Kaizen - 3A
Kaizen - 3A
The idea is to identify the goals of the organization, identify the factors that hinder the
achievement of those goals, and then improve the business operations by continuously
striving to mitigate or eliminate the limiting factors.
The limiting factors are called bottlenecks or constraints. At any given time, an
organization is faced with at least one constraint that limits business operations. Typically,
as one constraint is eliminated another constraint will arise. The organization should then
focus its attention on the new constraint. And this process repeats itself continuously.
According to the theory of constraints, the best way for an organization to achieve its
goals is to reduce operating expenses, reduce inventory, and increase throughput. The
theory of constraints includes three core principles, six steps for implementation, and a
five step thinking process.
The theory of constraints was formalized and introduced by Dr Eliyahu Goldratt in the
1980s in his book The Goal. Goldratt subsequently published other books and gave
seminars and workshops on the theory of constraints. Also, other papers and books have
been written about the theory of constraints by other authors.
The theory of constraints has three principles. These three principles are: convergence,
consistency, and respect.
The convergence principle implies that a complex system is simpler to manage because
an adjustment or correction to one aspect of the system will impact the whole system.
The consistency principle implies that any internal conflict must be the result of at least
one flawed assumption. And the respect principle implies that humans are inherently
good and deserving of respect even when they make mistakes.
There are six steps for implementing the theory of constraints. The first one is to identify a
measurable goal. This is typically defined as throughput, or the amount of products or
services produced and sold to customers. Basically, the goal is some concrete objective
that involves the company’s success and profitability.
The third step is to exploit the bottleneck. This means making sure the bottleneck is being
put to its most profitable use. If the bottleneck is some slow machine that cranks out two
types of products, a very profitable product and a less profitable product, you should
make sure the machine is always working on the more profitable product.
The fourth step is to subordinate all other factors in the operation to the bottleneck. This
means optimizing the production process to the pace of the bottleneck. If the production
process involves three machines, one can crank out 10 products per hour, another can
crank out 20 products per hour, and the third can only crank out 3 products per hour,
then you must operate the first to machines so they produce only 3 products per hour to
keep pace with the bottleneck machine. This reduces excess inventory.
The fifth step is to increase the capacity of the bottleneck. For example, referring to the
previous paragraph, if the bottleneck can only produce 3 products per hour, then you
should try to increase that output rate. Perhaps by outsourcing that phase of production,
or by purchasing two more of those machines to increase output. Basically, you’ve
identified the constraint, and this is the step where you mitigate or eliminate it – alter the
process so this factor is no longer a constraint.
And the sixth step is to start the process over with the next bottleneck. There is always at
least one factor limiting the process. When you successfully manage that factor, another
bottleneck will arise as the constraint. Implementing the theory of constraints method of
process improvement is a never-ending endeavor.
The theory of constraints also includes a 5-step theory of constraints thinking process
designed to organize the thought process involved in approaching a bottleneck and
trying to resolve the problem relating to the constraint.
First, the people involved must agree on the problem. That is, they must all agree which
factor is the bottleneck.
Second, the people involved must agree on what sort of solution is required. This could
be something like increasing the output of machine number three in the production
process.
The third step is to get everyone to agree that the solution will resolve the problem. That
is, the proposed solution is the correct action for eliminating the bottleneck in question.
The fourth step is to look past potential negative ramifications of the process.
Finally, the fifth step is to overcome any hindrances to the implementation of the solution
to the problem.
Also, the theory of constraints allows the managers involved in the process to focus on
the constraints in the process. It is a way to galvanize efforts and energies and to focus
attention on a single aspect of the process with the intention of correcting a clear
problem to arrive at a clear solution.
Also, the organization that adopts and implements the theory of constraints will be
continuously striving for process improvement. This is a way to ward of inertia and
complacency and will most likely result in operations that continue to get more efficient
and more productive and more profitable over time.
Some criticisms of Goldratt’s theory of constraints include the idea that Goldratt himself
treats the theory as a product to sell and he acts as a salesman. Also, some say Goldratt’s
theory of constraints borrows ideas and concepts from previous studies and theories, but
Goldratt does not acknowledge these contributions to his theory.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTACCOUNTING
If a company is wasteful in its use of resources, or alternatively causes pollution, then this
impacts inthree ways:
(1) there is the direct cost to the company of spending more than is needed on
resources, orhaving to spend money cleaning up the pollution
(2) there is the damage to the reputation of the company – consumers are
becoming more andmore environmentally aware
(3) there are possible fines or penalties as a result of breaking environmental regulations.
For all of the above reasons it is important for the company to attempt to identify and
to managethe various costs involved.
The cost that comes to the mind of most people immediately are those relating to
dealing with waste. However there are many other costs that are likely to be just as
important. For example:
The amount of raw materials used in production. A publisher should consider ways of
using less paper (or recyclable paper) as a way of saving costs for themselves as
well as helping the environment.
Transport costs. Consideration of alternative ways of delivering goods could perhaps
reduce costsand reduce the impact on the environment.
Water and energy consumption. EMA may help to identify inefficiencies and wasteful practices
and, therefore, opportunities for cost savings.
Although you cannot be required to perform any calculations for this section of the
KAIZEN COSTING
In finer terms, the Kaizen Costing is the sustenance of existing cost levels for the products
under the manufacturing process by way of collective efforts to attain the intended cost
level.
Kaizen Costing aims at eliminating wastes and losses in the process of production,
assembly and distribution, along with removing the unnecessary steps during these
processes and implementing economic re-designs for the product. Thus, it reduces extra
costs at each stage.
The primary assumption behind Kaizen Costing is that nothing is perfect, so there is always
a room for improvements and reductions in the variable costs. So, slight, additional
changes are regularly applied and maintained during the production stage of the
product life cycle, over a long period, leading to substantial improvements.
Kaizen Costing is laid out to redo many value engineering steps until the production of
the product continues and constantly working on upgrading the process and thus
eliminating the extra costs. However, the cost reduction arising from Kaizen costing is
quite less than those attained with value engineering.
Nevertheless, Kaizen Costing is still essential for the organization as competitive pressures
will force the firms to reduce the price of the product over time and any possible savings
in the costs facilitate in achieving the intended profit margins while continually working
on reducing cost.