Advanced Course Reading Lesson 2: Matching Information
Advanced Course Reading Lesson 2: Matching Information
READING LESSON 2
Focus: Matching Questions, Yes/No/Not Given and Multiple Choice Questions
MATCHING INFORMATION
For this type of question, you need to locate an idea or piece of information in the text and
match it to a phrase that accurately describes it. The answers do not follow the same order as
the text and may not be the main idea of the paragraph. Some paragraphs contain more than
one answer. Not all paragraphs contain an answer.
STEP 1: Read the passage’s title (or subtitle, if available) to grasp the main topic. If there’s no
title, read the first 2 - 3 sentences of the first paragraph.
A. Geckos are remarkable little lizards, clinging to almost any dry surface, and Alyssa Stark,
from the University of Akron, US, explains that they appear to be equally happy scampering
through tropical rainforest canopies as they are in urban settings. A lot of gecko studies look at
the very small adhesive structures on their toes to understand how the system works at the
animals grip surfaces with microscopic hairs on the soles of their feet, which make close enough
contact to be attracted to the surface by the minute forces between atoms.
B. However, she and her colleagues Timothy Sullivan and Peter Niewiarowski were curious
about how the lizards cope on surfaces in their natural habitat. Explaining that previous studies
had focused on the reptiles clinging to artificial dry surfaces, Stark says ‘We know they are in
tropical environments that probably have a lot of rain and geckos don’t suddenly fall out of the
trees when it’s wet.’ Yet, the animals do seem to have trouble getting a grip on smooth, wet,
artificial surfaces, sliding down wet vertical glass after several steps. The team decided to find
out how geckos with wet feet cope on both wet and dry surfaces.
C. First, they had to find out how well their geckos clung onto glass with dry feet. Fitting a
tiny harness around the lizard’s pelvis and gently lowering the animal onto a plate of smooth
D. Next, the trio sprayed the glass plate with a midst of water and re-tested the lizards, but
this time the animals had problems holding tight. The droplets were interfering with the lizards’
attachment mechanism, but it wasn’t clear how. And when the team immersed the geckos in a
bath of room – temperature water with a smooth glass bottom, the animals were completely
unable to anchor themselves to the smooth surface. ‘The toes are super – hydrophobic’, (i.e.
water repellant) explains Stark, who could see a silvery bubble of air around their toes. But,
they were unable to displace the water around their feet to make the tight contact that usually
keeps geckos in place.
E. Then the team tested the lizard’s adhesive forces on the dry surface when their feet had
been soaking for 90 minutes, and found that the lizards could barley hold on, detaching when
they were pulled with a force roughly equalling their own weight. ‘That might be the sliding
behaviour that we see when the geckos climb vertically up misted glass’, says Stark. So, geckos
climbing on wet surfaces with damp feet are constantly on the verge of slipping and Stark adds
that when the soggy lizards were faced with the misted and immersed horizontal surfaces, they
slipped as soon as the rig started pulling. Therefore, geckos can walk on wet surfaces, as long
as their feet are reasonably dry. However, as soon as their feet get wet, they are barely able to
hang on it takes geckos to recover from a drenching.
Write the correct letter, A-E, in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet
STEP 4: Look at the statements below. Underline/circle keywords and look for them in the
passage. (Remember to identify what kind of information you need to find)
6. the contrast between Stark’s research and the work of other researchers
STEP 5: Read the relevant part of the passage in detail and answer the questions.
STEP 1: Read the passage’s title (or subtitle, if available) to grasp the main topic. If there’s no
title, read the first 2 - 3 sentences of the first paragraph.
In a finding that parallels the evolution of genes, researchers have shown that the more
frequently a word is used, the less likely it is to change over long periods of time.
STEP 2: With each paragraph, read the first 2 - 3 sentences (and the last sentence if there are
5 or more sentences) to grasp the main idea.
The question of why some words evolve rapidly through time while others are preserved –
often with the same meaning in multiple languages has long plagued linguists. Two
independent teams of researchers have tackled this question from different angles, each
arriving at a remarkably similar conclusion.
“The frequency with which specific words are used in everyday language exerts a general and
law-like influence on their rates of evolution,” writes Mark Pagel, author of one of two studies
published this week.
Anyone who has tried to learn English will have been struck by its excess of stubbornly irregular
verbs, which render grammatical rules unreliable. The past tense of regular verbs is formed by
adding the suffix ‘-ed’, but this luxury is not afforded to their irregular kin. Over time, however,
some irregular verbs ‘regularise’. For instance, the past tense of ‘help’ used to be ‘holp’, but
now it is ‘helped.
Mathematician Erez Lieberman, from Harvard University in Massachusetts, US, performed a
quantitative study of the rate at which English verbs such as ‘help’ have become more regular
with time. Of the list of 177 irregular verbs they took from Old English, only 98 are still irregular
today. Amazingly, the changes they observed obey a very precise mathematical description: the
half-life of an irregular verb is proportional to the square root of its frequency. In other words,
they found that the more an irregular verb is used, the longer it will remain irregular.
A separate group of academics, led by evolutionary biologist Mark Pagel from the University of
Reading, in the UK, used a statistical modelling technique to study the evolution of words from
87 different Indo-European languages.
Questions 1-5
Look at the following statements and the list of researchers below. Match each statement with
the correct researcher, A-C.
Write the correct letter, A-C, in boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet.
STEP 4: Look at the list of researchers below. Look for these names in the passage and
underline/circle them each time they appear.
A Pagel
B Lieberman
C Gray
STEP 5: Read these statements connected to the text and underline/circle the keywords in
each.
2. Regardless of what happens in the world, there appear to be fixed rules that govern the
way words alter over time.
3. Words that don’t follow a standard pattern will remain that way if they are used often.
5. We focused on the historical changes that have occurred in one particular language.
STEP 6: Look for the keywords in the parts where the names are found and read those parts in
detail. Answer the questions by matching each person with the correct statement.
STEP 1: Read the passage’s title (or subtitle, if available) to grasp the main topic. If there’s no
title, read the first 2 - 3 sentences of the first paragraph.
Aesop's fable ‘The crow and the pitcher’ more fact than fiction
New research indicates that rocks, members of the crow family, are able to solve
complex problems using tools.
STEP 2: With each paragraph, read the first 2 - 3 sentences (and the last sentence if there are
5 or more sentences) to grasp the main idea.
In Aesop’s fictional fable ‘The crow and the pitcher’, a thirsty crow uses stones to raise the level
of water in a jug to quench its thirst. A recent study demonstrates that rocks, birds belonging to
the corvid [or crow] family, are in fact able to solve complex problems using tools and can
easily master the same technique used in the story.
Christopher Bird of the University of Cambridge, who led the study, highlighted the importance
of the findings, stating: ‘Corvids are remarkably intelligent, and in many ways rival the great
apes in their physical intelligence and ability to solve problems. The only other animal known to
complete a similar task is the orang-utan. This is remarkable considering their brain is so
different to the great apes. Although it has been speculated in folklore, empirical tests are
needed to examine the extent of their intelligence and how they solve problems.’
In their first experiment, the researchers varied the height of the water in a tube and the four
rocks, which were the subject of the research, used stones to raise the water level to reach a
worm floating on top. The clever birds proved very adept and were highly successful, regardless
of the starting level of the water or the number of the stones needed. Two of the birds were
successful on their first attempt in raising the water to the correct height whilst the other two
birds needed a second try.
In addition to the speed with which they completed the task, the birds were also highly
accurate in their ability, adding the exact number of stones needed to reach the worm.
In the second experiment, the rocks were presented with stones that varied in size. Here, the
rocks selected larger stones over smaller ones (though they didn’t do this straight away). The
scientists speculate that the birds quickly realised that the larger stones displaced more water,
and they were thus able to obtain the reward more quickly than by using small stones.
According to the team, in the final experiment, the rocks recognised that sawdust could not be
manipulated in the same manner as water. Therefore, when presented with the choice between
a tube half-filled with either sawdust or water, rooks dropped the pebbles into the tube
containing water and not the sawdust.
Despite the fact that the study clearly demonstrates the flexible nature of tool use in rocks, they
are not believed to use tools in the wild. ‘Wild tool use appears to be dependent on motivation,’
remarked Bird. ‘Rooks do not use tools in the wild because they do not need to, not because
they can’t. They have access to other food that can be acquired without using tools.’ As Bird
noted, that fits nicely with Aesop's maxim, demonstrated by the crow: ‘Necessity is the mother
of invention.’
Questions 1-6
Write the correct letter, A-H. in boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet
STEP 4: Look at the sentence beginnings below. Underline/circle keywords and look for them
in the passage.
5. The research showed rooks can use tools with ease, though
6. The rooks worked out the properties of different materials and as a result,
STEP 5: Read the relevant part of the passage in detail and answer the questions by choosing
the correct endings from the list below. ( Remember to check that the completed sentence is
grammatical and that the meaning matches the text. )
Write the correct letter, A-H, in boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.
3. the age at which children can usually identify a static image of themselves
6. examples of the wide range of features that contribute to the sense of ‘self-as-object’
Questions 7-10
Look at the following findings (Questions 7-10) and the list of researchers below.
Write the correct letter, A-E, in boxes 7-10 on your answer sheet.
A James
B Cooley
C Lewis and Brooks-Gunn
D Mead E Bronson
7. A sense of identity can never be formed without relationships with other people.
8. A child’s awareness of self is related to a sense of mastery over things and people.
Human beings are the only species to perform sophisticated creative acts regularly. If we can
break this process down into computer code, where does that leave human creativity? 'This is a
question at the very core of humanity,' says Geraint Wiggins, a computational creativity
researcher at Goldsmiths, University of London. 'It scares a lot of people. They are worried that
it is taking something special away from what it means to be human.'
To some extent, we are all familiar with computerised art. The question is: where does the
work of the artist stop and the creativity of the computer begin? Consider one of the oldest
machine artists, Aaron, a robot that has had paintings exhibited in London's Tate Modern and
the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Aaron can pick up a paintbrush and paint on canvas
on its own. Impressive perhaps, but it is still little more than a tool to realise the programmer's
own creative ideas.
Simon Colton, the designer of the Painting Fool, is keen to make sure his creation doesn't
attract the same criticism. Unlike earlier 'artists' such as Aaron, the Painting Fool only needs
minimal direction and can come up with its own concepts by going online for material. The
software runs its own web searches and trawls through social media sites. It is now beginning
to display a kind of imagination too, creating pictures from scratch. One of its original works is a
series of f'zzy landscapes, depicting trees and sky. While some might say they have a
mechanical look, Colton argues that such reactions arise from people's double standards
towards software-produced and human-produced art. After all, he says, consider that the
Painting Fool painted the landscapes without referring to a photo. 'If a child painted a new
scene from its head, you'd say it has a certain level of imagination,' he points out. The same
should be true of a machine.' Software bugs can also lead to unexpected results. Some of the
Researchers like Colton don't believe it is right to measure machine creativity directly to that of
humans who 'have had millennia to develop our skills'. Others, though, are fascinated by the
prospect that a computer might create something as original and subtle as our best artists. So
far, only one has come close. Composer David Cope invented a program called Experiments in
Musical Intelligence, or EMI. Not only did EMI create compositions in Cope's style, but also that
of the most revered classical composers, including Bach, Chopin and Mozart. Audiences were
moved to tears, and EMI even fooled classical music experts into thinking they were hearing
genuine Bach. Not everyone was impressed however. Some, such as Wiggins, have blasted
Cope's work as pseudoscience, and condemned him for his deliberately vague explanation of
how the software worked. Meanwhile, Douglas Hofstadter of Indiana University said EMI
created replicas which still rely completely on the original artist's creative impulses. When
audiences found out the truth they were often outraged with Cope, and one music lover even
tried to punch him. Amid such controversy, Cope destroyed EMI's vital databases.
But why did so many people love the music, yet recoil when they discovered how it was
composed? A study by computer scientist David Moffat of Glasgow Caledonian University
provides a clue. He asked both expert musicians and non-experts to assess six compositions.
The participants weren't told beforehand whether the tunes were composed by humans or
computers, but were asked to guess, and then rate how much they liked each one. People who
thought the composer was a computer tended to dislike the piece more than those who
believed it was human. This was true even among the experts, who might have been expected
to be more objective in their analyses.
Where does this prejudice come from? Paul Bloom of Yale University has a suggestion: he
reckons part of the pleasure we get from art stems from the creative process behind the work.
This can give it an 'irresistible essence', says Bloom. Meanwhile, experiments by Justin Kruger
of New York University have shown that people's enjoyment of an artwork increases if they
think more time and effort was needed to create it. Similarly, Colton thinks that when people
experience art, they wonder what the artist might have been thinking or what the artist is trying
to tel them. It seems obvious, therefore, that with computers producing art, this speculation is
Vocabulary highlights
Write the correct letter, A-G, in boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.
List of Ideas
A. generating work that was virtually indistinguishable from that of humans.
B. knowing whether it was the work of humans or software.
C. producing work entirely dependent on the imagination of its creator.
D. comparing the artistic achievements of humans and computers.
E. revealing the technical details of his program.
F. persuading the public to appreciate computer art.
G. discovering that it was the product of a computer program.
- NO: 100% of the info in the statement can be located in the passage. The meaning of
the statement is opposite to that in the passage. You can use the information in the
passage to correct the statement.
- NOT GIVEN: Some information in the statement cannot be located in the passage.
You cannot use the information in the passage to correct the statement.
Example:
Extract: It is commonly believed that taking steps to protect the environment is morally the
right thing to do. What is sadly evident, however, is that we all have friends and family who do
not concern themselves at all with tackling this problem. The number one reason for this is
that, for some, it is just inconvenient. Other people just do not feel that their contribution
makes a difference. Fortunately, however, the majority of us do give it the attention it deserves
and many people go to great lengths to ensure the planet is protected for future generations.
Statements:
- Some people do not pay attention to environmental issues because they do not believe
their involvement would make an impact.
The answer for this statement is YES because all the information can be located in the extract.
The meaning of the sentence is also the same.
The answer for this statement is NO because all the information can be located in the passage,
but the meaning is opposite (“do not care” and “give it the attention it deserves”). This
The answer for this statement is NOT GIVEN because there’s no information on whether
people tackle environmental problems in the wrong way or not in the extract. It cannot be
corrected by any means because we don’t have the information.
While many organisations put a considerable amount of effort into conservation projects, it is
just not enough. Many of these efforts are effective short term, but in the long term they simply
do not work, due to a number of factors.
Whilst there remains a demand for exotic animals in society, endangered species will always be
at risk of being hunted and poached. Poachers often target larger animals - animals which take
a long time to repopulate, such as rhinos and elephants. The poachers are clever and use
methods which are sometimes completely undetectable. A recent case involved 300 elephants
being killed in Zimbabwe's largest nature reserve. Poachers put poison in the water holes, killing
hundreds of elephants and destroying an entire ecosystem.
Captive breeding is perhaps the most effective method of protecting animals from extinction,
but this also has its problems. First, releasing animals from captive environments could
introduce disease into wild populations. Secondly, after several generations in captivity, species
could become less able to survive in the wild. Would they know how to hunt for food? Or how
not to be killed by other animals?
Perhaps the biggest problem facing endangered species, however, is the increasing population
of the human race. Although conservation measures have helped to prevent humans from
completely destroying all natural habitats, human invasion will always be one of the greatest
risks to threatened species.
STEP 3: Read the instruction carefully to make sure you won’t mistakenly write True / False on
your answer sheets.
Questions 1-4
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage?
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
STEP 4: Look at the statements below. Then underline/circle keywords and look for them in
the passage.
1. Captive breeding programmes ensure that animals can cope in their natural habitat.
2. Poachers are good at hiding the way in which they kill animals.
3. Releasing animals into the wild after captive breeding has led to infections spreading.
4. Conservation projects have not made any impact on saving natural habitats.
STEP 5: Read the relevant part of the passage in detail and answer the questions by applying
the detailed definition of Y/N/NG that you’ve learnt above.
STEP 1: Read the passage’s title (or subtitle, if available) to grasp the main topic. If there’s no
title, read the first 2 - 3 sentences of the first paragraph.
STEP 2: With each paragraph, read the first 2 - 3 sentences (and the last sentence if there are
5 or more sentences) to grasp the main idea.
Most managers can identify the major trends of the day. But in the course of conducting
research in a number of industries and working directly with companies, we have discovered
that managers often fail to recognize the less obvious but profound ways these trends are
influencing consumers' aspirations, attitudes, and behaviors. This is especially true of trends
that managers view as peripheral to their core markets.
Many ignore trends in their innovation strategies or adopt a wait-and-see approach and let
competitors take the lead. At a minimum, such responses mean missed profit opportunities. At
the extreme, they can jeopardize a company by ceding to rivals the opportunity to transform
the industry. The purpose of this article is twofold: to spur managers to think more expansively
about how trends could engender new value propositions in their core markets, and to provide
some high-level advice on how to make market research and product development personnel
more adept at analyzing and exploiting trends.
One strategy, known as 'infuse and augment', is to design a product or service that retains
most of the attributes and functions of existing products in the category but adds others that
address the needs and desires unleashed by a major trend. A case in point is the Poppy range
of handbags, which the firm Coach created in response to the economic downturn of 2008. The
Coach brand had been a symbol of opulence and luxury for nearly 70 years, and the most
obvious reaction to the downturn would have been to lower prices. However, that would have
risked cheapening the brand's image. Instead, they initiated a consumer-research project which
revealed that customers were eager to lift themselves and the country out of tough times.
Using these insights, Coach launched the lower-priced Poppy handbags, which were in vibrant
colors, and looked more youthful and playful than conventional Coach products. Creating the
sub-brand allowed Coach to avert an across-the-board price cut. In contrast to the many
companies that responded to the recession by cutting prices, Coach saw the new consumer
mindset as an opportunity for innovation and renewal.
Questions 1-5
STEP 4: Look at the main part of the questions (NOT the options A, B, C, D). Underline/circle
keywords and look for them in the passage. After you’ve found the keywords, read the relevant
part of the passage in detail.
STEP 5: Look at the options A, B, C, D below and answer the question by choosing the correct
letter.
D. are unaware of the significant impact that trends have on consumers’ lives.
D. modify the entire look of its brand to suit the economic climate.
D. It was not the first time that Tesco had implemented such an initiative.
C. It was the type of strategy that would not have been possible in the past.
D. It was the kind of strategy which might appear to have few obvious benefits.
A. It contained technology that had been developed for the sports industry.
B. It appealed to young people who were keen to improve their physical fitness.
C. It took advantage of a current trend for video games with colourful 3D graphics.
Vocabulary highlights
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
28. In the 20th century, scientists should have conducted more studies of jellyfish.
29. Some jellyfish species that used to live in shallow water may be moving to deep water.
30. Dr Karen Hansen's views about jellyfish need to be confirmed by additional research.
32. The research findings of Paul Dewar have been accepted by other academics.
Questions 33-36
Write the correct letter, A-F, in boxes 37-40 on your answer sheet
37. Researchers working in Norway and the Arctic have shown that
38. The use of DNA sequencing and isotope analysis has proved that
40. Following research in the Mediterranean Sea, it has been claimed that
C. jellyfish can be observed and tracked in ways that do not injure them.
How will NASA transform the International Space Station from a building site into a cutting-
edge research laboratory?
A premier, world-class laboratory in low Earth orbit. That was how the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration agency (NASA) sold the International Space Station (ISS) to the US
Congress in 2001.Today no one can doubt the agency’s technological ambition. The most
complex engineering project ever attempted has created an enormous set of interlinked
modules that orbits the planet at more than 27,000 kilometres per hour. It might be travelling
fast but, say critics, as a lab it is going nowhere. So far, it has gone through $150 billion.
So where should its future priorities lie? This question was addressed at the recent 1st annual
ISS research and development conference in Colorado. Among the presenters was Satoshi
Iwase of Aichi Medical University in Japan who has spent several years developing an
experiment that could help solve one of the key problems that humans will face in space:
keeping our bodies healthy in weightlessness. One thing that physiologists have learned is that
without gravity our bodies begin to lose strength, leaving astronauts with weakened bones,
muscles and cardiovascular systems. To counter these effects on a long-duration mission to,
say, Mars, astronauts will almost certainly need to create their own artificial gravity. This is
where Iwase comes in. He leads a team designing a centrifuge for humans. In their preliminary
design, an astronaut is strapped into the seat of a machine that resembles an exercise bike.
Pedalling provides a workout for the astronaut’s muscles and cardiovascular system, but it also
causes the seat to rotate vertically around a central axis so the rider experiences artificial
gravity while exercising.
The centrifuge project highlights the station’s potential as a research lab. Similar machines have
flown in space aboard NASA’s shuttles, but they couldn’t be tested for long enough to prove
whether they were effective. It’s been calculated that to properly assess a centrifuge’s impact
on human physiology, astronauts would have to ride it for 30 minutes a day for at least two
months. The only way to test this is in weightlessness, and the only time we have to do that is
on the space station,’ says Laurence Young, a space medicine expert at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.
NASA has already begun to take action, hiring management consultants ProOrbis to develop a
plan to cut through the bureaucracy. And Congress also directed NASA to hire an independent
organisation, the Centre for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS), to help manage the
station’s US lab facilities. One of CASIS’s roles is to convince public and private investors that
science on the station is worth the spend because judged solely by the number of papers
published, the ISS certainly seems poor value: research on the station has generated about
3,100 papers since 1998.The Hubble Space Telescope, meanwhile, has produced more than I
1,300 papers in just over 20 years, yet it cost less than one-tenth of the price of the space
station.
Yet Mark Uhran, assistant associate administrator for the ISS, refutes the criticism that the
station hasn’t done any useful research. He points to progress made on a salmonella vaccine,
for example. To get the ISS research back on track, CASIS has examined more than 100
previous microgravity experiments to identify promising research themes. From this, it has
opted to focus on life science and medical research, and recently called for proposals for
experiments on muscle wasting, osteoporosis and the immune system. The organisation also
maintains that the ISS should be used to develop products with commercial application and to
test those that are either close to or already on the market. Investment from outside
organisations is vital, says Uhran, and a balance between academic and commercial research
will help attract this.
The station needs to attract cutting-edge research, yet many scientists seem to have little idea
what goes on aboard it. Jeanne DiFrancesco at ProOrbis conducted more than 200 interviews
with people from organisations with potential interests in low gravity studies. Some were aware
According to Alan Stern, planetary scientist, the biggest public relations boost for the ISS may
come from the privately funded space flight industry. Companies like SpaceX could help NASA
and its partners when it comes to resupplying the ISS, as it suggests it can reduce launch costs
by two-thirds. Virgin Atlantic’s Spaceship Two or Zero2lnfinity's high- altitude balloon could also
boost the space station’s fortunes. They might not come close to the ISS’s orbit, yet Stern
believes they will revolutionise the way we, the public, see space. Soon everyone will be
dreaming of interplanetary travel again, he predicts. More importantly, scientists are already
queuing for seats on these low-gravity space-flight services so they can collect data during a
few minutes of weightlessness. This demand for low-cost space flight could eventually lead to a
service running on a more frequent basis, giving researchers the chance to test their ideas
before submitting a proposal for experiments on the ISS. Getting flight experience should help
them win a slot on the station, says Stern.
Vocabulary highlights
27. What does the writer state about the ISS in the first paragraph?
32.There is general ignorance about what kinds of projects are possible on the ISS.
33.The process of getting accepted projects onto the ISS should be speeded up.
35.To properly assess new space technology, there has to be an absence of gravity.
List of people
A. Laurence Young
C. Mark Uhran
D. Jeanne DiFrancesco
Question 36