The document provides guidelines for assessing oral presentations. It includes criteria such as attire, clarity, content, knowledge, and vocabulary. For each criterion, it provides a scale from 1 to 4 points on exceeds expectations, meets expectations, needs improvement, and inadequate. Instructors can use these guidelines to evaluate students on their oral presentation skills.
The document provides guidelines for assessing oral presentations. It includes criteria such as attire, clarity, content, knowledge, and vocabulary. For each criterion, it provides a scale from 1 to 4 points on exceeds expectations, meets expectations, needs improvement, and inadequate. Instructors can use these guidelines to evaluate students on their oral presentation skills.
The document provides guidelines for assessing oral presentations. It includes criteria such as attire, clarity, content, knowledge, and vocabulary. For each criterion, it provides a scale from 1 to 4 points on exceeds expectations, meets expectations, needs improvement, and inadequate. Instructors can use these guidelines to evaluate students on their oral presentation skills.
The document provides guidelines for assessing oral presentations. It includes criteria such as attire, clarity, content, knowledge, and vocabulary. For each criterion, it provides a scale from 1 to 4 points on exceeds expectations, meets expectations, needs improvement, and inadequate. Instructors can use these guidelines to evaluate students on their oral presentation skills.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
LYCEUM-NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
Tapuac District, Dagupan City
College of Hospitality Management GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT Rubrics for Oral Presentation: Student(s) Name: Year/Section: Subject: ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ ________________________ ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ CRITERIA/SCALE 4 points – Exceeds Expectations 3 points – Meets Expectations 2 points – Needs Improvement 1 point - Inadequate Remarks Attire Dress or costume was neat and appropriate. Dressed fashionably and appropriately. Appearance was acceptable, but not Appearance was sloppy or inappropriate. Dresses appropriately for Costume was representative of the period Costume was representative of the remarkable. Costume distracted audience. Presenter made no effort to dress in presentation being presented. Presenter integrated period being discussed. Presenter Did not discuss how costume was related to costume. Total points: 4 points discussion of costume into presentation. referred to costume during presentation. presentation. CRITERIA/SCALE 4 points – Exceeds Expectations 3 points – Meets Expectations 2 points – Needs Improvement 1 point - Inadequate Remarks Clarity Appropriate volume throughout presentation. Spoke at an appropriate volume for Spoke quietly. Increased volume briefly after Barely audible, even after requests to Clarity and volume Varied volume when appropriate. most of presentation. Good inflection being asked. Spoke with little inflection. speak up. No inflection. Sounded bored or Total points: 4 points Proper inflection throughout presentation. and enunciation. Occasionally sounded uninterested. Paid little attention to proper Spoke clearly and understandably. monotone. pronunciation. CRITERIA/SCALE 4 points – Exceeds Expectations 3 points – Meets Expectations 2 points – Needs Improvement 1 point - Inadequate Remarks Content All content directly related to the topic. Content directly related to the topic. Had difficulty explaining how the content Presentation did not relate to topic. Relates to topic, detailed, Content was thoroughly developed and Included many details that demonstrated and topic relate. Many opinions were not Included few details and relied heavily and accurate demonstrated detailed knowledge of the topic. knowledge of the topic. Most opinions factually supported. upon unsupported opinion. Opinions were supported by fact wherever were supported by facts. Total points: 4 points possible. CRITERIA/SCALE 4 points points – Exceeds Expectations 3 points –Meets Expectations 2 points – Needs Improvement 1 point - Inadequate Remarks Knowledge Demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the Demonstrated a working knowledge of Demonstrated a basic knowledge of the Demonstrated little or no knowledge of the Demonstrate knowledge subject matter. Able to use audience questions the subject matter. Able to satisfactorily subject matter. Able to address audience subject. Unable to answer audience of subject to further demonstrate understanding of the answer audience questions and provided questions by repeating parts of the questions or comment further on any part Total points: 4 points topic. Appeared to be an expert on the subject additional information upon request. presentation - did not provide any additional of the presentation. being presented. information. CRITERIA/SCALE 4 points points – Exceeds Expectations 3 points –Meets Expectations 2 points – Needs Improvement 1 point - Inadequate Remarks Vocabulary Vocabulary was outstanding. Word choice Consistently used a scholarly Vocabulary was too casual. Attempted to use Did not speak in a scholarly or Appropriate word choice was professional but not artificial. Smoothly vocabulary. Successfully used topic- topic-specific vocabulary. May have used professional manner. Used little or no Total points: 4 points incorporated topic-specific vocabulary. specific vocabulary. Did not use any inappropriate language on one occasion. topic-specific vocabulary. Used inappropriate language. Misused words in an effort to seem scholarly. inappropriate language two or more times.