(CD) Santos vs. Mojica - G.R. No. L-25450 - January 31, 1969 - Internet

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

LEONARDO SANTOS, Petitioner, v. HON. ANGEL H.

MOJICA, Judge, Court of First


Instance of Rizal, Pasay City Branch, The PROVINCIAL SHERIFF of Rizal, Pasay City
Branch, TEODORICO, CARMEN, ANTERO, VIDAL, CATALINA, MELANIO,
MANUEL, FELICIDAD, AURELIO, PACITA and ELEUTERIA, all surnamed
ALLANIGUE, Respondents.
G.R. No. L-25450, January 31, 1969

FACTS

On 19 March 1959, The Allanigue (brothers and sisters), brought an action before the
CFI Rizal against their sister, Lorenza Allanigue, her husband, Simeon Santos for partition of a
360-sq. m. lot situated at San Dionisio, Parañaque, Rizal, and for the annulment of certain
conveyances involving the same.
The trial court rendered judgment ordering the partition of the lot among the 11 plaintiffs
and the defendant Lorenza Allanigue. A writ of execution was issued on the judgment ordering
the defendants to vacate the lot and deliver its possession to the plaintiffs. Leonardo Santos, son
of defendants Simeon Santos and Lorenza Allanigue, owned a house standing on the lot. He filed
with the sheriff a third-party claim, and with the court, a motion to recall the writ of execution
insofar as his house was concerned. The motion was denied.
A period was given for the defendants and movant to remove their hose, but they failed,
to which a court order was released ordering sheriff to demolish said houses due to the ground
that the petitioner is in bad faith. The petitioner, filed in the Supreme Court a petition for
certiorari and prohibition against Judge Angel H. Mojica, the Provincial Sheriff of Rizal and the
plaintiffs in the case, as respondents.

ISSUE

Whether the court erred in ordering the demolition of the house of the petitioner?

HELD

The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the respondent.


The owners of the land became owners of the improvement consisting of the house built
in bad faith if they chose to appropriate the accession. (Article 445 and 449, Civil Code.)
However, said owners could choose instead the demolition of the improvement or
building at the expense of the builder, pursuant to Article 450 of the Civil Code, which, in part,
provides “The owner of the land on which anything has been built, planted or sown in bad faith
may demand the demolition of the work, or that the planting or sowing be removed, in order to
replace things in their former condition at the expense of the person who built, planted or
sowed.” In the present case, the Allanigue brothers and sisters chose to have the house or
improvement built by Leonardo Santos demolished pursuant to their motion for demolition.

You might also like