Answer Final

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF ALBANY
SENATOR ELIZABETH O'C. LITTLE, SENATOR

PATRICK GALLIVAN, SENATOR PATRICIA
RITCHIE, SENATOR JAMES SEWARD, SENATOR
GEORGE MAZIARZ, SENATOR CATHARINE
YOUNG, SENATOR JOSEPH GRIFFO, SENATOR ANSWER OF
STEPHEN M. SALAND, SENATOR THOMAS DEFENDANT NEW
O'MARA, JAMES PATTERSON, JOHN MILLS, YORK STATE
WILLIAM NELSON, ROBERT FERRIS, WAYNE DEPARTMENT OF
SPEENBURGH, DAVID CALLARD, WAYNE CORRECTION AND
McMASTER, BRIAN SCALA, PETER TORTORICI, COMMUNITY
SUPERVISION
Plaintiffs, Index No. 2310-11
-against-
NEW YORK LEGISLATIVE TASK FORCE ON ___________________, J.

DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH AND
REAPPORTIONMENT, and NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants.
Defendant New York State Department of Department of Corrections and Community
Supervision (sued herein as either the New York State Department of Corrections or as New York
State Department of Correctional Services, and hereinafter referred to as "DOCCS"), by its attorney,
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York (Stephen M. Kerwin, Assistant
Attorney General, of counsel) answers the Complaint dated April 4, 2011 as follows:
1. Denies the allegations in paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 39, 40, 47, 48, 49,
50, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 71, 73, 79, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 105, 114,
115, 117, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 139, 141, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151,
152, 153, 160, 161, 165, 166, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 175, 178, 179, 182, 187, 188, 189, 190,
Printed [Reproduced] on Recycled Paper

191, 192, 194, 195, 198, 201, 202, 204, 205, 208, 210, 211, 214, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 223, 229,
230, 231, 232 and 236 of the Complaint.
2. Denies sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truthfulness of the
allegations in paragraphs 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 31, 37, 45, 46, 52, 54, 61, 62, 63, 64,
65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 72, 76, 82, 83, 102, 106, 108, 110, 112, 113, 134, 135, 136, 137, 156, 159,
162, 163, 167, 177, 185, 186, 199, 200, 203, 207, 209, 212, 213, 215, 216, 224, 233 and 235 of the
Complaint.
3. Admits the allegations in paragraphs 23, 27, 75, 77, 84, 101 and 104 of the Complaint.
4. With regard to paragraph 103, admits that the budget process is, in part, governed by the
New York State Constitution and the New York State Finance Law.
5. Denies sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truthfulness of the
allegations in paragraph 21 except denies that the votes of plaintiffs are diluted by reason of Part
XX.
6. Denies sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truthfulness of
the allegations in paragraph 22, and refers the Court to Chapter 45 of the Laws of 1978 as the
best evidence and most accurate version of its content.
7. With regard to paragraph 78 of the Complaint, admits that as of January 1, 2010 DOCCS
housed 213 inmates serving life sentences without the possibility of parole, but denies the balance of
the allegations in that paragraph.
8. Admits the truth, as of January 1, 2010, of the allegations in paragraphs 80 and 81 of the
Complaint.
Printed [Reproduced] on Recycled Paper 2

9. Makes no response to the introductory statements in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Complaint.
To the extent those paragraphs include allegations, they are denied.
10. Makes no response to the statements in paragraph 237 of the Complaint in that they
include no allegations. To the extent that the statements in those paragraphs are construed to be
allegations, they are denied.
11. With respect to the allegations contained in paragraphs 4, 5, 6, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36,
38, 118, 119, 120, 143, 144, 145, 146, 155, 157, 158, 164, 176, 180, 181, 183, 184, 193 and 197
of the Complaint, respectfully refers the Court to Part XX of Chapter 57 of the Laws of 2010 as
the best evidence and most accurate version of its content. DOCCS denies the additional
allegations in these paragraphs .
12. With respect to the allegations contained in paragraphs 41, 42, 43, 44, 51, 53, 59,
74, 107, 109, 111, 116, 132 and 142 of the Complaint, respectfully refers the Court to the New
York State Constitution as the best evidence and most accurate version of its content. DOCCS
denies the additional allegations in these paragraphs.
13. Paragraphs 133, 138, 225, 226, 227, 228 and 234 contain legal arguments, not
allegations of fact, and are improper in a Complaint. To the extent that the statements in those
paragraphs are construed as allegations, they are denied.
14. Repeats and re-alleges each response made herein to the allegations of the Complaint
that are incorporated into paragraphs 85, 95, 140, 154, 174, 196, 206 and 222 thereof.
15. Denies each and every allegation of in the Complaint not specifically responded to
above.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
16. Some or all of the Plaintiffs do not have standing to assert some or all of the claims
alleged in their Complaint.
17. The Complaint presents claims which are non-justiciable.
18. Chapter 57 of the Laws of 2010 was approved by the New York State Senate in
conformity with all parliamentary rules governing that body at that time.
19. Insofar as the Complaint presents a facial challenge to Part XX of Chapter 57 of the
Laws of 2010, it fails to state a cause of action.
20. Part XX of Chapter 57 of the Laws of 2010 implements Article III, § 4 of the New York
State Constitution, reconciles that provision with Article II, § 4 of the Constitution, and does not
violate that constitutional provision, nor Article I, § 11 of the New York Constitution.
21. Enactment of Chapter 57 of the Laws of 2010 did not violate Article VII of the New
York State Constitution.
22. The Complaint fails to state a cause of action, in whole or in part.
23. To the extent that DOCCS has already transmitted information required by Part XX, the
plaintiffs assert claims for which relief could not be granted.
WHEREFORE, Defendant New York State Department of Corrections and Community
Supervision respectfully requests that the relief requested in the Complaint be denied, that the
Complaint and this action be dismissed, and that it be awarded costs and disbursements, together
with such other relief as may be just.

Dated: Albany, New York
May13, 2011
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General of the State of New York
Attorney for Defendant NYS Department of
Corrections and Community Supervision
The Capitol
Albany, New York 12224-0341
By: _________s/______________________________
Stephen M. Kerwin
Assistant Attorney General
Telephone: (518) 473-7184
Fax: (518) 402-2221 (Not for service of papers)
e-mail: [email protected]
TO: David L. Lewis, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiffs
225 Broadway, Suite 3300
New York, New York 10007
New York State Legislative Task Force

On Demographic Research and Reapportionment
250 Broadway, Suite 2100
New York, New York 10007

VERIFICATION
Maureen E. Boll, being duly sworn, deposes and says that I am the Deputy Commissioner
and Counsel of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision; that I
have read the Complaint and the foregoing Answer to the Complaint, and the Answer is true to my
knowledge, except as to those matters alleged upon information and belief, and that as to those
matters, I believe them to be true.
______________s/____________________________________
Maureen E. Boll
Sworn to before me on the

12th day of May 2011
______s/________________________
Notary Public

Answer Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Answer Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Answer Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

SENATOR ELIZABETH O'C. LITTLE, SENATOR

NEW YORK LEGISLATIVE TASK FORCE ON ___________________, J.

Defendant New York State Department of Department of Corrections and Community

Printed [Reproduced] on Recycled Paper

230, 231, 232 and 236 of the Complaint.

2. Denies sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truthfulness of the

5. Denies sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truthfulness of the

6. Denies sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truthfulness of

best evidence and most accurate version of its content.

the allegations in that paragraph.

Printed [Reproduced] on Recycled Paper 2

To the extent those paragraphs include allegations, they are denied.

allegations, they are denied.

allegations in these paragraphs .

denies the additional allegations in these paragraphs.

paragraphs are construed as allegations, they are denied.

Printed [Reproduced] on Recycled Paper 3

alleged in their Complaint.

17. The Complaint presents claims which are non-justiciable.

Laws of 2010, it fails to state a cause of action.

York State Constitution.

22. The Complaint fails to state a cause of action, in whole or in part.

plaintiffs assert claims for which relief could not be granted.

WHEREFORE, Defendant New York State Department of Corrections and Community

with such other relief as may be just.

Printed [Reproduced] on Recycled Paper 4

TO: David L. Lewis, Esq.

New York State Legislative Task Force

Printed [Reproduced] on Recycled Paper 5

matters, I believe them to be true.

Sworn to before me on the

You might also like