Report of Investigation: I. Preliminary Statement
Report of Investigation: I. Preliminary Statement
Report of Investigation: I. Preliminary Statement
FOR :
SUBJECT :
1. Reference:.
2. Submitted herewith the Resolution and the entire Case Folder of the
above-subject administrative case consists of _____________ (__) pages including
this page.
3. Request acknowledged.
Respondent/s
x----------------------------------------------x
REPORT OF INVESTIGATION
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT:
1. Brief statement of the case:
That after perusal of the records of the case, where they found probable
cause to indict the respondent for Grave Neglect of Duty (Fail to appear and
testify in court as prosecution witness) pursuant to Rule 21, Section 2C, para
1(i) of NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2016-002, which provides:
III. ISSUE:
The core issue to be resolved in this case is whether respondent is guilty
or not for Grave Neglect of Duty (fail to appear and testify in court as
prosaecurtion witness pursuant to Rule 21, Section 2C, para 1(i) of
NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2016-002.
Neglect of Duty has been defined under (Sec. 1, para (1), Rule 21 of
NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2016-002) which provides that
“ fail to appear and testify in court, prosecutor’s office, the PNP disciplinary
authorities, appellate bodies, the IAS or any other quasi-judicial body when duly notified
or subpoenaed as witness. If his non-appearance resulted in the dismissal of the case
or the acquittal of the accused; or when he is the principal witness or the arresting
officer, the penalty of dismissal from the service shall be imposed”
II DISCUSSION
“A-I”—page 1
“A-2__page 2
SO RESOLVED.
for
DECISION
ANTECEDENT OF FACTS
ISSUES/FINDINGS
Neglect of Duty has been defined under (Sec. 1, para (1), Rule 21 of
NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2016-002) which provides that
The charge against the respondent is for violation of Section 2C, para 1(i)
of NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2016-002
“ fail to appear and testify in court, prosecutor’s office, the PNP disciplinary
authorities, appellate bodies, the IAS or any other quasi-judicial body when duly notified
or subpoenaed as witness. If his non-appearance resulted in the dismissal of the case
or the acquittal of the accused; or when he is the principal witness or the arresting
officer, the penalty of dismissal from the service shall be imposed”