Menting - DX Mele Assignment 1
Menting - DX Mele Assignment 1
Aphasia Assessments
60 Item Drawings
Reading Comprehension
Battery for Aphasia
Rehabilitation Institute of
Chicago Dysarthria
Evaluation
Cognition Assessments
The test contains 14 brief subtests that evaluate five domains:
Mental Status, Episodic Memory, Language Expression,
Language Comprehension, and Visuospatial Construction.
There are 4 additional screeners that are optional to use.
Communication Activities
of Daily Living – 3rd
Edition (CADL-2)
Social Knowledge, Taste and Swallowing, Olfactory,
Proprioceptive and Vestibular, Tactile, Auditory, Visual,
Testing Readiness, and Baseline Observations
Disorders of
Consciousness Scale
(DOCS)
4 Functional verbal reasoning tasks:
1. Planning an event
2. Scheduling
3. Making a decision
4. Building a case
Functional Assessment of
Verbal Reasoning and
Executive Strategies
(FAVRES)
Eye opening, Best Verbal Response, Best Motor Response
Minnesota Orientation
Amnesia Test (MOAT)
Rancho Levels of
Cognitive Functioning-
Revised-Online
Rehabilitation Institute of
Chicago Evaluation of
Communication Problems
in Right Hemisphere
Dysfunction – Revised
(RICE-R)
Ross Information
Processing-Geriatric 2nd
Edition (RIPA-G:2)
The Rivermead
Behavioural Memory Test-
3 (RBMT-3)
Dysphasia Assessment
Subtests include reason for admition, prior medical history,
history of dysphagia, imaging, labs, and diet. Includes
evaluating patient's chest xray for pneumoonia, lab values for
Dysphagia Bedside hematocrit/hemaglobin, BUN, neutrrophils to determine risk of
Evaluation infection, oral motor and cranial nerve exam, and assess oral
care/detentation, bolus presentations of thin, puree, solids,
and 3 oz swallow
Assessment Summary
The BASA is designed for identifying and quantifying Normed on 100 people(aged 30-79) with
perserved abilities. that might form at the beginning steps of severe adufitory comprrehension and verbal
rehabilitation prrograms for severely aphasic patients. It is exprerssion impairments. and.
appropriate for patients with severe impairments in bucco-facial/limb apraxia
comprehension and production of language and who may
have bucco-facial limb apraxia. It may also be adapted as a
bedside evaluation.
The BDAE-3 is designed to assess an individual's language Norm-referenced and standardized
in the modalities of Auditory Comprehension, Oral No studies have examined the internal
Expression, Reading Comprehension, and Written consistency of the BDAE in clients with
Expression. The BDAE is offered in short, standard, or stroke.
extended forms of the assessment. No studies have examined the reliability of
the BDAE in clients with stroke.
o Conversational and Expository Speech Content: No studies have examined the
-Simple Social Responses: Intended as an inventory for content validity of the BDAE in clients with
elementary responsive phrases that may be available to stroke.
patients at the most severe levels. Includes “Fine/Okay”, Criterion: Concurrent Validity: No studies
“Yes/No”, “I hope so”, etc. have examined the concurrent validity of the
-Free Conversation: Free conversation samples are BDAE in clients with stroke.
important for characterizing the speech output pattern of the Predictive Validity: No studies have
patient. examined the predictive validity of the BDAE
-Picture Description (The Cookie Theft Picture): Discourse in clients with stroke.
analysis is important in order to obtain a distribution of the
level of syntactic organization within patients’ utterances and
an overall complexity ratio.
• Definitions for various types of utterances considered
for scoring purposes is defined on p. 25 of manual)
-Extended Testing – Aesop’s Fables: Administered in order
to obtain a more extensive sample of free narrative from
patient.
o Auditory Comprehension
-Word Comprehension (one Standard Form subtest, Basic
Word Discrimination; five Extended Testing procedures)
• Basic Word Discrimination: Probes single word auditory
comprehension of patient using a multiple-choice match to
spoken sample format.
• Extended Testing: Word Comprehension in Categories
-Probes for dissociations between Implements (manmade
objects) and naturally occurring objects of Foods, Animals,
Body Parts, and Map.
• Supplemental Test: Probes for the integrity of patient’s
conceptual representation of pictured objects by asking
questions about a number of features or properties of the
objects bearing on its category, on a physical feature, and
The ADP is a quick and systematic assessment of language The standardization sample consisted of
and communication impairments associated with aphasia. 290 neurologically impaired patients
Personal Information: assesses an individual’s verbal (resulting from stroke or other brain
responses, gestural communication, and behaviors through damage) and 40 non-brain-damaged,
8 questions regarding the individual’s personal life. normal subjects from 42 sites in the US and
Writing: elicits the kinds of personal information that might Canada. 222 patients were potentially
be asked on official forms in everyday settings and compare aphasic. Subjects' ages ranged from 27 to
the client’s verbal performance from the previous subtest to 95 with a median age of 70.
their written expression.
Reading: assesses an individual’s reading comprehension
by utilizing the same Personal Information Sheet utilized
during the written subtest.
Fluency: composed of 3 items designed to elicit samples of
informative, connected speech and provide information
regarding the total number of words, number of correct
information units, index of wordiness, number of probes, and
phrase length. These items may also be used to assess
recent memory, remote memory, and word-finding abilities.
Naming: designed to assess an individual’s word-finding
abilities by utilizing 12 pictured objects that range in word
frequency, number of syllables, and phonemic complexity.
Gestural communication should be noted.
Auditory Language Comprehension: assesses an
individual’s ability to follow commands, comprehension of
single words, and understand stories.
Repetition: assesses an individual’s ability to repeat by
utilizing 12 items that vary in word frequency and phonemic
complexity.
Elicited Gestures: assesses oral praxis commands, limb
praxis commands, and representational gestures.
Singing: assesses an individual’s ability to initiate a song,
carrying a tune, and producing some words of familiar
songs.
Behavioral Profile: assesses the presence of
neuropsychiatric behaviors and emotional reactions
commonly seen in individuals with acquired brain damage.
The BASA is designed for identifying and quantifying Normed on 100 people(aged 30-79) with
perserved abilities. that might form at the beginning steps of severe adufitory comprrehension and verbal
rehabilitation prrograms for severely aphasic patients. It is exprerssion impairments. and.
appropriate for patients with severe impairments in bucco-facial/limb apraxia
comprehension and production of language and who may
have bucco-facial limb apraxia. It may also be adapted as a
bedside evaluation.
The BDAE-3 is designed to assess an individual's language Norm-referenced and standardized
in the modalities of Auditory Comprehension, Oral No studies have examined the internal
Expression, Reading Comprehension, and Written consistency of the BDAE in clients with
Expression. The BDAE is offered in short, standard, or stroke.
extended forms of the assessment. No studies have examined the reliability of
the BDAE in clients with stroke.
o Conversational and Expository Speech Content: No studies have examined the
-Simple Social Responses: Intended as an inventory for content validity of the BDAE in clients with
elementary responsive phrases that may be available to stroke.
patients at the most severe levels. Includes “Fine/Okay”, Criterion: Concurrent Validity: No studies
“Yes/No”, “I hope so”, etc. have examined the concurrent validity of the
-Free Conversation: Free conversation samples are BDAE in clients with stroke.
important for characterizing the speech output pattern of the Predictive Validity: No studies have
patient. examined the predictive validity of the BDAE
-Picture Description (The Cookie Theft Picture): Discourse in clients with stroke.
analysis is important in order to obtain a distribution of the
level of syntactic organization within patients’ utterances and
an overall complexity ratio.
• Definitions for various types of utterances considered
for scoring purposes is defined on p. 25 of manual)
-Extended Testing – Aesop’s Fables: Administered in order
to obtain a more extensive sample of free narrative from
patient.
o Auditory Comprehension
-Word Comprehension (one Standard Form subtest, Basic
Word Discrimination; five Extended Testing procedures)
• Basic Word Discrimination: Probes single word auditory
comprehension of patient using a multiple-choice match to
spoken sample format.
• Extended Testing: Word Comprehension in Categories
-Probes for dissociations between Implements (manmade
objects) and naturally occurring objects of Foods, Animals,
Body Parts, and Map.
• Supplemental Test: Probes for the integrity of patient’s
conceptual representation of pictured objects by asking
questions about a number of features or properties of the
objects bearing on its category, on a physical feature, and
The norms available in the test booklet are
limited to small groups of adults ranging in
age between 18 and 79 (N = 178) and of
Short Form: First 15 items children ranging in age between 5–0 years
Standard Form: 60 items following Short Form Items and 12–5 years (N = 356). Information about
Assesses patients' naming abilities. geographical region, ethnicity, or time
When using the standard 60-item test, begin with the first reference for this normative data is not
item (bed) with children undre the age of 10, aphasic provided.
patients, and other patients who may be expceted to have
failures early during the examination. For older children and
non-aphasic adults, begin with item 30 (harmonica) giving
credit to for all preeding items not administered. Continue
assessment unless the subject encounters a failure efore
item 38 (harp). In this case, return to item 29 (beaver).
The RCBA-2 provides information about the type and The RCBA-2 is not norm-referenced.
severity of reading impairments in individuals with aphasia.
Core Subtest
Single Word Comprehension: Visual Confusion - Assess
whether the individual can identify the picture that matches a
spoken word among visually similar items.
Single Word Comprehension: Auditory Confusion -
Assess whether the individual can identify the picture that
matches a spoken word among pictures of words that sound
the same.
Single Word Comprehension: Semantic Confusion -
Assess whether the individual can identify the picture that
matches a spoken word among pictures of words that have
the same use, context, or category.
Functional Reading - Provides a measure of functional
(daily-living) reading comprehension.
Synonyms - Whether the individual can match a spoken
word with a written one that has the same meaning.
Sentence Comprehension: Picture - Measure's an
individual's skills in constructing a mental picture of a written
word.
Short Paragraph Comprehension: Picture - Measure's an
individual's comprehension skills in the context of a short
paragraph by having the individual read the paragraph and
identify the image that best depicts the paragraph.
Paragraphs: Factual and Inferential Comprehension
(administered as one subtest but scored as two) - The
individual must read a short paragraph and answer two
factual questions and two inferential questions based on the
paragraph.
Morpho-Syntactic Reading with Lexical Controls -
Measures syntactic skills, by having the individual read three
sentences that differ in syntactic complexity and select the
sentence that describes the picture.
Supplemental Subtests:
Interviewer-administered self-report measure, describing the Normed on 95 patients, 83 were able to self-
severity of aphsi in patients who have suffered a stroke, and report to answer test items
its effects on ADLs. All test items scored from 1-5 ('unable to
do' - 'no trouble doing').
The WAB-R is designed to evaluate a patient's language Normed on 150 individuals with aphasia and
function following stroke, dementia, or other acquired 59 control patients; appropriate for English-
neurological disorder. The purpose of the WAB-R is to speaking adults or teenage children with
determine the presence, severity, and type of aphasia; to known or suspected acquired neurological
measure the patient's level of performance to provide a disorders
baseline for detecting any change over time; to provide a
comprehensive assessment of the patient's language assets
and deficits in order to guide treatment and management;
and to infer the location and etiology of the lesion causing
aphasia.
Writing: designed to elicit the kinds of personal information Standardized on a sample of 40 persons
that might be asked on official forms in everyday settings identified with apraxia (ages from 33 to 93)
and compare the client’s verbal performance from the and 49 persons with normal speech (aged
previous subtest to their written expression. 30 to 90) in 10 states.
Long Delay Free Recall Trial - After the delay, ask the
individual to name as many words as he or she can from the Normative Data was collected through the Q-Interactive Plat
first list.
Long Delay Cued Recall Trial - After the delay, ask the
Repetition: designed to assess an individual’s ability to Normed on 333 individuals (age 18-80) w/
repeat by utilizing 12 items that vary in word frequency and LCVA, RCVA, CHI, and AL/Dementia.
phonemic complexity.
Pen, paper, clock, and test book stimuli required. The Criterion Referenced: patients ages 18-89
10 subtests variably asses 5 modalities in different with suspected acquired neurological
combinations. Personal facts: attention, lanuguage, dysfunction; Good reliability & validity
memory, executive function. Symbol cancellation:
attention, executive function, visuospatial skills.
Confrontation naming: attention, language, exectuive
function, visuospatial. Clock drawing: attention,
visuospatial, language. Story recall: language,
atention, memory, executive function. Symbol trails:
visuospatial, memory, executive function. Generative
naming: language, attention, visuospatial. Design
memory: attention, memory, language,
visuospatial. Design generation: attention, memory,
visuospatial.
All subtests rate the patient's ability to react, respond "The scale was normed on subjects between
to, or recognize stimuli. Auditory: rated from 0 to 4 the ages of 17 to 79"
points; 4 points = consistent responses to auditory
stimuli. Visual: 0 to 5; 5 points = recognition of stimuli
objects. Motor function: 0 to 6; 6 = functional use of
stimuli object. Oromotor/verbal: 0 to 3; i3 = intelligible
verbalizations. Communication scale: 0 to 2; 2 =
functional and accurate responses to stimuli items.
Arousal scale: 0 to 3; 3 = eyes open and consistent
attention attained when aroused.
Additional information:
-Materials: Stopwatch, 2 pens, Examiner's Scoring
Booklet, Response Booklet, stimulus pages for task 1,
stimulus page for task 3.
-All tasks are timed
-Age group: Made for adults (age 18 +) with aquired
brain injuries
-Examples of candidates: Patients about to be
discharged from hospital, those attending outpatient
rehab, those living in the community.
GCS assesses level of consciousness after an injury. Can Was normed on 36 post-head injuries.
be used as part of an assessment or to monitor changes in
consciousness over time.
Three-item, 15-point scale that objectively
measures/describes the extent (depth & duration) of
impaired consciousness/coma in all types of acute medical
and trauma patients. It measures behaviors associated with
eye opening, best verbal responses and best motor
responses within 24 hours of injury.
Eye opening response: Spontaneous (4-indicates activity
of brainstem arousal mechanisms but not necessarily of
attentiveness), to speech (3-tested by any verbal approach
(spoken or shouted)), to pain (2-tested by a stimulus in the
limbs), absent (1-no response to speech or pain). Assesses
the arousal of the patient (are the awake and reactive?)
Best Verbal Response: Converses/oriented (5-awareness
of the self and the environment (who/where/when),
converses/disoriented (4-responses to questions with
presence of disorientation and confusion), inappropriate (3-
speech in a random way, no conversational exchange),
incomprehensible (2-moaning, groaning), absent (1-no
response). Assesses the patient’s awareness of
environment in terms of best verbal responses (ability to
perceive, feel, etc.).
Best Motor Response: Obeys (6), localizes pain (5),
withdraws (flexion) (4), decorticate rigidity (flexion) (3),
decerebrate rigidity (extension) (2), absent (1). Assesses the
patient’s awareness of environment in terms of best motor
responses (ability to perceive, feel, etc.)
• Best = the absolute best response given at any time,
not an average of trials
The GOAT can be administered bedside or at a table. "GOAT Scores correlated positively with
There are 14 test items, weighted from 2 to 30 points, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) scores
for a total of 100 points. Scores under 66 are (r = 0.456, p < 0.002) as well as with the
considered to indicate significant impairment. admission and discharge Functional
Independence Measure (FIM)"
The MIRBI-2 is used to identify and describe deficits of right The MIRBI-2 was standardized on 128
brain injury in adults aged 20-80. individuals with right brain injury, aged 20-90
years of age, 45 left-brain injured
Visual Scanning - Measures scanning skills. Direct an individuals, and 78 individuals without
individual to a letter at the beginning of one line and instruct neurological disorders. Normative data is
him or her to find all of that same letter in the line. given in stanine's and percentiles.
Integrity of Gnosis - Perform on Left Hand. Have the
individual name a finger on his or her left hand. With their
eyes closed, the individual must name the object that you
place in their left hand. The patient must state whether their
finger is being touched by one or two points (touch each
finger of the left hand 3 times).
Integrity of Body Image - Note whether the individual
demonstrates unilateral left-side neglect.
Visuoverbal Processing: Reading - Patient reads a
paragraph and is asked one factual question by the clinican
after. Provides a severity level based on the number of
errors exhibited.
Visuoverbal Processing:Writing - The patient writes a
short paragraph following a clinician prompt. A severity level
is based on the percentage of the paragraph that is
appropriate or includes errors. The patient is also asked to
copy a sentence that is presented verbally by the clinician.
Errors for both tasks include: mechanical, letter reversals,
syntax, inappropriate capitalization and punctuation,
spelling, and inappropriate semantic content. The individual
must also write a string on connected, cursive m's and w's.
Visuosymbolic Processing - Have the patient subtract 7
from 100 and then subtract 7 three more times.
Integrity of Visuomotor Praxis - The individual must draw
a clock set to 10 minutes after 11 on a blank page.
Expressing Emotion - The clinician provides a sentence
verbally in a neutral tone. The individual must repeat the
sentence using a tone stated by the clinician (happy, sad).
Higher-Level Language Skills - The individual participates
in higher level language activities: stating why a phrase is
funny, identifying what is wrong with a statement, explaining
This assessment was adapted from the Galveston N/A
Orientation and Amnesia Test by the Concussion Care
Centre of Virginia
Finally, the patient must answer the question, "Why are you
here."
After February 1st, 2020 you must be trained/certified to get The MoCA has been validated for 55-85
access to the MoCA. Most recent version 8.1 also includes a year olds.
Memory Index Score, which is a subscore, and incorporates
patients’ performance when given cues on the Delayed
Recall subtest.
The RBANS is a brief, individually administered test that The RBANS was standardized on 540 adults
measures cognitive decline or improvement in adolescents ranging from 20 to 89 years old throughout
and adults, ages 12 to 89 years. the US. The updated standardiaztion for the
List Learning and Story Memory assess immediate memory RBANS included 150 adolescents ranging
Figure Copy and Line Orientation assess from 12 to 19 years old.
visuospatial/constructional
Picture Naming and Semantic Fluency assess Language
Digit Span and Coding assess attention
List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure
Recall assess delayed memory
The Rancho Levels are designed to assess and describe Normed on patient's emerging from a coma
cognitive functioning in brain injury patients, usually used in
the planning of treatment, tracking recovery, and classifyng
of outcome levels often used with Glasgow Coma Scale
(GCS). This scale can be used troughout a patient's
rercovery to describe their cognitive function.
Level I: No Response: Total
Assistance
No response to external stimuli
Level II: Generalized Response: Total Assistance
Responds inconsistently and non-purposefully to external
stimuli
Responses are often the same regardless of the stimulus
Level III: Localized Response: Total Assistance
Responds inconsistently and specifically to external stimuli
Responses are directly related to the stimulus, for example,
patient withdraws or vocalizes to painful stimuli
Responds more to familiar people (friends and family)
versus strangers
Level IV: Confused/Agitated: Maximal Assistance
The individual is in a hyperactive state with bizarre and non-
purposeful behavior
Demonstrates agitated behavior that originates more from
internal confusion than the external environment
Absent short-term memory
Level V: Confused, Inappropriate Non-Agitated: Maximal
Assistance
Shows increase in consistency with following and
responding to simple commands
Responses are non-purposeful and random to more
complex commands
Behavior and verbalization is often inappropriate, and
individual appears confused and often confabulates
If action or tasks is demonstrated individual can perform but
does not initiate tasks on own
Memory is severely impaired and learning new information is
difficult
Assesses the most common areas of deficits in right 2 phases: phase 1 evaluated 65
hemisphere disorders; visuospatial neglect, consecutively admitted adult patients
pragmatics, memory, attention, and executive with unilateral right hemisphere stroke;
funtioning. Subtests selected based on initial Phase 2 evaluated 40 subjects with
assessment of patient. Behavioral observation: informal unilateral right hemisphere stroke and
conversation about a topic of interest. Pragmatic 36 normal controls. No comparison to a
communication skills: clinician asigns points for statistical norm.
conversation skills including eye contact, initiations,
gestures use, and conversational turn taking. Visual
scanning: assess presence of visual neglect. Writing:
spontaneous writing sample gathered from patient.
Metaphorical language: evaluates patient's understanding
of the meaning and use of metaphorical langauge.
The RIPA-G was designed to assess cognitive- Normed on adults(aged 15-90) with TBI
communiation deficits associated with TBI. It is used to
quantify cogntiive-linguistic deficits and. help deterrmine
severity levels
The RIPA-G:2 was designed to identify, describe, and The RIPA-G:2 was normed on 229
quantify congitive-linguistic deficits in the geriatric population individuals that consisted of 106 normal
(individuals aged 55 years and older). functioning adults and 123 adults with one of
Immediate Memory: assesses working memory the following: mild cognitive impairment, mild
Temporal Orientation: assesses episodic memory, semantic to moderate Alzheimer's Diseases, Right
memory, orientation, and organization Cerebrovascular Accident, and Traumatic
Spatial Orientation: assesses episodic memory, semantic Brain Injury. The assessment has a high
memory, orientation, and organization reliability and validity across measures.
General Information: assesses semantic memory
Situational Knowledge: assesses problem solving and
reasoning
Categorical Vocabulary: assesses semantic memory and
orientation
Listening Comprehenesion: assesses working memory and
auditory comprehension
Additionally, during each subtest, the individual's responses
are scored using 10 diacrtical marks. These diacritics
provide information regarding the individual's ability to
process information and their cognitive-linguistic skills.
Assesses cognitive and linguistic functions and severity of The SCATBI was standardized on a sample
injury of brain-injured adults and adolescents, showing of head-injured patients and a sample of
progress during recovery. It is a time-efficient assessment. matched adults with no history of head
Unlike other tests for this population, the SCATBI injury. Internal consistency coefficients were
progresses in difficulty levels. This permits patients who high (.90 or higher) for all subtests. Test-
functioned at very high levels, prior to injury, to continue to retest coefficients from a patient sample
be assessed with the SCATBI, as they regain use of higher- ranged from a low of .73 (Reasoning) to a
level abilities (such as complex organization and abstract high of .89 (Recall).
reasoning).
Includes multiple trials of thin liquid, puree, and solids. This pass/fail type of screening to help determine
is used to identify patients needing instrumental assessment if patient needs a comprhensive evaluation
and to help aid in your hypothesis of swallow dysfunction such as MBSS or FEES
What modalities it’s addressing - 20-25 protocols
what do you hope to gain from Time to administer & manipulatives? (Highlight
this test? red if no)
Language, executive functioning, motor 15-20 mins 2 scoring sheets, 2 test manuals
function, memory. The test aims to
describe how linguistic, physical, and
psychological deficits resulting from stroke
and aphasia haveaffected the patient's life.
Measures both linguistic and non-linguistic Bedside WAB-R 15 6 Part 1 Record Forms
skills. minutes 1 Part 2 Record Forms
Linguistic: speech content, fluency, auditory Oral/Verbal section of 19 Bedside Record Forms
comprehension, repetition, naming, WAB-R: 30-45 minutes 2 WAB-R Examiner's Manuals
reading, and writing Reading, Writing, 2 WAB-R Stimulus Books
Non-linguistic: drawing, calculation, block Apraxia Constructional,
design and apraxia Visuospatial, and Additional materials/manipulatives
Calculation, and needed: stopwatch/timer, unlined
Supplemental Writing writing paper, pen, matches,
and Reading sections: paperback or hardback book,
45-60 minutes telephone/cell phone, cup, pencil,
flower, comb, screwdriver, ball,
hammer, knife, safety pin,
toothbrush, eraser, padlock, key,
paper clip, watch, rubber band,
spoon, cellophane tape
Attention, Memory, Language, Executive 15-30 minutes 6 record forms, 1 response booklet
Function, Visuo-spatial Skills.
Language, attention, visuo-spatial skill. 15-30 minutes Not found in Hatcher; all administration materials availab
The American Congress of Rehabilitation
Medicine, Brain Injury determined that the
CRS-R was the most appropriate
assessment for evaluating disorders of
consciousness in Vegetative and Minimally
Conscious patients. The CRS-R thoroughly
addresses the sensory-persceptual skills
and communicative abilities of patients with
disorders of consciousness.
Language, executive functioning, visuo- ~30 minutes 30+ patient response forms; 7
spatial skills, attention. Assess the examiner record booklets
patient's ability to meet their daily
communication needs, within multiple
different contexts (work, social, family).
Pragmatic communication test items
and writing items diagnostically useful
for RHD deficits.
The DOCS allows for the differentiation 40 - 60 minutes Online - there is a short and long
between MCS, VS, and Coma by version as well as training videos
evaluating the responsiveness of the Materials Required:
patient to different forms of stimuli and Taste and Swallowing - taste item
tasks: social knowledge, taste/swallowing, (e.g. juice, milk, soda, familiar taste),
olfactory, proprioceptive/vestibular, tactile, gloves, cotton tipped applicators,
auditory, and visual. towels, bite block
localized, generalized, or no response to Olfactory: flavor extract, chewing
presented stimuli tobacco, cotton tip applicator
Tactile: mini vibrator, feather, can of
pressurized air, ice cubes or ice
chips, alcohol swab, kitchen scournig
pad,
Auditory: whistle, bell
Visual: small mirror, eye patch,
penlight, picture of a familiar person
to the individual, two 3D objects
Verbal reasoning, complex comprehension, 50-60 minutes The manual should be bound - it's
complex expression, problem solving, and all in pieces.
executive functioning during performance on a (The tasks can be given Materials: Stopwatch, 2 pens,
set of challenging functional tasks. separately over many Examiner Scoring Booklet (2),
sessions if needed) Examiner Response Booklet (1), one
Strengths & Weaknesses Checklist,
one Stimulus page 1, one Stimulus
page 2, three stimulus pages 3, one
extra copy of Task 2 Scheduling
Sheet.
Addresses motor, verbal and eye-opening 10-15 minutes Not available in Hatcher https://www.glasgowcomascale.
responses.
Total Glasgow Coma Score gives a useful
‘summary’ of the overall severity of
impaired consciousness (Mild Injury (GCS
Score 13-15) <24 hours post-traumatic
amnesia; Moderate Injury (GCS Score 9-
12); Severe (GCS Score 3-8) >24 hours
post-traumatic amnesia).
The MoCA assesses different cognitive ~15 min. 28 normal response forms, 2 for
domains: attention and concentration, those with visual impairments (blind)
executive functions, memory, language,
visuoconstructional skills, conceptual
thinking, calculations, and orientation
Attention, memory, thought organization, 30-120 min. 7 record forms, 3 manuals, 2 stimulus
thought flexibility books, 2 sets of cards (1 set is
missing cards #60,61), CD, tape