0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views6 pages

Homework Set 12: Alberto Rendon Vargas // Jose Daniel Ambriz Hernández

The document contains solutions to 3 problems: 1) It shows that if K is a continuous function and f is Riemann integrable, then the function g defined by an integral of K and f is continuous. 2) It proves that if f and g are Riemann-Stieltjes integrable, then their maximum function max(f,g) is also Riemann-Stieltjes integrable. 3) It shows that if a continuous function f is not everywhere zero, then its integral over a domain is positive, and if a continuous function's integrals over powers of x are all zero, then it is everywhere zero.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views6 pages

Homework Set 12: Alberto Rendon Vargas // Jose Daniel Ambriz Hernández

The document contains solutions to 3 problems: 1) It shows that if K is a continuous function and f is Riemann integrable, then the function g defined by an integral of K and f is continuous. 2) It proves that if f and g are Riemann-Stieltjes integrable, then their maximum function max(f,g) is also Riemann-Stieltjes integrable. 3) It shows that if a continuous function f is not everywhere zero, then its integral over a domain is positive, and if a continuous function's integrals over powers of x are all zero, then it is everywhere zero.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

HOMEWORK SET 12

Alberto Rendon Vargas // Jose Daniel Ambriz Hernández

Noviembre 2021

Problem 12.1 Let K : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → R be a continuous function. Show that


if f : [0, 1] → R is Riemann-integrable, the function
Z 1
g(x) = K(x, y)f (y)dy
0
makes sense and is in fact continuous.
Solution
We have a continuous K : [0, 1]×[0, 1] → R which is continuous. For each fixed
x ∈ [0, 1], the function y → K(x, y) is thus a continuous function from [0, 1] →
R, hence is Riemann integrable. Since f : [0, 1] → R is Riemann integrable
by assumption and the product of two integrable functions is integrable, we
conclude that
Z 1
g(x) = K(x, y)f (y)dy
0
Is well-defined. We will show that it is continuous. Let  > 0. Pick M ∈ R
sufficiently large that
Z 1
|f (y)|dy < M
0

K is a continuous function on the compact set [0, 1] × [0, 1], hence is unifor-
mally continuous. Thus, there exists δ > 0 such that
p 
(x0 − x)2 + (y 0 − y)2 < δ ⇒ |K(x0 , y 0 ) − K(x, y)| <
M
For {x, x0 , y, y 0 } ⊂ [0, 1]. So that,

|x0 − x| < δ ⇒ |K(x0 , y) − K(x, y)| <
M
Thus, for |x0 − x| < δ, we have
Z 1 Z 1
|g(x0 ) − g(x)| = | K(x0 , y)f (y)dy − K(x, y)f (y)dy|
0 0
Z 1 Z
0
=| (K(x , y) − K(x, y))f (y)dy| ≤ |K(x0 , y) − K(x, y)| · |f (y)|dy
0
Z 1

< |f (y)|dy < 
M 0

Which proves the (uniform) continuity of g.


Problem 12.2 Prove that if f, g : [a, b] → R are Riemann-Stieltjes integrable
(for some α) , then so is the function máx(f, g) .
Solution

1
Let a, b ∈ R. We claim that máx(a, b) = (a + b + |a − b|)/2. So, we have three
cases here:
a = b: Then (a + b + |a − b|)/2 = a = máx(a, b) .
a > b: Then (a + b + |a − b|)/2 = (a + b + a − b)/2 = a = máx(a, b) .
a < b: Then (a + b + |a − b|)/2 = (a + b + b − a)/2 = b = máx(a, b) .
Now suppose f and g are Riemann-Stieltjes integrable for some α. Then f − g
is integrable, hence so is |f − g|, hence so is (f + g + |f − g|)/2 = máx(f, g) .
Problem 12.3 (i) Prove that if f : [a, b] → R is a continuous function and
Z b
not everywhere zero, then f (x)2 dx > 0.
a Z b
(ii) Using that, prove that if f : [a, b] → R is a continuous function and xn f (x)dx =
a
0 for all n>0, then f is everywhere zero.
Solution
i) Suppose f : [a, b] → R is continuous. Then f 2 ∈ R. By assumption there
exists x0 ∈ [a, b] with f (x0 ) 6= 0. Because f 2 is continuous at x0 there exists a
δ > 0 such that

x ∈ [a, b], |x − x0 | < δ ⇒ |f 2 (x) − f 2 (x0 )| < |f 2 (x0 )|/2.


Thus

x ∈ [a, b], |x − x0 | < δ ⇒ |f 2 (x)| > |f 2 (x0 )|/2.


By definition
Z b n
X
f 2 (x)dx = sup L(P, f 2 ) and L(P, f 2 ) = mi 4xi .
a i=1
If we choose a partition P with two points in [a, b]∩(x0 −δ, x0 +δ) then at least
one of the mi ’s is strictly greater than zero and the rest are all greater
Z than or
equal to zero. Thus for this partition L(P, f ) > 0 and we obtain f 2 > 0.

Problem 12.4 Give the proofs to the following statements:


R∞
1. ζ = s 1 x[x]
s+1 dx. Hint: Compute the difference between the integral over

[1,N] and the N th partial sum of the series that defines ζ(s)
Solution
Let b a real number such that b>2, and let N be a integer such that N≤
b < N+1. Then N ≥ 2 and we see that
Z b Z N
[x] [x]
s s+1
dx ≥ s dx
1 x 1 xs+1
N −1 Z k+1
X x
=s s+1
dx
k x
k=1

2
N −1 Z k+1
X k
≥s dx
k xs+1
k=1
N
X −1 Z k+1
=s k x−s−1 dx
k=1 k

N −1
X (k + 1)−s − k −s
=s k
−s
k=1
N −1  
X 1 1
= k s
− (1)
k (k + 1)s
k=1

On the other hand,


Z b Z N +1
[x] [x]
s s+1
dx ≤ s dx
1 x 1 xs+1
N Z k+1
X [x]
=s s+1
dx
k x
k=1
N Z k+1
X k+1
≤s dx
k xs+1
k=1
N
X Z k+1
=s (k + 1) x−s−1 dx
k=1 k

N
X (k + 1)−s − k −s
=s (k + 1)
−s
k=1
N  
X 1 1
= (k + 1) −
ks (k + 1)s
k=1
N   XN  
X 1 1 1 1
= k − + −
ks (k + 1)s ks (k + 1)s
k=1 k=1
N    
X 1 1 1
= k − + 1− (2)
ks (k + 1)s (N + 1)s
k=1

By combining (1) and (2) we obtain

N   Z b
X 1 1 [x]
k − ≤ s dx (3)
ks (k + 1)s 1 x s+1
k=1

3
N    
X 1 1 1
≤ k − + 1 −
ks (k + 1)s (N + 1)s
k=1

For every number b > 2 and for the natural number N such that N ≤ b
< N+1,(i.e.N=[b]) and so N ≥ 2.
Conversely, for every natural number N > 2, we can find a real number
B such that N ≤ b < N+1, and so (3) Holds.
R∞
s
2. ζ(s) = s−1 − s 1 x−[x]
xs+1 dx,Where [x] denotes the greatest integer ≤ x.
Solution
We now assume that
Z ∞
[x]
ζ(s) = s dx (4)
1 xs+1

holds.Then
∞ ∞ ∞
x − [x]
Z Z Z
s s 1 [x]
−s dx = −s dx + s dx
s−1 1 xs+1 s−1 1 xs 1 xs+1
Z b
s 1
= − s lı́m dx + ζ(s) [using(4)]
s−1 b→∞ 1 xs
s b−s+1 − 1
= − s lı́m + +ζ(s)
s−1 b→∞ −s + 1

s lı́mb→∞ b−s+1 − 1
= −s + ζ(s)
s−1 −s − 1
s 0−1
= −s + ζ(s) [because s > 1]
s−1 −s + 1
= ζ(s)

Problem 12.5 Change of variables in a Riemann-Stieltjes integral


Theorem: Suppose that ϕ is strictly increasing and continuos, and maps
|A, B| to |a.b|. Then if f:|a, b|=⇒ R is RS-integrable for some α,g=f(ϕ) such
that |A, B| =⇒ R is RS-integrable for β = α(ϕ) and
Z b Z B
f dα = gdβ
a A

Proof To each partionP = {x0 , ..., xn } of [a,b] correspons a partion Q =


y0 , ...yn of [A,B], so that xi = ϕ(yi ). All partions of [A,B] are obtained in this
way.Since the values taken by f on [xi−1 , x − i] are exactly the same as those
taken by g on [yi−1 , y − i], then

U (Q, g, β) = U (P, f, α), L(Q, g, β) = L(P, f, α)

4
The fact that f is RS-integrable onR [a,b] impies that ∀ > 0 and given P, such
that both U (P, f, α) are close to f dα.
Now, the equalities in the above expressions
R and the partition Q of [A,B] imply
U (Q, g, β) and L(Q, g, β are close to gdβ, hence = f (ϕ) : [A,B] =⇒ R i.e.,
RS-integrable thus
Z B Z b
gdδ = f dα
A a

You might also like