Indometacin - Grupa 4
Indometacin - Grupa 4
Indometacin - Grupa 4
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225291731
CITATIONS READS
8 181
4 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Alex Zlatkov on 05 October 2017.
Research Article
HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC ASSAY OF INDOMETHACIN AND ITS
RELATED SUBSTANCES IN TABLET DOSAGE FORMS
were weighed and finely powdered. An amount of the powder at 25±0.2 °C. Samples were taken at suitable time intervals during 6
equivalent to 25.0 mg indomethacin for assay and 200.0 mg for hr of incubation. The progress of hydrolysis was monitored by
analysis of related substances were weighed into 50.0 ml volumetric means of HPLC method developed. 20 µl of sample examined was
flasks and approximately 30 ml mobile phase were added to each. analysed for remaining indomethacin. First order rate constant for
The samples were sonicated for 10 min and the solutions were then the hydrolysis was determined from the slope of linear plot of the
diluted to volume with mobile phase, mixed well, and filtered. For logarithm of residual indomethacin against time.
assay, 5.00 ml stock solution were diluted to 25.00 ml with mobile
phase to give a solution containing 100 μg/ml indomethacin. The RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
solution used for analysis of related substances contained 4.0 mg/ml Under the proposed chromatographic conditions the obtained
indomethacin. retention times were 2.41 min for 5-methoxy-2-indoleacetic acid,
Stability of indomethacin 3.31 min for 4-chlorobenzoic acid and 7.42 min for indomethacin.
From the chromatogram shown in Fig. 1, it is evident, that both of
In the kinetic run, the reaction was initiated by adding 10.0 ml related substances were completely separated from each other (Rs =
reference stock solutions of indomethacin to 50.00 ml of preheated 0.95), which indicated that the method is selective and could be used
sodium hydroxide buffer solution (pH 9.0; 1mM), the final for their simultaneously identification, quantification and in purity
concentrations being 100 μg/ml. The reaction flask was maintained tests.
m V(x10)
2.414/1245646
8.0 Detector A:240nm
7.416/2133626
7.0
6.0
5.0
3.331/634103
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 m in
Fig. 1: Chromatogram of working standards: 4-chlororbenzoic acid RS, 5-methoxy-2-indoleacetic acid RS and indomethacin RS
The precision of the analytical system was investigated by The limits of quantitation and limits of detection were calculated
performing six consecutive replicate injections of the same standard from the standard deviation of responses and slopes using signal-to-
solution. The standard deviation (S d ) and relative standard noise ratio. The quantitation limits for indomethacin, 4-
deviation (RSD) obtained are listed in Table 2. The low RSD values chlorobenzoic acid and 5-methoxy-2-indoleacetic acid were 0.2
indicated that the method is precise. µg/ml, 1.0 µg/ml and 0.8 µg/ml, respectively, while detection limits
were 0.05 µg/ml, 0.2 µg/ml and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively.
The accuracy of the method was investigated by determination of
Alkaline hydrolysis of indomethacin
both impurities in the presence of indomethacin. A solution
containing indomethacin (C = 4.0 mg/ml) with no detectable At constant pH value and temperature the formation of the
impurities was spiked with the reference substances at appropriate degradation products 4-chlorobenzoic acid and 5-methoxy-2-
concentrations. The recovery and relative standard deviations (RSD) indoleacetic acid was found to be linear function of the initial
obtained (Table 3) confirmed the satisfactory accuracy of the indomethacin concentration indicating first-order degradation
method. kinetics. First-order rate constant for the hydrolysis was calculated
550
Tsvetkova et al.
Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 4, Suppl 3, 549-552
from the slope of semilogarithmic plot of percent indomethacin first order plot for degradation of indomethacin was presented. The
remaining versus time and was found to be 8.4.10-3. On Fig. 2 the corresponding half-life was 82.51 min.
5,0
4,5
4,0
3,5
ln %remaining
3,0
2,5
2,0
1,5
551
Tsvetkova et al.
Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 4, Suppl 3, 549-552
552