0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views4 pages

A Call For More Research On Green' or Environmental Advertising

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

International Journal of Advertising

The Review of Marketing Communications

ISSN: 0265-0487 (Print) 1759-3948 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rina20

A call for more research on ‘green’ or


environmental advertising

Charles R. Taylor

To cite this article: Charles R. Taylor (2015) A call for more research on ‘green’ or
environmental advertising, International Journal of Advertising, 34:4, 573-575

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1077572

Published online: 12 Sep 2015.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 16

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rina20

Download by: [Universite Laval] Date: 22 September 2015, At: 13:06


International Journal of Advertising, 2015
Vol. 34, No. 4, 573 575, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1077572

EDITORIAL
A call for more research on ‘green’ or environmental advertising
Charles R. Taylor

Villanova University, Department of Marketing and Business Law, Villanova, PA USA

‘Green’ advertising has received considerable attention from academics over the years
and our knowledge of environmental issues and advertising has grown considerably as a
result. The Journal of Advertising has published two special issues on the topic, the first
Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 13:06 22 September 2015

edited by Iyer in 1995 and the second by Sheehan and Atkinson in 2013. Iyer’s article to
lead off his special issue was effective in helping to better define green advertising and in
emphasizing both pro-environmental behaviors on the part of both consumers and compa-
nies. As noted by Kilbourne (1995) in the same issue, in order to fully understand green
advertising practices, the legal and regulatory framework governing business practices
needs to be factored in (Kilbourne 1995; Sheehan and Atkinson 2013). Since this time,
there has been a more holistic view of green advertising and consumer response to it.
Recent research on green advertising has employed rich theoretical frameworks,
including regulatory focus (Kareklas, Carlson, and Muehling 2013), prospect theory
(Royne et al. 2012), persuasion knowledge (Bickart and Ruth 2013), message framing
(Chang, Zheng, and Xie 2015), and message assertiveness (Baek, Yoon, and Kim 2015),
threat appeals and cognitive efficacy (Hartmann et al. 2014). It has also focused heavily
on managerial implications of the findings, such as Hartmann et al.’s findings suggesting
that appropriate threat appeals can increase responsiveness to environmental appeals and
change behavioral intentions.
While it is clear that advances have been made in this important area, the time is riper
than ever for additional emphasis on it. For example, in an environment where many large
advertisers, such as Apple, BP, and Microsoft are focused on promoting their corporate
social responsibility programs, it is worthwhile to examine the degree to which advertis-
ing these programs enhances the emotional dimension of corporate social responsibility.
While there have been a few studies over the years aimed at analyzing the impact of com-
munications about CSR programs on corporate reputation (e.g., Dean 2003), more is
needed. This is especially true given recent research findings of Raithel and Schwaiger
(2015) suggesting that improvements in non-financial, affective aspects of corporate repu-
tation are positively correlated with stock returns more than improvements in reputation
on the cognitive side. Such findings lend credibility to the idea that firms that are already
viewed as highly competent in making their product may need to turn their attention to
developing a reputation as a good corporate citizen.
In an environment where consumers are increasingly concerned about socially respon-
sible behavior and, perhaps, more prone to reward companies for it than in the past (Taylor
2014), there is clearly more to be learned about: (1) how pro-environmental behaviors
can be encouraged by society at large; (2) how companies engaging in environmentally
friendly practices can effectively promote themselves; and (3) how ‘green products’ can
be effectively marketed. As was aptly pointed out by Sheehan and Atkinson (2013), it is
also worth exploring the size of the segment of consumers that responds to green appeals

Ó 2015 Advertising Association


574 Editorial

or is willing to buy green products at a price premium. Many studies of the past have
suggested that some consumers are ‘all talk’ about environmental consciousness when it
comes to actually taking money out of their pockets and spending on environmentally
conscious products. One would suspect that there has been at least some growth in the
green segment. Perhaps more importantly, understanding when and why environmental
appeals are effective is a very important topic and I hope to see more submissions to IJA
on this topic. Thus, this editorial should be considered a general call for more research on
green advertising.
The time of year has come to announce IJA’s annual best article and best reviewer
awards. Based on statistics from the review process and nominations by the associate
editors, it is with much gratitude that we recognize the following individuals with the
‘Outstanding Reviewer Award’:

Mickey Belch, San Diego State University


Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 13:06 22 September 2015

Steven Bellman, Murdoch University

Christian Burgers, VU University Amsterdam

Sandra Diehl, Alpen-Adria University

Sascha Raithel, Freie University of Berlin

Dongyong Sohn, Hanyang University

I would note that at IJA we view the Outstanding Reviewer Award as a lifetime
achievement award as prior recipients and the individuals above have consistently
provided a substantial number of high quality reviews. Reviewing is critical to the success
of an academic journal and IJA benefits from the efforts of these award winners as well as
other dedicated reviewers. To all of you who make the effort to review, I would like to
send a sincere thank you on behalf of myself and the associate editors.
Last, but certainly not the least, the best paper award recipient for 2014, as voted on
by the Editorial Review Board, is Patrick Hartmann, Vanessa Apaolaza, Clare D’Souza,
Jose M. Barrutia, and Carmen Echebarria (2014). Environmental threat appeals in green
advertising: the role of fear arousal and coping efficacy. International Journal of
Advertising, 33(4), pp. 741 765.
For anyone who has not read this paper, I would encourage you do so it is a great
example of the type of research that moves environmental advertising research forward.

References
Baek, T.H., S. Yoon, and S. Kim. 2015. When environmental messages should be assertive: Exam-
ining the moderating role of effort investment. International Journal of Advertising 34, no.1:
135 57.
Bickart, B., and J.A. Ruth. 2013. Green eco-seals and advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising
41, no. 2: 51 67.
Chang, H., L. Zhang, and G.X. Xie. 2015. Message framing in green advertising: The effect of
construal level and consumer environmental concern. International Journal of Advertising 34,
no. 1: 158 76.
Dean, D. 2003. Consumer perceptions of corporate donations: Effects of company reputation for
social responsibility and type of donation. Journal of Advertising 32, no. 4: 91 102.
Editorial 575

Hartmann, P., V. Apaolaza, C. D’Souza, J.M. Barrutia, and C. Echebarria. 2014. Environmental
threat appeals in green advertising: The role of fear arousal and coping efficacy. International
Journal of Advertising 33, no. 4: 741 65.
Iyer, E.S. 1995. Three faces of green advertising. Journal of Advertising 24, no. 2: III V.
Kareklas, I., J.R. Carlson, and D.D. Muehling. 2013. The role of regulatory focus and self-view in
“green” advertising message framing. Journal of Advertising 41, no. 2: 25 39.
Kilbourne, W.E. 1995. Green advertising: Salvation or oxymoron? Journal of Advertising 24, no. 2:
7 19.
Raithel, S., and M. Schwaiger. 2005. The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general
public on shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal 36, no. 6: 945 56.
Royne, M.B., Martinez, J. Oakley, and A.K. Fox. 2012. The effectiveness of benefit type and price
endings in green advertising. Journal of Advertising 41, no. 2: 85 102.
Sheehan, K., and L. Atkinson. 2013. Revisiting green advertising and the reluctant consumer.
Journal of Advertising 41, no.2: 5 7.
Taylor, C.R. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and advertising. Does it extend to taking stances
on social issues? International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 1: 11 15.
Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 13:06 22 September 2015

You might also like