Electrical Signature Analysis Performed On Vertical Turbine Pump Motors in Municipal Application
Electrical Signature Analysis Performed On Vertical Turbine Pump Motors in Municipal Application
Electrical Signature Analysis Performed On Vertical Turbine Pump Motors in Municipal Application
Authored by William Kruger, Technical & Training Manager, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC, and Alex Panattoni,
Control Systems Technician II, City of Henderson Department of Utility Services Electrical Section
Background
Vertical Turbine Pump Info
Originally put into operation in 1999, Pump Station P-19A OEM: Goulds
supplies drinking water to the City of Henderson, which is the Model: VTC-1
second largest city in Nevada. Serving a population well over
GPM: 7400 GPM
270,000 people, P-19A is one of the most critical potable pump
stations operated by the city. The pump station originally utilized # of Stages: 5 Stage
three pumps when its operation began, but in 2006, two more Size: 20x20 GHC-5
vertical pumps were installed in the pump station
Suction Size: 20-inches
(Pumps 1 & 5).
RPM: 1200 RPM
In 2006, the pump size was increased, but the motor horsepower remained the same. The
motors have a service factor of 1.15 and often exceed 105% of nameplate full-load amperage
(FLA). Although this is within the capabilities of the motors, they operate at near maximum
output.
Two months later, in January 2015, Motor 5 exhibited signs of overheating; reaching
temperatures that exceeded 160-degrees Celsius. While the other pumps did not show any
symptoms similar to that of Motor 5, the maintenance team took action and initiated an in-house
investigation of all five pump motors using their predictive maintenance equipment.
the large change in rotor speed with a very small Pump Speed: 1183 RPM 1175 RPM
change in motor load. The rotor was running
Demand Power: 738.98 HP 726.96 HP
considerably below name plate; after running about
Load: 100.7% 99.1%
thirty minutes, the rotor speed was 1171 RPM. This
was also confirmed by an independent tach system Output Load: 507.95 KW 495 KW
provided by the third-party who performed the vibration
Severity Rating: 6 out of 7 7 out of 7
analysis. While the results of the vibration analysis did
not show any indications of rotor problems, the speed The RPM values shown in the chart above are
consistent with rotor bar anomalies. Motors
and the ESA data taken with the ATPOL II™ indicated 1 & 5 indicate an increased "slip frequency".
that several rotor bars were broken (see Figure 3).
Rotor bar breaks all occurred in the middle three rows of laminations.
Rebuilding the Rotor with Different Metallurgy
After discussing the issues with the motor manufacturer and a third party motor repair company,
the maintenance team chose to have both Motor 1 and Motor 5 rebuilt with copper rotor bars.
Pumps 2, 3, and 4 had copper rotor bars and did not have the same issues as Pumps 1 and 5.
The original rotor bars in Pump 1 and Pump 5 had been made of aluminum. This was believed
to be the root cause of the problem. Because the motors at P-19A normally run 100% to 110%
of load, there is a high current flowing through the rotor. This produces heat that causes
expansion and contraction. Over a period of time, the aluminum rotor bar breaks under tension,
then the arcing occurs at the spot of the break. The currents are then forced through the
remaining bars, putting more loads on them and causing more broken bars, weakening the
strength of the entire rotor. This issue would have eventually shorted out the stator winding by
the increased operating temperature or arcing metal from the rotor, and would have caused the
need for a rewind or possible scrapping of the entire motor, in addition to the repair or
replacement of the rotor. Having the motors rebuilt with copper rotor bars enabled the
maintenance team to avoid catastrophic failure of their vertical turbine pump motors.