FILED

Moorish Nadonal Republic Federal Government

Northwest Amexem / Northwest Africa / North America / 'The North Gate'
Sociens Republicae Ea Al Maurikanos
r
lhe True and De jure Al Moroccans
(Americans)
The Aboriänal / Indigenous Natnra.l People of the I-and

BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; MJG 1 2 CV

IN BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND DISTRICT
Circuit Court Hon. John Grason Turnbull Il

Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum

USC Title 28 2242. USC Title 28
WARRANT NUMBER Lawfully Assigned Judicial Offcer
CASE NUMBERS: 000000BP43695

Petitioner, Anaid El and Olivia Evans-El EMERGENCY PETITION

Permanent Representative of: FOR CONSTITUTIONAL
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
MOORISH DIVINE, NATIONAL MOVEMENT; AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT AND
DEMAND FOR DUE PROCESS OF LAW
PURSUANT TO USC Title 28 2242 : ON BEHALF OF Protected by the 4th amendment
Ashep Herser Neter El, In Propria Persona Sui Heredes
Being detained as the Ex Relatione [PIERRE ANDRE HALL]
Petitioners' Correspondence
MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF
AMERICA, INC.
c/o General Delivery
2833Alabama Avenue, SE — Suite 31309
BALTIMORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Near Maryland State Republic
Baltimore County Circuit Court John Grason Turnbull Il [20020] A010 1.2.e2) As Amended
James W. Johnson, Chief of Police Non-Domestic

TO THE BALTIMORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

JAMES P. O'NEIL; or Lawfully Assigned Judicial Officer, et al.

TO BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT MAGISTRATE COX, or her Lawfully

Assigned Judicial Officer, et al. AND R. JAY FISHER BALTIMORE COUNTY
ELECTED SHERIFF

"Associate Justice WILLIAM O. DOUGLAS once wrote, "[Wlhere police take matters in
their own hands, seize victims, beat and pound them until they confess, there cannot be the
slightest doubt that the police have deprived the victim of a right under the Constitution. It
is the right of the accused to be tried by a legally constituted court, not by a kangaroo
court" (Williams v. United States, 341 U.s. 97, 71 S. ct. 576, 95 L. Ed. 774[1951]).
 VERIFICATION / DECLARATION

Petitioners, Anaid El and Olivia Evans-El, Permanent Representative of MOORISH

DIVNE, NATIONAL MOVEÄ[ENT, in association with Ashep Herser Neter El, being
competent to make this affidavit in our own writing, state and declare the following facts to
be true, correct, certain, complete, not misleading, and not intended for any improper
purpose to wit as an Authorized Representative under the laws of the Moorish Holy Temple
of Science of the World/ Moorish Science Temple of America Divine Constitution and By-
Laws and Council by virtue of the Charter Dispensation of the Moorish Science Temple of
America not being repugnant to Article 1 Section 10 ofthe United States Constitution
Republic, with Ashep Herser Neter El.
Petitioner, Anaid El and Olivia Evans-El, in full life, a Natural person and Aboriginal
Autonomous Autochthon Indigenous inhabitant of North America/Morocco, not in the
CORPORATE STATE OF MARYLAND Jurisdiction, and several States of America
Declares and Affrm under the dejure Laws of the Constitution for the United States of
America Republic, The Moorish Holy Temple of Science / Moorish Science Temple of
America Divine Constitution and
By-Laws, and Zodiac Constitution (Nature's Law), The Treaty of Peace and Friendship of
1787/1836 Between United States and Morocco Treaty Number 244-1. Petitioner is
competent to be a witness, and that the facts contained herein are frue, correct, complete, and
not misleading, to the best of PetitionerDeclarants first hand knowledge and belief. See
attached affdavit in support

JURISDICTION

Ashep Herser Neter EL possesses Freehold by Inheritance status; stands squarely affirmed
and bound to The Moorish Holy Temple of Science / Moorish Science Temple of America
Divine Constitution and By-Laws, and Zodiac Constitution (Nature's Law) with all due
respect and honors given to the Constitution for the United States Republic of North
America (Amexem). Being a direct descendant of the Moroccans and bom in America, the
Ancient Moabites from the Land of Moab, who received permission from the Pharaohs of
Egypt to settle and inhabit North West Africa (Amexem/America) North Gate. The Moabites
/ Moors are the founders and are the frue possessors of the present Moroccan Empire; with
our Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren, who sojourned from the land of Canaan,
seeking new homes. Our Dominion and Inhabitation extended from Northeast and southwest
Africa, across the Great Atlantis, even unto the present North, South and Central America
and the Adjoining Islands; bound squarely affirmed to the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of
Seventeen Hundred and Eighty-Seven (1787) A.D., superceded by the Treaty of Peace and
Friendship of Eighteen Hundred and Thirty-Six (1836) A.D., In Force; the same as displayed
under Treaty Law, Obligation, Authority as expressed in Article VI Moroccan [Americas by
custom and by culture] and as registered with the Library of Congress and Department of
Justice, Washington, District of Columbia — Truth Al, AA222141 Federal Citizens Foreign
Relations and Intercourse. U.S.C. 22 and pursuant to Title 8 USC 1401(b) — Citizenship.

Article Ill. Section 2:

"The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this
Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under their authority; -- to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and
consuls; -- to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,• -- to controversies to which
the United States shall be a party; — to controversies between two or more states,• --
between a state and citizens of another state; — between citizens of different states; --
between citizens of the same claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a
state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects."

"In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a
state shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other
cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law
and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make."

Petitioner, Anaid El and Olivia Evans-El is a Lawfully Assigned Judicial Offcer

(Public Minister) of the Moorish Divine and National Movement and are granted the proper
jurisdiction in Law Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 301, 9(b), Titles 22 USC
chap2 $141-145. 28 USC $ 28 USC 1331, 28USC 28 USC 28 USC $ 1351(1)(2)
and the Constitution for The several States of America and the Union created by said
Constitution of 1789 A.D. as amended in 1791 A.D., guaranteeing to each state a republican
form of government.

VENUE

The Venue is proper in that Ashep Herser Neter El, is an Aboriginal, Indigenous
Moor inhabitant of Northwest Amexem near Maryland, A Republic created by the
Constitution for the Several Sates of America.

Article IV, Section 4: "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a
republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on
application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened)
against domestic violence."

CAUSE OF ACTION

-EXAMPLE -
It has come to our attention that on 12 October 2012 our Moorish American National Ashep
Herser Neter El was kidnapped (unlawfully arrested) and is being held hostage for profit by
the public servants of TI--IE STATE OF MARYLAND. Ashep Herser Neter El made a
special appearance before Magistrate Cox exercising his "Right to Travel" for case
#03K12003596 on an unlawful arrest that took place by private contractor/employee of the
DEPARTÄ/IENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE Slusar ID#1409 on March 9, 2012. While
attending the hearing exercising his right to travel a wanton disregard ofthe Petitioner
substantive rights protected by the United States Republic Constitution Article [Amendment]
4 of the Bill of Rights; with the lack of a lawful United States Republic Constitution 4 fr
Article [Amendment] of the Bill of Rights warrant or an indictment under the appellation
Ashep Herser Neter El was violated. Magistrate Cox ordered that he be detained at the
BALTIMORE COUNTY DEPARnÆNT OF CORRECTIONS. We have further been
notified that our Moorish American National will be held hostage without any due process of
law, in violation of his right to face his accuser, absent of a lawful sworn affidavit from an
injured party. Further, foreign persons are being paid to evaluate our Moorish American
National in a fraudulent 730 examination to determine mental competency. The one
arresting has "a duty to immediatelp seek a magistrate," and failure to do so "makes a case of
false imorisonment." Health v. Boyd. 175 S.W. 2d. 217 (1943). "To detain the person
arrested in custody for any purpose other than that of taking him before a magistrate is
illegal. " Kominskv v. Durand, 12 Ad. 2d. 654 (1940)

Respondent, BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, after having Knowledge

of the International Jurisdiction of the Petitioner, conspired with BALTMORE COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT by accepting "Prima Facie Evidence" and Notwithstanding Warrant for
an false Arrest issued by BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT MAGISTRATE
COX. In addition of a lack of a United States Republic Consstitution Article [Amendment]
4th of the Bill of Rights warrant without an Indictment or Delegation of Authority to hinder
the Substantive Rights of the Natural People to Due Process of Law and BALTIMORE
COUNTY POLICE DEPARTNIENT for the depravation of Right to Travel upon the public
highways without a License Excise arrest made without a warrant, if challenged bp the
defendant, is presumptively invalid...the burden is u on the state" to •usti it as authori ed b
statute and as not violative o constitutional provisions. State v. Mastrian. 171 N. W. 2d 695
(1969): Butler v. State. 212 So. 2d 577 (Miss 1968).

BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTIv1ENT has violated the Inalienable Rights of

Petitioner by enforcing private foreign for profit DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR Corporate
policies which are not threats to the public safety or arrestable, prosecutable offenses as
argued in Christv v. Elliot, 216 1 131, 74 HE 1035, LIRA NS 1905-1910. The Usurpation of
Governmental seats resulted constituted kidnapping (False Arrest) and notwithstanding
administration, in which Moorish American National is being held for a ransom. Alleged
 Crimes was not Sworn by an affidavit by a De Jure Lawful public servant/officer.
BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, BALTIMORE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DISTRICT
COURT and BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT are in violation of the following:

AMENDMENT IV OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES REPUBLIC

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue except
upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched and the papers and things to be seized.

Section 8: IN HARMONY w1TH AMENDMENT V OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE

UNITED STATES REPUBLIC...N0 person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense,
unless on the presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases of impeachment, or
in cases now prosecuted without indictment, or arising in the army or navy or in the militia,
when in actual service in time of war or public danger.

Section 9: The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate; but the Legislature may authorize
the trial of civil causes by a jury of six persons, The Legislature may provide that in any civil
cause a verdict may be rendered by not less than five-sixth of the jury. The Legislature may
authorize the trial of the issue of mental in competency without a jury.

INDICTMENT (As Defined By Blacks Law Dictionary Fourth Edition)

Crime Law, practice.

1. A written accusation of one or more persons of a crime or misdemeanor, presented to,

and preferred upon oath or affirmation, by a grand jury legally convoked. 4 BL Com.
299; co. Litt. 126; 2 Hale, 152; Bac. Ab. H. t.; Com.Dig. H. t. A; 1 Chit. Cr. L. 168.
2. This word, indictment, is said to be derived from the old French word inditer, which
dignifies to indicate; to show, or point oute Its object is to indicate the offence charged
against the accused. Rey, des Inst. 1'Angle Tome 2, p. 347.
Section 2249. Certified copies of indictment, plea and judgment; duty of respondent

On application for a writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the detention of any person
pursuant to a judgment of a court of the United States, the respondent shall promptly
file with the court certified copies of the indictment, plea of petitioner and the
judgment, or such of them as may be material to the questions raised, if the petitioner
fails to attach them to his petition, and same shall be attached to the return to the writ,
or to the answer to the order to show cause.

The offence aught be properly described. This is done by stating the substantial
circumstances necessary to show the nature of the crime and, next, the formal allegations
and terms of art required by law. 1. As to the substantial circumstances. The whole of the
facts of the case necessary to make it appear judicially to the court that the indicators have
gone upon sufficient premises, should be set forth; but there should be no unnecessary
matter or any thing which on its face makes the indictment repugnant, inconsistent, or
absurd. Hale, 183; Hawk. B. 2, c. 25, s. 57; Ab. H. t. G 1; Com. Dig. H. t. G 3; 2 Leach, 660;
2 Str. 1226. All indictments ought to charge a man with a particular offence, and not with
being an offender in general: to this rule there are some exceptions, as indictments against a
common barrater, a common scold, and the keeper of a common bawdy house; such persons
may be indicted by these general words. 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 230, and the authorities there cited.

The offence must not be stated in the disjunctive, so as to leave it uncertain on what it is
intended to rely as an accusation; as, that the defendant erected or caused to be. Erected a
nuisance. 2 Str. 900; 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 236.
By Amendment 5 to the Constitution of the United States Republic, "No person shall be held
to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment
of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in
actual service in time of war, or public danger."
Where provisions are not made to address Foreign Relations and Intercourse in a Consular
Court, Titles 22 USC chap2 8141-145, USC Title 28 $ as prescribed by law, then
no jurisdiction exists! A Court of General Sessions, Congressionally sanctioned, in accord
with the National Constitutions and Treaties, with Consulars and officials representing both
nations/nationals, present and In Propria Persona would be proper jurisdiction. All parties
would operate by De Jure Constitutional and Treaty law.

If there is no proper jurisdiction or venue, then no lawful or legal trial can be held, therefore,
all rights revert back to the People (Self-government with Sovereign Authority). This is
where Certificate AA 222141 clearly proves its purpose. When government officials
supersede their jurisdiction, or deny lawful due process, redress, recourse and remedy, "At
Law", then they are criminals, and are traitors to the Constitution and Treaty to which they
are bound by law and from whence they derive any Authority at all! This is where the
Supreme Law of the Land comes into effect.

United Nations DECLARATION on the RIGHTS 0(1NDIGENOUS PEOPLES

Article 37
"Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of Treaties,
Agreements and other constructive Arrangements concluded with states or their successors, according
to their original spirit and intent, and to have states honor and respect such Treaties, Agreements and
other constructive arrangements, conflicts and disputes which cannot otherwise be settled should be
submitted to competent International bodies agreed to by all Parties concerned."

Article 40
"Indigenous peoples have the right to have access to and prompt decision through just and fair procedures for the
resolution of conflicts and disputes with states, as well as to effective remedies for all infringements of their
individual and collective Rights. Such a decision shall give due consideration the customs, traditions, rules and
legal System of the Indigenous peoples concerned and international human rights"

DUE PROCESS OF LAW

(As Defined By Blacks Law Dictionary Fourth Edition)

"Due process of law in each particular case means such an exercise of the powers of
the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction, and under such safe
guards for the protection of individual rights as those maxims prescribe for the class of cases
to which the one in question belongs."

"They then mean a course of legal proceedings according to those rules and principles
which have been established in our systems of jurisprudence for the enforcement and
protection of private rights. To give such proceedings any validity, there must be a tribunal
competent by its constitution — that is, by the law of its creation-to pass upon the
subjectmatter of the suit; and, if that involves merely a determination of the personal liability
of the defendant, he must be brought within its jurisdiction by service of process within that
state, or his voluntary appearance."

"Due process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present
before the tribunal which pronounces judgment upon the question of life, liberty, or property,
in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or other wise, and to have the
right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in
the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him,
this is not due process of law."

"The Essential elements of "due process of law" are notice and opportunity to be
heard and to defend in orderly proceeding adapted to nature of case, and the guarantee of
due process requires that every man have protection of day in court and benefit of general
law."

"A law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds on inquiry and renders
judgment only after trial."
 LAW FORM

The substantive system of the Supreme Law of the Land, invoked by Petitioner Anaid El and
Olivia Evans-El for this hearing, is an Inalienable Right, as guaranteed to be Secured by the
Constitution for the and the Constitution for the several States of the United
States America of 1789 A.D.: and Amended in 1791 A.D. Ashep Herser Neter El does not
consent to any laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding, pursuant to Article VI of
the Constitution for the United States of America, Republic, even though such a Make-Up of
Rules and Laws may have been presumed in the past. Nor does he wave or abandon any of
his Rights.
 Jurat.
Maghrib' al' Aqca.
Northwest Amexem.
da of
Duly Subscribed and Affrmed on this y One Thousand
Four Hundred Thirty-Two M.C. [2012 C.C.Y.] before me, the undersigned, a Wazi [Notary
Public] for the Moorish National Republic Federal Government, appeared Anaid El De Jure,
by special visitation, known to me upon the basis of satisfactory National Standing to be the
one whose appellation [Name] and Autograph/Seal/Mark is subscribed hereto, and
voluntarily executed the same without threat or force of arms.

Witness my hand and official Seal:

Waz
i [Notary Public].

Printed Appellation [Name].