100% found this document useful (1 vote)
530 views1 page

HyperX Cloud Alpha

The document compares the frequency response of the HyperX Cloud Alpha headset without equalization (EQ) and with EQ. It shows that without EQ, the frequency response deviates significantly from the Harman target. With EQ, the response is adjusted through 10 individual filters to closely match the Harman target, resulting in a more balanced sound.

Uploaded by

MappleSeerup
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
530 views1 page

HyperX Cloud Alpha

The document compares the frequency response of the HyperX Cloud Alpha headset without equalization (EQ) and with EQ. It shows that without EQ, the frequency response deviates significantly from the Harman target. With EQ, the response is adjusted through 10 individual filters to closely match the Harman target, resulting in a more balanced sound.

Uploaded by

MappleSeerup
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

EQ setting for HyperX Cloud Alpha

SPL Frequency Response SPL Frequency Response


without EQ with EQ
30 30

20 20
Sound Pressure Level [dBr]

Sound Pressure Level [dBr]


10 10

0 0

-10 -10

Harman AE/OE 2018 Target Harman AE/OE 2018 Target


Raw Frequency Response Raw Frequency Response
Compensated Frequency Response Compensated Frequency Response
-20 -20
10 100 1 000 10 000 10 100 1 000 10 000
Frequency [Hz] Frequency [Hz]

EQ Curve EQ Curve
Individual Filters total
20 20

f1 f3 f6 f7 f9
105 Hz 710 Hz 4000 Hz
5700 Hz
8000 Hz

10 10
Amplitude [dBr]
Amplitude [dBr]

0 0

-10 -10

f2 f4 f5 f8 f10
120 Hz 3000
3500
Hz Hz 6600 Hz 12000 Hz

-20 -20
10 100 1 000 10 000 10 100 1 000 10 000
Frequency [Hz] Frequency [Hz]

Error Curve Histogram Error Curve Histogram


without EQ with EQ
100% 100%

80% 80%
Relative Statistic Frequency [%]

Relative Statistic Frequency [%]

60% 60%

40% 40%

20% 20%

0% 0%
-9
-8

-6
-5
-4
-3

-1

-8
-7
-6

-3
-2
-1
-7

-2

-9

-5
-4
more

more
less
-20

1
2
3

5
6
7
8
-15
-10

less

3
4
5

8
9
-20
-15
-10

1
2

6
7
10
15
20

10
15
20

Deviation [dB] Deviation [dB]

Filter Settings Preamp gain:


Filter Type Frequency Gain Q-Factor BW -4,6 dB
Band 1 LOW_SHELF 105 Hz 5,5 dB 0,71 Adjust gain of band 1 to preference (bass)
Band 2 PEAK 120 Hz -5,8 dB 0,2 4,75 Deviation from Target Adjust gain of band 3 to preference (tonality)
Band 3 PEAK 710 Hz 4,5 dB 1,1 1,27 Before EQ After EQ Adjust gain of band 6 to preference (treble)
Band 4 PEAK 3000 Hz -3,7 dB 1,4 1,01 2,21 dB 0,41 dB Adjust gain of band 10 to preference (airiness/detail)
Band 5 PEAK 3500 Hz -1,0 dB 6,0 0,24
Band 6 PEAK 4000 Hz 6,0 dB 1,0 1,39 Preference Rating*
Band 7 PEAK 5700 Hz -2,8 dB 6,0 0,24 Before EQ After EQ
Band 8 PEAK 6600 Hz -4,0 dB 4,0 0,36 66/100 99/100
Band 9 PEAK 8000 Hz -3,9 dB 6,0 0,24
Band 10 HIGH_SHELF 12000 Hz -4,0 dB 0,71

*preference rating prediction based on:


[1] S. Olive et al: "A Statistical Model That Predicts Listeners' Preference Ratings of In-Ear Headphones: Part 1" (2017)
[2] S. Olive et al: "A Statistical Model That Predicts Listeners' Preference Ratings of In-Ear Headphones: Part 2" (2017)
[3] S. Olive et al: "A Statistical Model That Predicts Listeners' Preference Ratings of Around-Ear and On-Ear Headphones" (2018)
The normalized preference ratings are used, where zero deviation from target equals a preference rating of 100

measured on GRAS45BC KEMAR


v2.9
GRAS KB5000/5001 anthropometric pinnae
APx515 or APx526 Signal Generator/Analyzer by oratory1990
APx1701 amplifier 08.07.2020

You might also like