Engineering Design Process
Engineering Design Process
nWhat is engineering?
nWho is an engineer? What do engineers do?
nEngineering problem solving
nTypes of engineers
3
The engineering design process
Create specifications
Test
Develop plan
Manufacture
4/Chapter3
Step 1: Determine needs
Step 2: Create Specifications
Non-Functional Requirements
nOperation Environment
pTemperature conditions
pHumidity conditions
pLighting conditions
Non-Functional Requirements
nShape, size, weight
nReliability
nPower Supply
nPower Consumption
nProduction expense
nProduction time
Functional Requirements
• Protection function:
pIs there any form to protect the product from water,
moisture?
• Display Function:
pThe order of display
pList the order of effects
Step 6: Select best alternatives
Practice: select best alternatives
Choose LEDs
Normalize
Select min(muy)
Step 7: Test
Practice: select best alternatives
nDecide what phenomenon you wish to investigate.
pWhat parts of the recipe did they vary to make the recipe
a success
pNow, should one keep all the factors involved in the
experiment at a constant level and just vary one to see
what would happen?
pThis is a strategy that works but is not very efficient.
à This is one of the concepts that we will address in this
course.
Design of Experiments (DOE)
n All experiments are designed experiments
pPoorly designed or well-designed
!!
pOur estimates of the mean become less variable
"
as the sample size n increases
The Basic Principles of DOE
n Replication:
p Example: Design of PROPELLERS
The Basic Principles of DOE
n Replication:
p Example: Design of PROPELLERS
The Basic Principles of DOE
n Blocking
pA technique to include other factors in your experiment which contribute
to undesirable variation.
pto control sources of variation that will reduce error variance
n For example: human studies
p gender
pAge
◊Age and gender are often considered nuisance factors which contribute to
variability and make it difficult to assess systematic effects of a treatment
◊Using age and gender as blocking factors, you can avoid biases that might
occur due to differences between the allocation of subjects to the treatments, and
as a way of accounting for some noise in the experiment.
The Basic Principles of DOE
nMulti-factor Designs
pMulti-factor experimental designs: 2k designs, 3k designs, response
surface designs
pContrary to the scientific method à The one factor at a time
method is a very inefficient way of making scientific advances
pAn experiment that simultaneously includes combinations of
multiple factors that may affect the outcome.
The Basic Principles of DOE
nCofounding
pExample 1:
◊Let's say we are doing a medical study with drugs A and B.
◊ We put 10 subjects on drug A and 10 on drug B.
◊If we categorize our subjects by gender, how should we allocate our drugs
to our subjects?
The Basic Principles of DOE
nCofounding
pSolutions for Example 1:
◊Let's make it easy and say that there are 10 male and 10 female subjects.
◊A balanced way of doing this study would be to put five males on drug A and
five males on drug B, five females on drug A and five females on drug B.
◊This is a perfectly balanced experiment such that if there is a difference
between male and female at least it will equally influence the results from
drug A and the results from drug B.
The Basic Principles of DOE
n Cofounding
pExample 2:
◊if patients were randomly assigned treatments as they came in the door.
◊At the end of the study they might realize that drug A had only been given to the
male subjects and drug B was only given to the female subjects.
◊We would call this design totally confounded.
◊This refers to the fact that if you analyze the difference between the average
response of the subjects on A and the average response of the subjects on B, this
is exactly the same as the average response on males and the average response on
females. You would not have any reliable conclusion from this study at all.
◊The difference between the two drugs A and B, might just as well be due to the
gender of the subjects, since the two factors are totally confounded.
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
1. Recognition and statement of the problem
2. Choice of factors, levels, and ranges
3. Selection of the response variable(s)
4. Choice of design
5. Conducting the experiment
6. Statistical analysis
7. Drawing conclusions, and making recommendations
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
nChoice of factors, levels, and ranges
33/Chapter3
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
nSelection of the response variable(s)
p Microwave popcorns:
◊Factors: brand, time, power, height (on bottom or raised)
◊Responses: taste (maximize), un-popped kernels (minimize)
p Boiling water:
◊Factors: pan type, burner size, cover
◊Response: time to boil water
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
nChoice of design
• Choice of design
pDetermine:
factors; and
◊What combination of the factors would maximize Y1 but minimize Y2 ?
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
nStatistical analysis
pExample
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
nStatistical analysis
pExample
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
nStatistical analysis
pExample
Steps for Planning, Conducting
and Analyzing an Experiment
nStatistical analysis
pExample: Response Function
Now, let design a paper helicopter
Goal: Making a Better Paper Helicopter
n Objectives:
pTo increase the flight time: stay in the air for longer time
T0: The helicopter is dropped
Height
of 2m