Shift of Educational Focus From Content To Learning Outcomes
Shift of Educational Focus From Content To Learning Outcomes
INTRODUCTION
Reduced to the barest components, the educative process happens between the teacher
and the student. Education originated from the terms “educare” or “educere” which meant “to draw
out”. Ironically, however, for centuries we succeeded in perpetuating the belief that education is a
“pouring in” process wherein the teacher was the infallible giver of knowledge and the student was
the passive recipient. It followed that the focus of instruction was content and subject matter. We
were used to regarding education basically in terms of designating a set of subjects to take and
when the course is completed, we pronounce the students “educated”, assuming that the instruction
and activities we provided will lead to the desired knowledge, skills and other attributes that we think
the course passers would possess.
The advent of technology caused a change of perspective in education, nationally and
internationally. The teacher ceased to be the sole source of knowledge. With knowledge explosion,
students are surrounded with various sources of facts and information accessible through user-
friendly technology. The teacher has become a facilitator of knowledge who assists in the
organization, interpretation and validation of acquired facts and information.
Learning Outcomes:
At the end you are expected to:
a) Differentiate educational objectives from learning outcomes;
b) Identify the characteristics of good student learning outcomes and
c) Create student learning outcomes
The change in educational perspective is called Outcome-based Education (OBE) which has
three (3) characteristics:
1) It is student centered; that is, it places the students at the center of the process by focusing on
Students Learning Outcomes (SLO).
2) It is faculty drive; that is, it encourages faculty responsibility for teaching, assessing program
outcomes and motivating participation from the students.
3) It is meaningful; that is, it provides data to guide the teacher in making valid continuing
improvement in instruction and assessment activities.
To implement outcomes-based education on the subject or course level, the following procedure
is recommended.
1) Identification of the educational objectives of the subject/course.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING 2
Educational objectives are the broad goals that the subject/course expects to achieve,
and defining in general terms the knowledge, skills and attitude that the teacher will help the
students to attain. The objectives are stated from the point of view of the teacher such as: “to
develop, to provide, to enhance, to inculcate, etc.”
2) Listing of learning outcomes specified for each subject/course objective.
Since subject/course objectives are broadly stated, they do not provide detailed guide
to be teachable and measurable. Learning outcomes are stated as concrete active verbs
such as: to demonstrate, to explain, to differentiate, to illustrate, etc. A good source of
learning outcomes statements is the taxonomy of educational objectives by Benjamin
Bloom. Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives is grouped into three (3):
• Cognitive, also called knowledge, refers to mental skills such as remembering,
understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, synthesizing/creating.
• Psychomotor, also referred to as skills, includes manual or physical skills, which
process from mental activities and range from the simplest to the complex such as
observing, imitating, practicing, adapting, and innovating.
• Affective, also known as attitude, refers to growth in feelings or emotions from the
simplest behavior to the most complex such as receiving, responding, valuing,
organizing, and internalizing.
3) Drafting outcomes assessment procedures.
This procedure will enable the teacher to determine the degree to which the
students are attaining the desired learning outcomes. It identifies for every outcome the
data that will be gathered which will guide the selection of the assessment tools to be
used and at what point assessment will be done.
Students who are well informed about what behaviors are expected of them in a course /
subject or learning activity have a definite guide during the learning activity and are therefore
perceived to attain success. Correlatively, teachers who know very well what they wish their
students to demonstrate or perform will be in the best position to align their instructional activities
to the desired learning outcomes. In this light, all assessment and evaluation activities should
start with the identification and clarification of the students learning outcomes (SLO). The
identified and clarified student learning outcomes serve as the load stars that will guide both
teacher and students in activities leading to the attainment of the deserved learning outcomes.
course/subject which are in turn, integrated into the year – end formation of students as they
progress towards becoming professional teachers. Attainment of these learning outcomes
should be periodically assessed cooperatively by both teacher and students. Periodic
assessment helps the students determine their strengths and deficiencies and become active
participants in outcomes attainment.
2. Good learning outcomes are based on the program mission statement agreed upon
by the program faculty consultation with other stakeholders like alumni and other
professionals. It is important that the student learning outcomes are based on
issuances from government regulatory agencies such as DepEd’s K to 12 Law
Enhanced Basic Education in the Philippines, the CHED’s Policies, Standards and
Guidelines on Teacher Education, thrusts of appropriate professional organizations
and advocacies of employer and industry groups.
3. Good student learning outcomes are very well understood by both students and
faculty. They should be in agreement on the importance of these competencies which
they will cooperatively develop.
4. Good learning outcomes include a spectrum of thinking skills from simple to the higher
order of application of knowledge and skills. Here is an example of a range of learning
outcomes from the simple to the complex under the competency: “ability to
understand.”
a) Can identify
b) Can explain
c) Can apply
d) Can analyze
e) Can synthesize
f) Can evaluate
g) Can judge
h) Can create
5. Good learning outcomes are measurable. Student competencies should be expressed
as transitive verbs and/or action words which are demonstrable and observable at
various level.
changing the names in the six subdivisions from noun to verb and (b) slightly re-arranging the
order.
In the early seventies, E Simpson, Dave and A.S. Harrow recommended categories for the
psychomotor domain includes physical movement, coordination, and the use of the motor-skill
areas. Development of these skills require practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision,
distance, procedures, or techniques in execution. Simpson contributed 7 categories, Dave 5
categories and Harrow 6 categories. They have been re-organized and simplified into 4
categories or levels.
The affective domain includes the manner in which we deal with things emotionally, such
as feelings, values, appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes. Affective learning is
demonstrated by behaviors indicating attitudes of awareness, interest, attention, concern, and
responsibility, ability to listen and respond in interactions with others, and ability to demonstrate
those attitudinal characteristics or values which are appropriate to the test situation and the field
of study. The five major categories are listed from the simplest behavior to the most complex.
SAMPLE
CATEGORIES/LEVEL OUTCOMES VERBS LEARNING OUTCOME
STATEMENTS
1 EXERCISES
A. Differentiate each of the following pairs by explaining the meaning of each and giving
examples for further clarification.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
3) Student-centered Instruction and Content-Centered Instruction
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
4) Formative and Summative Assessment
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
5) Assessment FOR, OF, and AS learning
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
B. In two to three sentences explain why the below learning outcome is a good learning
outcome. Identify the characteristics of a good student learning outcome that it depicts.
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Cognitive Domain:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING 2
Affective Domain:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Psychomotor Domain:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________