Autosar Rs Main

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Document Title Main Requirements

Document Owner AUTOSAR
Document Responsibility AUTOSAR
Document Identification No 054
Document Classification Auxiliary
Document Version 2.1.0

Document Status Final
Part of Release 4.0
Revision 1
Document Change History

Date Version Changed by Change Description
30.11.2009 2.1.0 AUTOSAR  Changed [Main90] and [Main 370]
Administration  Legal disclaimer revised
23.06.2008 2.0.4 AUTOSAR Legal disclaimer revised
Administration
05.12.2007 2.0.3 AUTOSAR  Document meta information extended
Administration  Small layout adaptations made
24.01.2007 2.0.2 AUTOSAR  “Advice for users” revised
Administration  “Revision Information” added
28.11.2006 2.0.1 AUTOSAR Legal disclaimer revised
Administration
06.12.2005 2.0.0 AUTOSAR  Removed section “2.1 Recipients”
Administration  Update of section 3.1.1
 Changed [Main11], [Main60], [Main300],
[Main310], [Main320], [Main330],
[Main340], [Main350], [Main360],
[Main370], [Main380]
 Use Case added
 Changed [Main20]
 Rationale extended
 Changed [Main10], [Main50], [Main80],
[Main90], [Main130], [Main230],
[Main240]
 Rationale added
 Changed [Main160], [Main280]
 Rationale and Use Case added
 Changed [Main300], [Main310]
 Headline and Short description written in
active
 Update of section 3.3 according to
changes of 3.1.1
09.05.2005 1.0.0 AUTOSAR Initial release
Administration
1 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

AUTOSAR confidential
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Disclaimer
This specification and the material contained in it, as released by AUTOSAR is for
the purpose of information only. AUTOSAR and the companies that have contributed
to it shall not be liable for any use of the specification.
The material contained in this specification is protected by copyright and other types
of Intellectual Property Rights. The commercial exploitation of the material contained
in this specification requires a license to such Intellectual Property Rights.
This specification may be utilized or reproduced without any modification, in any form
or by any means, for informational purposes only.
For any other purpose, no part of the specification may be utilized or reproduced, in
any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
The AUTOSAR specifications have been developed for automotive applications only.
They have neither been developed, nor tested for non-automotive applications.
The word AUTOSAR and the AUTOSAR logo are registered trademarks.
Advice for users
AUTOSAR Specification Documents may contain exemplary items (exemplary

reference models, "use cases", and/or references to exemplary technical solutions,
devices, processes or software).
Any such exemplary items are contained in the Specification Documents for
illustration purposes only, and they themselves are not part of the AUTOSAR
Standard. Neither their presence in such Specification Documents, nor any later
documentation of AUTOSAR conformance of products actually implementing such
exemplary items, imply that intellectual property rights covering such exemplary items
are licensed under the same rules as applicable to the AUTOSAR Standard.

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Table of Content
1 Scope of the document.......................................................................... 6
2 How to read this document.................................................................... 7

2.1 Conventions used.................................................................................. 7
3 The AUTOSAR main requirements ....................................................... 8
3.1 The AUTOSAR project objectives and their concretization by the main
requirements ......................................................................................... 8
3.1.1 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO1 (CONSIDERATION OF
AVAILABILITY AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS) ................................................ 8
3.1.2 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO2 (REDUNDANCY ACTIVATION)
9
3.1.3 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO3 (SCALABILITY TO DIFFERENT
VEHICLE AND PLATFORM VARIANTS) ........................................................... 9
3.1.4 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO4 (IMPLEMENTATION AND
STANDARDIZATION OF BASIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONS AS AN OEM WIDE STANDARD
CORE SOLUTION) ................................................................................... 10
3.1.5 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO5 (TRANSFERABILITY OF
FUNCTIONS THROUGHOUT THE NETWORK) ................................................ 10
3.1.6 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO6 (INTEGRATION OF
FUNCTIONAL MODULES FROM MULTIPLE SUPPLIERS) .................................. 11
3.1.7 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO7 (MAINTAINABILITY
THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE)...................................... 12
3.1.8 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO8 (INCREASED USE OF
COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF HARDWARE (COTS))................................... 13
3.1.9 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO9 (Software updates and
upgrades over vehicle lifetime) ............................................................ 13
3.2 Refinement of the Main Requirements ................................................ 14
3.2.1 [Main10] Using AUTOSAR a system reliability shall be achievable with
a failure rate down to 10-8 per hour ...................................................... 14
3.2.2 [Main11] AUTOSAR shall provide means to reduce system down-time
15
3.2.3 [Main20] AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to support redundancy
paths.................................................................................................... 15
3.2.4 [Main30] A SIL-3-Level compatible development process must be
possible with AUTOSAR...................................................................... 16
3.2.5 [Main50] AUTOSAR shall support inter- and intra-ECU-communication
mechanisms with high reliability .......................................................... 16
3.2.6 [Main60] AUTOSAR shall provide open and standardized software
interfaces for intra-ECU and inter-ECU communication ...................... 17
3.2.7 [Main70] AUTOSAR shall provide complete interfaces to application
software and basic software modules.................................................. 18
3.2.8 [Main80] AUTOSAR shall ease the reusability of software and its
concepts and implementations ............................................................ 18
3.2.9 [Main90] Tool-chains, which are developed for or adapted to
AUTOSAR, must be compatible with the AUTOSAR methodology ..... 19

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.10 [Main100] All AUTOSAR standard software functions shall be
standardized across OEM and Supplier .............................................. 19
3.2.11 [Main110] AUTOSAR shall provide a software architecture that is
applicable across different functional domains .................................... 20
3.2.12 [Main120] AUTOSAR shall provide means to clearly check the
conformance of an AUTOSAR-implementation with its AUTOSAR-
specification......................................................................................... 21
3.2.13 [Main130] AUTOSAR shall provide an abstraction of the application
software from hardware....................................................................... 21
3.2.14 [Main140] AUTOSAR shall provide an independency of application
software from in-vehicle communication technologies......................... 22
3.2.15 [Main141] AUTOSAR should provide an independency of application
software from operating systems......................................................... 22
3.2.16 [Main150] AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms and methods to
encapsulate application software from the infrastructure..................... 23
3.2.17 [Main160] AUTOSAR shall provide a functional interface view of the
entire system ....................................................................................... 23
3.2.18 [Main170] AUTOSAR shall provide secure access to ECU ................. 24
3.2.19 [Main180] AUTOSAR shall provide protection/unlock mechanisms for
software through appropriate services in the infrastructure ................. 24
3.2.20 [Main190] AUTOSAR shall provide interoperability with legacy software
24
3.2.21 [Main200] AUTOSAR shall imply only small memory and performance
impacts when used in today’s micro controllers .................................. 25
3.2.22 [Main210] AUTOSAR shall provide means to integrate AUTOSAR
ECUs in non-AUTOSAR networks....................................................... 25
3.2.23 [Main220] AUTOSAR shall support following programming languages:
C, C++, Java ....................................................................................... 26
3.2.24 [Main230] AUTOSAR shall support networks of networks including sub
networks .............................................................................................. 26
3.2.25 [Main240] AUTOSAR shall provide means to protect SW-Components
from malicious SW-components .......................................................... 27
3.2.26 [Main250] AUTOSAR shall provide means to achieve compositionality
27
3.2.27 [Main260] AUTOSAR shall provide diagnostics means during runtime,
for production and services purposes.................................................. 28
3.2.28 [Main270] Releases of AUTOSAR shall be forward and backward
compatible ........................................................................................... 28
3.2.29 [Main280] The AUTOSAR architecture must provide dynamic
communication pattern ........................................................................ 28
3.2.30 [Main290] AUTOSAR shall ensure the verification of all products
developed within AUTOSAR ............................................................... 29
3.2.31 [Main300] AUTOSAR shall support work-share in large inter-company
development groups ............................................................................ 30
3.2.32 [Main310] AUTOSAR shall support hierarchical design methods........ 30
3.2.33 [Main320] Definitions of relations between SW components are
exhaustive and formal ......................................................................... 31
3.2.34 [Main330] SW components are protected from illegal access ............. 31
3.2.35 [Main340] Protection of timing requirements is supported by AUTOSAR
32
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.36 [Main350] AUTOSAR methods shall be FMEA compatible ................. 32
3.2.37 [Main360] Management of vehicle diversity is supported by AUTOSAR
33
3.2.39 [Main380] Basic requirements to change process in design are
predefined and supported by AUTOSAR............................................. 33
3.3 Mapping of the Project Objectives and the Main Requirements .......... 34
4 References .......................................................................................... 36

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
1 Scope of the document

Each partner has committed to the overall project objectives (PO) of AUTOSAR. The
objectives are listed in the AUTOSAR Standard Info Pack V3.3 or in subsequent
documents. AUTOSAR Standard Info Pack is an official communication paper of
development partnership.
These objectives are not directly usable and have to be refined in order to generate
the specific technical requirements. For this purpose, the AUTOSAR Main
Requirements are established as a fundamental base to derive these specific
requirements.
The goal of this document is to define the main requirements of AUTOSAR including
its link to the AUTOSAR objectives.
The term AUTOSAR is used as a synonym of the development partnership and the
technical product AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture.
Besides the technical requirements also non-technical requirements (i.e. business

model, legal issues) exist, which are not covered here.
The project objectives are listed as follows:
No. Project objectives Abbreviation Priority

1 Consideration of availability and safety requirements AUTOSAR PO1 1
2 Redundancy activation AUTOSAR PO2 2
3 Scalability to different vehicle and platform variants AUTOSAR PO3 1
4 Implementation and standardization of basic system AUTOSAR PO4 1
functions as an OEM wide Standard Core solution
5 Transferability of functions throughout the network AUTOSAR PO5 1
6 Integration of functional modules from multiple AUTOSAR PO6 1
suppliers
7 Maintainability throughout the whole product life cycle AUTOSAR PO7 2
8 Increased use of commercial off the shelf hardware AUTOSAR PO8 3
(COTS)
9 Software updates and upgrades over vehicle lifetime AUTOSAR PO9 2
For this document the project objectives are given.

The prioritization of the objectives has following levels:
1: High, required
2: Medium, recommended
3: Low, optional

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
2 How to read this document

Each requirement has its unique identifier starting with the prefix “Main” (for “Main
Requirement”). For any review annotations, remarks or questions, please refer to
this unique ID rather than chapter or page numbers!
2.1 Conventions used

In requirements, the following specific semantics are used (taken from Request for
Comment RFC 2119 from the Internet Engineering Task Force IETF)
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. Note that the requirement
level of the document in which they are used modifies the force of these words.
 MUST: This word, or the terms "REQUIRED" or "SHALL", mean that the
definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.
 MUST NOT: This phrase, or the phrase „SHALL NOT“, means that the
definition is an absolute prohibition of the specification.
 SHOULD: This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item,
but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before
choosing a different course.
 SHOULD NOT: This phrase, or the phrase "NOT RECOMMENDED" mean
that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the
particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full implications
should be understood and the case carefully weighed before implementing
any behavior described with this label.
 MAY: This word, or the adjective „OPTIONAL“, means that an item is truly
optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a particular
marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that it enhances the
product while another vendor may omit the same item. An implementation,
which does not include a particular option, MUST be prepared to interoperate
with another implementation, which does include the option, though perhaps
with reduced functionality. In the same vein an implementation, which does
include a particular option, MUST be prepared to interoperate with another
implementation, which does not include the option (except, of course, for the
feature the option provides.)

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3 The AUTOSAR main requirements

This chapter describes the main requirements of AUTOSAR. These main
requirements shall be used as a basis for the work in the work packages. Besides
these technical requirements, there are non-technical requirements, such as new
business model etc., which are not considered here.
3.1 The AUTOSAR project objectives and their concretization by

the main requirements
The following shows the main requirements of each project objectives. The main
requirements are described below in chapter 3.2.
3.1.1 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO1 (CONSIDERATION OF

AVAILABILITY AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS)
 Using AUTOSAR system reliability with a probability of failure per system

down time shall be achievable down to 10-8 per hour [Main10].
 AUTOSAR shall provide means to reduce system down-time [Main11].
 AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to support redundancy paths [Main20].
 A SIL-3-Level development must be possible with AUTOSAR [Main30].
 AUTOSAR shall support inter- and intra-ECU communication mechanisms
with high reliability [Main50].
 AUTOSAR shall provide means to clearly check the conformance of an
AUTOSAR-implementation with its AUTOSAR-specification [Main120].
 AUTOSAR shall provide an abstraction of the application software from
hardware [Main130].
 AUTOSAR shall provide an independency of application software from in-
vehicle communication technologies [Main140].
 AUTOSAR should provide an independency of application software from
operating systems [Main141].
 AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms and methods to encapsulate application
software from the infrastructure [Main150].
 AUTOSAR shall provide means to protect SW-components from malicious
SW-components [Main240].
 AUTOSAR should provide means to achieve compositionality [Main250].
 AUTOSAR shall provide diagnostics means during runtime, for production and
service purposes [Main260].
 AUTOSAR shall ensure the verification of all products developed within
AUTOSAR [Main290].
 AUTOSAR shall support work-share in large inter-company development
groups [Main300].
 AUTOSAR shall support hierarchical design methods [Main310].
 Definitions of relations between SW components are exhaustive and formal
[Main320].
 SW components are protected from illegal access [Main330].
 Protection of timing requirements is supported by AUTOSAR [Main340].

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
 AUTOSAR methods shall be FMEA compatible [Main350].
 Management of vehicle diversity is supported by AUTOSAR [Main360].
 Basic requirements to change process in design are predefined and supported
by AUTOSAR [Main380].
3.1.2 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO2 (REDUNDANCY ACTIVATION)
 AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to support redundancy paths [Main20].

 AUTOSAR shall support inter- and intra-ECU-communication mechanisms
with high reliability [Main50].
[Main320].
3.1.3 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO3 (SCALABILITY TO DIFFERENT

VEHICLE AND PLATFORM VARIANTS)
 AUTOSAR shall provide open and standardized SW interfaces for intra- and
inter-ECU communication [Main60].
 AUTOSAR shall provide complete interfaces to application software and basic
software modules [Main70].
 AUTOSAR shall ease the reusability of software and its concepts and
implementations [Main80].
 AUTOSAR shall provide interoperability with legacy software [ [Main190].
 AUTOSAR shall imply only small memory and performance impacts when
used in today’s micro controllers [Main200].
 AUTOSAR shall provide means to integrate AUTOSAR ECU’s in non-
AUTOSAR networks [Main210].
 AUTOSAR shall support networks of networks including sub networks
[Main230].
 AUTOSAR shall provide means to achieve compositionality [Main250].
 Releases of AUTOSAR shall be forward and backward compatible [Main270].
 The AUTOSAR architecture must provide dynamic communication pattern
[Main280].
groups [Main300].
[Main320].
 AUTOSAR method shall provide a predefinition of typical roles in work-share
method [Main370].
 Basic requirements to Change process in design are predefined and
supported by AUTOSAR [Main380].
Remark: Intra-ECU: AUTOSAR and OS-interface; Inter-ECU: CAN, MOST, LIN,

FlexRay.

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.1.4 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO4 (IMPLEMENTATION AND
STANDARDIZATION OF BASIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONS AS AN OEM WIDE STANDARD
CORE SOLUTION)
 All AUTOSAR standard software functions shall be standardized across OEM-

and Supplier [Main100].
 AUTOSAR shall provide a software architecture that is applicable across
different functional domains [Main110].
 AUTOSAR shall support following programming languages: C, C++, Java
[Main220].
groups [Main300].
[Main320].
method [Main370].
Note: This objective is more precisely with the formulation “… system functions as an
OEM and Supplier wide Standard …”.
3.1.5 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO5 (TRANSFERABILITY OF

FUNCTIONS THROUGHOUT THE NETWORK)
 AUTOSAR shall provide open and standardized software interfaces for inter-
and intra-ECU communication [Main60].
 Tool-chains, which are developed or adapted to AUTOSAR, must be
compatible with the AUTOSAR methodology [Main90].
hardware [Main130].

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
 AUTOSAR shall support networks of networks including sub networks
[Main230].
[Main280].
groups [Main300].
[Main320].
method [Main370].
3.1.6 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO6 (INTEGRATION OF FUNCTIONAL

MODULES FROM MULTIPLE SUPPLIERS)
 AUTOSAR shall provide open and standardized software interfaces for intra-
ECU- and inter-ECU communication [Main60].
 Tool-chains, which are developed or adapted to AUTOSAR, must be
hardware [Main130].
 AUTOSAR shall consider protection/unlock mechanisms for software through
appropriate services in the infrastructure [Main180].
 AUTOSAR shall provide means to protect SW-Components from malicious
SW-components [Main240].
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
[Main280].
groups [Main300].
[Main320].
method [Main370].
3.1.7 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO7 (MAINTAINABILITY THROUGHOUT

THE WHOLE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE)

 Tool-chains, which are developed for or adapted to AUTOSAR, must be
compatible with the AUTOSAR methdology [Main90].
hardware [Main130].
 AUTOSAR shall provide a functional interface view of the entire system
[Main160].
 AUTOSAR shall provide means to integrate AUTOSAR ECU’s in non-
AUTOSAR networks [Main210].
 AUTOSAR shall support following programming languages: C, C++, Java
[Main220].
[Main280].
groups [Main300].
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
method [Main370].
3.1.8 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO8 (INCREASED USE OF

COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF HARDWARE (COTS))
ECU and inter-ECU communication [Main60].
 Tool-chains, which are developed for or adapted to AUTOSAR, must be
hardware [Main130].
used in today’s small micro controllers [Main200].
groups [Main300].
method [Main370].
Remark:
The listed requirements fulfill also the increase of commercial off the shelf software.
Especially the bullet encapsulation is essential for commercial off the shelf software
(COTS-SW).
3.1.9 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO9 (Software updates and

upgrades over vehicle lifetime)
ECU and inter-ECU communication [Main60].
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
hardware [Main130].
 AUTOSAR shall provide secure access to ECU [Main170].
[Main280].
groups [Main300].
method [Main370].
In 3.3 a table is shown, which gives the links from the objectives to the Main
Requirements.
3.2 Refinement of the Main Requirements

In the following the Main Requirements are refined.
Note:
1. The Importance Level have following meanings:

High: Required,
Medium: Recommended,
Low: Optional.
2. The use cases in the requirements are given as examples.
3.2.1 [Main10] Using AUTOSAR a system reliability shall be achievable with a

failure rate down to 10-8 per hour
Initiator: PL Team
Date: Nov. 19th, 2003
Short Description: Using AUTOSAR a system reliability shall be achievable with a failure

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
rate down to 10-8 per hour.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: Reliability and availability are defined in [Glossary].
The value of the failure rate  =10-8 per hour is related to safety
objectives.
AUTOSAR shall provide the means to achieve this target failure rate
applying the best current practice.
Rationale: High reliable systems are necessary in order to run safety-relevant
applications.
Use Case: Steering angle sensor signal has to have a high reliability for the use in
the electronic stability program or in active steering. Erroneous signals
must be detected that those systems can fall back into a degraded, safe
mode.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
Supporting Material:  AUTOSAR PO1 (3.1.1)
3.2.2 [Main11] AUTOSAR shall provide means to reduce system down-time
Initiator: BMW/PSA
Date: Feb. 7th, 2005
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide means to reduce system down-time.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: Reducing the system down-time increases the availability of a vehicle
(see [IEEEElecEng]). Thus, AUTOSAR shall provide to enhance
availability during operation or by reducing repair-time to achieve this
purpose. Possible examples are:
 self-reset,
 memory protection,
 HW and SW watchdog management,
 state management on ECU and system architecture level,
 error management,
 self-diagnostics,
 fast diagnostics in field service based on standardized
communications protocols.
Rationale: Availability of the functionality of a vehicle is highly customer-relevant.
Use Case: Reduction of repair-time of a vehicle in field-service.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.3 [Main20] AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to support redundancy

paths
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to support redundancy paths.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: AUTOSAR shall provide following mechanisms to support redundancy
paths:

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
 redundant data handling in SW and/or HW,
 agreement,
 voting,
 activation of redundant units.
Redundancy is a solution to achieve reliable, available and safe systems.
Rationale: Establishing redundancy paths can enhance reliability, availability, and
safety at the same time.
Note:
Redundancy is related to HW, SW, time and value and enables to detect
and overcome faults of SW and HW according to the fault hypothesis.
Use Case: Steering Angle: steering angle-value-signal comes from two independent
sensors. The handling of the steering angle signal implies agreement of
data.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
 AUTOSAR PO2 (3.1.2)
3.2.4 [Main30] A SIL-3-Level compatible development process must be

possible with AUTOSAR
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: A development process comparable to IEC 61508 SIL 3 process shall be
possible with AUTOSAR.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: AUTOSAR has to deal with E/E-functionalities and their development up
to a level of SIL 3 (see [IEC61508-4]). Minimal requirement is that
AUTOSAR shall not prevent a SIL 3 development. AUTOSAR should
ease a SIL 3 development.
AUTOSAR must be compatible with concepts, mechanisms, tools, and
processes to handle safety-related systems like IEC61508 (see
[IEC61508-4], [IEC61508-7]).
Rationale: Currently SIL-3-Systems begin to penetrate in vehicle architecture.
Caveat:
AUTOSAR does not help from itself to master hazards caused outside
AUTOSAR. AUTOSAR delivers no support for control hazards coming
from outside. E.g. functionality with very poor quality cannot expect help
from AUTOSAR to significantly improve its quality if it is integrated into
the open environment and architecture.
In the best case, AUTOSAR can encapsulate this functionality that other
functionalities are not (heavily) affected or damaged.
Use Case: Active Front Steering is a SIL-3-functionality.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.5 [Main50] AUTOSAR shall support inter- and intra-ECU-communication

mechanisms with high reliability
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall support inter- and intra-ECU-communication

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
mechanisms with high reliability.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: To achieve high reliability in communication AUTOSAR shall support
concepts to handle erroneous communication channels (e.g. repeat
messages or redundant communication paths, see [Main20]) and
communication mechanisms like alive-counter, CRC and so on.
Note:
HW development is not in the focus of AUTOSAR. To ensure [Main50]
high quality of HW is a necessary precondition.
Rationale: Reliable communication is a key-factor for safe operation of E/E-systems.
Use Case: FlexRay continuation of communication despite erroneous
communication channel by switching to a redundant channel.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: Hardware is not in the scope of AUTOSAR. AUTOSAR by itself cannot
provide high availability, this must be implemented in the concepts of the
functional SW.
3.2.6 [Main60] AUTOSAR shall provide open and standardized software

interfaces for intra-ECU and inter-ECU communication
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide open and standardized software interfaces for
intra-ECU and inter-ECU communication.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: The following interfaces shall be standardized:
 align the SW architecture to ISO/OSI layered model,
 from SW components to AUTOSAR Runtime Environment,
 from AUTOSAR RTE to different SW layers below the AUTOSAR
RTE.
"Open" means here: The specification of a component is open if
(1) its interface specification is fully defined and available to the public,
and
(2) this specification is maintained by a group consensus process.
Rationale: Using a standardized Software architecture with standardized APIs (see
[Glossary]) between the layers supports abstraction of SW components
from the hardware. This abstraction leads to an easy integration of
different functional modules and the possibility of relocatability of these
modules.
Furthermore, it is intended to shift parts of AUTOSAR in the future to ISO
or other standardization bodies. Any misalignment would make this shift
futile.
Use Case: Application SW is developed independently from the underlying
infrastructure.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.7 [Main70] AUTOSAR shall provide complete interfaces to application
software and basic software modules
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide complete interfaces to application software and
basic software modules.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: Due to compatibility and extensibility reasons the interfaces of the
software module have to be complete.
Complete means that all elements of the interface shall be defined during
design time.
But this doesn’t mean that e.g. all ports must have access to internal
(software) functionalities. A remaining number of ports can only be
declared (for example as proxies) in this way that extensions to the
functionality are easily achieved – without redefinition of the interface.
Otherwise this leads regularly to compatibility problems.
In some senses the situation can be compared with an ECU-connector
where only 8 pins of a 20-pin connector are assigned with electrical
wires. The remaining 12 pins are free for further extensions.
Rationale: Controlling compatibility of interfaces during extension of functionality of
SW.
Use Case: Compatibility handling of all SW-components.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.8 [Main80] AUTOSAR shall ease the reusability of software and its
concepts and implementations
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall ease the reusability of software and its concepts and
implementations.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: AUTOSAR shall provide a meta-model of elements to be used for SW
description.
With using the meta model, a reuse of SW components provided as
description, simulation model, source code and in a second step object
code should be eased. Further on SW components below the AUTOSAR
RTE should easily be reusable as well.
AUTOSAR should provide for the car domains a partitioning of the
functionality into reusable SW-components. A tool to check the
compatibility of the SW components shall be provided.
Rationale: SW Reuse is one of the major aims of AUTOSAR. SW what shall be
transferred to another ECU must be reusable. Otherwise integration into
to the new environment is impossible.
Use Case: Momentum control in different ECU.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.9 [Main90] Tool-chains, which are developed for or adapted to AUTOSAR,

must be compatible with the AUTOSAR methodology
Initiator: PL Team
Date: Jan. 24th, 2004
Short Description: Tool-chains, which are developed for or adapted to AUTOSAR, must be
compatible with the AUTOSAR methodology.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: New tools shall be developed to support the AUTOSAR methodology.
Existing tools must be adapted in a way that they are conformant with the
AUTOSAR methodology (input data consumption, and output data
production)
AUTOSAR shall provide standards for data exchange formats covering
information needed during the AUTOSAR generation process.
Those tools are modeling tools, simulation tools, compilers, linkers,
debugging tools, configurators, and generators.
Rationale: It is to be expected that AUTOSAR needs a good tool support in each
activity of the process. Thus, tool-chains must support the AUTOSAR
methodology.
Use Case: Tools must be able to utilize the AUTOSAR input data and produce the
AUTOSAR output data for a specific activity in the process.
Dependencies: [Main370] requires the description of a uniform AUTOSAR methodology
within the AUTOSAR standardization.
Conflicts: --
3.2.10 [Main100] All AUTOSAR standard software functions shall be

standardized across OEM and Supplier
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: All AUTOSAR standard software functions shall be standardized across
OEM and Supplier.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: The Basic Software provides the infrastructural (schematic dependent
and schematic independent) functionalities of an ECU.
It consists of ECU Firmware (see [Glossary]) and Standard Software (see
[Glossary]).
Standard software does not implement functionality, which can be

recognized by the customer.
This kind of services is needed in all ECU. The APIs and the
content/functionality shall be standardized. Common implementations
should be used.

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Rationale: Hence, it makes sense to define, implement, and test the basic software
once but integrating this in many ECU’s of an E/E-architecture.
Achieving this for many OEMs one reaches an OEM-wide standard for
the purpose of interchangeability. The suppliers then have stable
foundation for implementing their application without bothering about
details of the basic software. Standardization leads in general to higher
quality und lower costs (development, marketing, maintenance) of the
regarded elements with defined and well-known properties.
Use Case: Compatibility of the basic SW with defined quality and maintenance is
achieved.
The BMW, DC, VW Standard Core were introduced for the purpose of
company internal standardization.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.11 [Main110] AUTOSAR shall provide a software architecture that is

applicable across different functional domains
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide a software architecture that is applicable across
different functional domains.
Type : New
Importance: Medium
Description: The AUTOSAR software architecture shall be defined as a general
architecture across the functional domains, which can be found in
vehicles.
The functional domains are:
 body/comfort,
 power train,
 chassis,
 safety,
 multimedia/telematics,
 human-machine-interface.
In a first AUTOSAR release the architecture shall be applicable in the
functional domains body/comfort, power train, chassis, and safety.
The architecture may be applicable in the functional domains
multimedia/telematics MM/T and human-machine-interface HMI.
Rationale: A common architecture across the functional domains allows the
relocatability of software components across domains.
It increases the degree of freedom at generating the E/E system.
Use Case: Apply the software architecture at least to one ECU at each functional
domain.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: The integration of all needs, which are required in MM/T and HMI
domain, seems to be not achievable in the 1st phase of AUTOSAR,
because in these domains more powerful OS and multiprocessor ECU’s
are convenient.
In any case, the AUTOSAR architecture shall provide a stable interface to
the domains MM/T and HMI.
Supporting Material: AUTOSAR PO4 (3.1.4)

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.12 [Main120] AUTOSAR shall provide means to clearly check the
conformance of an AUTOSAR-implementation with its AUTOSAR-
specification
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide means to clearly check the conformance of an
AUTOSAR-implementation with its AUTOSAR-specification.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: AUTOSAR shall develop criteria that define AUTOSAR conformance.
Criteria shall be developed for implementations of AUTOSAR basic
software and application SW components.
Difference between both: application software components have only to
be AUTOSAR conformant by its interface definition and description
methodologies; in addition basic software shall be AUTOSAR conformant
by its functional behavior.
AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to ensure that implementations are
AUTOSAR conformant.
Rationale: This requirement is a basic assumption of AUTOSAR: each product that
is called AUTOSAR conformant shall be conformant to the specification
from which is implemented/produced. Thus, there is a strong need for
conformance methods/testing/specification i.e. the conformance ensures
a certain behavior of the regarded elements.
Use Case: Integration of the infrastructure SW into a specific ECU, bring it into the
E/E-architecture without backlashes on the system.
Example from real world:
OSEK (NM, COM, OS) as the kernel of the basic software did compile
conformance specification and test suites.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.13 [Main130] AUTOSAR shall provide an abstraction of the application

software from hardware
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide an abstraction of the application software from
hardware.
Type: Change Main130
Importance: High
Description: The application SW shall be abstracted from the hardware. Thus, the
SW-layers below the applications shall guarantee the abstraction from
the HW.
Rationale: Today’s ECU’s in the automotive domain in general have no abstraction
from the hardware. This leads to at least reengineering of the SW if the
HW is changed (e.g. new microcontroller family). This effort is not longer
acceptable.
Use Case: Relocate SW application from one ECU with hardware A to ECU with
hardware B without changes of the SW application.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.14 [Main140] AUTOSAR shall provide an independency of application

software from in-vehicle communication technologies
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide an independency of application software from in-
vehicle communication technologies.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: AUTOSAR shall support different communication technologies.
Considered communication systems are CAN, MOST, LIN, FlexRay for
the purpose of inter-ECU communication. Others like IEEE1394 (see
[IEEE1394]) or MML can follow later. Communication systems have to be
at least industry standard solutions.
Communication from the in-car network to the outside world is currently
not in the focus of AUTOSAR. With respect to its openness an integration
of e.g. GSM, WLAN, Bluetooth or IrDA is expected to achieve much
easier with AUTOSAR architecture.
Rationale: The relocatability of application SW is one of the most important
objectives of AUTOSAR. For this purpose the application must be
independent from communication technologies and operating systems.
Use Case: Relocation of SW component from ECU A with CAN-Bus to ECU B with
MOST.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.15 [Main141] AUTOSAR should provide an independency of application

software from operating systems
Initiator: PL Team
Date: Sept. 14th, 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR should provide an independency of application software from
operating systems.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: AUTOSAR should support several operating systems.
Operating systems are OSEK, OSEKTime, QNX, VxWorks, Win CE,
Embedded Linux, and uITRON (the list is not exhaustive).
Rationale: The relocatability of application SW is one of the most important
objectives of AUTOSAR. For this purpose the application must be
independent from operating systems.

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Use Case: Relocation of SW component from ECU A with OSEK to ECU B with
QNX.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.16 [Main150] AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms and methods to

encapsulate application software from the infrastructure
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms and methods to encapsulate
application software from the infrastructure.
Type: Change Main150
Importance: High
Description: Encapsulation of the functional software supports the relocatability and
reuse of the functional software. Thus, AUTOSAR has to deal deeply with
mechanisms, methods, tools, and processes to achieve this. In difference
to the requirements [Main140] and [Main141] this requirement [Main150]
gives an requirement how to handle encapsulation of application SW.
Rationale: In addition to the standardized APIs mentioned in other requirements
AUTOSAR shall provide scheduling mechanisms, etc that allow
integration of separate SW components into one ECU.
Use Case: Relocation of yaw rate control from one ECU to another. Current situation
is: more or less each component implements its own one. The
encapsulation of this functionality gives the opportunity to relocate a
valuable solution to another company for integration into its ECU.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.17 [Main160] AUTOSAR shall provide a functional interface view of the

entire system
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide a functional interface view of the entire system.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: A functional decomposition is essential for an appropriate functional
clustering and partitioning in the SW-components. This leads to a logical
architecture of the entire system and the functional interfaces.
Rationale: Appropriate SW/SW-partitioning bases on functional decomposition.
Use Case: SW/SW-partitioning.
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.18 [Main170] AUTOSAR shall provide secure access to ECU
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide secure access to ECU.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: AUTOSAR shall provide secure access to ECU, (e.g. by user
authentication), including standardized up- and download of data and
software. For this mechanisms and methods shall be defined.
Rationale: The update and upgrade feasibility provided by AUTOSAR includes
technical challenges (e.g. standardized up-/download protocol, partly
update of the software) and mechanisms (e.g. how to authorize the user).
Use Case: Download of dedicated SW-components in ECU.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.19 [Main180] AUTOSAR shall provide protection/unlock mechanisms for

software through appropriate services in the infrastructure
Initiator: PL Team
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide protection/unlock mechanisms for software
through appropriate services in the infrastructure.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: Integration of software of different suppliers requires exchange of
software (especially source code) between the different parties involved.
Thus, AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to safe-guard software.
AUTOSAR shall ensure a smooth integration process that at the same
time protects intellectual property of the companies involved.
Rationale: Integration of third party solutions requires dealing with intellectual
property issues.
Use Case: 1) SW sale of split-screen software for navigation.
2) Integration of BSW modules of different suppliers.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.20 [Main190] AUTOSAR shall provide interoperability with legacy software
Initiator: PL Team
Date: Feb 13th, 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide interoperability with legacy software.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: AUTOSAR must not require that all E/E functionality of a car has to be
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
developed with AUTOSAR technology. Integration of legacy software
blocks (ECU abstraction and/or Complex Device Drivers) in an ECU that
is developed according to AUTOSAR shall be supported. For this
purpose, a minimum set of imported interfaces shall be given to ensure
that an OS scheduler does not exist twice.
Note:
It is important to clarify that the interface definitions of the AUTOSAR
architecture are not touched by the integration of legacy software.
Otherwise the interoperability cannot be achieved.
Rationale: A smooth integration of the AUTOSAR process requires that software
from existing cars can be reused.
Use Case: Reuse of existing complex device drivers for a new ECU that is
developed according to AUTOSAR.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: Conflict with [Main100]:
Legacy SW may have other interfaces than the AUTOSAR architecture.
In this case the legacy SW has to be redesigned in accordance to the
rules of AUTOSAR.
3.2.21 [Main200] AUTOSAR shall imply only small memory and performance
impacts when used in today’s micro controllers
Initiator: DC
Date: Mar 18th, 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall imply only small memory and performance impacts
when used in today’s micro controllers.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: AUTOSAR shall support 16 bit controllers/processors and bigger ones.
All Basic Software including Runtime Environment and a small
application should fit into 64KByte of ROM.
Rationale: It can be expected that concerns over a potentially unacceptable
overhead in terms of processing and memory needs implied by
AUTOSAR will occur. The acceptance and utilization of AUTOSAR does
such depend heavily on these resource needs and the possibilities for
optimization.
Use Case: Integration of the AUTOSAR architecture and a single application in an
16-bit microcontroller and with memory amount less than 64KByte ROM.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.22 [Main210] AUTOSAR shall provide means to integrate AUTOSAR ECUs

in non-AUTOSAR networks
Initiator: DC
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide means to integrate AUTOSAR ECUs in non-
AUTOSAR networks.
Type: New
Importance: High

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Description: Integration of AUTOSAR ECU in non-AUTOSAR network shall be
possible and supported during the development process.
Note:
A mix of AUTOSAR ECUs and non-AUTOSAR ECUs may lead to
conflicts in the infrastructure functionalities like network management,
COM or diagnostics.
Rationale: This opens a migration path for the application of AUTOSAR into existing
non-AUTOSAR architectures.
Use Case: Integration of an AUTOSAR-ECU into a non-AUTOSAR network.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: Conflict with [Main100].
Ability to relocate SW-Components might be limited in this use case.
One option is to modify the AUTOSAR-ECU to make it fit into the non-
AUTOSAR network. Modification can mean either leaving out some
modules, or replacing them with OEM-specific modules (i.e. compliant to
the interfaces but with specific behavior).
3.2.23 [Main220] AUTOSAR shall support following programming languages:

C, C++, Java
Initiator: DC
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall support following programming languages: C, C++,
Java.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: In today’s embedded systems only a small range of programming
languages are used: C, C++, and Java. Due to its differences the
methods, mechanisms, processes and tools in AUTOSAR shall take this
into account (independency where possible, some dependencies where
necessary).
To ensure flexibility / extensibility for the future AUTOSAR should support
object-oriented techniques.
Rationale: A useful reduction of programming languages to current programming
languages reduces the impacts on AUTOSAR definitions and
specifications due to logical and/or technical differences of different
programming languages.
Use Case: AUTOSAR implementation in C, C++, or Java.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: Usage of C++ and in particular Java may not be appropriate for some
lower performing and legacy ECU platforms.
3.2.24 [Main230] AUTOSAR shall support networks of networks including sub

networks
Initiator: DC
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall support networks of networks including sub networks.
Type: New
Importance: High

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Description: AUTOSAR shall handle net topologies with multiple networks and
different in-vehicle network technologies. These networks shall be
connected via bridges, repeaters or gateways.
Rationale: See Use Case.
Use Case: Today’s network topologies of E/E-architectures in series production.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.25 [Main240] AUTOSAR shall provide means to protect SW-Components

from malicious SW-components
Initiator: DC
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide means to protect SW-Components from
malicious SW-components.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: A malicious SW component shall not have serious impacts on other SW
components due to single point of failure and/or error propagation.
Rationale: Protection of SW-components is necessary because the integration of
third-party SW is one of the most important use cases of AUTOSAR.
Use Case: Corrupted SW component is integrated into ECU. The ECU remains
stable and the environment of this SW component is not affected due to
intra-ECU and/or inter-ECU communication.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.26 [Main250] AUTOSAR shall provide means to achieve compositionality
Initiator: BMW
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide means to achieve compositionality
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: Compositionality helps to decouple functionalities within the architecture
during designing, testing and integration.
A SW component or system shall meet its timing requirements
independent of the overall load and configuration.
Rationale: The easy integration of new functions without changing the interface
definitions.
Use Case: A new component or subsystem can be added to a system without
changing the behavior of the original components or system.
Dependencies: Compositionality as a whole can only be achieved by using e.g. time
triggered protocols, specific OS services.
Conflicts: Using CAN or MOST compositionality can not (strictly) be achieved
(needs to consider acceptable tolerances in timing aspects).

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.27 [Main260] AUTOSAR shall provide diagnostics means during runtime,

for production and services purposes
Initiator: BMW
Date: May 7th, 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall provide diagnostics means during runtime, for
production and service purposes.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: AUTOSAR shall at least support diagnostics standards like ISO14229 or
OBD. Specifications of error handling must be developed.
Furthermore, AUTOSAR shall reflect the invention of encapsulated SW in
its diagnostics specifications.
Rationale: Standardized diagnostics is necessary for field service and admission.
Use Case: Diagnosis of an encapsulated SW function or a ECU.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.28 [Main270] Releases of AUTOSAR shall be forward and backward

compatible
Initiator: BMW
Date: May 7th, 2004
Short Description: Releases of AUTOSAR shall be forward and backward compatible.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: Migration from AUTOSAR release n to release n+1 shall be supported
well. Forward and backward compatibility for the time after introduction of
the first AUTOSAR release is necessary.
Rationale: Forward and backward compatibility ensures a long time usage of the
AUTOSAR standard.
Use Case: Integration of ECU’s using infrastructure software of the latest AUTOSAR
release in a network built from ECU’s using a former release.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.29 [Main280] The AUTOSAR architecture must provide dynamic

communication pattern
Initiator: BMW

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Date: May 17th, 2004
Short Description: The AUTOSAR architecture must provide dynamic communication
pattern.
Type: New
Importance: Low
Description: Communication mechanisms must support a certain amount of dynamic
behavior. This means that during design time all potential communication
partners have to be specified and declared.
Note:
In the first release for the purpose of commercial exploitation Dynamical
reconfiguration of the architecture and/or dynamical relocation of software
during runtime shall not be part of the AUTOSAR architecture.
Rationale: Dynamic communication patterns are well known in the MOST
technology.
Use Case: A SW component can establish communication connections to another
SW component during run-time as long this was already defined in the
design process.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: Dynamical reconfiguration/relocation is an important issue for the
multimedia/telematics and man-machine-interface domain. Thus,
[Main280] is in conflict with requirement [Main110].
On the other hand dynamical reconfiguration/relocation is not allowed
within a SIL-Level3 System. In further releases of AUTOSAR careful
observation of [Main280] and [Main30] must take into account.
3.2.30 [Main290] AUTOSAR shall ensure the verification of all products

developed within AUTOSAR
Initiator: BMW
Date: May 20th, 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall ensure the verification of all methods and products
developed within AUTOSAR.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: To enable a SIL3 development all processes and products, which are
developed within the partnership must be at least verifiable.
Verification is here defined by: The act of reviewing, inspecting, testing,
checking, auditing, or otherwise establishing and documenting whether
items, processes, services, or documents conform to specified
requirements (see [IEEEElecEng]).
AUTOSAR shall support a certification of all processes and products
following accepted standards (e.g. IEC61508).
Rationale: Verification of all processes and products is a must of SIL3 development.
Use Case: Verification of Active Front Steering (SIL3 development).
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.31 [Main300] AUTOSAR shall support work-share in large inter-company
development groups
Initiator: SiemensVDO
Date: May 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall support work-share in large inter- company development
groups.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: Requirement comprises sub-requirements: hierarchical design methods
supported, interface definitions supported, encapsulation of variables
supported, protected scheduling definitions supported, FMEA compatible
design methods supported, support of car diversity, definition of roles in
work share, change process in design, protection of intellectual property.
Rationale: The AUTOSAR virtual functional bus VFB is expected to carry 10 000 to
30 000 signals per vehicle.
To develop vehicle descriptions in this size a good organization of work-
share is needed.
AUTOSAR tools support this work-sharing process.
Use Case: Data sharing between OEM and 1st Tier supplier.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.32 [Main310] AUTOSAR shall support hierarchical design methods
Date: May 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR shall support hierarchical design methods.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: It must be possible to structure SW components in a hierarchical way, so
that only links to outside SW components need to be treated / adapted /
changed in the next hierarchical level.
Rationale: Objective is to allow each actor in the development chain to focus on the
required level and tasks.
Use Case: SW development of an engine management system can only be
achieved by using hierarchical strategies.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.33 [Main320] Definitions of relations between SW components are
exhaustive and formal
Date: May 2004
Short Description: Definitions of relations between SW components are exhaustive and
formal.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: In AUTOSAR it is possible to describe all requirements of SW
components / SW- compositions to their outside links, such that
subsequent engineering can check their work result against these
requirements.
Rationale: It has to be defined, which requirements need to be described and where
these requirements need to be described. Potential requirements are
timing requirements, max delay requirements, requirement of availability
of specific other SW components in specific release states etc. Potential
solutions for the requirements locations are the attributes of the
connectors, as well in the class, group or instance requirements.
Use Case: SW component is designed by OEM and a 1st Tier Supplier shall
integrate this SW component into an ECU. In this case exhaustive and
formal description of the API is necessary
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.34 [Main330] SW components are protected from illegal access
Date: May 2004
Short Description: SW components are protected from illegal access.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: AUTOSAR method supports SW component protection in the way that
write-access to inner variables of a SW component is impossible.
Write access to exported variables (e.g. provide ports) is possible only
from the variable owning component. One potential solution is
encapsulation.
Here only the way how to deal with variables within a SW component
shall be protected.
Rationale: Need to ensure responsibility for the SW component by component
author.
Use Case: Changes of inner variables of a SW component can only by performed by
the component author.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.35 [Main340] Protection of timing requirements is supported by AUTOSAR
Date: May 2004
Short Description: Protection of timing requirements is supported by AUTOSAR.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: AUTOSAR method and mechanisms allow describing exhaustively and
protect timing requirements of SW components / compositions and
complex device drivers. This includes dataflow and control flow related
requirements.
Rationale: E.g. complex device drivers have specific timing requirements, which are
not to be overwritten by higher level changes.
Use Case: Real time control of today’s gasoline injection systems.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.36 [Main350] AUTOSAR methods shall be FMEA compatible
Date: May 2004
Short Description: AUTOSAR methods shall be FMEA compatible.
Type: New
Importance: High
Description: Boundary conditions to FMEA or fault tree analysis per function, atomic
SW component and composition is documented with the related class,
group and instance such that the non-fulfillment of these conditions is
likely to be recognized and submitted to the related change process.
Rationale: Shifting a SW component from one ECU to another is typically changing
the FMEA related assumptions. Same holds true related to changes in
signal timing etc.
These changes might be necessary to achieve efficient implementations.
It is however by no means acceptable that these changes happen
accidentally and unmanaged.
Use Case: FMEA is very common in the automotive industry.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
3.2.37 [Main360] Management of vehicle diversity is supported by AUTOSAR
Date: May 2004
Short Description: Management of vehicle diversity is supported by AUTOSAR.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: Diversity management is introduced on vehicle level. This enables formal
check of compatibility of SW components, management of availability of
partner SW components in vehicle versions their release state etc. Also
the number of required SW versions per ECU integration can be
evaluated and tracked with reasonable effort.
Rationale: Diversity of e.g. a wiring harness is reaching the amount of 10 000 to
1.000.000 different versions for the same vehicle platform.
Same diversity requirements multiplied with the version management per
SW component applies for the entity of the SW on the vehicle level.
Unmanaged this effect can lead to deadlock situations in the logistic of
vehicle SW.
Potential implementations are e.g. "existence" property matrix per class,
group and instance of SW components and connections.
Use Case: Integration of SW components in different ECUs and/or E/E-
architectures.
Dependencies: --
Conflicts: --
3.2.39 [Main380] Basic requirements to change process in design are

predefined and supported by AUTOSAR
Date: May 2004
Short Description: Basic requirements to change process in design are predefined and
supported by AUTOSAR.
Type: New
Importance: Medium
Description: Change process in its basic requirements is defined such that SW
component providers can take warrant for their deliverables.
Rationale: Changes in each hierarchical level on the VFB can influence timing,
FMEA assumptions, FMEA related requirements of the under laying SW
components as well as of those SW components which communicate
directly or indirectly with the directly affected SW component. A change
process has to be defined such that designers of SW components are
responsible to release these changes.
This process might need some formal support by the AUTOSAR tools.
Use Case: Change of SW component designed by OEM and its integration in 1st Tier
Supplier ECU.
Dependencies: --
Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Conflicts: --
3.3 Mapping of the Project Objectives and the Main Requirements

The following table shows the relationship of the project objectives with the main
requirements. The symbol "+" is used for compliant requirements. The symbol "-"
indicates contradictory requirements.
Project Objectives
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9
Main
Requirements
Main10 +
Main11 +
Main20 + +
Main30 +
Main50 +
Main60 + + + +
Main70 +
Main80 + + + +
Main90 + + +
Main100 +
Main110 +
Main120 + + +
Main130 + + + + + +
Main140 + + + + + +
Main141 + + + + + +
Main150 + + + + + +
Main160 +
Main170 +
Main180 +
[Main190 +
Main200 + + +
Main210 + +
Main220 + +
Main230 + +
Main240 + +
Main250 + + +
Main260 + + +
Main270 + + + + + + +
Main280 + + + + +
Main290 +
Main300 + + + + + + + +
Main310 + + + + + + +
Main320 + + + + + +
Main330 + + + +
Main340 + + + + + + +

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
Main350 + + + + + + + +
Main360 + + + + + + + +
Main370 + + + + + + + +
Main380 + + + + + + + +

Main Requirements
V2.1.0
R4.0 Rev 1
4 References
[Glossary] Glossary,
AUTOSAR_TR_Glossary.pdf
[IEC61508-4] Functional safety of electrical/electronical/programmable electronic

safety-related systems – Part 4: Definitions and abbreviations,
International Electrotechnical Commission
[IEC61508-7] Functional safety of electrical/electronical/programmable electronic

safety-related systems – Part 7: Overview of techniques and measures,
International Electrotechnical Commission
[IEEE1394] FireWire Bus,

standardized by IEEE
[IEEEElecEng] The Electrical Engineering Handbook,

Editor R. C. Dorf, CRC Press


Autosar Rs Main

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Autosar Rs Main

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Autosar Rs Main

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Main Requirements

Document Title Main Requirements

Document Version 2.1.0

Document Change History

1 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

Advice for users

AUTOSAR Specification Documents may contain exemplary items (exemplary

2 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

1 Scope of the document.......................................................................... 6

2 How to read this document.................................................................... 7

3 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

5 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

1 Scope of the document

Besides the technical requirements also non-technical requirements (i.e. business

The project objectives are listed as follows:

No. Project objectives Abbreviation Priority

For this document the project objectives are given.

6 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

2 How to read this document

2.1 Conventions used

7 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3 The AUTOSAR main requirements

3.1 The AUTOSAR project objectives and their concretization by

3.1.1 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO1 (CONSIDERATION OF

 Using AUTOSAR system reliability with a probability of failure per system

8 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.1.2 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO2 (REDUNDANCY ACTIVATION)

 AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to support redundancy paths [Main20].

3.1.3 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO3 (SCALABILITY TO DIFFERENT

Remark: Intra-ECU: AUTOSAR and OS-interface; Inter-ECU: CAN, MOST, LIN,

9 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

 All AUTOSAR standard software functions shall be standardized across OEM-

3.1.5 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO5 (TRANSFERABILITY OF

10 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.1.6 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO6 (INTEGRATION OF FUNCTIONAL

3.1.7 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO7 (MAINTAINABILITY THROUGHOUT

 AUTOSAR shall provide complete interfaces to application software and basic

3.1.8 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO8 (INCREASED USE OF

3.1.9 Requirements to achieve the AUTOSAR PO9 (Software updates and

3.2 Refinement of the Main Requirements

1. The Importance Level have following meanings:

2. The use cases in the requirements are given as examples.

3.2.1 [Main10] Using AUTOSAR a system reliability shall be achievable with a

14 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.2.2 [Main11] AUTOSAR shall provide means to reduce system down-time

3.2.3 [Main20] AUTOSAR shall provide mechanisms to support redundancy

15 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.2.4 [Main30] A SIL-3-Level compatible development process must be

3.2.5 [Main50] AUTOSAR shall support inter- and intra-ECU-communication

16 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.2.6 [Main60] AUTOSAR shall provide open and standardized software

17 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

18 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.2.9 [Main90] Tool-chains, which are developed for or adapted to AUTOSAR,

3.2.10 [Main100] All AUTOSAR standard software functions shall be

Standard software does not implement functionality, which can be

19 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.2.11 [Main110] AUTOSAR shall provide a software architecture that is

20 of 36 Document ID 054: AUTOSAR_RS_Main

3.2.13 [Main130] AUTOSAR shall provide an abstraction of the application