Fouling-the silent heat

transfer thief
Better boiler water chemistry can either on the tube or gas side whether it is a fire tube or water tube
improve overall heat exchanger. In addition to reduced duty, steam side cleanliness
impacts the tube wall temperature leading to its overheating and
duty and efficiency by minimizing scale failure in the long run.
and sludge buildup Good water chemistry is an easy, efficient way to reduce the
effects of steam-side fouling on boiler performance and tube wall
V Ganapathy, ABCO Industries, Inc. temperature. Water tube waste heat recovery boilers shown in Figs.
Abilene, Texas 1 and 2 will be used as examples. The concept applies to fired water
tube or fire tube boilers and heat recovery steam generators also.

A boiler's primary function is to achieve and to maintain

maximum heat duty with the least operating costs and downtime.
Water tube boilers. Typical water tube waste heat boilers
(Fig. 1) are used in applications such as heat recovery from
municipal waste incinerator exhaust or effluents from fluidized
bed cat crackers. Bare tubes minimize fouling from particulates
or ash in flue gases. Finned tube heat recovery boilers (Fig. 2)
Scale and sludge are silent heat transfer thieves who slowly steal
need clean gas streams such as exhaust from gas turbines or
heat duty by reducing the overall heat transfer coefficient. The fume incinerators to perform well. The bare tube boiler usually
effects of scale and sludge are more pronounced in finned tube operates at low heat flux inside the tubes, in the range of 10 to
boilers. Tube side fouling on finned tubes generates higher tube wall 30,000 Btu/ft 2/hr, while the finned tube waste heat boiler could
temperatures. Ultimately, high heat fluxes result in tube failures. operate under heat flux of 50 to 150,000 Btu/ft 2hr. It is
Implementing a quality feedwater program for boilers pays off in extremely important that the proper water chemistry be
improved exchanger efficiency, reduced operating costs and reduced maintained in finned tube exchangers. A small increase in steam
downtime
Clean is for maintenance.
better. Boilers or heat recovery steam generators side fouling factor on finned tubing can increase the tube wall
perform efficiently under clean conditions. Their performance is temperature significantly compared to the bare tube boiler. A
significantly affected by fouling few calculations will demonstrate the different fouling effects
between the tube types.

Fig. 1. Bare tube HRSG for incineration heat recovery. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING / OCTOBER 1992 49
 S = Q/U∆T
(1) where the duty is found by Eq. 2:

Design calculations. The surface area for the boiler is determined Q = WCp (T l - T 2)h1= WS∆H
from Eq. 1 (2) If U is computed based on tube inner diameter, then the tube inner
surface area should be used for S. Similarly, if U is based on tube
outer diameter, S should be computed using the tube outer diameter.
Remember that
Table 1. Suggested water quality limits*
Boiler type: industrial watertube, high duty, primary fue l fired, drum type Makeup water percentage: up to 100% of feedwater
Conditions: includes superheater, turbine drives or process restriction on steam
purity Saturated steam purity target
Drum operating MPa 0-2.07 2.08-3.10 3.11-4.14 4.15-5.17 5.18-6.21 6.22-6.89 6.90-10.34 10.35-13.79

Pressure (psig) (0-300) (301-450) (451-600) (601-750) (751-900) (901-1,000) (1,001-1,500) (1,501-2,000)
Feedwater
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1 02)
measured before oxygen
scavenger addition <0.04 <0.04 <!0.007 <0.007 < 0.007 <0.007 ! <0.007 <0.0.007

Total iron (mg/1 Fe) <0.100 <0.05 <0.03 <0.025 <0.020 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01

Total copper (mg/1 Cu) <0.05 <0.025 <0.02 <0.02 <0.015 <0.015 <0.01 <0.01

total hardness
(mg/1 CaCO3) <0.300 <0.300 <0.200 <0.200 <0.100 <0.05 <0.05 -Not detectable

pH range @ 25°C 7.5-10.0 7.5-10.0 7.5-10.0 7.5-10.0 7.5-10.0 8.5-9.5 9.0-9.6 9.0-9.6
Chemicals for preboiler
system protection Use only volatile alkaline materials

Nonvolatile TOC (mg/1 °C) <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 As low as possible, <0.2

Oily matter (mg/1) <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 As low as possible, <0.2Boiler
water
Silica (mg/1 S102) <150 <90 <40 <30 <20 <8 <2 <1
Total alkalinity
(mg/1 CaCo3) <350 <300 <250 <200 <150 <100 -Not Specified-
Free hydroxide alkalinity
(mg/1 CaC03) Not specified Not detectable
Specific conductance
(pmho/cm) @ 25°C

without neutralization <3500 <3000 <2500 <2000 <1500 <1000 <150 <100
'Adapted from ASME 1979 consensus. See ASME 1979 for a complete discussion.
50 HYDROCARBON PROCESSING / OCTOBER 1992
the product U x S is the same whether U and S are based on Table 2. Watertube boilers recommended
tube ID or OD. U based on tube outer diameter is given by the water limits and associated steam purity
following equation for bare tube boilers: At steady state full load operation drum type boilers ABMA-1982
1/U o = 1/ho + (1/hi)(d./di) +ffi (d./di) +ffo Drum Range Range Suspended solids
+ (d/24Km)ln (do/di) pressure, total dissolved 2
total alkalinity boiler water,
psig solids' boiler boiler water, ppm (max)
(3) and by the following equation for the finned tube boilers: water, ppm (max) Ppm
1/U= (AT/hiAi) +ffi (AT/Ai) +ffo + (ATd/Aw24Km) In
0-300 700-3,500 140-700 15
(d/di) + 1/η ho 301-450 600-3,000 120-600 10
(4) The boiling heat transfer coefficient hi inside the tubes 451-600 500-2,500 100-500 8

will be very high on the order of 2,000 to 3,000 Btu/ft /hr °F. 601-750
2
751-900
200-1,000
150-750
40-200
30-150
3
2
An error of 10% to 20% in its value will not affect Uo. 901-1,000 125-625 25-125 1
1,001 -1,800 100 3
1
1,801 -2,350 50 N/A
Correlations for computing ho. The gas-side coefficient for 2,351 -2,600 25 N/A
bare and finned tube boilers consists of two components, 2,601 -2,900 15 N/A
namely hc- the convective heat transfer coefficient and h, - Once through boilers
1,400 and
the nonluminous heat transfer coefficient. The hc is obtained
above 0.05 N/A N/A
from the Grimsons equation for bare tubes and from ESCOA 1
1-3 Actual values within the range reflect the TDS in the feed water. Higher values are
correlations for finned tube boilers. Tube-side fouling solids, lower values are for low solids in the feed water.
factor ff i affects duty and tube wall temperatures and the 2
Actual values within the range are directly proportional to the actual value of TDS
impact is more significant in a finned tube boiler compared to water. Higher values are for the high solids, lower values are for low
a bare tube design. water.
3
Dictated by boiler treatment.
4 silica.
Scale formation and fouling factor ffo. Typically, with These values are exclusive of

treated feedwater and boiler water that is maintained Table 3. Thermal conductivities of scale materials
according to ASME or ABMA guidelines, a fouling factor of
0.0005 to 0.001 ft 2/hrF/Btu could be used. If the water Material Thermal conductivity, B
chemistry is not properly maintained, then sludge and scale Analcite
can accumulate on the inside of tubes hindering heat transfer. Calcium phosphate
Calcium sulfate
ASME and ABMA guidelines for water chemistry are listed Magnesium phosphate
in Tables 1 and 2. Magnetic iron oxide
Scale is a relatively hard and adherent deposit, while Silicate scale (porous)
sludge is softer and can be easily dislodged. The buildup of Boiler steel
scale is most severe in high heat flux areas. Scale buildup is Firebrick
associated with compounds whose solubilities decrease with Insulating brick
increasing temperatures. Conversely, sludges are precipitated
directly from the boiler water when their solubilities are Table 4. Results of calculations
exceeded. Scale and sludge increase the resistance to heat Case 1 2 3
transfer and decrease U. Most importantly, sludge and scale 1. Gas temp in 1,000 1,000 1,000
raise the tube wall temperature. Fouling factor could be 520 545 520
2. Exit temp
approximated by dividing the scale layer thickness by its 3. Duty 19.65 18.65 19.65
conductivity: 4. Steam flow 19,390 18,400 19,39
ff i = thickness of scale/conductivity 5. (5)
ffi The thermal conductivity of some c .001 .01 .001
Heat flux. Using the electrical analogy as an example, one can 6. Heat flux 9,314 8,162 35,36
7. Wall temp 437 516 490
show that the heat transfer across tubes is analogous to flow
8. Fin temp 730
of current in an electrical circuit. Current is analogous to heat 9. A t/A; 1.13 1.13 5.6
flux, while voltage drop is analogous to temperature 10. Fins bare bare (2x.75
difference and resistance and fouling factor are analogous. To x.05
compute the temperature drop across the fouling layer, x.157
multiply the heat flux by the fouling factor: 11. Tubes/row 20 20 20
12. No. deep 60 60 16
∆Tf= q x ffi (6)
13. Length 8 8 8
Heat flux q computed on inner tube diameter basis is
14. Surf. area 5,024 5,024 6,642
calculated by Eq. 7: 15. Gas Ap 3.0 3.1 1.80
Units:
Temp., °F
Flow, Ib/hr
Duty, MMBtu/hr
ff, ft 2/hr°F/Btu
heat flux, Btu/ft 2/hr
Surf. area, ft 2
Gas Ap, in., water column
Length, ft

q = Uo x (At/Ai) x (T - t) (7)
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING/ OCTOBER 1992 51
At, Ai refer to external and internal surface areas. T, t refer to gas and
boiling water temperatures. Note that At/A i will be very large for
finned tubes compared to bare
 tubes. Hence, the temperature drop due to the same fouling factor Water chemistry is very important in boilers. Increases in the steam-
can be large for boilers with finned tubes. side fouling factor due to formation of thick layer of scale or sludge
Example. A water tube boiler for a fume incineration system is can result in reduced duty and higher tube wall temperatures. The
required to cool 150,000 lb/hr of clean flue gases from 1,000°F to problem is exacerbated when the heat flux across the tubes increases
520°F. Gas analysis is: due to use of extended surfaces. The larger the fin surface area
vol% (obtained by using high fin density), the higher the temperature at the
C02 7 tube wall and fin tip. Even in fired bare tube boilers, the furnace tubes
H2O 12 should have proper cooling. Otherwise, high heat flux and scale for-
N2 75 mation can produce overheating at the tube wall and result in tube
02 6 failure. Hence, one must be very watchful and monitor tube side
Gas pressure is atmospheric. Steam pressure is 285 psig and fouling which is affected by the feedwater quality and proper boiler
feedwater is at 230°F. Carbon steel tubes of size 2 in. x 1.77 in. are water maintenance. Even if tube failures may not be the immediate
used. Assume that the gas side fouling factor = 0.001 ft2/hr°FBtu; concern, the decrement in energy transferred may be substantial and
metal thermal conductivity = 25 Btu/ft/hr°F; steam side coefficient prompt a review of current water treatment practices.
= 2,000 Btu/ft 2/hr°F; and heat loss = 2%.
Design the boiler using a steam side fouling factor ffi of 0.001 NOMENCLATURE
ft 2/hr°FBtu (0.025 in. thick calcium phosphat e scale) and check the Ai inner tube area, ft 2/ft
performance with a ffi = 0.0 1(0.006 in. thick silicate scale). At total external area, ft 2/ft
Study three options: bare tubes, finned tubes with 2 x 0.75 x Aw area of average wall, ft 2/ft
0.05 x 0.157 (2 fins/in., 0.75 in. high, 0.05 in. thick with 0.157 in. Cp gas specific heat, Btu/lboF
serration) and finned tubes with the geometry 5 x 0.75 x 0.05 x do tube outer diameter, in.
0.157 and transverse and longitudinal pitch = 4 in. di tube inner diameter, in.
Solution. Calculations were ff fouling factors inside tubes, ft 2/hr°F/Btu
performed using the ffo fouling factors outside tubes, ft 2/hroF/Btu
Boilers or heat methodology discussed in
references 1-3. The results are
hi heat transfer coefficients inside tubes, Btu/ft 2/hr°F
ho heat transfer coefficients outside tubes, Btu/ft2/hroF

recovery steam
listed in Table 4. Several ∆HS enthalpy absorbed by steam, Btu/lb
important aspects may be Kn, thermal conductivity of tube, Btu/ft/hr°F
noted: q heat flux, Btu/ft 2/hr
generators 1. Tube wall and fin tip
temperatures increase sig-
Q duty, MMBtu/hr
S surface area, ft 2
perform nificantly when ffi increases,
though Uo and heat flux are
∆T log mean temperature difference, °F
T,t gas and steam temperatures, °F

efficiently under
lower with increased fouling
U overall heat transfer coefficient, Btu/ft2/hr°F W
factor. The product of heat flux
gas flow, lb/hr
and ffi determines the tem-
W s steam flow, lb/hr
clean conditions. perature drop across
the fouling layer which increases the tube wall and fin tip tem-
η effectiveness of fin, fraction Subscripts
f temperature drop across fouling layer 1 entering
perature. 2 leaving
2. Duty decreases with increase in ffi. The decrement is large as a LITERATURE CITED
percentage with finned tubes compared to bare tubes. With 5 fins/in. 1 Ganapathy, V, Applied Heat Ransfer, Pennwell Books, 1982. Ganapathy, V, Waste Heat
design, the duty is much lower compared to 2 fins/in. design and Boiler Deskbook, Fairmont Press, 1991.
significantly lower compared to bare tubes. We generate only ue Ganapathy, V, "Evaluating extended surfaces carefully," Hydrocarbon Processing, Vol
14,4001b/hr steam with 5 fin/in. compared to 18,4001b/hr with bare 68, October 1990, p. 65.

tube boiler for the same fouling factor, though the basic design is for
the same steam generation with the same fouling factor of 0.001. The author
3. More surface area does not mean more duty. Increased fin density
requires a larger surface area to transfer the same duty with a lower V Ganapathy is a heat transfer specialist with
Ua . Also, the tube wall and fin tip temperatures are higher with ABCO Industries Inc., Abilene, Texas. He is
increases in fin surface area for the same fouling factor. engaged in the engineering of heat recovery
4. Compared to bare tube design, a finned tube boiler is more boilers for process, incineration and
compact, weighs less and has lower gas pressure drop for the cogeneration applications, and packaged water
same duty. However, one has to be careful about the falloff in tube steam generators. He also develops
performance and possible overheating of tubes with increase in software for engineering of heat recovery
tube-side fouling or scale formation. systems and components. He holds a B Tech
degree in mechanical engineering from
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India, and an MSc(eng) in
boiler technology from Madras University. Mr. Ganapathy is the
author of over 175 articles on boilers, heat transfer and steam plant
systems and has written five books: Applied Heat Transfer, Steam
Plant Calculations Manual, Nomograms for Steam Generation and
Utilization, Basic Programs for Steam Plant Engineers (book and
diskette), and Waste Heat Boiler Deskbook, copies of which are
available from him. He also has contributed several chapters to the
Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, Vols. 25 & 26,
Marcel Dekker, New York.