) = (v m + v e)/r m
And v e Earth orbital velocity around the Sun
Page 3
Earth
Sun
Mercury
And θ m' (Earth) = v m /r m +v e /r m
And not v m /r m
Le Verrier mistake is: v e /r m
The angular speed delay is: v* e /r m
Or, [(v e/v m) (v m /r m)]
Taking into account Earth rotation vº e
Liverier mistake: Then the angular speed delay:
Is: v e /r m = [v* e /r m +/- vº e /r m]
In arc second per century multiplying by [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)]
Then δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /r m] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)]
Page 4
And δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m)] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
With earth orbital speed of v* e = 29.8 km/sec
And spin of Earth vº e = 0.465 km/sec

And v m = 48.14 km/sec
Then: [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m)] =0.61

And (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)] = 70.75
And δ θ’0 = 0.61 x 70.75 = 43 arc second per century
Page 5
What is amazing about NASA and the international astronomical Union
is total incompetence to realize that astronomer's study of the same
stars and each have different astronomical values and their values
differ from satellite values is as clear as water.
23.4°
.4 °
23
When an astronomer starts studying a star using a telescope, Earth

precession changes the direction of the telescope and his reading
changes not only due to star motion but also due to earth precession.
When an astronomer does not read the data in real time he commits an
error and the location of telescope has to have a real time Earth
precession based on his location because Earth precession can have
different readings dependent upon location.
Page 6
At Maximum reading of Earth precession angle of 23.4 a reading of the
perihelion looks twisted as if it is at a different location. There are three
angles involved in this mess axial tilt and motion tilt and rotational tilt.
The total of [sine (θ m +θ r + θ t)] x (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]

Or, [sine (θ m +θ r + θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
I - Axial tilt correction factor of θ t = 23.4°
Telescope
23.4
II - Motional tilt θ m = sine-1 [(Mercury period)/ (Earth period)]

= sine-1 (Tm/Te) = sine-1 (88/365.26) = 13.94°
Earth
Mercury
Sun
Page 7
III - Rotational tilt: θ r = sine-1 (1/88) = 0.65°
And the answer is:
[Sine (θ m +θ r + θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
= [Sine (13.94 + 0.65 + 23.4)] x 70.75
= 0.6155 x 70.75 = 43.55
However, the rotational effect is changing from θ r to - θ r
[Sine (13.94 - 0.65 + 23.4)] x 70.75 =42.27
And averaging (43.55 + 42.27)/2 = 43
Or drop θ r: [Sine (θ m + θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]
And δ θ’0 = [Sine (13.9 +23.4)] x 70.75 = 0.606 x 70.75 = 43
DI Herculis apsidal motion puzzle as a clear motion that said Einstein's

relativity theory and modern physics that is based on time travel physics
is garbage and had no solution and stayed without a solution for decades
and when I handed Edward Guinan the solution in 2008 he gave the
solution to his students at Harvard using axial tilt to publish it to keep
Einstein's time travel stupidity when Dr Guinan had been trashing time
travel and Einstein. When Dr Guinan and Villanova University realized
their scam of using visual effect to claim great science of stars that does
not fit in any theory taking dozens of grant on stupidity research he
decided it is time to call the bank because the bankers told him so!
The axis of crime and stupidity of big Institutions selling time travel as
science when gypsies know better science than all of Alfred Nobel Mafia
of Harvard MIT Cal - Tech Stanford NASA JPL and all other planet of the
Dumb Apes
My name is Joe Nahhas and Alfred Nobel Institution head is my

promise!
All rights reserved

Page 8

It Is Earth and Not Mercury Presession of 43 Arc Dec Per Century

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

It Is Earth and Not Mercury Presession of 43 Arc Dec Per Century

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

It Is Earth and Not Mercury Presession of 43 Arc Dec Per Century

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

joenahhas1958@yahoo.

(A/B) C = C + [(A - B)/B] C

(A/B) C = C + [(A - B)/B] C

If C = δ θ’0 = 70.75; A = Mercury - Sun distance = 58.2 x 109 km/sec

Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier the French Ass - Tronomer made

The angular velocity of Mercury around the Sun is: θ m' = v m /r m

And δ θ’0 = 70.75; v m = Mercury orbital velocity around the Sun

If Planet Mercury angular speed is measured for planet Mercury from

But Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier lethal mistake is

If planet Mercury around the sun measured from earth:

Then θ m' (Earth) = (v m + v e)/r m

And v e Earth orbital velocity around the Sun

And θ m' (Earth) = v m /r m +v e /r m

Le Verrier mistake is: v e /r m

The angular speed delay is: v* e /r m

Or, [(v e/v m) (v m /r m)]

Taking into account Earth rotation vº e

Liverier mistake: Then the angular speed delay:

Is: v e /r m = [v* e /r m +/- vº e /r m]

In arc second per century multiplying by [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)]

Then δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /r m] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)]

And spin of Earth vº e = 0.465 km/sec

Then: [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m)] =0.61

When an astronomer starts studying a star using a telescope, Earth

The total of [sine (θ m +θ r + θ t)] x (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]

I - Axial tilt correction factor of θ t = 23.4°

II - Motional tilt θ m = sine-1 [(Mercury period)/ (Earth period)]

And the answer is:

[Sine (θ m +θ r + θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]

= [Sine (13.94 + 0.65 + 23.4)] x 70.75

= 0.6155 x 70.75 = 43.55

However, the rotational effect is changing from θ r to - θ r

[Sine (13.94 - 0.65 + 23.4)] x 70.75 =42.27

And averaging (43.55 + 42.27)/2 = 43

Or drop θ r: [Sine (θ m + θ t)] x (2 π /T m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/88)]

And δ θ’0 = [Sine (13.9 +23.4)] x 70.75 = 0.606 x 70.75 = 43

DI Herculis apsidal motion puzzle as a clear motion that said Einstein's

My name is Joe Nahhas and Alfred Nobel Institution head is my

All rights reserved

You might also like