Module 5: Index Numbers & Time Series: 1. Index Number For The Base Year Is Always Taken As 100
Module 5: Index Numbers & Time Series: 1. Index Number For The Base Year Is Always Taken As 100
1. Defining (Stating) the purpose of the Index number: At the very outset, the purpose of
the Index number should be decided. As different Index numbers are useful for
different purposes, the purpose on hand may need a particular Index number. A clear
definition of purpose will help in the selection of right index number. While
constructing the Index number the selection of items, base period, weights etc.
depends mainly on the purpose. Absence of clear definition of purpose often leads to
construction of an unsuitable index number.
2. Selecting the Base Period: While constructing an Index number, appropriate Base
period should be selected. The base period should be economically stable. There
should not be any abnormal variations. The period should be free of wars, floods,
famines, etc. It should not be too distant from the current period. Again, the
consumption pattern during the two periods should not differ much. Depending on the
situation, fixed base index number or chain base index number may be preferred.
3. Selecting the Items: Selection of items is mainly based on the purpose of the Index
number. Items differ with the purpose. For Eg: A wholesale price Index number
requires items which are transacted at the wholesale market. A consumer price index
number requires items which are consumed by the particular group of people.
However, in a Consumer Price Index number items differ with the habits, customs
and standard of living. Generally, there are many items that could be included in the
Index number. But, the list can be reduced by selecting representative items only.
4. Obtaining Price quotations: After selecting the items for constructing an Index
number, price quotations for these items should be obtained. Since price is likely to
vary from place to place, it is better to obtain price quotations from different places
and also from different agencies. Then the prices should be averaged. Again, prices
are likely to vary during the span of the base period and during the span of the current
period. Hence, it is better to collect price quotations at regular intervals. These
quotations should be averaged and the averages should be used in the construction.
5. Selecting the appropriate system of weights: The items considered in the constructing
Index numbers often have varied importance. According to their importance, weights
are attached to the items. Mostly, these weights are quantities in the base period, those
in the current period or those in any other period. Sometimes, a combination of
quantities in different periods may be considered as weights.
6. Selecting the appropriate formula: The selection of formula is mainly based on the
availability of data. Depending on availability of data regarding quantities,
Laspeyre’s, Paasche’s, Fisher’s or any other Index number is calculated. While
selecting the formula, care should be taken to see that maximum use of available data
is made.
Price Index Numbers: The various Price Index numbers which are in common use are –
1. Unweighted Price Index number
2. Weighted Price Index number.
1. Unweighted Price Index number: There are two types of Unweighted Price index
number. They are –
A. Simple average of Relatives
B. Simple aggregative Index number.
P01=
∑P
n where P denotes the Price relative.
The unweighted G.M Index number is,
P01=anti log (∑ ) .
log P
n
It is customary to denote the base year by ‘0’ and the current year by ‘1’. Thus P 01 is
the price Index number for the current year with respect to the base year.
B. Simple aggregative Index number: Here the current year aggregate value is expressed
as a percentage of base year aggregate value. The Index number is –
P01 =
current year total
×100=
∑ p1 ×100 .
base year total ∑ p0
Problems:
1. From the following data, Calculate
i) The unweighted A.M Index number.
ii) The unweighted G.M Index number
iii) The unweighted aggregative price Index number for the year 2004 taking 1990 as
the base year.
Price in Rs/Quintal
Commodity
1990 (p0) 2004(p1)
Rice 600 1350
Wheat 320 992
Sugar 1040 1560
Dhal 540 3240
Soln:
Price in Rs/Quintal Price Relative Log P
Commodity
1990 (p0) 2004(p1) P = (p1/p0*100)
Rice 600 1350 225 2.3522
Wheat 320 992 310 2.4914
Sugar 1040 1560 150 2.1761
Dhal 540 3240 600 2.7282
∑ p0 =2500 ∑ p1 =7142 ∑ P =1285 ∑ LogP =9.7979
Ans: P01=321.3 by A.M, P01 = 281.5 by G.M, P01 = 285.68 by simple aggregative method.
2. Compute the Price Index number for the year 1997 and 1998 for the following data by
using a simple average of price relative method by i) Arithmetic Mean ii) Geometric
Mean. Hence the compare the price levels in 1997 and 1998.
Prices (in Rs)
Items
1991(p0) 1997(p1) 1998(p2)
Bricks 10 16 18
Timber 20 21 22
Board 5 6 7
Sand 2 3 5
Cement 7 14 21
Ans: P01(1997) = 147, P01(1998) = 196 by A.M.
P01(1997) = 143.30, P01(1998) = 184.40 by G.M.
Weighted Price Index number: While constructing the various unweighted Index number,
equal importance is given to all the items. But in practice, it can be seen that different items
have varied importance. Though Rice and sugar are used everyday, the quantity of rice used
is much more than the quantity of sugar used. And so variation in the price of rice should
have greater impact on the Index number. Thus, while computing Index numbers, items
should be considered with appropriate importance. This is done by assigning weights to
various items. Generally the quantities (used, sold or produced) are regarded as the weights.
Depending on the availability of data, base year quantities or current year quantities or both
are regarded as weights.
There are two types of Weighted Price Index numbers. They are
a. Weighted average of Relatives.
b. Weighted aggregative Index numbers.
a. Weighted average of Relatives: Here, appropriate weights are assigned to the various
items and a weighted average of the concerned relatives is calculated. The weighted
A.M Index number is –
P01=
∑ wP
∑w
The weighted G.M Index number is –
P01=
∑ p1 q 0 ×100
∑ p0 q0
Here, the weights assigned are the base year quantities.
2. Paasche’s Price Index number.
P01=
∑ p 1 q1 ×100
∑ p0 q1
Here, the weights assigned are the current year quantities.
3. Marshall-Edgeworth Price Index Number.
P01=
∑ p1 ( q 0 +q 1
2 ) ×100=
∑ p1 q 0+ ∑ p1 q1 ×100
∑ p 0 q 0 + ∑ p 0 q1
∑ p0 2( q 0 + q1
)
Here, the weights assigned are the average of the base year and current year
quantities.
4. Dorbish- Bowley Price Index Number.
This is the arithmetic mean of Laspeyre’s and Paasche’s Index number. It is –
P ( Laspeyre ' s)+ P 01( Paasche ' s)
P01= 01
2
P01=
1
2 [ ∑ p1 q 0 + ∑ p 1 q1
∑ p 0 q 0 ∑ p 0 q1 ] ×100
P01=
[√ ∑ p1 q 0 × ∑ p1 q 1 ×100
∑ p 0 q 0 ∑ p0 q 1 ]
.
Problems:
1. Calculate Laspeyre’s, Paasches’s, Marshall-Edgeworth, Dorbish-Bowley and Fisher’s
Price Index number for the following data.
Price(in Rs./Quintal) Quantity sold (quintals)
Item
Base Year(p0) Current year(p1) Base year(q0) Current year(q1)
Rice 400 850 100 120
Wheat 320 690 20 60
Sugar 720 1600 10 10
Dal 720 2100 10 20
Soln:
Item p0 p1 q0 q1 p0q0 p0q1 p1q0 p1q1
Rice 400 850 100 120 40000 48000 85000 102000
Wheat 320 690 20 60 6400 19200 13800 41400
Sugar 720 1600 10 10 7200 7200 16000 16000
Dal 720 2100 10 20 7200 14400 21000 42000
∑ p0 q0= ∑ p0 q1= ∑ p1 q 0= ∑ p1 q 1=
60,800 88800 135800 201400
2. For the data given in Q.No.1, find the Laspeyre’s, Paasche’s , Marshall-Edgeworth, Dorbish-
Bowley and Fisher’s Quantity index numbers.
Laspeyre’s Quantity Index number.
Q01=
∑ q 1 p 0 ×100
∑ q0 p 0
Paasche’s Quantity Index number.
Q01=
∑ q1 p1 ×100
∑ q0 p 1
Marshall-Edgeworth Quantity Index Number.
Q 01=
∑ q 1 p 0+ ∑ q1 p1 ×100
∑ q0 p 0 + ∑ q 0 p 1
Dorbish- Bowley Quantity Index Number.
Q 01( Laspeyre ' s )+Q 01( Paasche ' s )
Q01=
2
Q01=
1
2 [ ∑ q 1 p 0 + ∑ q1 p1
∑ q 0 p 0 ∑ q0 p1 ] ×100
Q 01 =
[√ ∑ q 1 p 0 × ∑ q 1 p 1 ×100
∑ q0 p 0 ∑ q 0 p 1 ]
3. Using the following data calculate the appropriate price index numbers for the years
2003 and 2004 with regard to the base 1990.
Price (in Rs./unit) Quantity(units)
Commodity
1990(p0) 2003(p1) 2004(p2) 1990(q0)
Rice 640 1550 1680 10
Wheat 1020 1540 1610 2
Sugar 60 126 130 2
Dal 50 120 110 1
4. From the following the data, compute the suitable price Index number.
Price (in Rs./unit) Quantity(units)
Commodity
Base Year Current Year Current Year (q1)
A 120 150 20
B 80 80 10
C 40 30 20
D 100 140 5
2. Factor Reversal Test: This test also is proposed by Prof. Irving Fisher. Here the
argument is that the index number should be such that the price index and quantity
index computed according to the formula should both be equally effective in
indicating the changes.
‘Factor Reversal test requires that the product of the index number of price (with
quantities as weights) and the index number of quantity (with prices as weights)
should indicate net change in value taking place in between the two periods.’
Thus, if P01 and Q01 are the price and quantity index numbers respectively, the test
requires that –
∑ p 1 q1
P01 x Q01 = ∑ p0 q0 .
Here P01 and Q01 are the mere ratios – they should not be expressed as percentages.
Note: Fisher’s index number satisfies Factor reversal test. But Laspeyre’s, Paasche’s,
Marshall-Edgeworth and Dorbish-Bowley index numbers do not satisfy the Factor
Reversal Test.
P01 (L )=
∑ p1 q 0 =122
∑ p0 q 0 98
P10 (L )=
∑ p0 q 1 =93
∑ p1 q 1 118
122 93
×
98 118
Consider the L.H.S i.e P01(L) x P10(L) = ≠ 1. Hence it is proved that
Soln:
p1q1 p0q0 p1q0 p0q1
3375 2880 3600 2700
1620 784 1008 1260
1728 1210 1320 1584
2400 980 1400 1680
∑ p1 q 1= 9123 ∑ p0 q0 = 5854 ∑ p1 q 0= 7328 ∑ p0 q1= 7224
P01 (F) = √ ∑ p1 q0 × ∑ p 1 q 1
∑ p0 q0 ∑ p0 q 1 √7328 9123
×
= 5854 7224
P10 (F) = √ ∑ p0 q1 × ∑ p0 q 0
∑ p1 q1 ∑ p1 q 0 √7224 5854
×
= 9123 7328
According Time reversal test, P01(F) x P10 (F) = 1
√
7328 9123 7224 5854
× × ×
Consider the L.H.S i.e P01(F) x P10 (F) = 5854 7224 9123 7328 = 1 = R.H.S. Hence
Proved.
∑ p 1 q1
Similarly for the Factor Reversal test, P01(F) x Q01 (F) = ∑ p0 q0 .
Now, Q01(F) = √ ∑ q1 p0 × ∑ q1 p 1
∑ q0 p0 ∑ q 0 p1 √
7224 9123
×
= 5854 7328
√ √ (9123) 9123 ∑ p 1 q1
2
7328 9123 7224 9123
× × × =
Thus, P01(F) x Q01 (F) = 5854 7224 5854 7328 (5854 )2 = 5854 = ∑ p 0 q 0 =R.H.S.
Hence Proved.
3. Using the following data, Show that Fishers Index number satisfies Time Reversal
and Factor Reversal Test.
2002 2004
Item
Price Quantity Price Quantity
P 5 6 6 7
Q 7 12 6 13
R 6 15 8 15
S 8 10 8 12
4. Compute an index number by using the following data.
No. of units used Price (in Rs./unit)
Commodity
in current year Base Year Current year
Rice 200 1.00 2.10
Sugar 20 2.00 5.20
Milk 200 2.20 2.40
Egg 30 4.00 6.00
Cloth 10 10.00 15.00
5. If Laspeyre’s Index number is 212.6 and Paasche’s Index number is 208.4, then
find the Dorbish-Bowley and Fisher’s Index number.
6. If Fisher’s Index number is 114.8 and Paasche’s Index number is 116.1 then find
the Laspeyre’s index number.
7. If Laspeyre’s index number is 461.3 and Dorbish-Bowley index number is 447.4
then find the Paasche’s index number.
a) Aggregative Expenditure Method: Here the quantities used in the base year are taken
as weights. Thus the CPI by this method is –
Total expenditure in the current year
P01= ×100
Total expenditure in the base year
P01=
∑ p1 q 0 ×100
∑ p0 q0
b) Family Budget Method: Consumer Price Index number by this method is the weighted
A.M of the Price relatives. The weights assigned are the expenditure in a normal
period. Thus, the CPI is –
P01=
∑ wP
∑w
Where w and P denote weights and Price Relatives respectively.
Problems:
1. Calculate the consumer price index numbers for the year 2005 with respect to the base
1980.
No. of units used in Price per unit in Rupees
Commodity
1980 1980 2005
Rice 4 250 1640
Sugar 0.5 600 1600
Dhal 1 400 2100
Tea 4 16 64
Fuel 12 80 300
Cloth 1 200 300
House Rent 12 200 1200
Others 12 200 2000
2. Compute the cost of living Index Number by using the following data.
Price In Rupees
Item Weight
Base Year Current Year
Food 10 150 225
House Rent 5 50 150
Clothing 2 30 60
Fuel& lighting 3 30 75
Miscellanous 5 50 75
3. Compute the consumer price index number using the following group indices and the
group weights.
Group Group Index Group Weight
Food 200 20
House Rent 250 10
Clothing 150 5
Fuel & Lighting 250 10
Others 200 5
4. Compute the cost of living index number by aggregative expenditure method.
Base Year Current year q0=V0/p0
Commodity Price(in Rs) Expenditure(in Price (in Rs.)
p0 Rs) V0=p0q0 p1
Rice 200 1000 900 5
Sugar 300 300 1500 1
Soap 15 45 30 3
Kerosene 140 140 420 1
House Rent 50 600 300 12
Others 50 600 400 12
5. A family budget enquiry revealed that the average expenditure on various items are
30%, 10%, 20%, 10% and 30% on food, cloth, house rent, fuel and others
respectively. If the respective group indices for 2003 with base 1990 are 160, 120,
200, 200 and 150, find the consumer price index number for 2003 with base 1990.
6. The following table gives the group indices with base 1980 under various heads for
two different years 2003 & 2004. The budget percentages as indicated in a survey are
also given. Compute consumer price index numbers for the two years with base 1980.
Group Index with base 1980 Percentage Budget
Group
2003(P1) 2004(P2) (w)
Food 412 418 30
House Rent 500 580 20
Clothing 290 240 10
Fuel 480 590 15
Others 360 410 25
Time Series
Generally, planning of economic and business activities are based on predictions of
production, demand, sales, etc. The future can be predicted by a detailed study of the
past variations. Thus, future demand can be predicted by studying the variations in the
demand for last few years.
Generally, time series are those of production, demand, sales, price, imports, exports,
bank rate, value of money, etc. The following is a time series of price of rice.
Year 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002
Price
180 280 260 300 380 540 810 1280 1460
(Rs./Quintal)
Usually, in a time series equidistant points of time are considered. There may be
weekly, monthly, yearly, etc., recordings.
In a time series, the observations vary with time. The variation occurring in any
period is the result of many factors. The effects of these factors may be summed up as
four components. They are—
1. Trend (Secular trend, Long term movement)
2. Seasonal variation
3. Cyclical variation(Business cycle)
4. Irregular variation (Random fluctuation, Erratic variation)
An analytical study of different components of a time series, the effects of these
components, etc., is called Analysis of Time series.
The utility of such analysis is –
a. Understanding the past behavior of the variable.
b. Knowing the existing nature of variation.
c. Predicting the future trend.
d. Comparison with other similar variables.
Examples:
1. Steady increase in the population of India in the past many years is an upward trend.
2. Steady increase in the price of gold in the last many years is an upward trend.
3. Due to availability of greater medical facilities, death rate is decreasing. Thus, death
rate shows a downward trend.
4. Atmospheric temperature at a place, though shows short time variations, does not
show significant upward or downward trend.
The root cause of trend is technological advancement, growth of population, change in
the tastes, etc.
Trend is measured, mainly, by the method of moving averages and by the method of least
squares.
2. Seasonal Variation.
The regular and periodic variation in a time series is called seasonal variation. Generally, the
period of seasonal variation would be within one year. The factors causing seasonal variation
are
i. Weather conditions
ii. Customs, traditions and habits of people.
Seasonal variation is predictable.
Examples:
1. An increase in the sales of woolen cloths during winter.
2. An increase in the sales of note-books during the months of June, July and August.
3. An increase in atmospheric temperature during summer.
One cycle consisting of four stages occurs in a period of few years. The period is not
definite. Generally, the period is 5 to 10 years.
Many Economists have explained the causes of cyclical variation. Each of them is
significant.
Examples:
1. The oscillatory movement of BSE share Index (Sensex) over last many years is
cyclical variation.
2. The upward and downward movement in the bank interest rates over last few
years is cyclical variation.
MEASURMENT OF TREND
The methods used for the measurement of trend are -
1. Method of Moving Averages.
2. Method of Least squares.
If y1, y2, y3, .….. yn are the observations and if m=3 is the period, the successive
moving averages are..
y 1+ y 2+ y 3 y 2+ y 3+ y 4 y 3+ y 4+ y 5
, , , etc..
3 3 3
Here, the first moving average is the average of the first, the second and the third
observations. It is written against the second time point which is the middle most of
the first, the second and the third time points. Such an association of moving averages
with time points is possible only if the period m is an odd number. If m is an even
number, firstly, moving averages are found. The second set of moving averages can
be associated with given time points (This procedure is called centering). However,
for finding trend values when m is even, firstly, moving sums with period m are
obtained, and the resulting sums are divided by 2m. These values are the trend values.
Merits.
1. The method is simple
2. If the time series shows periodic variation, this method is very effective in
obtaining trend.
Demerits.
1. Since the method does not establish mathematical relation, it cannot be used for
forecasting.
2. The method does not provide the trend values at the beginning and at the end of
the time series.
3. The method is not much effective when period of variation in the time series is not
definite.
Problems:
1. Compute the trend values by finding three-yearly moving averages for the
following time series.
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Population(in
412 438 446 454 470 483 490
millions)
2. Compute the trend values by finding four yearly moving averages for the
following time series data. Also, graph the observed valued and the trend values.
Year 1996 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04
Value 103 104 107 101 102 104 105 99 100
3. Calculate 5-yearly moving averages for the following data regarding profit in
Lakh Rupees.
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
11 9
12 10
13
Profit 110 104 98 105 109 120 115 110 114 122 127
0
5- Yearly Moving Trend Values
Year Profit (in Rs)
sum (i) (i)/5
1 110 - -
2 104 - -
3 98 526 105.2
4 105 536 107.2
5 109 547 109.4
6 120 559 111.8
7 115 568 113.6
8 110 581 116.2
9 114 591 118.2
10 122 603 120.6
11 130 - -
12 127 - -
The process of minimization of the sum of the squared errors results in some
equations called Normal equations. The Normal equations are the equations which are
used for finding the coefficients of the relation which is fitted by the method of least
squares.
Merits.
In this method, a relation of the type y=a+bx is fitted to the time series. Here, y denotes
the values and x denotes the points of time. The constants a and b are obtained by solving the
normal equations
na+b ∑ x =∑ y
a ∑ x+b ∑ x 2=∑ xy
Here, y denotes the observed values an n denotes the number of observations in the series. If
x is chosen such that ∑ x=0 , the values a and b are
∑y b=
∑ xy
a=
n and ∑ x2
By substituting the values of x in the trend equation, the corresponding trend values can be
obtained. The graph of trend equation can be obtained by plotting two trend values and
joining them by a straight line.
Problems:
1. The following are the figures of production (in thousand quintals) of a sugar factory.
Year 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
Productio
77 81 88 94 94 96 98
n
(i) Fit a straight line trend to the data.
(ii) Estimate the production in the year 2006.
(iii) Graph the observed values and the trend values.
Ans: y = 89.7+3.61(x). Estimate in the year 2006 is y = 104.14thousand quintals.
2. Fit an equation of the type y= a + b(x) to the following data and estimate the
production in 2005.
Year 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Productio
142 180 150 127 140 171 140
n
**************