Notes of Voicelessness For Piano, Beat Furrer

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9
At a glance
Powered by AI
The piece has a minimalist style with a slow progression of time and uses limited notes across different registers of the piano.

The piece is divided into three sections with changes in phrasing and range between different systems.

The chords start narrow and become wider as the piece progresses, shifting between low and high registers.

Ivan Liuzzo

Analysis – Voicelessness (B. Furrer)

Voicelessness is a composition for solo piano written by Beat Furrer in 1986.


The piece length is 10 circa.

I concentrated my analysis on the harmony and on how the registers of the


sections are constructed.
First of all, the composition has a very minimal material. The notes are carried
throughout the staff.
The reading of the score must be in two staves (which I will call System). The
player will play the first stavesand once the staff is finished, the lower staff
will form a new "system", becoming the upper staff, and a new line is added.
Only on page 4 will the system become 3 staves, once finished, it will return to
reading at two staves, untill the end.

On a perceptive level, the composition is almost as if it belonged to a modal


system, with a light character, which recalls the tradition of the nocturnal.
in addition, the very limited use of notes (both in quantity and space) and
overlaps, emphasize a very slow passage of time.

I have reported the heights written as a chord, each corresponding to its line,
or staff (upper or lower, the classification of the resulting intervals and the
“scale” created by the combination of the staves.

An obvious thing is the departure of the chords and their intervals in a narrow
position(also block chord), and each system tends to widen, up to the maximum
extension and even reduction of the notes used.

I have divided the composition into three sections called: I, II, III
I

Section I is on the first page and is made up of 4 systems.


At the level of musical phrasing I notice a change in system 3 and system 4.

The piece start with a small cluster between the lines:


although the lines have an interval of a major third, in the encounter it is as
if they became a minor second:

B – C ; D# - E

But it sounds like a melody.

the first system has the range between the root note and the top note is a 4(B-
E); and the notes are 4

The second system has a 6th major as range and 6 notes

The third system has a 6th major as range and 7 notes

The fourth systems has 7th minor as range and 6 notes

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
II
Section II is on pag 2 and 3: pag 2 is made by 8 systems.
I found a musical changes at the 4th system(called II 1c); at the 5th (II.2 and
II.2c) and the 7th(II.3).

the second movement sees a gradual increase in values and rhythmic intensity.
At the same time the register begins to shift towards the high.
The rhythmic climax in this high register is then "slowed down" and dilated by
the entry of the low register (so far never heard) in which the two notes that
make up an interval of 7 major (C - B), conclude the development that has taken
place and introduce to the last part in which the piano is played for all the
registers and with the use of very few notes.
III
Section III is made by 5 systems: the second has three staves.

I found a musical changes at 3rd and 4th systems.

this part is characterized by the repetition of the note C (inherited from the
last system of II): this note is played at different pitches and registers of
the piano. The only different note is the B, often creating tension from the
minor second or major seventh interval.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You might also like