N N N N
N N N N
In this section we show how the topological entropy of simple examples may
be computed explicitly, and then show that in good situations certain measure–
theoretic entropies may be deduced.
so that α is a generator.
Lemma 7.2. T is expansive if and only if T has a generator.
Proof. Let δ be an expansive constant T∞ for T , and¯let α be an nopenncover with
diam(α) < δ. If φ : Z → α, and x, y ∈ n=−∞ T −n φ(n), then (T x, T y) ≤ δ for
all n, so by expansiveness x = y. Therefore α is a generator.
Conversely, let α be a generator, and let δ be a Lebesgue number for α. If
d(T n x, T n y) ≤ δ for all n, then for each n there is a φ(n) ∈ α with T n x, T n y ∈ φ(n),
so
∞
\
x, y ∈ T −n φ(n).
n=−∞
Typeset by AMS-TEX
43
44 CHAPTER 7. TOPOLOGICAL ENTROPY II: HOMOGENEOUS MEASURES
∞
\
x, y ∈ T −n A¯n ,
n=−∞
N
!
_
h(T, β) ≤ h T, T −n α
−N
k−1 N
!!
1 _ _
= lim H T −i T −n α
k→∞ k
i=0 −N
N +k−1
!
1 _
= lim H T −n α
k→∞ k
n=−N
2N_
+k−1
!
1
= lim H T −n α
k→∞ k
n=0
2N_
+k−1
!
2N + k − 1 1 −n
= lim H T α
k→∞ k 2N + k − 1 n=0
= h(T, α).
That is, h(T, β) ≤ h(T, α) for all open covers β so h(T ) = h(T, α).
(b) Let δ 0 < δ/4, and choose x1 . . . , xk such that X is covered by the sets
B(xi , 12 δ − 2δ 0 ). Then the open cover α = {B(xi , 12 δ)} has 2δ 0 for a Lebesgue
number so by Lemma 6.11, h(T, α) ≤ r(δ 0 , X) ≤ s(δ 0 , X) ≤ h(T ). Apply (a) to
obtain the result (since α is a generator).
Corollary 7.4. An expansive homeomorphism has finite topological entropy.
Examples
(1)Q
The full shift. Let T be the shift map on the full two–sided shift space
∞
X = −∞ {0, 1, . . . , k − 1}. Then α = {Aj = {x ∈ X | x(0) = j}} is a natural
EXAMPLES 45
n−1
!
1 _
h(T ) = h(T, α) = lim log N T −i α
n→∞ n
i=0
1
= lim log(k n ) = log k.
n→∞ n
1
h(T |Z ) = lim log tn (Z).
n→∞ n
This is clear: let α be the natural generator, and notice that tn (Z) is equal to
Wn−1
N ( i=0 T |−i
Z α).
(3) Subshifts of finite type. A special case of (2) is given by subshifts of
finite type or topological Markov shifts. Let A = (aij ) be a k × k matrix with
entries in {0, 1}. Define XA ⊂ X by
It follows that
k−1
X k−1
X
tn (XA ) = ai0 i1 ai1 i2 . . . ain−2 in−1 = (An−1 )i0 in−1 .
i0 ,...,in−1 =0 i0 ,in−1 =0
P
Introduce a norm on the set of k×k matrices by k(bij )k = i,j |bij |. Then tn (XA ) =
kAn−1 k, so
1
log tn (XA ) = log kAn−1 k1/n → log λ,
n
by the spectral radius formula.
(4) Smooth maps. Let T : M → M be a differentiable transformation of a
p–dimensional Riemannian manifold M . Let d be the metric on M induced by the
Riemannian metric. Then
1 1
h(T ) = h(T m ) ≤ max{0, n log kT m k} ≤ max{0, n log kT m k1/m },
m m
Homogeneous measures
The next goal is to replace the estimate in Example (5) above with an exact
formula. To do this, we need to make some preliminary steps towards the following
interesting problem: given a homeomorphism T of a compact metric space X, which
(if any) T –invariant Borel probability measures µ on X may be expected to have
h(T ) = hµ (T )? The main result in this area is the variational principle, which states
that
h(T ) = sup{hµ (T ) | µ ∈ M (X, T )},
where M (X, T ) is the space of T –invariant Borel probability measures on X. This
result is more than we need, so we will prove a much more elementary result suffi-
cient for our needs. Recall that X has covering dimension at most m if every open
cover α of X has a refinement β such that each point of X lies in at most (m + 1)
elements of β. For example, an m–dimensional manifold has this property.
Lemma 7.4. Let (X, d) be a compact metric space with covering dimension at
most m for some m, and let T : X → X be continuous. Then, if µ is a T –invariant
Borel probability measure on X,
hµ (T ) ≤ hd (T ).
By property (3) this definition does not depend on the point y chosen. See Exercise
7.1.
48 CHAPTER 7. TOPOLOGICAL ENTROPY II: HOMOGENEOUS MEASURES
1
s(, K) ≤ lim sup − log µ (Dn (y, δ, T )) .
n→∞ n
and so
1
r(δ, K) ≥ lim sup − log µ (Dn (y, , T )) .
n→∞ n
Letting → 0, hd (T, K) ≥ h∗ (µ, T ), so hd (T ) = h∗ (µ, T ).
Now assume that X is compact, and µ is a T –invariant T –homogeneous proba-
bility measure. By Lemma 7.4,
hµ (T ) ≤ hd (T ) = h∗ (µ, T ).
Let > 0, and choose δ > 0 and c > 0 with µ (Dn (x, δ, T )) ≤ cµ (Dn (y, , T )) for
all x, y and n ≥ 0. Let α = {A1 , . . . , Ar } be a measurable partition of X with
Tn−1
diam(α) < δ. If x ∈ A(i0 , . . . , in−1 ) = k=0 T −k Aik . Then A(i0 , . . . , in−1 ) ⊂
Dn (x, δ, T ) and so µ(A(i0 , . . . , in−1 )) ≤ cµ(Dn (y, , T )). It follows that
1
hµ (T ) ≥ hµ (T, α) ≥ lim sup − log µ (Dn (y, , T )) .
n→∞ n
Letting → 0, hµ (T ) ≥ h∗ (µ, T ).
THE VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE 49
Lemma 7.7. Let G be a locally compact metrizable group, with right invariant
metric d and a right Haar measure µ, and let T : G → G be a surjective affine map
T (x) = A(x)g. Then µ is T –homogeneous and h∗ (µ, T ) = h∗ (µ, A).
Proof. It is clear that T is uniformly continuous. We prove by induction that
where for the last step we have used the fact that A−1 (CA(x)) = A−1 (C)x for any
set C ⊂ G since A is onto. By intersecting (7.1) over all k, 0 ≤ k < n, we see that
Theorem 7.8. Let G be a compact metrizable group (of finite covering dimen-
sion), T : G → G a surjective affine transformation, T (x) = A(x)g for an auto-
morphism A, and let µ be normalized right Haar measure on G. Then
hd (T ) = hd0 (T 0 ).
j+1 0 j+1 0
d0 (T 0 x ,T0 y)<δ
by choice of . So
j+1 0 j+1 0
d(T j+1 ρ(x0 ), T j+1 ρ(y 0 )) = d0 (T 0 x ,T0 y ) > .
Now
n−1
−(n−1)
A−j
\
µ1 1 B d1 (0, ) ≤ µ1 A1 B d1 (0, )
j=0
while
n−1
A−j
\
µ2 2 Bd2 (0, )
≥ µ2 (Bd2 (0, )) .
j=0
It follows that X
h(T ) ≥ log | det A1 | = log |λi |.
|λi |>1
where µ is Haar measure on the torus, and λ1 , . . . , λm are the eigenvalues of the
matrix determined by A.
Proof. The first four equalities have been proved already. The last follows by
applying Theorem 7.11 and Theorem 7.12.
52 CHAPTER 7. TOPOLOGICAL ENTROPY II: HOMOGENEOUS MEASURES
Exercises
7.1 Show that the property of being T –homogeneous, together with the quan-
tity h∗ (µ, T ) for a homogeneous measure µ, depend only on the uniform
equivalence class of the metric d.
7.2 Use Corollary 7.13 to exhibit countably many toral automorphisms that are
not measurably isomorphic to each other.
7.3 Let X be a compact metric space, and let M (X) be the set of all Borel
probability measures on X; write B for the σ–algebra of Borel sets. Recall
that any m ∈ M (X) is regular, so for any Borel set B,
where the infimum is taken over all open sets U . Recall also the Riesz Rep-
resentation Theorem, stating that any continuous linear positive operator
J : C(X) R → C with J(1) = 1 has a corresponding mJ ∈ M (X) such that
J(f ) = X f dm.
a. Show that each m ∈ M (X) is characterised by Rhow it integrates R the
continuous functions: if m1 , m2 ∈ M (X) have X f dm1 = X f dm2
for all f ∈ C(X), then m1 = m2 .
b. Let the weak∗ –topology
R on M (X) be the smallest topology making
each map m → X f dm, f ∈ C(X), continuous. A basis for this
topology
R isRtherefore given by all sets of the form U (µ) = {m ∈ M (X) |
| fi dµ − fi dm| < , i = 1, . . . , n}. Prove that M (X) is metrisable
in the weak∗ –topology by showing that
∞ R R
−k | fn dµ − fn dm
X
d(µ, m) = 2
kfn k
k=1