Electrical Signature Analysis Performed On Vertical Turbine Pump Motors in Municipal Application

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Electrical Signature Analysis Performed on

Vertical Turbine Pump Motors in Municipal Application

Authored by William Kruger, Technical & Training Manager, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC, and Alex Panattoni,
Control Systems Technician II, City of Henderson Department of Utility Services Electrical Section

Background
Vertical Turbine Pump Info

Originally put into operation in 1999, Pump Station P-19A OEM: Goulds
supplies drinking water to the City of Henderson, which is the Model: VTC-1
second largest city in Nevada. Serving a population well over
GPM: 7400 GPM
270,000 people, P-19A is one of the most critical potable pump
stations operated by the city. The pump station originally utilized # of Stages: 5 Stage

three pumps when its operation began, but in 2006, two more Size: 20x20 GHC-5
vertical pumps were installed in the pump station
Suction Size: 20-inches
(Pumps 1 & 5).
RPM: 1200 RPM

Cause for Concern

In 2006, the pump size was increased, but the motor horsepower remained the same. The
motors have a service factor of 1.15 and often exceed 105% of nameplate full-load amperage
(FLA). Although this is within the capabilities of the motors, they operate at near maximum
output.

In November 2014, vibration analysis was


performed as part of the plant’s Predictive
Maintenance Program. While those test
results suggested the possibility of early
bearing degradation in Motor 5, the rotor bar
passing frequency was within range (see
Figure 1). The vibration summary concluded
Figure 1. November 17, 2014 - 2AS - Motor Inboard
that systems were operating within acceptable Axial - Acceptable Vibration - Note: High Frequency
Vibration ~81,102 cpm is Rotor Bar Passing
limits and that no maintenance actions Frequency. No Maintenance Action Recommended
needed to be taken at that time. at this time. Continue to Monitor.

Two months later, in January 2015, Motor 5 exhibited signs of overheating; reaching
temperatures that exceeded 160-degrees Celsius. While the other pumps did not show any
symptoms similar to that of Motor 5, the maintenance team took action and initiated an in-house
investigation of all five pump motors using their predictive maintenance equipment.

Comprehensive Testing to Prevent Motor Failure

The in-house maintenance team utilized their hand-held ALL-TEST


PRO 31™ and ALL-TEST IV PRO™. These high-tech instruments,
which are used for de-energized testing, are designed to detect
potential winding faults and provide indications of rotor problems.
First, they used both the ALL-TEST PRO 31™ and ALL-TEST IV
PRO™ to perform winding tests and confirm that the windings ALL-TEST PRO 31™ for initial tests

were in good condition. Then they used this equipment to conduct


‘insulation to ground’ tests to prove the insulation was not grounded.
Next, they performed a rotor inductance test, which measures the
inductance of all three phases of a motor at different individual
rotor positions. During the test, the rotor is positioned at exact
intervals, as seen in the picture to the right. Rotor Tested at 5-degree Intervals

“We performed an extensive rotor test - taking readings every 5


degrees of shaft rotation using the ALL-TEST IV PRO™ - only then
did indications show an issue with both Pump 1 and Pump 5,”
explains Alex Panattoni, the Control Systems Technician leading the
Electrical Section of the City of Henderson’s Department ALL-TEST IV PRO™ for initial tests

of Utility Services. “While the tests indicated the


possibility
of a rotor problem, the results didn’t show the problem
definitively. We knew the current was modulating and
we put a time trace on it, but we needed to do more
extensive testing,” explains Panattoni. At the
maintenance team’s request, a third-party specialist
went to the pump station to perform vibration analysis.
When the vibration analysis did not indicate any
electrical faults (pole pass frequency sidebanding) in Figure 2. January 23, 2015 - Vibration analysis
the associated vibration FFT signatures (see Figure 2), for Motor 5 indicates the presence of low
amplitude non-synchronous energy in the
the decision was made to bring in technical PeakVue timedomain data collected on the upper
motor bearing. Only recommendations made
support from ALL-TEST Pro to perform additional were to monitor bearings for further degradation.
Vibration analysis gave no indication of potential
testing.
problems with the rotor.
William Kruger, Technical and Training Manager at ALL-TEST Pro,
went to the pump station in January to perform an Electrical Signature
Analysis. Electrical Signature Analysis is a diagnostic technology that
uses the motors supply voltage and operating current to identify
existing and developing faults in the entire motor system. To perform
the Electrical Signature Analysis, he brought with him the ALL-TEST
PRO On-Line II™. The ATPOL II™ is an energized motor testing tool
which, when in ESA mode, evaluates the condition of incoming power,
the control circuit, the motor itself, and the driven load. Kruger
requested that MVA data be taken simultaneously while the Electrical
Signature Analysis was being performed. ALL-TEST PRO On-Line II™

Electrical Signature Analysis Reveals Broken Rotor Bars

During the energized motor tests, data was taken at


ESA Data from ATPOL II™
different times; first shortly after start-up, then again
after the pump had been running. Of significance was Pump 1 Pump 5

the large change in rotor speed with a very small Pump Speed: 1183 RPM 1175 RPM
change in motor load. The rotor was running
Demand Power: 738.98 HP 726.96 HP
considerably below name plate; after running about
Load: 100.7% 99.1%
thirty minutes, the rotor speed was 1171 RPM. This
was also confirmed by an independent tach system Output Load: 507.95 KW 495 KW
provided by the third-party who performed the vibration
Severity Rating: 6 out of 7 7 out of 7
analysis. While the results of the vibration analysis did
not show any indications of rotor problems, the speed The RPM values shown in the chart above are
consistent with rotor bar anomalies. Motors
and the ESA data taken with the ATPOL II™ indicated 1 & 5 indicate an increased "slip frequency".
that several rotor bars were broken (see Figure 3).

Figure 3. January 2015 – Electrical


Signature Analysis using the
ATPOL II™ - (Before repair) pole
pass frequency side bands indicate
very severe rotor bar damage;
current draw was 820 amps and
modulating around16 amps.
Rotor bars are solid continuous bars that run through the rotor’s steel laminations, which are
spaced to allow air flow to cool the rotor. Once the maintenance team received the report from
the Electrical Signature Analysis, which showed severe indications of rotor bar issues (Pump 1
had a severity rating of 6 out of 7 and Pump 5 had a severity rating of 7 out of 7), they pulled
Motor 5 and found that 30% of the rotor bars were in fact broken.

Rotor bar breaks all occurred in the middle three rows of laminations.
Rebuilding the Rotor with Different Metallurgy

After discussing the issues with the motor manufacturer and a third party motor repair company,
the maintenance team chose to have both Motor 1 and Motor 5 rebuilt with copper rotor bars.
Pumps 2, 3, and 4 had copper rotor bars and did not have the same issues as Pumps 1 and 5.
The original rotor bars in Pump 1 and Pump 5 had been made of aluminum. This was believed
to be the root cause of the problem. Because the motors at P-19A normally run 100% to 110%
of load, there is a high current flowing through the rotor. This produces heat that causes
expansion and contraction. Over a period of time, the aluminum rotor bar breaks under tension,
then the arcing occurs at the spot of the break. The currents are then forced through the
remaining bars, putting more loads on them and causing more broken bars, weakening the
strength of the entire rotor. This issue would have eventually shorted out the stator winding by
the increased operating temperature or arcing metal from the rotor, and would have caused the
need for a rewind or possible scrapping of the entire motor, in addition to the repair or
replacement of the rotor. Having the motors rebuilt with copper rotor bars enabled the
maintenance team to avoid catastrophic failure of their vertical turbine pump motors.

Motor 5 was rebuilt and installed in May


of 2015. Another round of MVA and ESA
testing was performed immediately after
installation to ensure proper operation.
The electrical signatures taken in May
reported excellent rotor condition (see
Figure 4). It also showed that rotor speed
increased, while overall current dropped.
Figure 4. May 5, 2015 – Electrical Signature Analysis
The newly rebuilt Motor 1 was installed using the ATPOL II™ - (After repair) pole pass
in September 2015 and a third round frequency side bands were gone and current draw
was 754 amps with 2 amps modulation.
of testing was performed.
Lessons Learned
Having a Predictive Maintenance and proper
diagnostic tools program is important. It is essential
to equip your maintenance team with state-of-the-art
equipment to increase the effectiveness of your
Preventive Maintenance program. Tools like the
ATPOL II™ exist so you can perform higher level
Chart from third-party vibration analysis performed
testing, such as Electrical Signature Analysis, in May 2015: Rotor bar issues produce low-
amplitude sideband sets spaced at "pole passing
which is proving to be a very effective technology
frequency". The red circle highlights the location of
for detecting faults before they lead to calculated pole pass frequency sidebands (vertical
lines). The absence of these sidebands indicate
catastrophic failure.
motor rotor is in good health, as expected with a
newly rebuilt rotor.

You might also like