Delphi Technique: Submitted By: Chandan Singh Swati Priya
Delphi Technique: Submitted By: Chandan Singh Swati Priya
SUBMITTED BY:
Chandan singh
Swati priya
DELPHI TECHNIQUE 2011
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 2
1. INTRODUCTION
The Delphi method was originally developed in the 50s by the RAND
Corporation in Santa Monica, California.
This approach consists of a survey conducted in two or more rounds.
It provides the participants in the second round with the results of the
first so that they can alter the original assessments if they want to - or
stick to their previous opinion. The survey is done anonymously using a
questionnaire (the first Delphi’s were panels).
It is commonly assumed that the method makes better use of group
interaction (Rowe et al. 1991, Häder/Häder 1995) whereby the
questionnaire is the medium of interaction (Martino 1983).
The Delphi method is especially useful for long-range forecasting (20-30
years), as expert opinions are the only source of information available.
Meanwhile, the communication effect of Delphi studies and therefore
the value of the process as such is also acknowledged.
During the last ten years, the Delphi method was used more often
especially for national science and technology foresight.
Delphi studies are rather complex procedures and require some resources
depending on the breadth of the study planned.
experts’ forecasts from the previous round as well as the reasons they
provided for their judgments
The Delphi method is based on structural surveys and makes use of the
intuitive available information of the participants, who are mainly experts.
Therefore, it de-livers qualitative as well as quantitative results and has
beneath its explorative, predictive even normative elements.
The Delphi method is a combination of qualitative and quantitative processes
that draws mainly upon the opinions of identified experts to develop theories
and projections for the future. A group of experts is drawn from several
disciplines and professions. A multiple-round survey system is administered to
this group over an extended period of time.
The goal of this method is to reach a consensus among the group by the end of
this multiple-round questionnaire process. The uniqueness of Delphi lies in its
reliability, given the variableness of human opinion, and in its ability to be
administered remotely and without direct participant interaction. It is best
used for a fairly simple assessment of new products and developments, but it
is one of the most complex methodologies available.
The initial contributions from the experts are collected in the form of answers
to questionnaires and their comments to these answers. The panel director
controls the interactions among the participants by processing the information
and filtering out irrelevant content. This avoids the negative effects of face-to-
face panel discussions and solves the usual problems of group dynamics.
Usually all participants maintain anonymity. Their identity is not revealed even
after the completion of the final report. This stops them from dominating
others in the process using their authority or personality, frees them to some
extent from their personal biases, minimizes the "bandwagon effect" or "halo
effect", allows them to freely express their opinions, encourages open critique
and admitting errors by revising earlier judgments
3. DELPHI PROCESS
1. Articulate a problem.
2. Ask participants to provide potential solutions through a series of
carefully designed questionnaires
3. Participants complete the first questionnaire anonymously and
independently.
4. The results of the first questionnaire are tabulated, transcribed,
reproduced, and forwarded to each participant.
5. After reviewing, members submit new solutions.
6. They may make new estimates, often based on a 50-50 probability, as to
whether each breakthrough will occur earlier or later than predicted by
the other participants.
7. The submission of new solutions based on reiterations of the
questionnaire process is repeated until the participants reach a
consensus.
The first step is to found a steering committee (if you need one) and a
management team with sufficient capacities for the process. Then expert
panels to prepare and formulate the statements are helpful unless it is decided
to let that be done by the management team.
The whole procedure has to be fixed in advance The last organisational point is
the interface with the financing organisation if this is different from the
management team.
summary, which is then provided to the experts for a review and for the
opportunity to make further comments.
This process typically results in consensus within a number of rounds, and this
technique typically helps minimize bias, and minimizes the possibility that any
one person can have too much influence on the outcomes.
The Delhi Method (Technique) is a recommended for Quality, safety, Risk and
Time Management.
Delhi Method
Method
Step 1: Determine and formulate the questions
Step 2: Select experts
FIRST ROUND.
Formal introduction
Thank you for participating in this questionnaire which is through internet and
verbal medium. The topic of the questionnaire is
“Assessment viability that is CNG a viable option for Delhi’s growing traffic and
pollution problem. Please fill the information below
(tick the appropriate boxes) and send it as a reply to our internet message”
Out of the survey it was found that maximum people knew about the causes of
pollution in Delhi and very few people had an idea about the sources of
renewable energy.
8. CONCLUSIONS
The panel had better idea about the causes of pollution and there is strong need of
some clean source of fuel but there are concerns of the infrastructure and technology
support which will be provided to the users.
The cost benefit analysis of cng as option came out to be the most efficient alternative
fuel.