Master in Business Administration (Mba) (Supply Chain and Logistics) 2021/2022
Master in Business Administration (Mba) (Supply Chain and Logistics) 2021/2022
Master in Business Administration (Mba) (Supply Chain and Logistics) 2021/2022
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT 2
LECTURER
ASSOC. PROF. TS. ROZITA BINTI HUSAIN
PREPARED BY
AVINASHINI SIVA KUMAR (3211435)
QUESTION 2
Most of TA’s customers made ‘distress purchases’ – their car had broken down
and they wanted it to be fixed quickly. So, TA needed a fast replacement service from
the local distributor. While the distributors both recognised the need for fast
replacements, the performance of the purchasing department at the remanufacturer
was measured on cost savings. Thus, the component supplier thought that the name of
the game was low cost.
As for order qualifier, it would be quality and cost for Talleres Auto. TA
would have been aware that they are already many players in the same market
as it is involved in as roadside repair and recovery service is a common business
segment. Hence, there must be a few characteristics that are instilled in the
organisation from its early days in order for its service and products to be
considered as viable option for its customers. As mentioned earlier, TA should
provide its services in the best possible quality. For example, employees should
be trained to always treat their consumers with respect, patience and kindness,
not forgetting that the products TA purchases for its business should of the best
quality too. With that being said, it ensures that TA would have returning
customers. Moving on to the element of costs, TA should set the costs of its
service and replacement products at a fair and affordable price range. This would
be of immense importance as if it does not meet the stated criteria, customers
could easily find different resource that sticks out to them better.
2. What were the order winners and order qualifiers at the component supplier?
As for the component supplier, its cost would be its order winner. As
stated in the case study, we see that TA needs the products as quick as
possible. The distributors were aware of this situation and the component
supplier figure that producing the needed products at a low cost would be placing
it in a great position of profit for TA to keep on its business from the same
component supplier. Therefore, the best way of the component supplier could
achieve this would be via intermittent manufacturing in large batches. This
product manufacturing would them be done as make to order as in they should
be made according to what is the most in demand need from their customers.
The component supplier should manufacture the products in large batches so
that it could save money on its production and also provide a great deal to its
buyers.
By now it is clear that both order winners and order qualifiers are
significant in supply chain flows. In fact, they both share a common trait that is
entirely dependent on a perspective that is unique to each consumer. But it could
be influenced by the communication between with supplier experience and
personnel and they are uncontrollable. Therefore, when mismatch happens
between these two, it would impact customer service in a way where it would
lead to the risk where the supplier or the Talleres Auto run out of inventories due
to the large deliveries that are irregular. With the issues arising with regards of
stock issues, it would lead to the repair services to the to be delayed. This in the
long run could cause distress among the customers and they could easily opt to
different place to deal with their situation instead of getting to TA. This would
cause the customers to have an unhappy business and it could cause a chain
reaction all the way in the supply chain.
REFERENCES
Harrison, A., & van Hoek, R. I. (2008). Logistics Management and Strategy: Competing
Through the Supply Chain. Prentice Hall Financial Times.