CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH IN MIND STUDENT’S BOOK 3

ENGLISH TEXTBOOK FOR GRADE X OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

USING LITTLEJOHN’S THEORY

a final project

submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan
in English Language Education

by
Jeanne Citra Maharani
2201415135

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG
2019
APPROVAL

ii
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY

iii
 MOTTO AND DEDICATION

“Hasbunallah wani’mal wakil, ni’mal maula wani’man nashiir”

“… and He is with you wherever you are” – Quran (57:4)
“Remember, you are loved and enough”

This Final Project dedicated to:

The greatest and sweetest one, Allah Subhanahuwata’ala
My beloved self
My never-ending support system Ayah Yadi and Ibuk Ida
My dearest siblings: Dek Ifa, Mas Wildan, and Dek Izza
Kakung, Yangti, Mbah Sakini, Bani Sadjiman and Bani Rumadi
And all of my sister of deen
May this final project useful and full of barakah.

iv
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The first and foremost, let me take this opportunity to raise my greatest
thanks to Allah SWT, the almighty with all of His blessing, loving, and everything
that strengthens me in completing this final project. Alhamdulillahiladzi
bini’matihi tatimush shilihat.

I give my deepest appreciation for my beloved advisor Mrs. Sri Wahyuni,

S.Pd., M.Pd who provided very valuable guidance and carefully read, comment
patiently on incalculable revisions. I always get much advice from her so that I
can overcome a lot of difficulties and learn many things from the beginning until
this final project is completed.

This journey will be impossible and nothing without the guidance from my
lecturers in the English Department of Universitas Negeri Semarang, as well as, I
took their valuable knowledge from many lectures with them.

Million thanks to Mr. Margono, S.Pd who was willing to provide

information regarding the use of English in Mind textbook, Dzaky Farhansyah
who has lent his textbook as the material for this final project, and all members of
SMA Islam Al-Azhar 16 Semarang.

Finally, most important people, I dedicate my final project and give my

enormous thanks to my never-ending support system, Ayah Yadi, and Ibuk Ida,
my beloved siblings Dek Ifa, Mas Wildan and Dek Izza, my friends from English
Education 2015, Rombel 5 English Education, my dearest Nadiyah, Salsabiilah,
Nisa, Zuzu, Yuniar, Dewi, Atikah, Sifa, Nurma and all of my sister of deen,
jazakumullahu jannata ‘adn.

Semarang, October 2019

Jeanne Citra Maharani

NIM 2201415135

v
 ABSTRACT
Maharani, Jeanne Citra. 2019. Content Analysis of English in Mind Student’s
Book 3 Textbook for Grade X of Senior High School. Final Project.
English Department. Faculty of Languages and Arts. Universitas Negeri
Semarang. Advisor: Sri Wahyuni, S.Pd., M.Pd.
Keywords: Content Analysis, Textbook Analysis, Three Level Analysis

The research aims to analyze the implicit and explicit nature in the student
textbook English in Mind Student’s Book 3 for Tenth Graders Senior High School
using Three-Level Analysis proposed by Littlejohn (2011). Level 1 analysis ‘what
is there?’ analyzes the objective description of the selected textbook. Level 2
analysis ‘what is required of user’ analyze the subjective analysis of the textbook
and level 3 analysis ‘what is implied’ draws the subjective inference of the
textbook from Level 1 and 2. This research used descriptive qualitative content
analysis as its research method. The data were collected from the English in Mind
Student’s Book 3 second edition. Using the evaluation method, the data were
collected using document review supported with checklist and Task Analysis
Sheet (TAS). The level analysis 1 found for the explicit nature of the textbook
package contains the student’s textbook, workbook, teacher’s resource book,
classware, and testmaker. Then, for the level analysis 2 of subjective analysis in
this selected textbooks mostly required the students to respond to the materials to
do grammar focus, select information, and discussion and it is also applied
students centered teaching and learning. The deduction for level 3 reveals that the
role of the materials as a whole is to structure the teaching and learning of
English, classroom time, and classroom interaction, to provide a route for teaching
and learning English and to provide a resource for the teaching of motivation
content (stories, cross-curricular topics) and engaging tasks. The aim of this
textbook is to develop learner’s communicative competence by encouraging the
learners to build text, to respond role in using language, to focus on meaning and
to build positive affective aspects through the teaching and learning process. It
also found that the teacher needs to facilitate the learners, to manage the
classroom and to monitor the task completions. This textbook can be a
complement to strengthen teachers in the teaching and learning process since the
analysis found that some points of this foreign published textbook are related to
the K13 curriculum. This textbook is also completed with classware. Additionally,
this textbook applies critical thinking and communication skills. Therefore, the
content of the textbook supports the development of twenty-first-century skills
which is also recommended in the 2013 curriculum.

vi
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT ........................................................................................... i

APPROVAL .................................................................................................................. ii
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY ........................................................................ iii
MOTTO AND DEDICATION..................................................................................... iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................. v
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ vii
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ x
LIST OF FIGURE ....................................................................................................... xi
CHAPTER I .................................................................................................................. 1
INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background of the Study ..................................................................................... 1
1.2 Reasons for Choosing the Topic .......................................................................... 4
1.3 Research Questions.............................................................................................. 5
1.4 Purposes of the Study .......................................................................................... 5
1.5 Significances of the Study .................................................................................... 6
1.6 Definition of Key Terms ...................................................................................... 6
1.7 Scope of the Study ............................................................................................... 9
1.8 Outline of the Study ............................................................................................. 9
CHAPTER II............................................................................................................... 11
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE ........................................................ 11
2.1 Review of the Previous Studies ............................................................................. 11
2.1.1 Characteristic of ELT Textbooks ................................................................. 12
2.1.2 Users’ Perspective towards ELT Textbooks ................................................. 13
2.1.3 Cultural Content Analysis in ELT Textbooks. ............................................. 13
2.1.4 K13 Curriculum in ELT Textbooks.............................................................. 16
2.1.5 Three-Level Analysis by Littlejohn (2011) ................................................... 19
2.1.6 Gaps Identification....................................................................................... 20
2.2 Reviews of theoretical studies ............................................................................ 22

vii
 2.2.1 Textbook ...................................................................................................... 22
2.2.2 Textbook Analysis ........................................................................................ 24
2.2.3 Content Analysis .......................................................................................... 25
2.2.4 Three Level of Analysis by Littlejohn (2011)................................................ 26
2.2.5 English in Mind Student’s Book 3 ............................................................... 27
2.3 Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................... 28
CHAPTER III ............................................................................................................. 30
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................................................... 30
3.1 Research Design................................................................................................. 30
3.2 Object of the Study ............................................................................................ 31
3.3 Research Instrument ......................................................................................... 32
3.4 Type of Data ...................................................................................................... 32
3.5 Unit of Analysis.................................................................................................. 33
3.6 The Procedure of Data Collection ..................................................................... 33
3.7 The Procedure of Data Analysis ........................................................................ 34
3.7.1 Level Analysis 1 ........................................................................................... 34
3.7.2 Level Analysis 2 ........................................................................................... 35
3.7.3 Level Analysis 3 ........................................................................................... 36
3.8 Procedure for Presenting the Results ................................................................ 37
3.9 Triangulation ..................................................................................................... 37
CHAPTER IV ............................................................................................................. 39
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS ............................................................................... 39
4.1 Data Presentations ............................................................................................. 39
4.2 Findings ............................................................................................................. 40
4.2.1 The Objective Descriptions of the English textbook “English in Mind
Student’s Book 3 Second Edition” ........................................................................ 40
4.2.2 The Subjective Analysis of the English Textbook “English in Mind Student’s
Book 3”................................................................................................................. 50
4.2.2.1 What is the Learners Expected to do........................................................... 50
4.2.2.1.1 Turn Take ............................................................................................... 50
4.2.2.1.2 Focus on ................................................................................................. 52
4.2.2.1.3 Mental Operation .................................................................................... 53
4.2.2.2 Who With? ................................................................................................ 62

viii
 4.2.2.3 With What Content .................................................................................... 63
4.2.2.3.1 Form ....................................................................................................... 63
4.2.2.3.2 Source..................................................................................................... 66
4.2.2.3.3 Nature..................................................................................................... 66
4.2.3 The Subjective Inference of the English Textbook “English in Mind
Student’s Book 3 Second Edition” ........................................................................ 67
4.3 Discussions ......................................................................................................... 70
CHAPTER V ............................................................................................................... 79
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS.................................................................... 79
5.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 79
5.2 Suggestions......................................................................................................... 80
REFERENCES............................................................................................................ 83
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. 89
Appendix 1 The Explicit Nature of a Set of Materials ........................................... 90
Appendix 2 Syllabus of English in Mind Student’s Book 3 .................................... 94
Appendix 3 Task Analysis Sheet ........................................................................... 108
Appendix 4 Definition of Features ........................................................................ 120

ix
 LIST OF TABLES

1. Table 3. 1 The steps of Collecting the Data……………………………...34

2. Table 4.1. Frequency and percentage of Turn Take features…………….52

3. Table 4.2. Frequency and percentage of the Focus On features………....53

4. Table 4.3. Frequency and percentage of Mental Operation features….....54

5. Table 4.4. Frequency and percentage of Who With features…………….63

6. Table 4.5. Frequency and percentage of Input to the learner features…...64

7. Table 4.6 Frequency and percentage of Expected output from learners

features…………………………………………………………………...65

8. Table 4.7 Frequency and percentage of Source features…………………66

9. Table 4.8 Frequency and percentage of nature features………………….67

x
 LIST OF FIGURE
1. Figure 2.1 Theoretical Framework Analysis………………………….…29

2. Figure 4.1 Classware……….……………………………………………49

3. Figure 4.2 The Example of Decode Semantic Meaning Task………..….55

4. Figure 4.3 The Example of Select Information Task……………………56

5. Figure 4.4 The Example of Discussion Task…………………………….57

6. Figure 4.5 The Example of Build Text Task…………………………….58

7. Figure 4.6 The Example of Fill in the Blank Task………………………58

8. Figure 4.7 The Example of Grammar Focus Task………………………59

9. Figure 4.8 The Example of Express Own Information Task…………….60

10. Figure 4.9 The Example of Role-play Task………………………..…….61

11. Figure 4.10 The Example of Hypothesis Task……………….…………..61

xi
 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

In teaching and learning English there is some aspect that affects the

teaching and learning process. Richards (2001: 1) argues that "teaching materials

are a key component in most language programs. Whether the teacher uses a

textbook, institutional prepared material or makes use of his or her own materials,

instructional materials generally serve as the basis for much of the language input

learners receive and the language practice that occurs in the classroom”. One of

the important things in teaching materials is textbook.

According to Cunningsworth (1984: 1) “textbook is a book written by

experienced and well-qualified people and the material contained in them is

usually carefully tested in pilot studies in actual teaching situations before

publication”. In Indonesia textbook is one of important material that has been used

for a long time ago. Textbooks determined the procedures, the content, and

method in the teaching and learning process in the classroom. They also provide

the syllabus to help the teacher to arrange the materials systematically in every

subject.

O'Neill (1982: 104) added the reasons for the use of textbooks: Firstly,

most parts of textbook materials are appropriate for students' needs, even if they

are not specially designed for them. Secondly, they make it possible for students

to plan for future learning and also review the previous materials or lessons.

1
 2

Thirdly, textbooks provide students with high-quality materials at a reasonable

price. Finally, suitable textbooks allow teachers to adapt and modify them to meet

the learners' needs and also allow for natural interaction to happen.

As English textbooks play some important points, both teachers and

students have to know how to use them. The more easily they use and understand

the book, the better and useful they become. Its functions are not only a guide in

the teaching and learning process but also the teacher used it to develop the

material.

Since in Indonesia textbooks are considered as the important materials in

the language teaching process, the English teacher very depends on them. They

rely on the textbook whether on primary books from The Ministry of Education

and Culture of Indonesia or complementary books that they used. However, the

teachers are responsible for choosing and selecting the material in the textbook. In

other words, they have to be able to analyze whether the content of a book is

proper or not to support their learning and teaching process. Especially for the

complementary book that sometimes the content does not really depend on the

curriculum. McDonough et al. (2013:52) comment, “No textbook or set of

materials is likely to be perfect, and there does not seem as yet an agreed set of

criteria or procedures for evaluation.” Because of that statement, we especially the

teacher have to consider the nature of the implicitly and explicitly content of a

textbook whether the textbook is appropriate to support students' learning process

or not.
 3

Some teachers use English in Mind textbook as a complementary book.

One of the schools that use this book is SMA Islam Al- Azhar 16 Semarang. They

use two books in their teaching and learning process. The first book is the main

book with the title ‘Buku Bahasa Inggris kelas X’ that published by The Ministry

of Education and Culture of Indonesia. The other textbook that the teacher

chooses to use is "English in Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition”. Actually,

the book has 3 kinds of books in each series. They are a student's book, teacher's

book, and workbook. In this research, the researcher wants to focus only on a

student's book because the teacher mostly uses this book than the other 2 books.

The teacher usually combines using the two books, the main book, and the

complementary book. Firstly the teacher will use the main book to explain the

materials, then the teacher uses a complementary book to give other examples or

exercises. The teacher said that the complementary book can help the students to

get additional materials either from the presentation materials or the exercise they

did because the English in Mind textbook is published by a foreign publisher. The

use of vocabulary in this book is different and more various than the main book.

Sometimes the vocabularies also a little bit complicated and unfamiliar and make

the students difficult to understand. These points make the teacher more selective

in using this book. The teacher also said that this book can help a lot to students

who are talented in English, but to an ordinary student, they often get difficulties

when using this book.

In this research, I intend to analyze a complementary book with the title

‘English in Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition’ that usually used for X graders
 4

of Senior High School published by Cambridge University Press. Not all school

use this book, only some schools that use this book to give addition materials for

their students besides materials from the main book that provided by the

government. This book is a complementary book that publishes from a foreign

publisher that the contents and the methods do not depend on our curriculum or

K13. The analysis would be based on the theory of material analysis purposed by

Littlejohn (2011) called Three Level of Analysis. Level 1 analysis is ‘What is

there’. Level 2 analysis is ‘What is Required of Users’ and Level 3 analysis is

‘What is implied’.

From those explanations above, I think that it is important to do analyzing

this book with its benefits. By analyzing this book it will help the teacher to see

whether the book is appropriate for supporting language teaching and the learning

process or not.

1.2 Reasons for Choosing the Topic

English in Mind textbook is a complementary textbook that is used only by

some schools. The teachers who use this book as a complementary textbook want

to improve the students’ materials so they will get more materials from this book.

The teachers also use this book to get other references in developing materials for

the language teaching process. The different books will help the students to avoid

boring materials. They will get new insight into the English subject. From that

explanation, the researcher wants to conduct the analysis of this textbook. Several

reasons for choosing this topic are:

 5

1. Some teachers need a complementary book to give them another

resource in teaching EFL.

2. The results of this research will help the teachers to decide whether the

book is appropriate or not with the learner’s need.

3. The book is published by the foreign publisher that the curriculum they

use to arrange this book is not the same as ours, so it is important for

us to analyze this book.

4. There is no guarantee if a textbook can support the teaching and

learning process.

1.3 Research Questions

A problem is a question of interest that can be tested or answered through

the collection and analysis of data (Gay, L.R., Geoffrey E. Mills & Peter Airasian,

2012). In order to get the result of this research, the researcher has been focusing

on presenting this study by the following problems:

1. How is the objective description of the English textbook “English in

Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition” presented?

2. How is the subjective analysis of the English textbook “English in

Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition” realized?

3. How is the subjective inference of the English textbook “English in

Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition” applied?

1.4 Purposes of the Study

Based on the formulated problems above, the following are the objectives of this

final project:
 6

1. To present the objectives description of the English textbook “English

in Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition”.

2. To explain the realization of the subjective analysis of the English

textbook “English in Mind Student’s Book 3”.

3. To explain the application of the subjective inference of the English

textbook “English in Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition”?

1.5 Significances of the Study

Through this study, the researcher expects the significance; which are:

1. Theoretically, this study will show the nature of the textbook explicitly

and implicitly.

2. Practically, this study will:

First, for other researchers, this study can be a reference to conduct

other research. Second, for teachers, the researcher hopes that this

study will give information about the content of the book from the

objective description, subjective analysis, and subjective inference of

the book, so it will help the teacher to choose the best complementary

textbook to help them in the teaching process as a reference book.

Third, for English textbook writer, the result of this study might help

them to be more aware of developing the content of materials inside of

the textbook explicitly and implicitly.

1.6 Definition of Key Terms

Some key terms need to be defined so the content of this final project can be

understood well. I find out some following key terms:

 7

1. Content Analysis

Content analysis is a research technique for making replicable and valid

inferences from data to their context (Krippendorff, 1980).

Content analysis is a procedure for the categorization of verbal or

behavioral data for purposes of classification, summarization, and

tabulation (Hancock, 2002:21).

Content analysis is any technique for making inferences by systemically

and objectively identifying special characteristics of the message (Aizah,

2018)

Content analysis in this present study is a technique for analyzing the

contents of the book explicitly and implicitly.

2. English in Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition textbook is a textbook

used by some schools in Indonesia. One of the schools that uses this book

is SMA Islam Al-Azhar 16 Semarang. It is the second edition and also a

special edition with DVD-ROM. The writers of this book are Harbert

Puchta and Jeff Stranks with Richard Carter and Peter Lewis-Jones. This

book published by Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University

Press is part of the University of Cambridge. This book is the first

published book published in 2016. It was printed in Malaysia by Vivar

printing.
 8

3. Textbook

A Textbook is an instructional material which consists of content and

material of the subject that is well organized in written form and has a

great contribution to the teaching and learning process (Yulianti, 2011).

A Textbook is a lesson book in the specific field of study, which is a

standard book written by the experts in that field according to the

instructional purpose, completed by suitable teaching media which is easy

to be understood by the users in schools or college (Tarigan, 1990: 13).

The textbook is a stimulus or instrument for teaching and learning

(Thomson, 2000).

The textbook in this present study is the complementary textbook that used

to give additional materials for the students and help the teachers to get

other references in the teaching process.

4. Textbook analysis

A textbook analysis is one of the processes of textbook evaluation. It is a

process of choosing what textbook to use in a particular course

considering the need and value of teaching (Cunningsworth, 1995).

A textbook analysis involves measuring the potential value of textbooks

by making a judgment about the effect of the materials on the people using

them (Aizah, 2018).

A textbook analysis in this present study is analyzing the textbook about

its contents and the benefits to see the engagement between the book and

the users.
 9

1.7 Scope of the Study

This study investigates the textbook entitled English in Mind Student’s

Book 3 Second Edition published by Cambridge University Press part of the

University of Cambridge. This study conducted to analyze the objective

description, subjective analysis and subjective inference of the textbook. The

content and material analysis of the textbook as one part of the preliminary step to

material evaluation purposed by Littlejohn (2011). The preliminary step to

material evaluation has 4 stages. They are the analysis of the target situation of

use, material analysis, match and evaluation, and action. In this research, I only

focused on material analysis. The analysis was done by using the Three-Level of

Analysis. Level 1 analysis is ‘What is there’. Level 2 analysis is ‘What is required

of users’ and Level 3 analysis is ‘What is implied’. The present study focused on

analyzing 3 chapters, which are chapter 6, chapter 7 and chapter 8.

1.8 Outline of the Study

The explanation about the chapters are presented below:

Chapter I consists of a background of the study, reasons for choosing the topic,

research questions, objectives of the study, significances of the study, definition of

the key terms, the scope of the study and the last is the outline of the study.

Chapter II covers the review of related literature, which includes reviews of

previous studies, reviews of theoretical studies, and theoretical framework. A

review of previous studies presents some researches which ever been conducted

related to the topic of this study. Then, reviews of related literature present some

theories embodied the study which is used as the reference. It includes the
 10

definitions of a textbook, textbook analysis, and content analysis. The last one is

the theoretical framework. It is the conclusion from both reviews of previous

studies and reviews of theoretical studies.

Chapter III is the Research Methodology. It consists of research design, the

subject of the study, the object of study, the role of the researcher, research

instrument, type of data, unit of analysis, the procedure of data collection,

procedure of data analysis, procedures of presenting the results, and triangulation.

Chapter IV is the findings of the study and the discussion of the findings.

This chapter presents the overall analysis and the discussion of the result which

consists of the presentation and analysis of the research data. The data

presentation is outlined in four parts. The first part is the data analysis of Level 1

analysis, the second part is the data analysis of Level 2 analysis, the third part is

the data analysis of Level 3 analysis and the last part is about the triangulation.

Chapter V consists of conclusions and suggestions. The report is completed with

references and appendices.

 CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE

Chapter II covers the review of related literature, which includes reviews

of previous studies, reviews of theoretical studies, and theoretical framework. A

review of previous studies presents some researches which ever been conducted

related to the topic of this study. Then, reviews of related literature present some

theories embodied the study which is used as the reference. It includes the

definitions of a textbook, textbook analysis, and content analysis, and the last one

is the theoretical framework. It is the conclusion from both reviews of previous

studies and review of theoretical studies.

2.1 Review of the Previous Studies

There has been a lot of researches that had been conducted by other

researchers throughout the world. I have reviewed some journal articles related to

this present study and divided the articles into some categories to help the readers

understand easily. They are the analysis of the characteristic of ELT textbooks,

users’ perspective towards ELT textbooks, cultural content analysis in ELT

textbooks, K13 Curriculum in ELT textbooks, and the last is textbooks analysis

using Little John theory. The following sections present the reviews of the

previous studies.

11
 12

2.1.1 Characteristic of ELT Textbooks

There have been a number of studies dealing with textbook analysis. The

following researches focused their studies on the characteristic in ELT textbooks

for example by Mahmood (2011), Mohammadi and Abdi (2014), Ahour,

Towhidiyan, and Saeidi (2014), Tsagari and Sifakis (2014), Ahour & Golpour

(2016), Pratama (2017). They did similar research about the characteristic of a

textbook using different theories. Mahmood (2011) analyzed the textbook

characteristic in which the object of the study was the government textbook. He

used a modified evaluation textbook model by Garvin (1988). Moreover,

Mohammadi and Abdi (2014) investigated the textbook to gain the data to see to

what extent the textbook has met with the students’ needs. He used the Likert

scales and questionnaires to investigate its characters. A similar study conducted

by Pratama (2017), she investigates the textbook to find out whether the Pathway

to English textbook of the eleventh grade at the first semester fulfilled syllabus

points of the 2013 curriculum and how broad they presented. She uses

characteristic checklist evaluation in gaining the data. The three researchers above

have the same way to evaluate the textbook by seeing the characteristic of

textbooks even though they have different purposes and methods. The textbooks

that have been analyzed, have their own positive and negative characteristics, but

overall the positive attributes far outweighed the negative characteristic. By seeing

this characteristic the researchers who did the studies can see to what extent the

textbook can meet with the student’s need.

 13

2.1.2 Users’ Perspective towards ELT Textbooks

There are some studies about the English evaluation textbook seen from

the teacher’s perspective. One study conduct by Ahour, Towhidiyan, and Saeidi

(2014), they focused on the evaluation of “English Textbook 2” taught in Iranian

High Schools. The study also sought to investigate to what extent the textbook can

match the student’s needs. The result shows that based on the teachers’ viewpoints

the English Textbook 2 is irrelevant to the student’s interest, need and concerns.

In addition, Ahour & Golpour (2016) also conduct research in Prospect 1

textbook published in 2013 with Quantitative research. This research conduct to

see to what extent its different features are appropriate for the teacher’s views.

They use the Likert scale as the research design. The findings revealed that

teachers have a positive perception of this book. Moreover, Tsagari and Sifakis

(2014), find out the strengths and weaknesses of the EFL courseware materials for

level 4 and 5 of primary education textbooks in Greece. They used a questionnaire

to gain the data, and the data confirmed the initial reaction towards the two books,

in that book E attracted more negative evaluations than book D.

2.1.3 Cultural Content Analysis in ELT Textbooks.

A large body of research has been carried out to find cultural content or

cultural view in some English textbooks by many researchers. They are Yuen

(2011), Shin, Eslami, and Chen, n.d. (2011), Aliakbari and Jamalvandi (2012),

Awayed-bishara (2015), Tajeddin and Teimournezhad (2016), Sadeghi and Sepahi

(2017), and Gunantar (2017). Bennett, Bennett, and Allen (2003: 243) refer to

‘Big C’ and ‘little c’ as ‘objective culture’, which includes institutions, artifacts,

 14

and everyday behavior; the world view maintained by the members of a group or

society, such as values and beliefs, can be described as ‘subjective culture’, which

is more conceptual in contrast to the tangible ‘objective culture’. For example, the

mosque and going to the mosque can be viewed as part of the objective culture of

a place, where the belief in God can be included in the subjective culture.

Yuen (2011) has been investigated how the representation of foreign

cultures in Longman Elect and Treasure Plus, the two kinds of junior secondary

English language textbooks used in Hong Kong schools. He used four aspects to

analyze, that are products, practices, perspectives, and persons. In addition,

Aliakbari and Jamalvandi (2012) examined the quality of representation of source

culture (C1), target culture (C2) and other cultures (C3) in ‘New Senior English

for China’ textbook. They adopt the categorization by Ramirez and Hall (1990) as

the basis of the textbook analysis. Their findings showed that the textbooks have

given imbalanced attention to the aspects of culture, the distribution of references

to different categories was also of an unequal situation and the same inequality in

the culture representation holds true regarding major cultural themes examined in

the textbooks. They also found that the content of foreign culture in textbooks is

fragmented and stereotypical.

A study about how the perspective of English as an International Language

paradigm is appearing is presented by Shin et al., n.d. (2012). They analyzed

seven series of internationally distributed ELT textbooks that are designed for

ESL/EFL contexts and are used in several Asian countries, providing a total of25

books using a modified approach recommended by Murayama (2000). The found

 15

that inner circle cultures are more highly valued than those in the outer and

expanding circles, even though the majority of English users employ English in

international contexts.

Textbook analysis has shown how through the reoccurrence of Western

and basically American and Jewish culturally-based issues, the textbooks

interpellate English learners as Western-oriented Jewish-Zionist subjects, thus

contributing to the reproduction and perpetuation of Western and Jewish

hegemony. That study about cultural content to see the use of the English

textbook in Israel reinforce the marginalization of the Palestinian Arab minority

that has been conducted by Awayed-bishara (2015). He conducted a systematic

text-oriented discourse analysis (TODA) of various linguistic devices appearing in

the texts and how they construct learners’ knowledge, shape identities, and

perpetuate dominant ideologies. He employed seven discursive devices as

diagnostic tools for assessing ideological bias.

Tajeddin and Teimournezhad (2016) investigated the representation of

culture in dialogues and reading passages in international and localized textbooks

used in Iran where localization is favored by language education policymakers in

their macro-planning. The two books they used were Top Notch: English for

Today’s World (Saslow & Ascher 2006), while the other was The ILI English

Series: Intermediate (2004). They adopted and modified two frameworks

purposed by Cortazzi and Jin (1999) and Adaskou, Britten, and Fahsi (1990). The

findings showed that in both the international and the localized ELT textbooks, no

reference was made to the learners’ source culture.

 16

Sadeghi and Sepahi (2017) moreover did cultural content of three EFL

textbooks by teachers’ and learners’ cultural preferences and cultural themes of

textbooks. They found that the textbooks were dominated by small “c” themes of

culture and that both teachers and learners preferred almost the same cultural

themes.

In addition, Gunantar (2017) analyzing English as a foreign language

(EFL) textbooks from the perspective of Indonesian culture. She focuses his study

on the question of whether the culture being discussed in the textbooks are more

local or Indonesian culture of western culture. At the end of the research, she

found that the most discussion is focused on Indonesia local culture and it is

considered as an effective way to teach English to Indonesian learners.

2.1.4 K13 Curriculum in ELT Textbooks

A number of researchers have investigated textbook evaluation viewed

from the K13 curriculum. The 2013 Curriculum is the curriculum that is applied

in Indonesia started in 2013. They investigate ‘When English Rings a Bell’

textbook with various editions and grades. They also investigated in many ways

and viewpoints. Fitriyani (2013) explained about analysis of the thematic coding

in this textbook. She found that from the sides of communicative function of the

nine integrated standard, the textbook she analyzed was proportional enough

because it contains almost the whole communicative function, but from the side of

age analysis, the book of “When English Rings the Bell” textbook not necessarily

used on their grade although it’s suitable with the curriculum nowadays. On the

other hand, Kusumawati (2015) analyzed the textbook more general because she
 17

analyzed the textbook with the goal of the 2013 curriculum that is emphasize on

daily communication, oral and written communication. She found that in explore

English skill the textbook uses communicative exercise for the students, in each

activity make the students active in teaching learning process, and develop their

English skill by doing the activities. From the result of the research, the textbook

is in line with the syllabus.

Arba'ati (2015) she analyzed the basic competence of the textbook with

the curriculum, she found that not all themes and materials in every chapters in

that English textbook are appropriate with the basic competences of the 2013

Curriculum. Moreover, Ardini (2016) focused on analyzing the relevancy between

the materials and the SK, SKL, and KD in the 2013 curriculum. After the

analyzed the content materials using documentation checklist, she found that

“When English Ring A Bell” was suitable to be used as a learning material.

According 7 criteria of the good textbook according to curriculum 2013 which has

issued by KEMENDIKBUD she gave a score in each criteria’s and it can

conclude that the textbook were correct, logic, and can be implemented as a

learning source in the classroom.

Nurhikmah (2016) analyzed the feasibility of content and feasibility of

presentation in the English Textbook “Bahasa Inggris untuk SMA/MA/SMK

Kelas X” according to curriculum 2013. The result of that study could be

concluded that the feasibility of content 89.58% for completeness, depth, social

function, generic structure, linguistic feature, relevance and development of life

skills and development of diversity insight from 6 chapters the whole textbook
 18

and the feasibility of presentation textbook concluded that 88.88% for the criteria

of systematic, chapter equilibrium, learner centre, development of initiative,

creativity, and learner’ critical thinking, the development of self- reliance

students, the development of learners’ ability to evaluate themselves, introduction

part, content part and closing part. From the research findings she concluded that

the textbook she analysed had met the standard of a good textbook in Indonesia

based on BSNP assessment rubric.

Furthermore, Setiawati (2015), Puspa (2017), Adi (2018), and Yuliastuti

(2018), investigated the relevancy of the materials contained in the textbook with

basic competence in 2013 curriculum in terms of cognitive and psychomotor

domains. Bloom's (1956) Cognitive domain involves knowledge and the

development of intellectual.

Puspa (2017), focus on the scientific approach of 2013 Curriculum in the

English textbook “When English Rings a Bell”. She found the compatibility

between the textbook with the scientific approach of 2013 Curriculum and the

compatibility between the textbook with the core and basic competence in terms

cognitive and psychomotor domain.

Moreover, Adi (2018) found that the textbook she analysed has applied

more relevant materials of cognitive domain rather than psychomotor domain. It is

also shown that the textbook does not support many psychomotor domain

activities. Thus, it can be concluded that the materials in this textbook materials

are relevant with 2013 curriculum, in term of cognitive domain. Even though, it
 19

lacks of relevant materials of psychomotor domain. Additionally, Yuliastuti

(2018) concluded that the textbook she analyzed covers around 72 % materials

which are relevant with the Psychomotor Domain and satisfactory the purpose of

the topic, language features, and social functions of the ideal materials which are

intended to be achieved by the students, and according to the analysis of materials

contained in the textbook entitled When English Rings a Bell with the basic

competence written in 2013 Curriculum English Syllabus in terms of action verbs

in Cognitive Domain and Psychomotor Domain from Bloom Taxonomy, the

researcher conclude that the textbook quality as teaching materials in school is

Good. It is because the relevant materials with basic competence three and four is

more than 50%.

2.1.5 Three-Level Analysis by Littlejohn (2011)

These reviews of the previous study below mention some researches about

textbook analysis using Littlejohn’s theory (2011). Littlejohn’s materials

evaluation framework the learning task presented in the materials are considered

the building blocks of any set of materials. As such, the analysis of tasks from

different aspects is very important in order to find out the overall value of the

materials.

Sahragard and Rahimi, (2009) carried out a study on evaluations of

Interchange 3rd Edition textbook. They analyzed to what extent the real

application of communicative and task-based approaches are applied in the

materials of the textbook. The finding showed that the books may not be that

successful in preparing the students for being communicatively competent.

 20

Guilloteaux (2013), only use level 2 analysis as her framework. She

compared five random series of Middle School English I (Student Book). The

results indicate that the procedure was efficient in discriminating between the

sampled textbooks, revealing a clear cluster composed of three higher scoring

books (Books B, D, and C), and two outliers with much lower scores (Books A

and E). Furthermore, Fitria (2014) analyzed the government textbook entitled

“When English Rings a Bell” and found that the textbook is in line with the

implementation of the newly designed 2013 curriculum. In line with Fitria (2014),

Rindawati, Ikhsanudin, and Wardah (2014) point out that the teaching and

learning process using the book emphasizes learner-centered activities where the

teacher’s roles are to facilitate and to monitor the activities. Whereas, the learners’

role is to be active in developing communicative activities that, in turn, will have

positive affect on their communicative competence.

Akhgar (2017) evaluates a series of an ELT textbook, namely, Mosaic

Series Middle East (Gold) Edition. The results of the study showed that although a

number of shortcomings and drawbacks were found in Mosaic Series Middle East

(Gold) Edition, it stood up reasonably well to detailed and in-depth analysis and

that its pedagogic values and positive attributes far outweighed its shortcomings.

2.1.6 Gaps Identification

Most of the previous studies mentioned above are related to textbook

evaluation which tends to know the quality of the English textbook by evaluating

the content of the textbook with a particular theory proposed by an expert. The

gaps between this study and those studies mentioned are this study tries to analyze
 21

the objectives description, subjective analysis and subjective inference of the

textbook.

The last category of the previous study is closely related to this present

study. There are some similarities and differences between my research and those.

First, we used a Qualitative method to conduct our research and content analysis

approach purposed by Littlejohn (2011). Otherwise, there are some differences.

The data source is taken from different textbooks. They used various kinds of

ELT textbooks that no one is the same as mine. I choose “English in Mind

Student’s Book 3 published by Cambridge University Press in 2016.

This present research was needed to be conducted to give a contribution to

the theory of textbook analysis. The previous study was nearly perfect in every

area they took, but there are some ELT textbooks that have been analyzed yet, so I

decided to do research in my chosen textbook. I hope that my research can give

the reference for anyone who wants to conduct the research as I have, and gives

information on how to get a credible textbook that appropriates with the learner’s

needed.
 22

2.2 Reviews of theoretical studies

2.2.1 Textbook

Textbooks play a crucial role in ELT classes. They help the teachers to

deliver the materials in the teaching and learning process in the classroom. They

are really crucial in today’s realm of language teaching and learning because the

textbooks are generally considered to be an essential component of teaching and

will, therefore, have a great impact on a teacher’s methods of instruction (Long,

2005). Some teachers rely on the textbook to guide them in the teaching and

learning process. Since there is a lot of textbooks available to use, the teacher can

choose them to depend on their need. Some textbook provides complete content

and need. They consist of for example materials itself, the method that can

teachers use, tasks that appropriate and suitable with the materials for students,

and enrichment. Nowadays, textbooks also complete with CD-Room, DVD Room

or application in a smartphone that support the teaching and learning process. By

learning in such modern tools will help the students more interest in learning

English. It will be more fun, not bored, and relax. The teacher doesn’t need to

search for other media to support their teaching because modern tools have

provided them completely. Tomlinson (2011b) also believes that a textbook helps

provide a route map for both teachers and learners, making it possible for them to

look ahead to what will be done in a lesson as well as to look back on what has

been done. So the students could prepare what will they learn and summarize

what they have learned before. McGrath (2002) asserts that textbooks can set the

direction, content and they can propose ways in which the lesson is to be taught.
 23

Garinger (2001) commenting on the usefulness of textbooks emphasizes that

using a textbook is one of the most effective and readily available ways to relieve

some of the pressures put on teachers, lessens preparation time, provides ready-

made activities and finally provides concrete samples of classroom progress

through which external stakeholders can be satisfied.

A textbook in this present study is the complementary textbook that used

to give additional materials for the students and help the teachers to get other

references in the teaching process. According to Sitepu (2012: 21), the textbook

has functions for student as a manual instructor in studying, and for the teacher as

a direction to teach a lesson. The student uses the textbook as the main source for:

1) Preparing the student as an individual or group before the teaching and

learning process in the class.

2) Interacting in the class teaching and learning process.

3) Doing the assignments given by the teacher

4) Preparing the student for the test or formative and summative examination

Whereas for the teacher, the textbook used as the source for:

1) Making teaching design

2) Preparing the other learning source

3) Developing contextual learning source

4) Giving the assignments

 24

5) Arranging evaluation materials

2.2.2 Textbook Analysis

A textbook analysis is one of the processes of textbook evaluation. It is a

process of choosing what textbook to use in a particular course considering the

need and value of teaching (Cunningsworth, 1995). Not all textbooks are available

for students’ need, they have each syllabus and contents that sometimes are not

the same as the students’ needs. A textbook analysis in this present study is

analyzing the textbook about its contents and the benefits to see the engagement

between the book and the users. There is a lot of theory for doing textbook

analysis or textbook evaluation. Some theory about textbook analysis is proposed

by Cunningsworth, Tomlinson, Littlejohn and many more. Littlejohn (2011, p.

183), for instance, claims that “materials analysis and evaluation enable us to look

inside the materials and to take more control over their design and use”. By

controlling the textbook will help the teachers to make a decision about the use of

a textbook. According to Cunningsworth (1995), a textbook evaluation would

involve the careful selection of materials examining whether they reflect the needs

of the learners, the aims, methods, and values of a specific teaching program.

Textbook evaluation helps the teachers move beyond impressionistic assessments

and it further facilitates them to acquire useful, accurate, systematic and

contextual insights into the overall nature of textbook materials (Cunningsworth,

1995 and Ellis, 1997). Through the evaluation of a textbook, teachers know the

content of the book, its strengths, and weaknesses which will facilitate them to

adapt it to suit the course aims, learners’ needs, and teachers’ beliefs. As
 25

Littlejohn (1998) observes, textbook evaluation serves the purpose of examining

whether the methodology and content of the materials are appropriate for a

particular language teaching context.

Evaluation of teaching materials can be divided into three types according

to the literature in the field of English Language Teaching.

1. Pre-use or predictive evaluation by (Ellis, 1997; McGrath, 2002;

Tomlinson, 2003), involves making decisions about the potential value

of materials for their users.

2. In-use or whilst-use evaluation by (McGrath, 2002; Tomlinson, 2003),

which involves measuring the value of materials while using them or

observing them as being used.

3. Post use evaluation by (McGrath, 2002; Tomlinson, 2003). According

to McGrath, measures the actual effect of the materials on the users. As

Tomlinson (2003, p. 25) states post-use evaluation can measure the

actual outcome of the use of the materials and thus provide the data on

which reliable decisions about the use, adaptation or replacement of

materials can be made.

2.2.3 Content Analysis

Content analysis is part of the textbook analysis. Content analysis is a

procedure for the categorization of verbal or behavioral data for purposes of

classification, summarization, and tabulation (Hancock, 2002:21). Content

analysis in this present study is a technique for analyzing the contents of the book
 26

explicitly and implicitly. In this research, the researcher used the theory of

material analysis purposed by Littlejohn (2011). The preliminary step to material

evaluation has 4 stages. They are an analysis of the target situation of use,

material analysis, match and evaluation, and action. In this present study, I only

focused on material analysis by doing Three Level of Analysis. Level 1 analysis is

‘What is there’. Level 2 analysis is ‘What is Required of Users’ and Level 3

analysis is ‘What is implied’.

2.2.4 Three Level of Analysis by Littlejohn (2011)

Three Level of Analysis. Littlejohn (2011: 181) states that the Three Level

Analysis is a systematic analysis of what is actually contained in the textbook.

They are as following:

a. Level 1 Analysis: ‘What is there’

Level 1 analysis concerns the objective description of the explicit nature of

materials which contains a statement of description, physical aspects of the

material, and the main steps in instructional sections.

b. Level 2 Analysis: ‘What is required of users’

Level 2 analysis covers the analysis of the task. The researcher subdivided

every activity into all chapters of the book into constituent tasks. At this level, it is

possible to describe the subject matter and focus of the materials (With what

content?), types of teaching/learning activities (What is the learner expected to

do?), and participation (Who with?).

 27

c. Level 3 Analysis: ‘What is Implied’

The final level of analysis draws the findings at level 1 and 2 to come to

some general conclusions about the aims, principles of selection and sequence, the

roles of teacher and learner, and the role of the material as a whole in facilitating

language learning and teaching. The writer drew the findings at levels 1 and 2 to

complete the descriptions under the aspect of design. Statements about the aims of

the materials are formulated with reference to any given syllabus specification and

the main sequence of activity.

2.2.5 English in Mind Student’s Book 3

English in Mind Student’s Book 3 Second Edition textbook is a textbook

used by some schools in Indonesia. One of the schools that uses this book is SMA

Islam Al-Azhar 16 Semarang. It is the second edition and also a special edition

with DVD-ROM. The writers of this book are Harbert Puchta and Jeff Stranks

with Richard Carter and Peter Lewis-Jones. This book published by Cambridge

University Press. Cambridge University Press is part of the University of

Cambridge. This book is the first published book published in 2016. It was printed

in Malaysia by Vivar printing. In one package of every book’s level, there is some

book in them, for level 3 of the book itself there is a student’s book, teacher’s

guidance book, workbook, and application software. The teachers who use this

book usually get annual coaching from the Cambridge instructor. This event held

to help the teachers or users about how to use this book exactly.
 28

2.3 Theoretical Framework

English in Mind Student’s Book 3 is an English textbook published by

Cambridge University Press in 2016 for the second edition, for the first edition the

book doesn’t mention it at all. This book has its own curriculum and syllabus.

Because of the different curriculum that book’s used and the curriculum in

Indonesia now, the researcher tries to analyze the explicit and implicit nature of

the book to know how well this book to use. In this present study, used theory

analysis proposed by Littlejohn (2011) because it’s related with the research

question, and then Littlejohn approach used checklist analysis of the implicit and

explicit nature of a textbook as the framework not only making general judgments

such as Cunningsworth (1995) checklists, that claiming that they would “involve

making general, impressionistic judgments on the materials” (p.192).

Additionally, Littlejohn approach (2011) also support to analyze a textbook

whether the textbook in line with the K13 curriculum, for example, some feature

in task analysis sheet confirm the points of twenty-first-century skills such as

critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, etc. The theory has three levels of

analysis, they are: Level 1 analysis is ‘What is there’. Level 2 analysis is ‘What is

Required of Users’ and Level 3 analysis is ‘What is implied’.

 29

English in Mind Student’s

Book 3 Textbook

Three Level Analysis by

Littlejohn (2011)

Level Analysis 1 Level Analysis 2 Level Analysis 3

What is their explicit What is required of What is implied by
nature? users? their use?

Conclusion

Figure 2.1 Theoretical Framework Analysis

 CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

This chapter presents the conclusions and suggestions of what has been discussed

in the previous chapters.

5.1 Conclusions

The explicit content within the English textbook: “English in Mind

Student’s Book 3” consists of physical aspects and sequence main activities of the

textbook. The textbook published by a foreign publisher, Cambridge University

Press part of Cambridge University. The material is intended to aid in the

teaching/learning in general English, principally this textbook provides for

teenagers, in Indonesia this book used to teach grade X of Senior High School.

This textbook designed for one year school and offer the layout with full-colored

picture and design, where consists of 128 pages and divided into fourteen chapters

with four main parts on each chapter: an opening reading text, a grammar page

(often including pronunciation), two pages of vocabulary and skills work, and a

photo story (a Fiction in mind text, a song or Culture in mind text, followed by

writing skills work and extra speaking). The textbook package is quite complete

starting from this student’s book, teacher’s resource book, work-book with

accompanying DVD-ROM, classware and also testmaker.

Most tasks require learners to do scripted responses, do grammar focus,

select information and discussion. The majority of tasks focus on meaning and

require learners to work individually. It can be concluded that the main purpose of

79
 80

writing the textbook is to develop learners’ communicative competence by

encouraging the learners to build text, to response role in using language, to

focusing on meaning and to build positive affective aspects through teaching and

learning process. So, it can be inferred that the “English in Mind Student’s Book

3” is intended to facilitate more efficient use of the learners’ materials.

The role of the materials as a whole is to structure the teaching and

learning of English, classroom time, and classroom interaction, to provide a route

for teaching and learning English and to provide a resource for the teaching of

motivation content (stories, cross-curricular topics) and engaging tasks. This

textbook can be a complement to strengthen teachers in the teaching and learning

process since the analysis found that some points of this foreign published

textbook are related to the K13 curriculum. This textbook is also completed with

classware. Additionally, this textbook applies critical thinking and communication

skills. Therefore, the content of the textbook supports the development of twenty-

first-century skills and apply learner-centered teaching which is also

recommended in the 2013 curriculum.

5.2 Suggestions

Based on the conclusion above, the researcher would like to propose some

suggestions for English teachers, future researchers, and materials designer.

As the references for English teachers, especially teachers who teach

tenth grade of high school students, these textbooks can be used as a

complementary textbook to support teaching in the learning process but it needs

little modifications, for example, this textbook provides less of group tasks.
 81

Therefore, teachers should include more activities requiring students to work in

groups or pairs since it helps the learners to build their collaborative learning.

Learners will feel more confident if they accomplish the tasks together. Therefore,

this will engage them to be more active to learn the language rather than work

alone. In fact, the 2013 curriculum also emphasizes group work rather than

individual work (PERMENDIKBUD Number 36, 2018).

This textbook used different curriculum with ours. The teachers should

adopt it with the syllabus of the K13 curriculum and because this textbook

provides especially for second language students, there is a different standard with

Indonesia’s students as foreign language students. Therefore, the teacher should

adjust it based on the students' needs and abilities.

Since this research concerned only in the material analysis as one of the

steps in a preliminary step to material evaluation proposed by Littlejohn (2011),

further, the researchers can use the result of analysis to complete the preliminary

step to material evaluation. The steps left are an analysis of the target situation of

use, match and evaluation and action. These may relate the result of analysis to

the local context, curriculum or student’s and teacher’s need to know how much

the suitability and then decide whether to reject, adopt, adapt, supplement, or

make the materials a critical object.

The materials designer of this textbook should develop and improve the

materials in oral output so it will be equal with the proportion of written output

materials. This selected textbook mostly required the students to complete the task

individually it will be better if the designer of this textbook gives an additional

 82

proportion to students work in the group considering the benefit of group work.

Another feature that needs to improve from this selected textbook is the

opportunity of the students to express their opinion/ideas in completing the task.

The tasks mostly required the students to response and it will be better to increase

the proportion of initiate, in the turn-take feature.

This paper also suggests to the future ELT textbooks designer could

improve their content by including more activities targeting the teaching of 21 st-

century skills since it is recommended in the 2013 curriculum. 21 st-century skills

also have a lot of benefits that learners need to thrive in today’s global economy.
 REFERENCES

Adaskou, K., D. Britten & B. Fahsi. (1990). Design decisions on the cultural
content of a course for Morocco. ELT Journal 44, no. 1: 3–10.

Adi, Hayati Wasistyo. (2018). Content analysis of student book “When English
rings a bell (revised edition) for grade VIII of junior high school. Thesis.
Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B. & Saeidi, M. (2014). The evaluation of “English

Textbook 2” Taught in Iranian high schools from teachers’ perspectives.
English Language Teaching,7(3),150-159.

Ahour, Touran & Golpour, Farhad. (2016). Iranian new jhs book (prospect 1)
weighted against material evaluation checklist perspective. Journal of
Applied Linguistics. 6(13).

Akhgar, Farzad, Talebinejad, Mohammad Reza, & Ansari, Moslem. (2017). ELT
materials evaluation: A comprehensive analysis of mosaic series middle
east gold edition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research,
108-122.

Alavinia, P., & Siyadat, M. (2013). A comparative study of English textbooks

used in Iranian institutes. International Journal of Asian Social Science,
3(1), 150–170. Retrieved from http://www.pakinsight.com/pdf-files/150-
170.pdf

Aliabari, M & Jamalvandi, B. (2012). Realization of culture in English textbooks

in Chinese high school level. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of
Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 89-100.

Arba’ati, Rani. (2015). An analysis of English textbook entitled Bahasa Inggris

“When English rings a bell” for the eighth year student of junior high
school based on the 2013 curriculum. Thesis. Universitas Muhamadiyah
Surakarta.

Ardini, Wuri Dwi. (2016). Content analysis of “When English ring a bell” an
English textbook for eighth-grade junior high school students relevancy to
curriculum 2013. Thesis. Universitas PGRI Nusantara Kediri.

Awayed-Bishara. (2015). Analyzing the cultural content of materials used for

teaching English to high school speakers of Arabic in Israel. Sage, Vol.
26(5) 517 –542.

83
 84

Bennett, J. M., M. J. Bennett, and W. Allen. (2003). ‘Developing intercultural

competence in the language classroom’ in D. L. Lange and R. M. Paige
(eds.).

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of

educational goals: Handbook i, cognitive domain. New York: Longman.

Canale, Michael & Swain, Merril. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative

approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics. I.
10. 1093/applin/I.1.1.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in Education. 5th
ed. London: Routledge.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the
EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching
(pp. 196–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approaches (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL Teaching Material.

London: Heinemann.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT

Journal, 51, 36-42.

Fill in the blank. (2019). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary. Retrieved from

http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/fillintheblank

Fitria, Tira Nur. (2014). An analysis of English textbook for seventh junior high
school “When English rings a bell” in revised edition 2014. Thesis.
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Fitriyani, Meita. (2013). A textbook analysis of “When English rings the bell” a
textbook for the seventh grade of junior high. Thesis. Universitas Negeri
Yogyakarta.

Garinger, D. (2010). Textbook selection for the ESL classroom. Eric Digest.

Garvin, D.A. (1988), Managing quality, The free press, New York, NY.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research:

Competencies for analysis and application (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
 85

Guilloteaux, M. J. (2013). Language textbook selection: Using materials analysis

from the perspective of SLA principles. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 22(3):231–
239.

Gunantar, Devy Angga. (2017). Textbooks analysis: Analyzing English as a

foreign language (efl) textbooks from the perspective of Indonesian
culture. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, XI/2.

Hancock, Beverley. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. University of

Nottingham: Trent Focus Group.

Harmer, J. 2007. The practice of English language teaching (4th Ed.). Harlow:
Pearson Education Limited.

Iran Language Institute. (2004). The ILI English series: Intermediate. Tehran: Iran
Language Institute.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Peraturan menteri pendidikan

dan kebudayaan nomor 36 tahun 2018 tentang perubahan atas peraturan
menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 59 tahun 2014 tentang
kurikulum 2013 sekolah menengah atas/madrasah aliyah. Jakarta,
Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kusumawati, Fajar Arum. (2015). The analysis of English textbook: “When

English rings a bell (revise edition)” for 7th-grade students publish by
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Thesis.
Universitas Muria Kudus.

Krippendorff, Klaus. (1980). Content analysis; An introduction to its methodology

2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Littlejohn, A. (2011): The analysis of language teaching materials: inside the

trojan horse. In Tomlinson, B. (Ed.): Materials development in language
teaching (pp: 190-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Long, M. H. (Ed.) (2005). Second language need analysis. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Mahmood, K. (2009). Conformity to quality characteristics of textbooks: The

illusion of textbook evaluation in Pakistan. Journal of Research and
Reflections in Education, 5 (2), 170-190

Mertens, Donna M. & Biber, Sharlene H. (2012). Triangulation and mixed

methods research: provocative position. Journal of Mixed Method
Research, 6(2), 75- 79. Sage.
 86

McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in
ELT: A teacher’s guide (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.

McGrath. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching.

Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Mohammadi, Mohammad, and Abdi, Heidar. (2014). Textbook evaluation: a case

study. Urmia University.

Murayama, Y. (2000). The promotion of intercultural understanding in English

language teaching: An analysis of textbooks and teacher training courses
for upper secondary schools in Japan. (Unpublished Masters’ thesis). The
University of York, UK.

Nurhikmah, Wita. (2016). The analysis of English textbook used in the first grade
of senior high school based on curriculum 2013. A Thesis. Universitas
Negeri Medan.

O'Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks?. ELT Journal, 36 (2), 104-111.

Puspa, Hindun Annisa. (2017). Content analysis of “When English rings a bell”
an English textbook for seventh-grade junior high school based on
scientific approach of 2013 curriculum. Thesis. IAIN Surakarta.

Ramirez, A., & Hall, J. (1990). Language and culture in secondary level Spanish
textbooks. Modern Language Journal, 74, 48–65.

Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodger, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language

teaching (2nd Ed.). United States of America: Cambridge University
Press.

Rindawati, Ikhsanudin, & Wardah. (2014). An analysis on English textbook

“Bahasa Inggris: When English rings the bell”. Pontianak: Universitas
Tanjungpura.

Rohmatillah and P. Audina, Devi. 2017. An analysis of textbook entitled

“Pathway to English” published by erlangga at the first semester of the
11th grade of Senior High School. Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris. 10(2):
326-343.

Sadeghi, Karim & Sepahi, Zhila (2017): Cultural content of three EFL textbooks:
Teachers’ and learners’ cultural preferences and cultural themes of
textbooks, Pedagogies: An International Journal, DOI:
10.1080/1554480X.2017.1417128.
 87

Sahragard, R., Rahimi, A., & Zaremoayeddi, I. (2009). An in-depth evaluation of

Interchange series (3rd ed.). Porta Linguarum, 12, 37–54.

Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2006). Top notch: 3A. USA: Pearson-Longman.

Setiawati, Dian. (2015). Content analysis of student book “When English rings a
bell” for grade VIII junior high school. Thesis. Universitas Negeri
Semarang.

Shin, J., Eslami, Z. E., & Chen, W.-C. (2011). Presentation of local and
international culture in current international English-language teaching
textbooks. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 24(3), 253–268.

Sitepu, B.P. (2012). Penulisan buku teks pelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan kombinasi (mixed

methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tajeddin, Zia & Teimournezhad, Shohreh. (2015). Exploring the hidden agenda in
the representation of culture in international and localised ELT textbooks,
The Language Learning Journal, 43:2, 180-193, DOI:
10.1080/09571736.2013.869942.

Tarigan. H.G. & Djago Tarigan. (1986). Telaah buku teks bahasa Indonesia.
Bandung: Angkasa.

Thomson Heinle. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers.

Canada: Kathleen Graves, p. 175.

Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. Continuum

Intl Pub Group.

Tomlinson, B. (2011b). Introduction: Principles and procedures of materials

development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language
teaching (pp. 1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trochim, W.M. (2006). The research methods knowledge base. Retrieved from:
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/.

Tsagari, D., & Sifakis, N. C. (2014). EFL coursebook evaluation in Greek primary
schools: views from teachers and authors. System, 45,211e226

Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (2001). Educational Research: a Guide to the

Process. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Yuen, K.-M. (2011). The representation of foreign cultures in English textbooks.

ELT Journal, 458-466.
 88

Yulianti, R. (2011). Content analysis on the English e-book “Developing English

competencies for senior high school (SMA/MA) grade X”. Unpublished
Thesis. Malang: Faculty of Letters State University of Malang.

Yuliastuti, Aizah Eka. (2018). Content analysis of basic competence in “When

English rings a bell” textbook 2017 edition for seventh graders.
Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Negeri Semarang.