Lecture Notes 5.7 Euler's Marvelous Formula
Lecture Notes 5.7 Euler's Marvelous Formula
Euler would explain why that was true. Using the derivative and infinite series, he would show that
and so
eiz + e−iz
cos z = . (46)
2
If we subtract the equation e−iz = cos z − i sin z from Euler’s equation (43) and then divide by 2i, we
have a formula for sine:
eiz − e−iz
sin z = . (47)
2i
235
Euler’s formula writes the exponential function in terms of trig functions; now we have written a trig
function in terms of exponential functions. The exponential and trig functions are very closely related.
Trig functions are, in some sense, really exponential functions in disguise!
eπi = −1.
3. Put the complex number z = 18 + 26i in the “polar” form z = reiθ where r, θ ∈ R and both r and
θ are positive.
Solution. The√modulus of z = 18 + 26i is 182 + 262 = 1000. So the polar coordinate form of
z = 18 + 26i is 103 eiθ where θ = tan−1 ( 26
18 ). (The angle θ is about 0.96525166319.)
4. Find a cube root of the number z = 18 + 26i and put this cube root in the “Cartesian” form
z = a + bi where a, b ∈ R. (Use a calculator and get an exact value.)
√
Solution. Using the previous problem, we write z = 18 + 26i = 103 eiθ where θ = tan−1 ( 26
18 ).
√
The cube root of 103 eiθ is √
10 eiθ/3
(The angle θ/3 is about 0.3217505544.) Using a calculator, we can see that this comes out to
approximately √ √
10 cos(θ/3) + i 10 sin(θ/3) = 3 + i.
One could check by computing (3 + i)3 and see that we get 18 + 26i.
236
5.7.3 Complex numbers v. Real numbers
Here are some things one can do with the real numbers:
1. Show that f (x) = sin x is periodic with period 2π, that is, f (x + 2π) = f (x).
2. Find an infinite set of numbers, x, such that sin(x) = 1/2.
These are all topics for further exploration in a course in complex variables.
In the free textbook, Precalculus, An Investigation of Functions, by Lippman and Rassmussen (edition
1.3, available at www.opentextbookstore.com) DeMoivre’s Theorem is covered in section 8.3 but Euler’s
formula is not covered.
In the textbook by Ratti & McWaters, Precalculus, A Unit Circle Approach, 2nd ed., c. 2014,
here at Amazon.com DeMoivre’s Theorem is covered in section 6.7 but Euler’s formula is not covered. In
the textbook by Stewart, Precalculus, Mathematics for Calculus, 6th ed., c. 2012, (here at Amazon.com)
DeMoivre’s Theorem is covered in section 8.3 but Euler’s formula is not covered.
237