8 Multi-Criteria Decisions: MSM 2020 Joydip Mitra
8 Multi-Criteria Decisions: MSM 2020 Joydip Mitra
8 Multi–Criteria Decisions
A. Goal Programming
109. Michigan Motors Corporation (MMC) has introduced a new car. As a part of
its promotional campaign, the marketing department has decided to send per-
sonalized invitation to test drive the new car to two target groups: (1) current
owners of MMC automobile, and, (2) owners of luxury cars manufactured by
one of MMC’s competitors. The cost of sending personalized invitation to each
customer is estimated to be $1 per letter. Based on previous experience with
this type of advertising, MMC estimates that 25% of the customers contacted
from group 1 and 10% from group 2 will test drive the new car. As part of
this campaign, MMC has set the following goals:
(a) Goal 1: Get at least 10,000 customers from group 1 to test drive the new
car.
(b) Goal 2: get at least 5000 customers from group 2 to test drive the new
car.
(c) Goal 3: Limit the expense of sending out invitations to $70,000.
Formulate a goal programming model for the above problem assuming that
goals 1 and 2 are priority level 1 goals and that goal 3 is a priority level 2 goal.
110. In-charge of a committee for promoting a golf tournament, is trying to de-
termine how best to advertise the event during the two weeks prior to the
tournament. The committee obtained the following information about the
three advertising media that they are considering to use. The last column
of the table shows the maximum number of advertisements that can be run
during the next two weeks; these values should be treated as constraints.
The committee has established the following goals for the campaign:
• Priority Level 1 Goal: Reach at least 4 million people.
• Priority Level 2 Goal: The number of television advertisements should
be at least 30% of the total number of advertisements.
• Priority Level 3 Goal: The number of radio advertisements should not
exceed 20% of the total number of advertisements.
• Priority Level 4 Goal: Limit the total amount spent for advertising to
$20,000.
Formulate a goal programming model for the above problem.
111. The university admissions office is processing freshman applications for the
upcoming academic year. The applications fall in three categories: in-state,
out-of-state, and, international. The male-female ratios for the in-state and
out-of-state applications are 1:1 and 3:2 respectively. For the international
students, the ratio is 8:1. The College Test factor is an important factor
in accepting new students. The statistics gathered by the university indicate
that the average College Test score for in-state, out-of-state, and, international
students are 27, 26, and, 23, respectively. The committee on admissions has
established the following desirable goals for the new freshman class:
Each employee must work for 5 consecutive days each week and then have 2
days off. The store currently has 60 employees. Mac’s priorities for employee
scheduling are as follows:
• Priority 1: The store will like to avoid hiring any additional employee.
• Priority 2: Saturdays and Sundays the store must be fully staffed.
• Priority 3: Fridays must be fully staffed.
• Priority 4: Rest of the days of week also should be fully staffed.
Formulate the above as a goal programming problem to determine the number
of employees who will start their 5-day workweek each day of the week to
achieve the store’s objectives.
113. Mantel produces toy carriage, whose final as- Produced units/run
sembly must include four wheels and two Shift Wheel Seats
seats. The factory producing the parts op- 1 500 300
erates three shifts a day. The adjacent table 2 600 280
provides the number of units produced of each 3 640 360
part in each run in each of the three shifts.
Ideally, the number of wheels produced is exactly twice that of the number of
seats (recall that, each toy will include 4 wheels and 2 seats). However, because
the production rates vary from shift to shift, exact balance in production may
not be possible. Mantel is interested in determining the number of production
runs in each shift that minimizes the imbalance in the production of parts.
The capacity limitations restricts the number of runs to: between 4 and 5 for
shift 1, 10 and 20 for shift 2, and, 3 and 5 for shift 3. Formulate the problem
as a goal programming model.
114. A person wants to buy a car. After test-driving many cars, she has narrowed
her list to three cars A, B, and C. The following data is collected by her.
Decision Alternatives
Characteristics A B C
Price ($) 13,100 11,200 9,500
Colour Black Red Blue
Miles per Gallon (MPG) 19 23 28
Interior Deluxe Above Average Standard
Body Type 4-door midsize 2-door sport 2-door compact
Sound System AM/FM, tape, CD AM/FM AM/FM
She wants to buy a car depending on price, mpg, style, and comfort. How will
she proceed?
(a) Non-numeric data: Not all data are numeric. Style, and Comfort, are
two examples.
(b) Subjectivity: Comparison of decision alternatives is necessarily subjective.
In case of price, a numeric data, the difference between A and C is 3600,
which is (= 100 × (3600/9500)%) more than the price of C. Whether this
difference is significant or not, (or, how significant is the difference) varies
with person. In case of non-numeric data, like style, the subjectivity is
even more obvious.
(c) Finding weights: This being a multi-criteria decision, each criterion is
assigned a non-negative weight (sum of weights is unity). The process is
given below.
i. Pairwise comparisons matrix: Each criterion x, is compared with
each other criterion y, and a subjective judgement is made on which
one is important and by how much, according to the following table.
This decides the entry (x, y) in the pairwise comparison matrix as
given in Table a. below.
Table a. Verbal Response to Numerical Rating
more imp.
Numerical criter.
Verbal judgement rating x y
Equally important 1 1 1
Equally to moderately more important 2 2 1/2
Moderately more important 3 3 1/3
Moderately to Strongly more important 4 4 1/4
Strongly more important 5 5 1/5
Strongly to very strongly more important 6 6 1/6
Very strongly more important 7 7 1/7
Very strongly to extremely more important 8 8 1/8
Extremely more important 9 9 1/9
We present the buyer’s verbal judgement of the pairwise comparison of criteria
in Table b, and corresponding pairwise comparison matrix in Table c below. (In
these tables, we represent Price, Style, and Comfort, by Prc, Sty, and Com.
(d) Final computations: The following Table f shows the weights of each of
A, B, and C, with respect to each criterion, and the final priorities of
cars A, B, and C.
Table f. Overall Priority of A, B, and C
Prc Sty Com MPG Overall
Car 0.398 0.299 0.218 0.085 Priority
A 0.123 0.265 0.593 0.087 0.265
B 0.320 0.656 0.341 0.274 0.421
C 0.557 0.080 0.065 0.639 0.314
Here, overall priority of x is computed as
X
P (x) = P (x|y) × P (y)
y
115. Vacation Location: Students at a college in Delhi are planning for a winter
break vacation to one of three locations: A, B, and C. Decision will be
based on three criteria – weather, cost, and potential fun (based on surveys
of friends). The students have developed the following pairwise comparison
matrices for the locations for each of the above criteria (Table 1), and for the
three criteria (Table 2). Use AHP to decide where they will go for vacation.
Table 1. Table 2.
Pairwise Comparison of A, B, C by each criterion Pairwise Comparison of Criteria
Weather Cost Fun Criterion Weather Cost Fun
A 1 1/3 1/3 1 3 5 1 1/2 5 Weather 1 4 1/4
B 3 1 1 1/3 1 1/2 2 1 3 Cost 1/4 1 1/5
C 3 1 1 1/5 2 1 1/5 1/3 1 Fun 4 5 1
116. The Bay City Parks and Recreation Department is considering building several
new facilities, including a gym, an athletic field, a tennis pavilion, and a pool.
It will base its decision on which facilities to build depending on projected
usage (from surveys) and construction and operating costs. The department
strongly prefers usage to cost as a criterion for selection. The pairwise com-
parison matrices of preferences are given below. Rank the facilities using AHP,
and check the pairwise comparison matrices for consistency.
Pairwise Comparison of Facility by each Criterion
Table 1. Comparison by Usage Table 2. Comparison by Cost
Facility Gym Field Tennis Pool Facility Gym Field Tennis Pool
Gym 1 1/3 3 2 Gym 1 1/4 1/2 3
Field 3 1 5 4 Field 4 1 3 7
Tennis 1/3 1/5 1 1/3 Tennis 2 1/3 1 4
Pool 1/2 1/4 3 1 Pool 1/3 1/7 1/4 1