E-Mental Health
E-Mental Health
E-Mental Health
Objective: The authors conducted a review of the literature on e-mental of Medical Internet Research was
health, including its applications, strengths, limitations, and evidence published (4). Christensen and col-
base. Methods: The rapid review approach, an emerging type of knowl- leagues (5) defined e-mental health as
edge synthesis, was used in response to a request for information from “mental health services and informa-
policy makers. MEDLINE was searched from 2005 to 2010 by using tion delivered or enhanced through
relevant terms. The search was supplemented with a general Internet the Internet and related technolo-
search and a search focused on key authors. Results: A total of 115 gies.” However, there is no agreement
documents were reviewed: 94% were peer-reviewed articles, and 51% on a field-specific definition. Some
described primary research. Most of the research (76%) originated in the scholars consider e-mental health to
United States, Australia, or the Netherlands. The review identified include only initiatives delivered di-
e-mental health applications addressing four areas of mental health rectly to mental health service users
service delivery: information provision; screening, assessment, and (6) and only on the Internet (6,7) (as
monitoring; intervention; and social support. Currently, applications are opposed to, for example, delivery via
most frequently aimed at adults with depression or anxiety disorders. stand-alone computers or video semi-
Some interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in early trials. Many nars). Others adopt a wider definition
believe that e-mental health has enormous potential to address the gap that includes frontline delivery activi-
between the identified need for services and the limited capacity and ties related to screening, mental health
resources to provide conventional treatment. Strengths of e-mental promotion and prevention, provision of
health initiatives noted in the literature include improved accessibility, treatment, staff training, administrative
reduced costs (although start-up and research and development costs are support (for example, patient records),
necessary), flexibility in terms of standardization and personalization, and research (4).
interactivity, and consumer engagement. Conclusions: E-mental health Because of the growth of the
applications are proliferating and hold promise to expand access to care. e-mental health field, it is difficult
Further discussion and research are needed on how to effectively in- for policy makers and practitioners to
corporate e-mental health into service systems and to apply it to diverse stay abreast of available applications
populations. (Psychiatric Services 65:24–32, 2014; doi: 10.1176/appi. and the evidence for their effective-
ps.201300009) ness. In response to a request from
a Canadian executive-level policy
maker, we conducted a rapid review
I
nnovations in information and involves the use of ICT to connect of the literature on e-mental health.
communication technology (ICT) patients and providers in real time In this article, we report briefly on the
are transforming the landscape across geographical distances (2) for review methods and summarize key
of health service delivery. This eme- the delivery of typical care and where findings.
rging field, often referred to as the use of real-time video is the main
“e-health,” includes key features, such modality (3). Methods
as electronic, efficient, enhancing Interest is also increasing in the Rapid reviews are an emerging type of
quality, evidence based, empowering, application of ICT in mental health knowledge synthesis used to inform
encouraging, education, enabling, care. For example, the first interna- health-related policy decisions and
extending, ethics, and equity (1). tional e-mental health summit was discussions, especially when informa-
E-health is a broader concept than held in 2009 in Amsterdam, and tion needs are immediate (8–11).
telehealth (and telemedicine), which a summit-specific issue of the Journal Rapid reviews streamline systematic
review methods—for example, by fo-
Dr. Lal is with the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University Institute, and the cusing the literature search (8)
Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (e-mail: shalini. while still aiming to produce valid
[email protected]). Dr. Adair is with the Department of Psychiatry and Community conclusions. The requirements for the
Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. review, which was undertaken with