Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2134 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 4

1 GREGORY P. STONE (SBN 078329) ROLLIN A. RANSOM (SBN 196126)

STEVEN M. PERRY (SBN 106154) Sidley Austin LLP
2 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90013-1010
3 Thirty-Fifth Floor Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
4 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Email: [email protected]
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
5 Email: [email protected]; PIERRE J. HUBERT (admitted pro hac vice)
[email protected]
CRAIG N. TOLLIVER (admitted pro hac vice)
6
PETER A. DETRE (SBN 182619) McKool Smith P.C.
7 CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE (SBN 207976) 300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP Austin, TX 78701
8 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor Telephone: (512) 692-8700
San Francisco, CA 94105 Facsimile: (512) 692-8744
9 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Email: [email protected];
Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 [email protected]
10 Email: [email protected];
[email protected]
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS

RAMBUS INC.
12

13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MCKOOL SMITH

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DALLAS, TEXAS

14 SAN JOSE DIVISION

15

16 RAMBUS INC., ) Case No. C 05-00334 RMW

)
17 Plaintiff, ) DECLARATION OF PIERRE J.
HUBERT IN SUPPORT OF RAMBUS
) INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL
18 vs.
) DEPOSITION OF NANYA 30(B)(6)
19 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX ) DESIGNEES ON CERTAIN DDR3
SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., ) SDRAM TOPICS
20 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR )
MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., ) [EXHIBITS E & F SUBMITTED
21 ) UNDER SEAL]
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., )
22 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, Date: October 2, 2008
INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., ) Time: 9:00 am
23 SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, ) Before: Hon. Read Ambler (Ret.)
L.P., )
Place: JAMS - San Jose (telephonic)
24 )
NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, )
25 NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION )
U.S.A.,
)
26 )
Defendants.
27
28
Declaration of Pierre J. Hubert in Support of Rambus Inc.’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Nanya 30(b)(6) Designees on Certain DDR3
SDRAM Topics
Case No. CV 05-00334
Austin 45824v1
 Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2134 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 4

1 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX )

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., )
2 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR )
MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC.,
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., )
3 )
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR
4 DEUTSCHLAND GmbH, )
)
5 Counterclaim Plaintiffs, )
v. )
6 )
RAMBUS INC., )
7
Counterdefendant. )
8 ______________________________________ )

10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS

11

12
MCKOOL SMITH
DALLAS, TEXAS

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27
28
Declaration of Pierre J. Hubert in Support of Rambus Inc.’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Nanya 30(b)(6) Designees on Certain DDR3
SDRAM Topics
Case No. CV 05-00334
Austin 45824v1
 Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2134 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 4

1 I, Pierre J. Hubert, declare:

2
1. I am an attorney with the law firm of McKool Smith P.C., counsel of record for
3
Plaintiff Rambus Inc. in the above-entitled action. I am duly licensed in the State of Texas and
4
admitted to practice before this Court pro hac vice. I make this declaration based on my personal
5
knowledge, the record in this action, and matters of public record, and if called upon as a
6
witness, I could and would testify competently as to the matters set forth below.
7
2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a document entitled
8
Rambus Inc.’s Notice of Deposition of Nanya Technology Corporation and Nanya Technology
9
Corporation U.S.A. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 30(b)(6) dated June 29, 2007.
10
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Rambus’ e-mail re-
11
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS

notice of its 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice of Nanya dated August 20, 2008.
12
4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Nanya’s e-mail
13
MCKOOL SMITH

response to Rambus’ re-notice of its 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice of Nanya dated August 22,
DALLAS, TEXAS

14
2008.
15
5. Counsel for Rambus and Nanya conducted a meet and confer on August 29, 2008
16
and September 4, 2008 and were unable to reach an agreement regarding the provision of a
17
corporate witness for Nanya regarding DDR3.
18
6. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a document entitled
19
Order Denying Manufacturers’ Motions to Strike Rambus’ Counterclaims; Granting in Part
20
Samsung and Hynix’s Motions to Strike Affirmative Defenses dated November 15, 2007.
21
7. Attached hereto as Exhibit E are portions of the 30(b)(6) deposition of Mr. Willie
22
Liu dated October 17-18, 2007. Exhibit E is submitted under seal because it has been designated
23
“Confidential - Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to the Protective Order in the above-
24
captioned case.
25
8. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Rambus’ e-mail
26
regarding the meet and confer between the parties dated August 29, 2008. Exhibit F is submitted
27
28 Declaration of Pierre J. Hubert in Support of Rambus Inc.’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Nanya 30(b)(6) Designees on Certain DDR3
SDRAM Topics
Case No. CV 05-0334
1
Austin 45824v1
 Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2134 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 4

1
under seal because it has been designated “Confidential - Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
2
pursuant to the Protective Order in the above-captioned case.
3

4
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Texas that the foregoing
5
is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on September 5, 2008, at Austin,
6
Texas.
7

9 /s/ Pierre J. Hubert

Pierre J. Hubert
10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS

11

12
MCKOOL SMITH
DALLAS, TEXAS

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27
28
Declaration of Pierre J. Hubert in Support of Rambus Inc.’s Motion to Compel Deposition of Nanya 30(b)(6) Designees on Certain DDR3
SDRAM Topics
Case No. CV 05-00334
2