Book Editing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Print. Thrown in
Book Editing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Print. Thrown in
Martha Carlson-Bradley
PW 5020: Editing in the Professions
Final Draft: Annotated Bibliography
March 10, 2010
1. Introduction
2. Style Guidance
Sharp, Leslie T., and Irene Gunther. Editing Fact and Fiction: A Concise Guide to
Book Editing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Print. Thrown in
for good measure, I am sure this manual will only confirm my suspicion that
Einsohn is a great style guide. However, an alternate view dispels much
speculation. Perhaps two editor-authors are better than one.
Smith, Sarah Harrison. The Fact Checker's Bible: A Guide to Getting It Right. New
York: Anchor, 2004. Print. I own a series of fiction writer’s guidebooks on
everything from crime scene operating procedure to poisonings to explosives and
their effectiveness, this manual may shed some light on common misconceptions
and myths in editing and writing these genres, and even in the purveyance of
fiction’s stranger friend, truth.
Blake, Gary, and Robert W. Bly. The Elements of Business Writing: A Guide to
Writing Clear, Concise Letters, Memos, Reports, Proposals, and Other Business
Documents. 1st ed. New York: Longman, 1992. Print. In my experience thus far, I
have found that my general communications are too formal—just look at that
“thus”—with this book I hope to broaden, and modernize my approach to
business writing. I specifically wish to master the query letter and streamline my
article submissions for a broader appeal.
Blake, Gary, and Robert W. Bly. The Elements of Technical Writing: The Essential
Guide to Writing Clear, Concise Proposals, Reports, Manuals, Letters, Memos,
and Other Documents in Every Technical Field. New York: MacMillan, 1993.
Print. Along with the preceding entry, I expect to find in Bly and Blake, a voice
for my informal communications; even the simple e-mail has far reaching impact.
I also need more insight into the technical writing world to see if my style and
technique are appropriate when covering technical topics like mathematics.
Provost, Gary. 100 Ways to Improve Your Writing. New York: Mentor, 1985. Print.
Like a daily shot of cocoa, this slim book has palatable advice from one whose
work has spoken for itself. Provost is on my side.
4. Lexiconography
Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. 1990. Print. Well thumbed and broadly
splayed, my copy of MW has solved many a scrabble debate, debunked poor
usage, and, on countless occasions, has confirmed my literary instinct. I exist
vicariously in the realm of the second and third definition. I will always reach for
this book.
The Writer’s Dictionary. c.1940. Print. I have a coverless, “un-citable” lexicon upon
my desk that has provided me with years of pointed comments. I often pore over
this relic for capturing the essence of the language. It lists only one definition, no
etymology—no distractions. Sample definition: “burke (burk), v.t. to murder by
suffocating. Burked, burking.” What can I say more?
5. Online Resources
ill) have established the newsprint code—any submitter must browse this website
for standards.
The Chicago Manual of Style Online. University of Chicago Press, 2006, 2007. Web.
25 Jan. 2010. <http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html>. CMOS has
the content necessary to transform any praiseworthy topic into a praise receiving
publication. Though it cannot write for me, it is a comfort to know when I get
stuck, that it has almost all been done before.
OWL: Purdue Online Writing Lab. Purdue University, 1995-2010. Web. 25 Jan.
2010. < http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/ >. This online resource
covers everything from MLA style to Chicago style and covers a gambit of
resources for different styles of writing. This is where my bibliography gets its
final touches.
6. Organizations
“Copy Editing.” DMOZ Open Directory Project. Netscape, 2009. Web. 27 Feb.
2010. < http://www.dmoz.org/Arts/Writers_Resources/Copy_Editing/ > This
website is the “mall” of editing, from boutique niche archive pages to bedrock
columns of sage advice. It is a central web location for blazing topically sensitive
trails through the forest of editing styles.
The New Encyclopædia Britannica. 15th ed. 1977. Print. The benchmark of deep
understanding; my family has lugged these thirty leather-bounds for nearly a
decade. We call them our “stone-age internet”; after all, electricity does fail—at
our home, knowledge is ever at the ready.
Gross, Gerald. 3rd ed. Editors on Editing: What Writers Need to Know About What
Editors Do. New York: Grove, 1993. Print. An indulgent pleasure-read: “Cliff
notes” for editing…In this, a view from the other side of the fence, I expect to
come away with some sense of the editor’s persona. By realizing what makes an
editors day run smoothly I am sure to hone my submissions and inquiries toward
successful acceptance.
Quayle Annotated Bibliography
Rabiner, Susan, and Alfred Fortunato. Thinking Like Your Editor: How to Write
Great Serious Nonfiction--and Get It Published. New York: Norton, 2002. Print.
I have a shelf full of motivational writers “go get ‘em” books—all of which bear
appealing ‘instant gratification’ titles such as this one—each one has dropped at
least a nugget of golden advice on good writing into my pouch.
10. Indulgences
Frey, James N. How to Write A Damn Good Novel. New York: St. Martin’s Press,
1987. Print. What more can I say? Self motivation is a choice, this manual and
drama-management guidebook actually helps me to tone-down my prose,
especially on highly personal topics. Not for fiction only—the world, after all, is
stranger than that.
The Holy Bible: Authorized King James Version. & The Book of Mormon: Another
Testament of Jesus Christ. Salt Lake City: LDS Press, 1986. Print. I start each
day perusing the words of ancient prophets and journalists. I am convinced there
is no finer source for daily meditation and inspiration. I need to think in terms of
“thee, thou and thine,” in order to “link up” to my own potential.