Study Notes 01
Study Notes 01
Study Notes 01
What makes adolescents tick? The answer to that question has changed considerably since
the fourth century B.C.E., when early Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle identified two
qualities that distinguish adolescents from children—reasoning ability and self-determination.
During the eighteenth century, Rousseau believed infants, children, adolescents, and young
adults demonstrated unique behavior during distinct developmental phases. G. Stanley Hall
began the process of scientifically studying adolescence in the 1800s. Guided by Darwinian
thought, he investigated the influence of biological and environmental factors, identifying
genetics as a dominant force.
Unlike Darwin and Hall, Margaret Mead concluded that sociocultural influences affect the
adolescent experience to a greater extent than genetics. Historical events of the early twentieth
century subsequently influenced remarkable maturational, intellectual, and psychosocial
changes characteristic of adolescents.
By 1950, the developmental period of adolescence had not only physical and social identities,
but a legal identity as well. The voices of adolescents were heard loud and clear during the
political protests in the 1960s and 1970s. The women’s movement of the 1970s changed how
research on adolescents was conducted; research now included female as well as male
adolescents.
Today in the U.S., a more diverse population results in adolescents who are more open-
minded and tolerant than past generations. Adolescents in the 21st century are growing up
immersed in technology. The technological revolution is having both positive and negative
effects on today’s adolescents.
Groups tend to gather stereotypical descriptions, and adolescents certainly exemplify this trend.
Decade-specific characteristics—or time-in-history effects—are discussed extensively in
literature, history, and psychology as important factors in understanding people during specific
historical periods. The focus on highly visible members of the adolescent age group leads to an
adolescent generalization gap, an overly negative perspective toward all of its members. The
21st century signals a time for change.
Evidence suggests that both advantages and disadvantages abound from extended
adolescence. Opportunity arises from the freedom to experiment, prepare, and explore. Risks
from contradictory demands by peers and adults, the temptation to escape stress with drugs
and alcohol, and inconsistent community and cultural expectations present difficult choices and
require fine discriminations.
One might ask why youths do not develop more similarly than they do. Although historical
circumstances explain some of it, other aspects of context seem to contribute to marked
differences. Economic, social, and cultural factors reflected by families, peers, neighborhoods,
and schools influence the opportunity and risk faced by adolescents. In Chapter 1, Santrock
identifies the framework created by social policy as a social context that currently places large
numbers of youths in harm’s way. The strength of established societal members could sway
social policy, thus promoting generational inequity. Support for youth could be achieved,
however, with improved delivery of services that promote health and safety, family planning,
leisure and recreation, drug use prevention, and parent education.
What are youth around the world like? Although most of the research on adolescence has been
done in Europe and North America, cultural differences among adolescents do occur. Overall
health and well-being among adolescents around the world has improved, although some
behaviors that compromise adolescent health, such as drug use, have increased. Gender
differences in the way adolescence is experienced continue, but they are narrowing. Changes in
family factors are occurring worldwide and include increased family mobility. The number of
adolescents in developed countries that go to school is increasing, although in some
underdeveloped countries many adolescents do not have access to education. Peers seem to
be more important in the lives of adolescents living in Western countries.
Important developmental transitions take place from childhood to adolescence and from
adolescence to adulthood. Adolescents manifest developmental changes with:
● growth spurts, hormonal changes, and sexual maturation.
● shifts in abstract, idealistic, and logical thinking.
● demands for intellectual challenge.
● shifts toward egocentrism and cravings for independence.
● quests for affiliative peers.
● desire for increased intimacy with friends and romantic partners.
● demonstrations of self-responsibility, both personally and financially.
Debates about the influence of each stance have shifted from an either/or argument to one that
discusses their relative impact on observable outcomes. The importance of these
● Freud’s theory articulates personality structure as the id, ego, and superego; defense
mechanisms for resolving conflict; and characteristics of five psychosexual stages.
● Erikson’s theory consists of psychosocial stages, explaining that both instincts and
experience influence development, that each stage characterizes distinctly different
crises, and that degree of resolution within each stage influences success in
development.
Psychoanalytic theories recognize early experiences, family relationships, and the unconscious
mind. Criticism includes lack of scientific foundation, sexual underpinnings, and negative image
of humans.
Cognitive theory focuses on conscious operations that change during childhood and
adolescence.
● Piaget’s theory states that children and adolescents demonstrate qualitative change by
systematically exploring and manipulating the environment to understand it. He
described four stages of distinctly different thinking processes: sensorimotor stage,
preoperational stage, concrete operational stage, and formal operational stage.
● Vygotsky’s theory specifies that cognition can be understood through developmental
assessment, language-based interaction, and sociocultural contexts.
● Information-processing theory focuses on the development of cognitive ability,
specifically language and thinking, by measuring storage, retrieval, and speed of
processing.
Cognitive theories emphasize the individual’s active role in understanding the environment.
They are criticized for not explaining individual variations in either timing or content of thought
processes.
Behavioral and social cognitive theories emphasize observable behavior and consequences.
Developmental theories and research methods serve complementary functions in the scientific
explanation of adolescent development. Research methods involve numerous approaches for
collecting and analyzing information.
Time span research allows researchers to study the relation of age to some other variable. The
cross-sectional research design compares groups of individuals of different ages at the same
point in time to identify developmental differences. The longitudinal research design identifies
a group of adolescents and observes the same individuals at consistent time intervals to identify
developmental changes.
Challenges to good research are numerous. Here are some important ones to consider:
● The American Psychological Association enforces a code of ethics to protect
participants.
● Gender bias may influence the accuracy of the conclusions drawn about females and
males.
● Ethnicity and culture often have not been accurately identified and their effects may be
overlooked.
Apparently, many things make adolescents tick. Santrock presents key topics throughout the
text that clarify this answer. The information falls into the areas of (1) biological processes, (2)
cognitive processes, (3) the contexts in which developmental tasks occur, (4) social and
personality development, (5) problems and disorders adolescents encounter, (6) science that
allows us to distinguish truth from fiction, and (7) critical thinking to put the information into a
cohesive and usable package.