ideas ∙ thinkers ∙ practice

ragged schools and the development of

youth work and informal education
One of the great movements of Victorian philanthropy, ragged schools provided for
children and young people who were excluded by virtue of their poverty from
other forms of schooling. A key feature of their work was that they moved
significantly beyond the simple provision of educational opportunity – and as such
both provided an example for of youth and adult provision, and a concrete base for
their development.

contents: introduction · origins · shaftesbury, and the ragged schools union and the development of the
work · tensions with the state system · conclusion: ragged schools, youth work and informal education ·
further reading and references · links

The ragged schools movement grew out of recognition that charity, denominational and
Sunday schools were not providing for significant numbers of children in inner-city areas.
Working in the poorest districts, teachers (who were often local working people) initially
utilized such buildings as could be afforded - stables, lofts, railway arches. There would be
an emphasis on reading, writing and arithmetic - and on bible study (the 4 ‘R’s!). This mix
expanded into industrial and commercial subjects in many schools. The growth was
considerably aided by the activities of the Ragged Schools Union (RSU) founded in 1844
under the guidance of Lord Shaftesbury, and by propagandists like Thomas Guthrie and
writers like Charles Dickens. It is estimated that around 300,000 children went through
the London Ragged Schools alone between the early 1840s and 1881 (Silver 1983: 20).

Origins
There is some debate about the origins of ragged schooling, but the work of four men is
often cited - John Pounds (1766-1839), Sheriff Watson of Aberdeen, Thomas Cranfield and
Thomas Guthrie (1780-1873). John Poundswas a
cobbler in Portsmouth who began to use his shop in
1818 as base for educational activity for local poor
children neglected by other institutions. Part of his
concern was also to educate his disabled nephew.
His curriculum included the usual ‘three R’s’ plus
religious instruction and nature study, and various
practical tasks like cobbling, cooking, toy-making
and clothes-mending (Eagar 1953: 121). Provision
was free and often involved up to 40 students at a
time. We know quite a lot about his work because it
was championed and publicized by Thomas Guthrie
in a popular series of books and articles.

My first interest in the cause of Ragged

Schools was awakened by a picture I saw in Anstruther, on the shores of the
Firth of Forth. It represented a cobbler’s room; he was there himself,
spectacles on nose, an old shoe between his knees, that massive forehead and
firm mouth indicating great determination of character; and from between
his bushy eyebrows benevolence gleamed out on a group of poor children,
some sitting, some standing, but all busy at their lessons around him. (Quoted
in Montague 1904: 37)

John Pounds was active in recruiting children and young people to his school. He spent
time on the streets and quays of Portsmouth making contact and even ‘bribing’ them to
come with the offer of baked potatoes.

Nearly everything in the operations of the RSU existed in germ in that

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
 wonderful little shop, sex feet by sixteen. Even the fresh air movement had its
counterpart, for the scholars took turns at sitting on the step and the form
outside. The clothing department was represented by the garments
Poundsloaned to the children to enable them to attend Sunday school. The
cripple department was foreshadowed by that curious contrivance of leather
he made for his crippled nephew in the imitation of an orthopaedic instrument
he had seen, and which we are told effectually cured the distortion.
When there was a competition for places in his little academy he always gave
the preference to the little ‘blackguards,’ thus forestalling in practice Lord
Shaftesbury’s advice, ‘Stick to the gutter’. When he went out upon the
Portsmouth quays at night he put baked potatoes in his pockets for the ‘drifts’.
Not only so but he taught his girl scholars to cook simple food, so that the
ragged school cookery class had its origin in the shoemaker’s shanty. To the
lads he taught his own trade, and this would represent industrialism, while the
reading, writing and arithmetic in which they were thoroughly grounded,
stood for education. Being doctor and nurse to his young charges he may be
said to have had a medical department as well. As a maker of bats,
shuttlecocks and crossbows for the youngest he exhibited an interest in
recreation. (Montague 1904: 40-41)

He was certainly not the first person to do something like this, but his work was such that
it caught people’s imagination – but this was later. Before Thomas Guthrie popularised his
work in the late 1840s it is probable that relatively few people were aware of his
contribution.
The claims of Sheriff Watson as a ‘father’ of ragged schooling while sometimes cited, are
somewhat questionable. He certainly set up a society in Aberdeen to educate poor children.
Initially, tickets were issued so that these children could attend ordinary day schools but
there were objections from teachers ‘who did not like having in their classes children so
dirty, ragged and poor, and from the visitors, who found the children so hungry, that
offering a ticket seemed like offering a stone instead of bread’ (Young and Ashton 1956:
242). He revised his plans and instead, in 1840, set up an industrial school to educate,
train and feed all the vagrant children of the town. However, unlike the efforts of Pounds
and subsequent ragged schoolers, Watson used compulsion. Vagrant children were
arrested and put in the school. A 'ragged school for girls opened in 1843, and a mixed
school in 1845.
Thomas Cranfield was more in the John Pounds mould. He was a tailor and former
soldier. He had opened a Sunday school on Kingsland Road, London and in 1798
established a day school on Kent Street (close to London Bridge). He was a great organizer
and by the time of his death in 1838 had ‘built up an organization of nineteen Sunday,
night and infants’ schools situated in the foulest parts of London’ (Eagar 1953: 121). It was
with the establishment of the London City Mission in 1835 (and its employment of paid
missionaries and lay agents) that the ragged schooling got its name. The fifth annual
report of the London City Mission (1840) reports the establishment in the previous year of
five schools ‘formed exclusively for children raggedly clothed’ which a total of 570 children
were attending. (Montague 1904: 34)

Shaftesbury, and the Ragged Schools Union and the development of the
work
By 1844 it seems that there were at least 20 ragged schools in existence (including those
formed by agents of London City Mission) and it was becoming clear that there would be
great benefit from some sort of national organization that could promote their cause and
service their work. To this end a group of four people, Mssrs. Locke, Moutlon, Morrison
and Starey involved in the schools met on April 11, 1844 at 17 Ampton Street (just off the
Grays Inn Road) in London and set up a public meeting to establish the Ragged Schools
Union (later to become the Shaftesbury Society). With articles in publications like the
Chambers’ Journal, the gaining of the patronage of Lord Shaftesbury, and the
organizational abilities of those involved in, and employed by, the Union, ragged schools
became better known. Indeed, there was a massive growth in the numbers of schools,
teachers and students. For example there were around 200 teachers in 1844, over 1600 in
1851 (Montague 1904: 169). By 1867 it was reported that the 226 Sunday Ragged Schools,

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
the 204 Day Schools and the 207 Evening Schools had an average attendance of 26,000
children (Eagar 1953: 123).
Shaftesbury was president of the Ragged Schools Union for 40 years and took a very
active interest in the schools and the organization. As Eagar (1953: 123) noted, the
movement not only benefited from his great and growing influence, ‘he gave what had
been a Nonconformist undertaking the cachet of his Tory churchmanship – an important
factor at a time when even broad-minded churchmen thought that Noncomformists
should be fairly credited with good intentions but that co-operation was undesirable’. In
short, it could be said that he made ragged school philanthropy ‘respectable, even
fashionable’ (op. cit.). The downside, for some involved, was that ragged schooling became
too identified with Shaftesbury and his concerns. Many of those involved in the schools did
not subscribe to some of his political views, nor with his particular brand of
evangelicalism.
Ragged schools were institutions of evangelism, but generally had a strong and expanding
concern for the physical, mental and moral well-being of the children and young people.
There was a clear focus on care and upon creating a freer and more relaxed environment
then that could generally be found in other forms of schooling (Doyle and Smith
forthcoming). The schools that opened had their homes in various buildings including
stables, disused store rooms, covered-in railway arches, stables, old houses and various
former commercial buildings. Later there were to be some purpose-built schools. Some
were quite small with less than 25 students and none, initially, had more than 250
students. They started, usually, by opening on Sundays, but a number opened on
weeknights too. As Young and Ashton (1956: 241) comment, ‘it was soon realized that
unpaid, untrained workers were not achieving the desired end as quickly as was hoped’
and as a result by 1846 four London schools were opened with full-time paid workers.

Quintin Hogg and Of Street ragged school 1865

The room in Of Alley was at first used only in the
daytime, a female teacher being in charge, an
earnest woman whose ambitions somewhat
outstripped her capabilities. She begged Mr. Hogg to
open it in the evenings for the benefit of the older
lads, but with the vision of his only attempt at that
kind of work before him, he refused to take any
active part, though he sanctioned the use of the
room and gas, provided she would undertake to
keep order. Nothing daunted, the good woman
eagerly accepted the offer and made immediate
preparations [page 55] for the commencement of her plan. It so happened that the
evening the experiment was first tried, Quintin Hogg was in bed with a very bad
feverish cold.
“Suddenly” (in his own words) “about eight o’clock in the evening one of the elder boys
living in Bedfordbury came racing up to my father’s house in Carlton Gardens (the
house now occupied by Mr. Balfour), to beg me to come at once, as there was a row in
the school with the boys, who were fighting the police and pelting them with slates. In
about three minutes I had huddled on just sufficient clothes to suffice me, and slipping
on an overcoat as I ran through the hall, I made for the ragged school as hard as my
legs could carry me. On arriving there, I found the whole school in an uproar, the gas
fittings had been wrenched off and were being used as batons by the boys for striking
the police, while the rest of them were pelting them with slates, and a considerable
concourse of people was standing round in a more or less threatening way, either to see
the fun or to help in going against the police. I felt rather alarmed for the safety of the
teacher, and rushing into the darkened room, called out for the boys to instantly stop
and be quiet. To my amazement the riot was stopped immediately, in two minutes the
police were able to go quietly away, and for the first time in my life I learned that I had
some kind of instinct or capacity for the management of elder boys. From that day to
1868, when I had to go abroad for the first time, I scarcely missed the ragged school for
a single night.”

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
 The boys used to come into the house in an undescribable condition, so that it was
absolutely necessary to shave their heads and literally scrub them from head to foot
before they were fit to associate with any human being; all of which unpleasant
operations Mr. Hogg used to perform with his own hands.
“The class prospered amazingly; our little room, which was only 30 ft. long by 12 ft.
wide, got so crammed that I used to divide the school into two sections of sixty each, the
first lot coming from 7 to 8.30, and the second lot from 8.30 to 10. There I used to sit
between two classes, perched on the back of a form, dining on my ‘pint of thick and two
doorsteps,’ as the boys used to call coffee and bread and treacle, taking one class in
reading and the other at writing or arithmetic. Each section closed with a ten minutes’
service and prayer.”
Reproduced from Ethel M. Hogg (1904) Quintin Hogg. A biography, London:
Archibald Constable and Co.

As the schools developed, many gained better premises and broadened their clientele (age
wise), opened club rooms and extended their work. Walvin’s (1982) description of the
Hungate ragged school in York (founded in 1861) gives an example of the widening
involved.

Using voluntary teachers and charitable donations, the school began ‘to
impart to the pupils the elementary branches of knowledge, such as reading,
writing, and calculation; combined with and thoroughly pervaded by Biblical
and Religious instruction’. All this took place at two Sunday sessions and
evening classes on Tuesday ad Friday
Numbers grew; so did the school’s activities. Sports were added and open-air
‘treats’ became a feature. Visits to the countryside, picnics, and later, annual
excursions to the seaside all brought eagerly welcomed and beneficial fillips to
the life of the desperately poor pupils. Books were awarded as prizes and,
although discipline remained a perennial problem (and did so until the early
1920s) the teachers’efforts yielded results. Among the boys there were many
who were ‘apt and assiduous scholars, evidently anxious to embrace this
opportunity of supplying the defects of their training’.
Some, inevitably, dropped out; a few even fell foul of the law. But the evidence
suggests that most went into, or were simultaneously engaged in, useful
trades and occupations. Teachers made visits to the homes of the more
wretched boys, and the school gradually began to serve a wider social purpose.
Within two years, three hundred boys had attended, the library was both
sizeable and well used, a Band of Hope had been formed and dozens of boys
had sampled the hitherto unknown delights of Scarborough or Harrogate. In
1863 a girls’ school was added, its pupils being ‘ignorant and unruly’.

Some, like the schools Quintin Hogg was involved in, added hostel and shelter
accommodation (see the Youths’ Christian Institute). Others included Penny Banks,
savings clubs and holiday schemes to their programmes of classes. A good indication of
the widening of the work is given by S. E. Hayward’s illustration The Ragged School Tree
(an illustration in Montague 1904).

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Along the branches we find coffee and reading rooms, Bands of Hope, Penny Banks,
refuges, men’s clubs and sewing and knitting classes. This stood in stark contrast to the
narrow focus on the 4 ‘R’s that remained, for example, in the voluntary National and
British Colonial schools.

Tensions with the state system

After the passing of the Education Act (1870), the rationale for ragged schools needed
revising. Key figures like Shaftesbury believed that the ‘occupation’ of ragged schools had
been taken away – and that it was a ‘national calamity’ (Montague 1904: 308). He saw
ragged schooling as a counterbalance to popular secularism. As the state expanded its
control over schooling it was inevitable that religious instruction and moral guidance
would occupy a far less central role. The new School Boards took over some of the existing
buildings and embarked on a major school-building programme. There were many people
involved with education who wanting to sideline ragged schools (Bready 1926: 158).
Standards had been variable, there could be an emphasis on forms of Christian teaching
that offended the more secular-minded, and the freer and more holistic approach was not
one that was easily accommodated within the formal institutions of nineteenth century
popular schooling. Some of these tensions came to a head in 1876 when there was a
significant dispute around the Olge Mews Ragged School.
Founded in the early 1850s, the Olge Mews Ragged School had been fairly successful.
With the erection of a local Board School, things got rather heated. The directors were
unable to fill it, yet the ragged school was flourishing. The ragged school came in for some
difficulties.
Its officials were summoned to court on the ground that "the education given did not
satisfy the Board's standard." Warm scenes followed. The master of the new school "told
the bench plainly that extermination, not efficiency, was the Board's object." But this
object was scarcely charitable; and men who had sacrificed much for that particular
school, and knew something of its work, were not inclined to accept insults lying down. Sir
Robert Carden, an ex-Lord Mayor, was then a voluntary teacher in this very school; so he
brought children to court for viva voce examination by the magistrate. A test followed;
and all considered, the judicial examiner thought the youngsters passed through their
ordeal quite admirably. The Board School's counsel, however, chose to think otherwise; his
wrath was thoroughly roused, he had tasted blood and, henceforth, vegetable diet had no
appeal. He still, therefore, quibbled about the inadequacy of the Ragged School standards,
and Sir Robert in turn, checkmated him by insisting that children of the two schools be
pitted against one another in public examination. High pitched excitement thus continued
for some time, and several press articles appeared on the subject; but, fortunately, at this
juncture peace-makers came to the rescue and the issue was quietly settled, though the
mud thrown did no good to either side. (Bready 1926: 160-161)
By the mid-1870s the number of ragged schools had diminished significantly, and
remaining schools were rethinking their work. The Ragged Schools Union itself, according
to Montagu (1904: 316-17), spent ten years in a ‘constant bewailing of flown-birds and an
empty nest. Outsiders came to look upon the Society as archaic in its aims, a relic of
bygone days’. However, there were significant movements occurring, especially at a local

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
level – and new developments especially around the areas of night schools, youths’
institutes and clubs, and around the social welfare needs of children and young people
were appearing. While School Boards were able to provide some form of basic education
for their students, large numbers had other pressing social and emotional needs that could
not be met in Board Schools.

Conclusion: ragged schools, youth work and informal education

A number of the remaining schools continued with their men’s clubs, Sunday schooling
and night schools. Indeed, there seems to have been an increase in attendances at the
latter. However, one of the most significant developments linked to the RSU was the
development of boy’s and youth’s institutes. Some years before Arthur Sweatman had
advocated the establishment of such institutions – and now they appeared to be the logical
step for some local ragged schools.

Latymer Road Ragged School Youth’s Institute

The Latymer Road Mission in Notting Dale, London was founded in 1862. A Board
School was built for some 1300 students in the area. The response of the Mission was to
start a crèche for local laundry workers and in 1880 a coffee house for young men. The
RSU Quarterly Record in April 1881 described it as follows:
Every evening between 100 and 200 young fellows quietly interest themselves with
books, draughts, carpentry tools and games of various sorts. The name of Coffee House
has been dropped and that of Evening Shelter substituted. The boys, in fact, make the
place a kind of club and are sadly distressed when they are unable to obtain entrance,
which sometimes happens on the occasion of a public meeting. There is a weekly service
on Wednesdays at 7.30pm and the boys, by their quiet demeanour, show that they
appreciate the service and the kindness which prompts it.
There were evening classes twice a week, the three ‘R’s were taught to those who needed
it (and wanted it), and one of the main features of the shelter were fortnightly cocoa
concerts. The Quarterly Record reported that ‘admission is one penny, which is
returned in the shape of hot cocoa and a price of a cake’.
Eagar (1953: 133) comments on the illustration that it is painfully ordered and static by
more recent standards, ‘but the atmosphere has its charm, with an obviously kindly
manager in the canteen, a nurse (badly needed for treatments in an almost undoctored
district), pet birds, books, games and carpentry’.
All material from W. McG. Eagar (1953) Making Men. The history of the Boys’ Clubs
and related movements in Great Britain, London: University of London Press, page 132-
133

The number of ragged schools turning to this form of activity was significant but limited.
Perhaps ragged schooling’s greatest contribution to the development of informal education
and youth work was, as Young and Ashton (op. cit.) suggest ‘the experience of the
conditions they gave to the men and women who taught in and worked for them’. George
Williams, the leading light in the formation and development of the YMCA worked in one,
as did Quintin Hogg (the founder of the Regent Street Polytechnic), Tom Pelham (the
writer of the first practice text on boy’s club work and in the growth of boys club work),
Maude Stanley (who did a similar job for girl’s club work), Dr Barnardo and Mary
Carpenter. What is significant about this listing is that those named took this experience
and applied in different contexts. They developed other forms of intervention and provision
beyond the orbit of the Ragged Schools Union. Commenting on the development of work
with boys and young men, Eagar (1953: 130) comments:

Men, young men in particular, were feeling the impulse of motives which
differed from Lord Shaftesbury’s in expression if not in essence. They entered
the field of work for boys by a different gate, and took their own paths in its
wide, mainly untilled expanse.

An important period had passed, and the ragged schools movement been a significant

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
feature of many children’s, and young people’s, lives.
In terms of the development of informal education practice in Britain, ragged schools can
be seen as showing three things:

The buildings and settings used need not be ideal so long as they were
accessible and local to the people they were aimed at.
The character and quality of the educator was central – and that the qualities
necessary for success in the formal classroom of the school were not
necessarily what was required in the freer atmosphere of non-formal and
informal provision.
The significance and potential of attending to the ‘whole person’ – physical,
mental, spiritual and moral – and to the environment in which they operate,
especially the family and the peer group. (Young and Ashton 1956: 246)

As Walvin (1982: 119) it is easy, at first sight, to adopt a cynical view of ragged schooling,
‘seeing it as the work of biased Christians anxious to curb the development of heathen and
potential uncontrollable urban mob’. However, as Walvin continues, ‘the efforts of these
adults and the benefits to the children were both striking and unsolicited’. Lord
Shaftesbury may well have viewed ragged schools as a bulwark against secularism and
the rise of working class radicalism, but these schools did not, on the whole, represent the
imposition of middle class mores on working class students. Like Sunday schools they
involved a large number of working-class teachers and could be seen as nurturing and
extending some keys aspects of the ‘indigenous culture of working class life’ (ibid.: 114).

Further reading and references

Eagar, W. McG. (1953) Making Men. The history of the Boys’ Clubs and related
movements in Great Britain, London: University of London Press. 437 pages. Quite the
best historical treatment of UK youth work. Eagar begins by discussing the recognition of
adolescence; the development of church and philanthropic concern around youth; the
emergence of ragged schooling, clubs, settlements and missions and then charts the
history of the boys' clubs movement. There is some material on girl's clubs. He is
particularly strong on the idea of the club, linkages into schooling and rescue, and how
these related to other Victorian institutions and concerns. Thoroughly recommended.
Montague, C. J. (1904) Sixty Years in Waifdom. Or, the Ragged School Movement in
English history, London: Charles Murray and Co. 459 pages. Helpful overview of the
history of the Union and of the experience of ragged schooling.
Walvin, J. (1982) A Child’s World. A social history of English childhood 1800-1914,
London: Pelican.
Young, A. E. and Ashton, E. T. (1956) British Social Work in the Nineteenth Century,
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

References
Besant, W. (1894) The Jubilee of the Ragged Schools Union, London: RSU.
Bready, J. W. (1926) Lord Shaftesbury and Social-Industrial Progress, London: George
Allen and Unwin.
Doyle, M. E. and Smith, M. K. (forthcoming) Christian youthwork, London.
Guthrie, T. (1847) Plea for Ragged Schools, or Prevention is Better Than Cure,
Edinburgh.
Hammond, J. L. and Hammond, B. (1939) Lord Shaftesbury, Harmondsworth: Pelican.
Holden Pike, G. (1884) Pity for the Perishing: the power of the Bible in London, London.
Percival, A. C. (1951) Youth Will Be Led. The story of the voluntary youth organizations,
London: Collins.
Redwood, H. (1944) Harvest, London. Centenary publication of the Shaftesbury Society.
Silver, H. (1983) Education as History, London: Methuen.

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Sweatman, A (1863) ‘Youths’ clubs and institutes’ in H. Solly (1867) Working Men’s Clubs
(revised edn. 1904), London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent and Co.

Links
the ragged school museum: The Museum was opened in 1990 in three canalside
warehouses in Copperfield Road, East London. The buildings were previously used by Dr
Barnardo to house the largest ragged school in London. The site provides details of the
museum plus links.
Charles Dickens on ragged schooling: piece reproduced from the Daily News on the
Maybole site.
Thomas Guthrie – the original Scottish ragged school: the full text of the first chapter of
Guthrie’s Out of the Harness. Part of the excellent site devoted to Guthrie and his work
maintained by Alan Newble: http://www.newble.co.uk/guthrie/index.html
Thomas Guthrie: brief biography from Sparticus.
History of ragged schools: brief overview from the Maybole homepage. See, also, the piece
on the Maybole Ragged School.
Schools – what were they like?: useful set of picture resources from a school site.
How to cite this piece: Smith, Mark K. (2001) 'Ragged schools and the development of
youth work and informal education', the encyclopaedia of informal education.
[www.infed.org/youthwork/ragged_schools.htm].
© Mark K. Smith 2001.

infed is a not-for-profit site [about us] [disclaimer]. Give us your feedback; write for us. Check our
copyright notice when copying. Join us on Facebook and Twitter.
Hosted on a Memset Dedicated Server [C arbonNeutral®].

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com