0% found this document useful (0 votes)
320 views

Particle Size Distribution Bs 1377-2-1990

This document summarizes the results of a particle size distribution test and Atterberg limit tests on a soil sample. The particle size distribution test found that the soil was predominantly sandy silt with some clay. The plastic limit and liquid limit tests determined the plastic limit to be 25.5% and the liquid limit ranged from 53.3% to 63% between test points.

Uploaded by

Nzunzu Ben
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
320 views

Particle Size Distribution Bs 1377-2-1990

This document summarizes the results of a particle size distribution test and Atterberg limit tests on a soil sample. The particle size distribution test found that the soil was predominantly sandy silt with some clay. The plastic limit and liquid limit tests determined the plastic limit to be 25.5% and the liquid limit ranged from 53.3% to 63% between test points.

Uploaded by

Nzunzu Ben
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION BS 1377-2-1990

Sample Ref: G2 Sample No. 2


Location: (km) Next to Mosque Depth(m): 1.5
Date Sampled: 28.12.2021
Layer: Date tested: 01.01.2021
Trial pit No. TP2 Material Source: Trial Pit 2
Reddish to dark Brown silty clay with medium
Tested By: Group Two
Description: gravel
Initial wt before washing (g) 3062.0 Moisture Content (%) 7.9
Dry wt after washing(g) 1581 Initial Dry Weight (g) 94
Diameter(mm) Partial Retained Mass(g) Cumulative Retained Mass(g) Cumulative Retained(%) % Passing

75 0.0 0.0 0.0 100


50 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
28 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
20 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100
3.35 0.1 0.1 0.1 100
2 2.1 2.2 2.3 98
1.18 10.9 13.1 13.9 86
0.6 21.6 34.7 36.8 63
0.425 13.7 48.4 51.4 49
0.300 17.4 65.8 69.9 30
0.212 22.6 88.4 93.8 6
0.15 16.8 105.2 111.7 -12
0.075 20.8 126.0 133.8 -34
Pan 0.2 126.2
Grading Coefficient Grading Modulus 1.9

Particle size distribution


100

90

80

70

60

50
% passing

40

30

20

10

0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
sieve sizes (mm)

Remarks:

Materials Technician Materials Engineer


Sign: Sign:

Date: Date:
PLASTIC LIMIT AND LIQUID LIMIT
BS 1377 : Part 2 1990
Sample Ref: G2 Sample No. 2
Location: Next to the Mosque Depth(m): 1.5
Date Sampled: 31.12.2021
Layer: 0 Date tested: 03.01.2022
Trial pit No. TP2 Material Source: Trial Pit 2
Tested By: Reddish to dark Brown silty clay with
Group Two Description: medium gravel
LIQUID LIMIT
Test Point 1 2 3 4
PLASTIC LIMIT
Initial Reading mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Penetration mm 15.5 23.50 20.5 26.4
Container no. T1 T2 T3 T4 P1 P2
Mass of wet soil + Tin (g) M1 58.80 57.20 40.80 39.80 45.90 49.10
Mass of dry soil + Tin (g) M2 45.00 42.90 33.10 31.80 40.10 44.80
Mass of Tin (g) M3 19.10 19.00 18.90 19.10 18.80 26.70
Mass of moisture (g) MI-M2=A 13.80 14.30 7.70 8.00 5.80 4.30
Mass of dry soil (g) M2-M3=B 25.90 23.90 14.20 12.70 21.30 18.10
Moisture content (%) =A/B*100 53.3 59.8 54.2 63.0 27.2 23.8
Average MC (%) 53.3 59.8 54.2 63.0 25.5

f(x) = NaN x + NaN


30
Sample Preparation
a) As Received
25 b) Air Dried
Penetration (mm)

c)Washed on 425µm

20 d) Oven Dried
e) Not Known

15
LIQUID LIMIT(%) 52.8
PLASTIC LIMIT(%) 25.5
10 P.I (%) 27.3
49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65
Moisture Content (%)

Remark:

For the Contractor (CSCEC) For the Engineer (LEA-KOM CONSULT)


Materials Technician Materials Engineer Materials Technician Materials Engineer

Sign: Sign: Sign: Sign:

Date: Date: Date: Date:


CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR
LEA Associates South Asia
Pvt.Ltd with KOM Consult Ltd. China State
UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS Construction
AUTHORITY (UNRA) Engineering
Corporation Ltd

CIVIL WORKS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF KAPCHORWA – SUAM ROAD (73.00KM)


CONTRACT NUMBER: UNRA/WORKS/2015-16/00124
LINEAR SHRINKAGE & SHRINKAGE PRODUCT
BS1377-2:1990
Sample Ref: G2 Sample No. 2
Location: Next to Mosque Offset (Km) : 1.5
Date Sampled: 28.12.2021 Depth(m): 0
Layer: 0 Date tested: 03.01.2022
Trial pit No. TP2 Material Source: Trial Pit 2
Tested By: SILAS Description: Reddish to dark Brown silty clay with medium gravel

Mould no. LD

Side measured

Initial Reading (mm) LO 140.00

Oven dried reading (mm) LD 122.4

Linear shrinkage =(LO-LD)/LO*100 (%) 12.6

Average lineer shrinkage (%) 12.6

Reported shrinkage (%) 12.6


Remarks

For the Contractor (CSCEC) For the Engineer (LEA-KOM CONSULT)


Materials Technician Materials Engineer Materials Technician Materials Technician

Sign: Sign: Sign: Sign:

Date: Date: Date: Date:


CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR
LEA Associates
South Asia Pvt.Lt China State Construction
UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS
with KOM Consult Engineering Corporation
AUTHORITY
Ltd. Ltd.

CIVIL WORKS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF KAPCHORWA – SUAM ROAD (73.00KM)


CONTRACT NUMBER: UNRA/WORKS/2015-16/00124
TEST Moisture-Density Test
TEST METHOD BS 1377:Part 4:1990
Sample Ref: G2 Sample No. 2
Location: Next to Mosque Offset (km) : 1.50
Date Sampled: 28.12.2021 Depth(m): 0
Layer: 0 Date tested: 20.02.2019
Trial pit No. TP2 Material Source: Trial Pit 2
Reddish to dark Brown silty clay with
Tested By: Description: medium gravel
Mould Diameter (mm) 152 Height of the mould (mm) 119.4
Volume of Mould(cm3) 2167 0
DENSITY DETERMINATION
TEST NO. 1 2 3 4 5
Mass of sample g 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000
Water added % 7 9 11 13 15
Mass of mould +compaction specimen (m2) g 8376 8600 8803 8750 8677
Mass of mould (m1) g 4453 4453 4453 4453 4453
Volume of mould (v) cm3 2167 2167 2167 2167 2167
Mass of compaction specimen (m2-m1) g 3923 4147 4350 4297 4224
Bulk density m 2  m1 g/c3
  1.810 1.914 2.007 1.983 1.949
V
100 
Dry density d  g/c3 1.626 1.686 1.738 1.687 1.631
100  W
MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION
Moisture container No. GIE MSA DTO VAP OTZ WTT CONY YRD 10L OSIL
Mass of wet sample + container g 120.1 93.9 101.8 60.9 86.7 113.3 90.1 113.3 89.9 122.8
Mass of dry sample + container g 109.5 86.1 91.7 54.9 77.4 100.4 79.2 98.8 78.0 105.5
Mass of container g 17.0 16.2 17.2 10.5 17.8 16.9 17.1 16 17.1 16.9
Mass of water g 10.6 7.8 10.1 6 9.3 12.9 10.9 14.5 11.9 17.3
Mass of dry soil g 92.5 69.9 74.5 44.4 59.6 83.5 62.1 82.8 60.9 88.6
Mositure Content (w) % 11.5 11.2 13.6 13.5 15.6 15.4 17.6 17.5 19.5 19.5
Mositure Content (w) % 11.3 13.5 15.5 17.5 19.5

Compaction Test Curve


1.75

1.70
Dry Density (g/cmᶟ)

1.65

1.60
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Moisture Content (%)

OMC (%) 15.5 MDD (g/cc) 1.738


NMC (%) 4.3
Remark:

For the Contractor (CSCEC) For the Engineer (LEA-KOM CONSULT)


Materials Technician Materials Engineer Materials Technician Materials Engineer

Sign: Sign: Sign: Sign:

Date: Date: Date: Date:


Consultant: Client: Contractor:
LEA Associates South Asia
Pvt.Ltd with KOM Consult UGANDA NATIONAL China State Construction
Ltd. ROADS AUTHORITY Engineering Corporation Ltd

CIVIL WORKS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF KAPCHORWA – SUAM ROAD (73.00KM)


CONTRACT NUMBER: UNRA/WORKS/2015-16/00124
CBR TEST
REF TEST METHOD: BS 1377- 4 (1990)
Sample Ref No. G2 Location Next to Mosque TP No. TP2 Depth(m) 0.0

Material Source Trial Pit 2 Offset(km) 1.50 Soaking Period 4d Proving Ring Factor 0.0117

Descripton Reddish to dark Brown silty clay with medium gravel Sampling Date 28.12.2021 Test Date 25.02.2019

Tested by David

Moisture content before moulding

Container No. PATH OO


Mass of wet soil +container, g 83.7 82.3
Mass of dry soil +container, g 73.9 72.7
Mass of container, g 11.8 12.0
Mass of Water, g 9.8 9.6
Moisture content, % 15.8 15.8
Average Moisture content 15.8
Optimum moisture content, % 15.5

Density Determination SWELL DETERMINATION

LIGHT INTRM HEAVY Blows LIGHT INTRM HEAVY

Mould No. MBC MOON MOYQ Initial Dial Gauge Setting 2.84 3.05 2.18

Volume of mould, cm 3
2167 2167 2167 Final Dial Gauge Setting 3.57 3.57 2.49

Mass of mould + Soil, g 8461 8908 9168


Swell % 0.61 0.44 0.26
Mass of mould, g 4610 4770 4834
Mass of soil, g 3851 4138 4334 CBR
Dry Density, Mg/m3 1.535 1.649 1.727 LIGHT INTRM HEAVY
Maximum Dry Density Mg/m3 1.738 1.738 1.738
Compaction, % 88.3 94.9 99.4

TESTING

Dial Gauge Reading Equivalent Force in kN


Penetration (mm) LIGHT INTRM HEAVY LIGHT INTRM HEAVY
Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom
0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.5 30 70 140 0.35 0.82 1.64
1.0 56 110 245 0.66 1.29 2.87
1.5 85 190 310 0.99 2.22 3.63
2.0 110 250 368 1.29 2.93 4.31
2.5 146 310 443 1.71 3.63 5.18
3.0 155 331 470 1.81 3.87 5.50
3.5 181 347 498 2.12 4.06 5.83
4.0 189 365 527 2.21 4.27 6.17
4.5 195 371 560 2.28 4.34 6.55
5.0 208 379 580 2.43 4.43 6.79
5.5 212 386 615 2.48 4.52 7.20
6.0 215 389 633 2.52 4.55 7.41
6.5 218 396 658 2.55 4.63 7.70
7.0 223 410 696 2.61 4.80 8.14
7.5 229 419 710 2.68 4.90 8.31
CALCULATION OF CBR %
CBR at 2.5 mm penetration 12.9 27.5 39.3
Average
CBR at 5.0 mm penetration 12.2 22.2 33.9
Average

For the Contractor (CSCEC) For the Engineer (LEA-KOM CONSULT)


Technician Materials Eng. Technician Materials Eng.
CBR TEST
REF TEST METHOD: BS 1377- 4 (1990)

Top Face Penetration Bottom Face Penetration


10.0 10.0

9.0 9.0

8.0 8.0

7.0 7.0

Force reading (kN)


Force reading (kN)

6.0 6.0

5.0 5.0

4.0 4.0

3.0 3.0

2.0 2.0

1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0

Penetration, mm Penetration, mm

Three point Graph


BLOWS LIGHT INTRM HEAVY
40
DRY DENSITY 1.535 1.649 1.727

CBR 13 28 39

30 28
Dry Density at 90% MDD 1.564
23
Dry Density at 93% MDD 1.616
CBR

Dry Density at 95% MDD 1.651 20

10

CBR @ 90% MDD 17

CBR @ 93% MDD 23


0
CBR @ 95% MDD 28 1.500 1.550 1.600 1.650 1.700 1.750

Dry Density Mg/m3

For the Contractor (CSCEC) For the Engineer (LEA-KOM CONSULT)


Technician Materials Eng. Technician Materials Eng.

Sign: Sign: Sign: Sign:

Date: Date: Date: Date:


CONSLTANT: CLIENT: CONTRACTOR:
LEA Associates South Asia
Pvt.Ltd with KOM Consult Ltd.
UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS
China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd
AUTHORITY

CIVIL WORKS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF KAPCHORWA – SUAM ROAD (73.00KM)


CONTRACT NUMBER: UNRA/WORKS/2015-16/00124
SUMMARY OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR BORROW PITS
TEST RESULTS
SAMPLE DETAILS
Grading SOAKED CBR

Percentage passing given seives (mm) ATTERBERG LIMITS


CBR CBR, CBR, CBR, CBR,
SAMPLE MDD OMC NMC
GM 90% 93% 95% 98% 100% SWELL
DESCRIPTION LL PL PI LS (Kg/m³) (%) (%) MDD MDD MDD MDD MDD
50 37.5 28 20 14 10 6.3 5 2.0 1.18 0.60 0.425 0.3 0.15 0.075
(%) (%) (%) (%)
SAMPLING TESTING LOCATION TEST OFFSET DEPTH
Ref: No
DATE DATE (KM) PIT No. (KM) (M) G3 100  ≥3  ≤2

Specification
G7 100  ≤30  ≥7  ≤2

Limits
G15 100  ≤25  ≥15  ≤1.5
G30  ≥1.2 ≤45 ≤16 ≤8 ≥30 ≤1.0

Reddish to dark Brown


Next to
G2 28.12.2021 25.02.2019 TP2 1.50 ### silty clay with medium 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98 86 63 49 30 -12 -34 1.9 52.8 25.5 27.3 12.6 1.738 15.5 17 23 28 0 0 0.4
Mosque
gravel

For the Contractor (CSCEC) For the Engineer (LEA-KOM CONSULT)


Materials Technician Materials Engineer Materials Technician Materials Engineer

Sign: Sign: Sign: Sign:

Date: Date: Date: Date:


Log

CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR


LEA Associates South Asia
Pvt.Ltdwith KOM Consult
Ltd. UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS China State Construction Engineering
AUTHORITY (UNRA) Corporation Ltd

CIVIL WORKS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF KAPCHORWA – SUAM ROAD (73.00KM)


CONTRACT NUMBER: UNRA/WORKS/2015-16/00124
TEST PIT LOG
Sample ref: G2 Material Source: Trial Pit 2
Location (km): Next to Mosque Offset (km): 1.5
Test Pit No. TP2 Investigation Date: 28.12.2021

PROFILE LABORATORY TESTING


Depth Soil VISUAL DESCRIPTION OF LAYER CBR @
GM PI (%) MDD(g/cm³) OMC(%)
(mm) Profile 95%MDD

Overburden

500

Reddish to dark Brown silty clay with medium gravel 1.9 27.3 1.738 15.52 28

1200

Legend for soil profile:

Top soil (Over burden)

Gravel & clayey Sand

Remark

For the Contractor (CSCEC) For the Engineer (LEA-KOM CONSULT)

Materials Technician Materials Engineer Materials Technician Materials Engineer


Sign: Sign: Sign: Sign:
Date: Date: Date: Date:
CONSULTANTS CLIENT CONTRACTOR

UGANDA NATIONAL
CHINA RAILWAY NO.5
ROADS
GINEERING CO.GROUP LTD
AUTHORITY(UNRA)

TEST CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (3-POINT CBR)


TEST METHOD BS 1377: Part 4 : 1990

Project: UPGRADING OF BULIMA - KIGUMBA ROAD TO BITUMEN STANDARD (69Km)

Location/Source Offset distance (km) 1.5


Depth 0.3-0.8m Sample Description
Sample No./TP No. preparation Date Mould Diameter: 152 mm
Tested by Testing Date Height of Mould: 127 mm

Number of blows per Layer 62 30 62


Mass of Rammer Used Kg 4.5(kg) 4.5(kg) 2.5(kg)
Number of Layers 5 5 3

Moisture Content Determination Before Soaking After Soaking Before Soaking After Soaking Before Soaking After Soaking
Container No. 12 15 HD M1 F 152 W1 J1

Mass of wet soil + container (m2) g 406.40 432.20 320.70 347.60 337.00 294.70

Mass of dry soil + container (m3) g 371.00 397.30

Mass of container (m1) g 35.20 35.30 34.90 35.40 33.90 34.40

Mass of moisture (m2 - m3) g 35.4 34.9 320.7 347.6 0.0 0.0 337.0 294.7
Mass of dry soil (m3 - m1) g 335.8 362.0 (34.9) (35.4) 0.0 0.0 (33.9) (34.4)

Moisture Content % 10.5 9.6 (918.9) (981.9) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! (994.1) (856.7)

Average Moisture Content, w % 10.1 -950.4 10.1 #DIV/0! 10.1 -925.4

Moulding Moisture %

Density Determination
Mould No. B4 B9 8

Mass of mould + soil (M2) g 13162 12857 10597

Mass of mould (M1) g 7699 7588 5757

Mass of soil (M2 - M1) g 5463 5269 4840

Volume of mould (V) cm3 2305.0 2305.00 2305.00

Bulk density p= (M2 - M1) / V kg/cm3 2370 2286 2100

Dry density pd = p/ (1+(w / 100)) Kg/m3 2153 2076 1907

Water Absorption
Mass of Mold + Wet Soil(g) After Soaking 13272 13048 10817
Water Absorption(g) 110 191 220
Average Water Absorption(g) 174

Swelling Determination
Dial gauge Dial gauge Dial gauge
Date Hour Hour Hour
reading reading reading
0 8.05 0 3.98 0 0.00
24 24 24
48 48 48
72 72 72
96 8.08 96 4.05 96 0.02
Swelling (%) 0.02 Swelling (%) 0.06 Swelling (%) 0.02

REMARKS
CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT

Materials Technician Materials Engineer Materials Technician Materials Engineer


Sign…………………………………………Sign…………………………………………….. Sign…………………………………. Sign………………………………………….

Date……………………………………..Date………………………………………….. Date……………………….. Date……………………………


CONSULTANTS CLIENT CONTRACTOR

CHINA RAILWAY NO.5


UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS
GINEERING CO.GROUP
AUTHORITY(UNRA)
LTD

3-POINT C.B.R. TEST

Project: UPGRADING OF BULIMA - KIGUMBA ROAD TO BITUMEN STANDARD (69Km)

Location/Source Offset distance (km)


Depth Sample Description
Sample No./TP No. preparation Date Test Condition
Tested by Testing Date 4 Days Soaked

No.of blows per laye 62 (4.5 Kg Rammer) 30 (4.5 Kg Rammer) 62 (2.5 Kg Rammer)
Number of layers 5 5 3
Mould No.
Proving Ring factor 0.1598 KN/DIV Proving ring capacity 0.1598 KN/DIV

Speed : 1 mm/min. Bottom Bottom Bottom


Force Force Force
Penetration of Gauge Reading (Div) Gauge Reading (Div) Gauge Reading (Div)
plunger in (mm) (KN) (KN) (KN)
0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
0.25 6.0 0.96 2.0 0.32
0.50 12.0 1.92 3.0 0.48
0.75 18.0 2.88 4.0 0.64
1.00 25.0 4.00 5.0 0.80
1.25 33.0 5.27 5.0 0.80
1.50 39.0 6.23 6.0 0.96
1.75 44.0 7.03 7.0 1.12
2.00 47.0 7.51 8.0 1.28
2.25 48.0 7.67 9.0 1.44
2.50 49.0 7.83 10.0 1.60
2.75 50.0 7.99 11.0 1.76
3.00 50.0 7.99 12.0 1.92
3.25 51.0 8.15 13.0 2.08
3.50 52.0 8.31 13.0 2.08
3.75 53.0 8.47 14.0 2.24
4.00 54.0 8.63 15.0 2.40
4.25 55.0 8.79 5.00 15.0 2.40
4.50 55.0 8.79 16.0 2.56
4.75 56.0 8.95 16.0 2.56
5.00 57.0 9.11 17.0 2.72
5.25 59.0 9.43 18.0 2.88
5.50 60.0 9.59 18.0 2.88
5.75 61.0 9.75 19.0 3.04
6.00 62.0 9.91 19.0 3.04
6.25 63.0 10.07 20.0 3.20
6.50 64.0 10.23 20.0 3.20
6.75 65.0 10.39 21.0 3.36
7.00 66.0 10.55 21.0 3.36
7.25 67.0 10.71 22.0 3.52
7.50 68.0 10.87 22.0 3.52

REMARKS
CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT
Materials Technician Materials Technician

Materials Engineer Materials Engineer


CONSULTANTS CLIENT CONTRACTOR

UGANDA NATIONAL CHINA RAILWAY


0 ROADS NO.5 GINEERING
AUTHORITY(UNRA) CO.GROUP LTD

C.B.R. TEST GRAPH

Project: UPGRADING OF BULIMA - KIGUMBA ROAD TO BITUMEN STANDARD (69Km)

Location/Source 0 Offset distance (km)

Depth 0 Sample Description


Sample No./TP No. preparation Date 23-Mar-2013 Test Condition
Tested by Testing Date 27-Mar-2013 4 Days Soaked

CBR TEST GRAPH

40.0

35.0

30.0

25.0
Force on Plunger (KN)

20.0

15.0

10.0

5.0

0.0
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00

Penetration of Plunger (mm)

62(4.5kg) 30(4.5kg) 62(2.5kg)

62(4.5Kg) 30(4.5Kg) 62(2.5Kg)

CBR % at a 2.5 mm 58.11 0.00 10.90


Penetration of 5.0 mm 45.54 25.00 13.58

REMARKS
CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT
Materials Technician Materials Technician

Materials Engineer Materials Engineer


CONSULTANTS CLIENT CONTRACTOR

UGANDA NATIONAL CHINA RAILWAY


ROADS NO.5 GINEERING
AUTHORITY(UNRA) CO.GROUP LTD

3 - POINT C.B.R. TEST GRAPH

UPGRADING OF BULIMA - KIGUMBA ROAD TO BITUMEN STANDARD (69Km)

Location/Source Offset distance (km)

Depth Sample Description


Sample No./TP No.
Tested by
preparation Date Test Condition
Testing Date 4 Days Soaked
MDD (Kg/m3) 1.796 OMC (%) 17.4
Number of blows per layer 62 (4.5 Kg Rammer) 30 (4.5 Kg Rammer) 62 (2.5 Kg Rammer)
CBR % 58.1 25 13.6
Density Kg/m3 2152.815 2076.365 1907.308

CBR - DRY DENSITY RELATIONSHIP

100.0

f(x) = 3.5173646153072E-36 x^11.142837689448


CBR %

10.0

1.0
1600.000 1650.000 1700.000 1750.000 1800.000 1850.000 1900.000 1950.000 2000.000 2050.000 2100.000 2150.000 2200.000

Dry Density Kg/m3

Degree of Compaction Reported CBR (%)


90% MDD
93% MDD
95% MDD
97% MDD
100% MDD

REMARKS
CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT
Materials Technician Materials Technician

Materials Engineer Materials Engineer

You might also like