2008-22-10 Fire Extinguishing Circuit System
2008-22-10 Fire Extinguishing Circuit System
2008-22-10 Fire Extinguishing Circuit System
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 Series Airplanes
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This
AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During planned maintenance visit on one A320 aircraft, a cross connection of the fire
extinguishing circuit system was identified. In case of fire, this cross connection will
activate (discharge) the wrong forward or aft cargo compartment fire extinguisher bottle.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
During planned maintenance visit on one A320 aircraft, a cross connection of the fire
extinguishing circuit system was identified. In case of fire, this cross connection will
activate (discharge) the wrong forward or aft cargo compartment fire extinguisher bottle.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires a one-time inspection and check of the
cargo firing circuit continuity to confirm the correct connection of the dedicated wires
between the discharge pushbutton switches and the relevant cargo bottle.
Corrective action includes modifying the wiring connection on plug 1505VC-A. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We considered the
comment received.
Northwest Airlines (NWA) requests that we revise the applicability of the NPRM to state that the
AD applies only to those airplanes produced before February 28, 2007 that have fewer than 8,000
total flight hours and that have not had Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Maintenance Review Board
Report (MRBR) Task 26.23.00/03 and 26.23.00/07, or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-26A1068, dated
March 19, 2007, accomplished.
We disagree that the applicability needs to be clarified. Paragraph (c), ''Applicability,'' of the
NPRM already excludes airplanes on which the MRBR tasks have been performed. Paragraph (f),
''Actions and Compliance,'' gives credit for airplanes on which the service bulletin has been
accomplished before the effective date of this AD. These exclusions are valid no matter the number
of total flight hours on the airplane. We have not changed the AD in this regard.
Clarifications of the AD
We have clarified the applicability to include a reference to the German standard airworthiness
certificate or original German export certificate of airworthiness. The applicability of the NPRM
referred only to the French standard airworthiness certificate or original French export certificate of
airworthiness. Some of the airplanes affected by this AD were produced in Germany.
2
We have removed the reference to Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 MRBR Task 26.23.00/03 or
26.23.00/07 in paragraph (f) of this AD to be consistent with FAA policy and Office of the Federal
Register regulations. We may consider approving the use of Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 MRBR
Task 26.23.00/03 or 26.23.00/07 as an alternative method of compliance with this AD, as provided
by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. We
determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the
scope of the AD.
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their
substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to
ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not
intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service
information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to
follow our FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 679 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will
take about 6 work-hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $325,920, or $480 per product.
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety.
Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ''Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ''Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III,
section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting
safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ''significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034,
February 26, 1979); and
3
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it
in the AD docket.
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
§ 39.13 [Amended]
4
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
FAA
Aircraft Certification Service www.faa.gov/aircraft/safety/alerts/
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/advanced.html
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December 19, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes, certificated
in any category, all certified models; all serial numbers which have received an original French or
German (as applicable) standard airworthiness certificate or original French or German (as
applicable) export certificate of airworthiness prior to February 28, 2007, and have been fitted with a
cargo compartment fire extinguisher bottle installed in production, or in service by an Airbus service
bulletin; except airplanes on which Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Maintenance Review Board
Report (MRBR) Task 26.23.00/03 or 26.23.00/07 has been performed.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 26: Fire Protection.
Reason
During planned maintenance visit on one A320 aircraft, a cross connection of the fire
extinguishing circuit system was identified. In case of fire, this cross connection will
activate (discharge) the wrong forward or aft cargo compartment fire extinguisher bottle.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires a one-time inspection and check of the
cargo firing circuit continuity to confirm the correct connection of the dedicated wires
between the discharge pushbutton switches and the relevant cargo bottle.
(f) Within 600 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, unless already done, perform the
inspection and continuity check of the cargo firing circuit and, before next flight, do applicable
5
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A320-26A1068, Revision 01, dated July 19, 2007. Actions done before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-26A1068, dated March 19, 2007, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the requirements of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No differences.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive 2007-
0249, dated September 24, 2007; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-26A1068, Revision
01, dated July 19, 2007; for related information.
(i) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-26A1068, Revision 01, excluding
Appendix 01, dated July 19, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service
information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 33 33; Internet http://www.airbus.com. (3)
You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.