Appendix B: MTBF, Fit, and PPM Conversions
Appendix B: MTBF, Fit, and PPM Conversions
Appendix B: MTBF, Fit, and PPM Conversions
Improving Product Reliability: Strategies and Implementation. Mark A. Levin and Ted T. Kalal
2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd ISBN: 0-470-85449-9
299
300 Appendix B
some will fail sooner, and some later. It is understood that with a population
of units the average or mean failure rate will be the stated MTBF rate.
Taking an example of 100 units that have a 1,000-h MTBF; let’s find out
more about how many failures there will be, how many units will fail before
the stated 1,000 failure rate, how many after, and how many units will have
more than one failure.
The rate of failure is exponential. Here the expression is:
λ = 1/MTBF (B.2)
λ and MTBF are inversely related MTBF is Mean Time Between Failures.
So (B.1) becomes:
R(t) = Nε −(t)/(MTBF) (B.3)
MTBF = 1,000 h
N = 100 new VCRs or TV sets, or any other type of system
R(t) = 100 × ε−(1000 h)/(1000 h between failures)
= 100 × 2.71−1000/1000
= 100 × 2.71−1
= 100 × 0.37
R(t) = 37 Units ‘‘STILL WORKING WITHOUT A FAILURE’’
304 Appendix B
This also means that 63 units had failures. But in 1,000 h shouldn’t all 100
units have had a failure? No; but there still were 100 failures!
At first it seems impossible that there were 100 failures and 37 units were still
working; but the answer is that of the 63 units that had failures, some had more
than one failure. Some had two or there or even more failures. That’s where
the total of 100 failures comes from. The only way this could happen is when
one unit fails, it is quickly repaired and placed back into service. Even after one
failure, as soon as it is repaired there are 100 units that are operating that all
have an MTBF of 1,000 h. Even after 25 or 50 or 63 failures, as soon as that last
failure was repaired there were always 100 units operating; all with an MTBF
of 1,000 h. This is considered the number of failures in ‘‘repairable’’ systems.
Where:
P (n) is the percent of units exhibiting n failures.
t is the time duration,
n is the number of failures in a single system, (e.g. 1, 2, 3, . . . n).
Let’s learn how many units will have 1, then 2, then 3, and so on, failures
per unit in the group of 63 units that will exhibit these 100 failures.
But first a short refresher in factorials:
Note: 0! Is defined as equaling 1; and 0! is read as ‘‘zero factorial.’’ See
Table B2 for a list of common factorials.
For zero failures: (this is the group of 37 units that had no failures in 1,000 h.)
So with 100 units there will be 37 units exhibiting zero failures in one MTBF
time period.
How many units will have one failure in 1,000 h?
Substitute 1 for n
So with 100 units there will be 37 units exhibiting one failure in one MTBF
time period (1,000 h).
How many units will have two failures in 1,000 h?
So with 100 units there will be 18 units exhibiting two failures in one MTBF
time period (1,000 h).
Table B.3 Repairable versus Nonrepairable Systems Still Operating (in MTBF Time Units)
Find how many will fail in one hundredth of an MTBF time period.
P (f ) = 0.001 × 1,000/100 h
P (f ) = 0.001 × 10
P (f ) = 0.01 or 1%
Using 100 units this means that 1 unit exhibits the very first failure in 10 h. So
the time to first failure is 10 h!!!!!
Which one it will be in the 100 units is a mystery, however . . ..
Interestingly enough one unit will last for 5,000 h before it finally has its
first failure.
Note: These failures have been considered where the failure rate was expo-
nential. There are other failure rates that are Weibull, Log Normal, and more.