Magnetic Particle Testing
Magnetic Particle Testing
TESTING
Introduction
1. Component pre-cleaning
Coil
Longitudinal Magnetic Field
Electric
Current
Application of Magnetic Media
(Wet Versus Dry)
Application of Magnetic Media
(Wet Versus Dry)
• MPI can be performed using either dry particles,
or particles suspended in a liquid. With the dry
method, the particles are lightly dusted on to the
surface.
• With the wet method, the part is flooded with a
solution carrying the particles.
• The dry method is more portable.
• The wet method is generally more sensitive since
the liquid carrier gives the magnetic particles
additional mobility.
Dry Magnetic Particles
Magnetic particles come in a variety of
colors. A color that produces a high level of
contrast against the background should be
used.
Interpretation of Indications
After applying the magnetic field, indications
that form must interpreted. This process
requires that the inspector distinguish between
relevant and non-relevant indications.
Demagnetization
• Parts inspected by the magnetic particle method
may sometimes have an objectionable residual
magnetic field that may interfere with subsequent
manufacturing operations or service of the
component.
• Possible reasons for demagnetization include:
– May interfere with welding and/or machining
operations
– Can effect gauges that are sensitive to magnetic
fields if placed in close proximity.
– Abrasive particles may adhere to components
surface and cause and increase in wear to
engines components, gears, bearings etc.
Demagnetization (Cont.)
• Demagnetization requires that the residual
magnetic field is reversed and reduced by the
inspector.
• This process will scramble the magnetic domains
and reduce the strength of the residual field to an
acceptable level.
Magnetized
Demagnetized
Advantages
• Can detect both surface and near sub-surface
defects.
• Can inspect parts with irregular shapes easily.
• Precleaning of components is not as critical as it is
for some other inspection methods. Most
contaminants within a flaw will not hinder flaw
detectability.
• Fast method of inspection and indications are visible
directly on the specimen surface.
• Considered low cost compared to many other NDT
methods.
• Is a very portable inspection method especially
when used with battery powered equipment.
Limitations
• Cannot inspect non-ferrous materials such as
aluminum, magnesium or most stainless steels.
• Inspection of large parts may require use of
equipment with special power requirements.
• Some parts may require removal of coating or
plating to achieve desired inspection sensitivity.
• Limited subsurface discontinuity detection
capabilities. Maximum depth sensitivity is
approximately 0.6” (under ideal conditions).
• Post cleaning, and post demagnetization is often
necessary.
• Alignment between magnetic flux and defect is
important