Luna Bey Ex Relation LYDIA LATOYA LYNN SMITH & Alahdeen Moroc Bey Ex Relation NAVAUGHN MARIO GILROY - MOORISH AMERICAN NATIONS

THE MOORISH NATIONAL REPUBLIC
THE MOORISH DIVINE AND NATIONAL MOVEMENT OF THE WORLD

Aboriginal and Indigenous Natural Peoples of North-West Amexem North America
Affidavit of Fact
Writ of Error
Date : August 19, 2021= M.C 1441
District Court of Ohio
Office of the Clerk
Attn: Richard W. Nagel Clerk
200 west second street room 712
Dayton Territory, Territory Republic
[45402] uSA
Re: Civil Case #3:21-cv-211__________in reference to Invitation/Suit/Complaint No.

____________
I am in receipt of your instrument dated 8/17/21 signed by Deputy Clerk Peter B. Silvain regarding your
response to the “Affidavit of Financial Statement”.
For the Record, On the Record, and Let the Record show, I am a Moorish National Aboriginal,
Indigenous Natural Person, and not a nom-de-guerre, straw man or any other artificial corporate
construct as written in all CAPITAL LETTERS, by the unclean hands of others. I am Sovereign to
this Land and as such, this Administrative Court does not have lawful jurisdiction to hear, present,
or pass judgment in any matter concerning my affairs under a quasi criminal non sanctioned
tribunal of foreign private law process.
In response to your misrepresented assumption that my Affidavit was a “Motion”, let the record show, it
was an exercise of right—“In Forma Pauperis”.
United States Constitution Article VI

“All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be
as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. This
Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all
treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or
laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned,
and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the
United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this
Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust
under the United States.”
United States Constitution Amendment V

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an
impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district
shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for
obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
As stated, an “Affidavit of Financial Statement” was submitted NOT as a Motion, as you have indicated,
by error, in your response.
In response, and in correction to your statement, that “Plaintiff’s Affidavit of Financial Statement does not
contain any financial information.” The Affidavit says plaintiff does not have, or possess, “any gold or
silver coins.”, pursuant to the United States Constitution as follows:
“United States Constitution Article 1, Section X,:
Page 1 of 3
No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of
marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but
gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts;
I Affirm, for the Record, I do not have, or possess, any gold or silver coins, as prescribed by United States
Constitution Law, which is lawful money, to pay the restricting demands, conditionally commanded by
Employees and Contractors of the Court. The said restrictions, that you are imposing, are unconstitutional,
and arbitrarily hinders Due Process. Therefore, I submit this Writ “In Forma Pauperis”, being an
enjoyment and exercise of my unconditional and Constitutionally - Secured Rights (and not a Feudal Law -
fee - burdened privilege), to timely and speedily enforce Due Process of Law.
Clearly your demand for a “Financial Statement” is used as an instrument to deny due process of Law
and my right to free access to the Courts. I introduced an Affidavit of Fact, marked as Evidence. Someone
in the Courts tampered with that Evidence, and misrepresented it as a Motion. A Motion is discretionary
and an assumption that permission must be requested to exercise a Constitutionally Secured Right. An
exercise of a Right is not a Request, and your office knows this to be “Stare Decisis”, and the Law of the
Land. Tampering with Evidence is a Federal Violation, and a clear corruption of the fiduciary duties of all
Court Officers. Furthermore, there is no Law prescribed in the United States Constitution stating, or
requiring a “Financial Statement, “Financial Fee (Feudal Law)”, or a “Motion” to exercise a Constitutional
Secured Right. Your demand is a violation of Amendment IX of the United States Constitution and a
violation of my Secured Right to Due Process.
United States Constitution, Amendment IX

“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed
to deny or disparage others retained by the people”
Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation,
which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436, 125:
Is it the position of the United States District Court of Connecticut, Deputy Clerk Kathleen Falcone,
and Judge Joan G. Margolis, that access to the court, which is a Constitutional Right, is for sale?
In addition, it appears it is your position that there is a Law to support that “Access to the Court, and
due process of Law” is for sale. Produce the Law to support this position. Refer to United States
Constitution Article VI.
*Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1975) 14 Cal. 3d 678, 694

Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately
disregards the requirements of fairness and due process.
This is not only a violation of the United States Constitution, it is also a violation of the Constitution of
Connecticut, Article 1 section 10:
“All courts shall be open, and every person, for an injury done to him in his person property or
reputation shall have remedy by due course of Law, and right and justice administered without sale,
denial or delay.
As Officer(s) of the Court, you and your assigns are bound, and have taken a solemn Oath to uphold and
Support the Constitution for the United States Republic (See Article VI). Refusal of this ‘Affidavit of
Financial Statement’ is construed to deny me ‘Due Process’ and is a ‘Colorable Act’. This act constitutes
“Perjury of Oath.” These violations result in additional lawful remedies or actions filed against those
violating Officers of the Court, Under United States Code Of Law, Title 18 and Title 42. Offenders may be
sued in their Official and private capacities. The Law always gives a remedy.
I Respectfully, with ‘Good Faith’, and with Honor, demand free access to the Court by Right, with said
access unhindered. By rightful due process, I submit this ‘Affidavit of Financial Statement’ and Evidence,
and demand that it be processed as it was originally intended and without tampering by any unauthorized
persons.
Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal – Notice to the Principal is notice to the Agent.
Thank You,
I am: ______________________________
Alahdeen Moroc Bey/Luna Latoya Bey Authorized
Representative
Natural Person, In Propria Persona:
Ex Relatione NAVAUGHN GILROY/LYDIA SMITH
All Rights Reserved: U.C.C. 1-207/ 1-308; U.C.C. 1-103
c/o P.O. Box 501
[Zip Exempt]
Non-Domestic
Cc: United States Attorney General

United States Justice Department
Page 2 of 3
State of Ohio Governor
State of Ohio Attorney General Attorney
State of Ohio Secretary of State,
United States District Court of Ohio Walter rice
Page 3 of 3

Luna Bey Ex Relation LYDIA LATOYA LYNN SMITH & Alahdeen Moroc Bey Ex Relation NAVAUGHN MARIO GILROY - MOORISH AMERICAN NATIONS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Luna Bey Ex Relation LYDIA LATOYA LYNN SMITH & Alahdeen Moroc Bey Ex Relation NAVAUGHN MARIO GILROY - MOORISH AMERICAN NATIONS

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Luna Bey Ex Relation LYDIA LATOYA LYNN SMITH & Alahdeen Moroc Bey Ex Relation NAVAUGHN MARIO GILROY - MOORISH AMERICAN NATIONS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE MOORISH NATIONAL REPUBLIC

THE MOORISH DIVINE AND NATIONAL MOVEMENT OF THE WORLD

Re: Civil Case #3:21-cv-211__________in reference to Invitation/Suit/Complaint No.

United States Constitution Article VI

United States Constitution Amendment V

“United States Constitution Article 1, Section X,:

United States Constitution, Amendment IX

*Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1975) 14 Cal. 3d 678, 694

Cc: United States Attorney General

You might also like