Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA SIBUGAY
Diplahan District
KAUSWAGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

READING INTERVENTION OF KAUSWAGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO

IMPROVE PUPILS’ READING PERFORMANCE
2013-2014

I-Objectives:
A. To improve the reading performance of pupils
- to eradicate non-readers
- to reduce the number of frustration readers
- to increase the number of instructional and independent readers

II- Activities:
A. All Teachers are designated Reading Specialists.
B. Teachers are given orientation for STAR implementation
C. Set up reading Clinic to be used during remediation.
D. Teachers conducted their special session in their respective classrooms.
E. Other Functions of the Reading Clinic Teacher
* diagnose deeper the reading problems of the pupils and to provide
appropriate intervention/s
* group the pupils according to their needs
* track the reading performance of the pupils
* provide feedback to parents the reading progress of their children

F. All class advisers have conducted their own remedial measures to their respective
pupils and Activities like:
 shared reading
 Each One Teach One
 Mentor and Mentee/
 Tutor-Tutee, Telling
 Retelling Stories,
 Free Reading
G. Reading Strategies such as:
 Word Attack
 Assisted reading
 read Aloud
 Graphophonic Strategies
 Drawing
 acting out
 activating prior knowledge
 questioning
were conducted.

H. Schedule of the Special Session: Advisers of the following clienteles are

responsible of their own pupils while the Reading Coordinator and Principal will
have their Quarterly Reading Assessment to monitor clienteles Progress.

Remediation time is Noontime Break @ 12:00 -1:00 M0nday to Friday

 I. Monitoring and Evaluation: Principal and Reading Coordinator monitored the
implementation of the STAR and provided immediate feedback to the teachers on the progress of
the clienteles reading ability.

First Reading Assessment is on September 27, 2013

Second Reading Assessment is on November 29, 2013
Third Reading Assessment is on January 24, 2014
Fourth Reading Assessment is on March 14, 2014

III- Findings:
1. Teachers who seriously perform their task during remediation have better
Reading Performance results.
2. Strong support of the administrators remarkably facilitated for a better STAR
implementation.
3. Regular monitoring and evaluation ensured better implementation.

Reading Intervention in Kauswagan Elementary School started after the Phil –IRI has been
conducted and pupils who are severely poor in reading are our clienteles for special remediation.

Identified clienteles are the following:

Grade I Grade V
Jelly Joy Danoy
1.. Ronrazel Elleccion
2.Ricky Cuajotor Richard Englatera
Vanvan Labajo
3. Raffy A. Turno
4. Joseph L. Villarez Pablito Muyag
Ayomere Claro\Licca May
Grade II Jequinto
1. Bryan Dean V. Martinez
2. Kier John Lloyd B. Baylon
3. Marjun A. Talitod. Grade IV
4.Marilou M. Japos
1. Jasmine Mae Bayubay
5.Daisy Mae M. Japos 2. Cherry Mae Roxas
6. Cristine C. Anaba
3. Joemar Gumalis
7. Gaile O Generalao 4. Neil Bueno
8. Cris Sumalinog
5. Jonathan Ordaniza
9. Jeralyn M. Guillermo 6. Shela Mae Caso

Grade III
1. Chermie Ann Roxas
2. Myka Stephanie Abubakar

Prepared and submitted by:

LEAH A. BALOFIÑOS
School English Coordinator

Attested by:
NENA I. SEBASTIAN, Ed.D.
Principal I
 NAME Sept. Nov. Jan. Mar Remarks
.
1. Ronrazel Elleccion Doesn’t have focus and has an oral defect. needs
to undergo summer class.
2. Ricky Cuajotor Could read graphophonemes and still needs
further followe up
3. Raffy A. Turno Doesn’t have focus and could hardly identify some
sounds of letters, needs to undergo summer
class.
4. Joseph L. Villarez Could read graphophonemes and still needs
further followe up
5. Bryan Dean V. Martinez Could read simple words and comprehension
ability has improved. still needs further practice.

6. Kier John Lloyd B. Baylon Could read simple words and comprehension
ability has improved. still needs further practice.
7. Marjun A. Talitod. Could read simple words and comprehension
ability has improved. still needs further practice.
8. Marilou M. Japos Could read simple words and comprehension
ability has improved. still needs further practice.
9. Daisy Mae M. Japos Showed improvement but needs further follow up

10. Cristine C. Anaba Could hardly recognize words needs further

follow up
11. Gaile O Generalao Showed improvement but needs further follow up

12. Cris Sumalinog She has improved, but still he needs follow up.

13. Jeralyn M. Guillermo She has improved after 2 mo. but still she needs
further attention.
Se is good and attentive in every session, and so
14. Chermie Ann Roxas
great improvement is evident.
15. Myka Stephanie Abubakar Showed improvement but needs further follow up.

16. Jasmine Mae Bayubay She was trying hard to learn to read, and she
has improved
17. Jelly Joy Danoy Still needs further practice in reading.

18. Richard Englatera Pronounce word correctly but could not

understand that much of he read.
19. Vanvan Labajo Couldn’t read well no focus and lack of
comprehension
20. Pablito Muyag Showed improvement but still needs practice in
reading.
21. Ayomere Claro Needs further follow up.could hardly pronounce
words correctly and comprehension is at stake
22. Jelly Joy Danoy Couldn’t read well no focus and lack of
comprehension
23. Richard Englatera Pronounce word correctly but could not
understand that much of he read.
24. Vanvan Labajo Needs futher practice in reding

25. Pablito Muyag Could read but lack of comprehension

26. Ayomere Claro Showed improvement but needs further practice.

27. Licca May Jequinto She has improved but still needs more practice

Legend:
NR SR AR FR
Prepared and submitted by:
LEAH A. BALOFIÑOS
School English Coordinator
Attested by:
NENA I. SEBASTIAN, Ed.D.
Principal II
 KAUSWAGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
RUBRICS FOR READING PROGRESS

Word Recognition: Number of correct words = WR

Number of word list

Non-Reader- 0-40% Slow- 41- 74% Average- 75-89% Fast- 90-100%

Reading Comprehension: Number of Correct response =RC

Number of questions

Non - Reader 0-40% Slow 41-79% Average 80-90% Fast 90 –

100%

Reading Progress Status

Word Recognition Reading Comprehension RPS

NR NR NR
S NR NR
A NR NR
F NR NR
S S S
A S S
F S S
S A A
A A A
F A A
S F A
A F F
F F F

Legend: NR- Non- Reader S- slow A- Average F- Fast

RPS- Reading Progress Status
RUBRICS FOR READING PROGRESS

Word Recognition: Number of correct words = WR

Number of word list

Non-Reader- 0-40% Slow- 41- 74% Average- 75-89% Fast- 90-100%

Reading Comprehension: Number of Correct response =RC

Number of questions
Non - Reader 0-40% Slow 41-79% Average 80-90% Fast 90 –
100%

Reading Progress Status

Word Recognition Reading Comprehension RPS

NR NR NR
S NR NR
A NR NR
F NR NR
S S S
A S S
F S S
S A A
A A A
F A A
S F A
A F F
F F F

Legend: NR- Non- Reader S- slow A- Average F- Fast

RPS- Reading Progress Status

Legend:

NR SR AR FR

Reading Status Description

Non- Reader Could not recognize words

Slow Reader Could read words and could answer Literal

questions.
Average Reader Could read words could answer literal and HOTS
Questions.

Fast Reader Could read passages in short span. Could answer

Literal and HOTS questions and could reflect on
what he has read and can make connections to his
life experience.

Prepared and submitted by:

LEAH A. BALOFIÑOS
School English Coordinator
Noted and Approved by:
NENA I. SEBASTIAN, Ed.D.
Principal II
 Paired Reading

Tutor - Tutee

Word Attack
DEAR time

Parents Participation in school and classroom

activities.
 Shared Reading

Teacher’s Remedial Period

Guided Reading

Free Reading