MA 105: Calculus D1 - T5, Tutorial 03: Aryaman Maithani
MA 105: Calculus D1 - T5, Tutorial 03: Aryaman Maithani
D1 - T5, Tutorial 03
Aryaman Maithani
IIT Bombay
Sheet 2: Problems 6 to 10
Sheet 3: Problems 2, 3, 5 to 7
f (c + h) − f (c) + f (c) − f (c − h)
lim+
h→0 2h
1 f (c + h) − f (c) f (c) − f (c − h)
= lim + lim+
2 h→0+ h h→0 h
1
= (f 0 (c) + f 0 (c)) = f 0 (c).
2
Aryaman Maithani MA 105 : Calculus D1 - T5, Tutorial 03
Sheet 2
(Converse.)
The converse need not be true. That is,
f (c + h) − f (c − h)
lim+
h→0 2h
may exist but f could still be non-differentiable at c.
Show this explicitly using f (x) := |x| as an example.
Case 1. f (0) = 0.
Substitute y = 0 in (1). Thus, f (x) = f (0)f (x) = 0.
Therefore, f is identically 0 which means it’s differentiable everywhere with derivative
0.
Verify that f 0 (c) = f 0 (0)f (c) does hold for all x ∈ R. (We did not need to use the fact
that f is differentiable at 0, it followed from definition.)
Case 2. f (0) = 1.
As f is differentiable at 0, we know that:
f (0 + h) − f (0) f (h) − 1
lim = f 0 (0) =⇒ lim = f 0 (0). (2)
h→0 h h→0 h
Aryaman Maithani MA 105 : Calculus D1 - T5, Tutorial 03
Sheet 2
(Optional) We have gotten that the derivative of f is a scalar multiple of f . Use this
to conclude.
2. Assume that the cubic (denote it by f (x)) has two roots, a and b. We may assume
that a < b. Then, we know the following:
(i) f is continuous on [a, b],
(ii) f is differentiable on (a, b), and
(iii) f (a) = f (b).
Thus, by Rolle’s Theorem, there exists c ∈ (a, b) such that f 0 (c) = 0.
However, f 0 (c) = 3c 2 + p cannot be 0 as 3c 2 is always non-negative and p is strictly
positive.
Note: We have shown that the cubic has at most 1 root. We haven’t actually shown
that f has a root. This can be shown using IVT. (How?)
Part 2. Now we will show the uniqueness of x0 . Assume that there exists x1 ∈ (a, b)
such that f (x1 ) = 0. We may assume that x0 < x1 .
Now, we know the following:
(i) f is continuous on [x0 , x1 ],
(ii) f is differentiable on (x0 , x1 ), and
(iii) f (x0 ) = f (x1 ).
Thus, by Rolle’s Theorem, there exists x2 ∈ (x0 , x1 ) such that f 0 (x2 ) = 0. But this
contradicts the hypothesis that f 0 (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ (a, b).
Theorem (MVT)
Let a < b and f : [a, b] → R be a function such that
(i) f is continuous on [a, b], and
(ii) f is differentiable on (a, b).
f (b) − f (a)
Then there exists c ∈ (a, b) such that f 0 (c) = .
b−a
a+b
6. Let c := . It is clear that a < c < b. Moreover, we have it that
2
2(c − a) = 2(b − c) = b − a.
f (c) − f (a)
By MVT, there exists c1 ∈ (a, c) such that f 0 (c1 ) = and there exists
c −a
f (b) − f (c)
c2 ∈ (c, b) such that f 0 (c2 ) = . As c1 and c2 belong to disjoint intervals, it
b−c
is clear that c1 6= c2 .
Observe that
f (c) − f (a) f (b) − f (c) f (c) − f (a) + f (b) − f (c)
f 0 (c 0
1 ) + f (c2 ) = + =2 = 2.
c −a b−c b−a
7. Assume not. That is, f (0) 6= 0. Then, there are two possibilities.
Case 1. f (0) > 0.
The function f satisfies the hypothesis of MVT, thus there must exist c ∈ (−a, 0) such
f (0) − f (−a) f (0)
that f 0 (c) = = + 1.
0 − (−a) a
As f (0) > 0 and a > 0, we get that f 0 (c) > 1 which contradicts the hypothesis.
and
f (a) − f (x) a − x + x − f (x) x − f (x)
= =1+
a−x a−x a−x
Choose x ∈ (−a, a) and use MVT appropriately to get contradictions for f (x) > x and
f (x) < x.