PMS 1,2
PMS 1,2
AND SIMULATION
UNIT -I
INTRODUCTION AND FUNDAMENTALS
By
Mr. Koteswara Rao Maradana
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
ANIS
Uses of Mathematical Models: Without doubt, the most important
result of developing a mathematical model of a chemical
engineering system is the understanding that is gained of what
really makes the process.
Thisinsight enables you to strip away from the problem the many
extraneous “confusion factors” and to get to the core of the
system. You can see more clearly the cause-and-effect relationships
between the variables.
Mathematical models can be useful in all phases of chemical
engineering, from research and development to plant operations,
and even in business and economic studies.
Research and development:
Determining chemical kinetic mechanisms and parameters from
laboratory or pilot-plant reaction data.
Exploring the effects of different operating conditions for
optimization and control studies; aiding in scale-up calculations.
Design:
Exploring the sizing and arrangement of processing equipment
for dynamic performance;
Studying the interactions of various parts of the process,
particularly when material recycle or heat integration is used;
Evaluating alternative process and control structures and
strategies; simulating start-up, shutdown, and emergency
situations and procedures.
Plant operation:
Troubleshooting control and processing problems.
Aiding in start-up and operator training.
Studying the effects of and the requirements for expansion
(bottleneck-removal) projects, Optimizing plant operation.
It is usually much cheaper, safer, and faster to conduct the kinds of
studies listed above on a mathematical model than experimentally
on an operating unit.
This is not to say that plant tests are not needed. They are a vital
part of confirming the validity of the model and of verifying
important ideas and recommendations that evolve from the
model studies.
Principles of Formulation:
➢ Basis
➢ Assumptions
➢ Mathematical consistency of model
➢ Solution of the model equations
➢ Verification
A. BASIS.
The basis for mathematical models are the fundamental physical
and chemical laws, such as the laws of conservation of mass,
energy, and momentum.
To study dynamics we will use them in their general form with
time derivatives included.
B.
ASSUMPTIONS.
Probably the most vital role that the engineer plays in modelling
is in exercising his engineering judgment as to what assumptions
can be validly made.
Obviously an extremely rigorous model that includes every
phenomenon down to microscopic detail would be so complex
that it would take a long time to develop and might be
impractical to solve, even on the latest supercomputers.
An engineering compromise between a rigorous description
and getting an answer that is good enough is always required.
This has been called “optimum sloppiness.” It involves
making as many simplifying assumptions as are reasonable
without “throwing out the baby with the bath water.”
In practice, this optimum usually corresponds to a model which is
as complex as the available computing facilities will permit. More
and more this is a personal computer.
The development of a model that incorporates the basic
phenomena occurring in the process requires a lot of skill,
ingenuity, and practice.
Itis an area where the creativity and innovativeness of the
engineer is a key element in the success of the process.
The assumptions that are made should be carefully considered
and listed. They impose limitations on the model that should
always be kept in mind when evaluating its predicted results.
C. MATHEMATICAL CONSISTENCY OF MODEL.
Once all the equations of the mathematical model have been
written, it is usually a good idea, particularly with big, complex
systems of equations, to make sure that the number of variables
equals the number of equations.
The so-called “degrees of freedom” of the system must be zero in
order to obtain a solution. If this is not true, the system is
underspecified or over specified and something is wrong with the
formulation of the problem.
This kind of consistency check may seem trivial, but I can testify
from sad experience that it can save many hours of frustration,
confusion, and wasted computer time.
Checking to see that the units of all terms in all equations are
consistent is perhaps another trivial and obvious step, but one that is
often forgotten.
Itis essential to be particularly careful of the time units of parameters
in dynamic models.
Any units can be used (seconds, minutes, hours, etc.), but they
cannot be mixed. We will use “minutes” in most of our examples,
but it should be remembered that many parameters are commonly
on other time bases and need to be converted appropriately, e.g.,
overall heat transfer coefficients in Btu/h °F ft2 or velocity in m/s.
Dynamic simulation results are frequently in error because the
engineer has forgotten a factor of “60” somewhere in the equations.
D. SOLUTION OF THE MODEL EQUATIONS.
However, the available solution techniques and tools must be kept
in mind as a mathematical model is developed.
An equation without any way to solve it is not worth much.
E. VERIFICATION.
An important but often neglected part of developing a
mathematical model is proving that the model describes the real-
world situation.
At the design stage this sometimes cannot be done because the
plant has not yet been built.
However, even in this situation there are usually either similar
existing plants or a pilot plant from which some experimental
dynamic data can be obtained.
➢ FUNDAMENTAL LAWS
❖A. TOTAL CONTINUITY EQUATION (MASS BALANCE)
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒
− =
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
✓ The units of this equation are mass per time.
✓ Only one total continuity equation can be written for one
system.
✓ The normal steady state design equation that we are accustomed
to using says that “what goes in, comes out.”
✓ The right-hand side of Eq. will be either a partial derivative 𝜕/𝜕𝑡
or an ordinary derivative d/dt of the mass inside the system with
respect to the independent variable t.
Problem 1: Consider the tank of perfectly mixed
𝐹0 (𝑡)
liquid as shown in Fig. Into which flows a liquid
𝜌0 (𝑡)
stream at a volumetric rate of F0 (ft3/min or
m3/min) and with a density of 𝜌0 (lbm/ ft3 or kg/
𝐹(𝑡)
m3). The volumetric holdup of liquid in the tank is
V (ft3 or m3), and its density is 𝜌. The volumetric 𝑉 𝑡 𝜌(𝑡)
flow rate from the tank is F, and the density of the 𝜌(𝑡)
outflowing stream is the same as that of the tank’s
✓ Since the liquid is perfectly
contents. mixed, the density is the
Solution: The mass balance is around the whole same everywhere in the
tank; it does not vary with
tank radial or axial position; i.e.,
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 there are no spatial gradients
− in density in the tank.
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 ✓ This is why we can use a
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 macroscopic system. It also
= means that there is only one
𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 independent variable, t.
𝐹0 𝜌0 − 𝐹𝜌 = 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝜌𝑉
𝐹0 (𝑡)
The units of this equation are lbm/min or 𝜌0 (𝑡)
kg/min.
3 𝑙𝑏𝑚
3
𝑓𝑡 𝑙𝑏𝑚 3
𝑓𝑡 𝑙𝑏𝑚 𝑓𝑡 𝐹(𝑡)
𝑓𝑡 3
. 3 − . 3 = 𝑉 𝑡 𝜌(𝑡)
𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝜌(𝑡)
Since ρ and V are functions only of t, an
ordinary derivative is used
𝑑 𝜌𝑉
𝐹0 𝜌 − 𝐹𝜌 =
𝑑𝑡
Problem 2: Fluid is flowing through a constant-diameter cylindrical
pipe sketched in Fig. The flow is turbulent and therefore we can
assume plug-flow conditions, i.e., each “slice” of liquid flows down
the pipe as a unit. There are no radial gradients in velocity or any
other properties. However, axial gradients can exist.
dZ
𝒱(𝑡,𝑧)
𝜌(𝑡,𝑧)
𝜕𝑓 𝜕2 𝑓 𝑑𝑧 2 ʋ(𝑡,𝑧) 𝜌(𝑡,𝑧)
𝑓 𝑧+𝑑𝑧 = 𝑓𝑧 + 𝑑𝑧 + +⋯ Z=0 Z Z+dZ Z=L
𝜕𝑧 𝑧 𝜕𝑧 2 𝑧 2!
If the dz is small, the series can be truncated after the first derivative term.
Letting 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑣𝐴𝜌
𝜕 𝜌𝒱𝐴 𝜕 𝐴𝜌𝑑𝑧
𝜌𝒱𝐴 − 𝜌𝒱𝐴 + 𝑑𝑧 =
𝜕𝑍 𝜕𝑡
Cancelling out the dz terms and assuming A is constant yield
𝜕𝜌 𝜕 𝜌𝒱
+ =0
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑍
B. COMPONENT CONTINUITY EQUATIONS
(COMPONENT BALANCES).
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
−
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
+
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
=
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
✓ The units of this equation are moles of component j per unit time.
✓ The flows in and out can be both convective (due to bulk flow) and
molecular (due to diffusion).
✓ We can write one component continuity equation for each
component in the system.
✓ If there are NC components, there are NC component continuity
equations for any one system.
✓ However, the one total mass balance and these NC component
balances are not all independent, since the sum of all the moles
times their respective molecular weights equals the total mass.
✓ Therefore a given system has only NC independent continuity
equations.
✓ We usually use the total mass balance and NC - 1 component
balances.
✓ For example, in a binary (two-component) system, there would be
one total mass balance and one component balance.
Problem 3. Consider the perfectly mixed tank, a 𝐹0
chemical reaction takes place in the liquid in the 𝜌0
tank. The system is now a CSTR (continuous stirred- 𝐶𝐴0
tank reactor) as shown in Fig. Component A reacts 𝐶𝐵0
irreversibly and at a specific reaction rate k to form
product, component B.
𝑘 𝑉 𝑡 𝐹
𝐴՜𝐵 𝜌 𝑡 𝜌
𝐶𝐴 𝐶𝐴
Let the concentration of component A in the 𝐶𝐵 𝐶𝐵
inflowing feed stream be CA0 (moles of A per unit
volume) and in the reactor CA. Assuming a simple
first-order reaction, the rate of consumption of
reactant A per unit volume will be directly
proportional to the instantaneous concentration of
A in the tank.
❖ Component ‘A’ balance 𝐹0
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝜌0
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝐶𝐴0
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝐵0
−
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓
+ 𝑉 𝑡
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝐹
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝜌 𝑡 𝜌
= 𝐶𝐴 𝐶𝐴
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝐶𝐵 𝐶𝐵
✓ 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = 𝐹0 𝐶𝐴0
✓ 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = 𝐹𝐶𝐴
✓ 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = − 𝑉𝑘𝐶𝐴
✓ The minus sign comes from the fact that A is being consumed.
𝑑 𝑉𝐶𝐴
✓ 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑘 =
𝑑𝑡
𝑑 𝑉𝐶𝐴
✓ 𝐹0 𝐶𝐴0 − 𝐹𝐶𝐴 − 𝑉𝑘𝐶𝐴 =
𝑑𝑡
❖ Component ‘B’ balance
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓
−
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐵 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐵 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐹0
+
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐵 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝜌0
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝐴0
= 𝐶𝐵0
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐵 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑑 𝑉𝐶𝐵
✓ 𝐹0 𝐶𝐵0 − 𝐹𝐶𝐵 + 𝑉𝑘𝐶𝐴 = 𝑉 𝑡 𝐹
𝑑𝑡
❖ Total continuity equation: 𝑀𝐴 𝐶𝐴 + 𝑀𝐵 𝐶𝐵 = 𝜌 𝜌 𝑡 𝜌
𝐶𝐴
where MA and MB, are the molecular weights of 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝐴
components A and B, respectively. 𝐶𝐵
Problem 4: Suppose we have the same macroscopic system as above
except that now consecutive reactions occur. Reactant A goes to B at a
specific reaction rate k1 but B can react at a specific reaction rate k2, to
form a third component C. write the component balance equation for
each component and total continuity equation.
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐴՜ 𝐵՜ 𝐶
❖ Continuity equations for Component ‘A, B and C’ are:
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
❖ − +
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
=
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
Component ‘A’ balance
𝑑 𝑉𝐶𝐴
✓ 𝐹0 𝐶𝐴0 − 𝐹𝐶𝐴 − 𝑉𝑘1 𝐶𝐴 =
𝑑𝑡
Component ‘B’ balance
𝑑 𝑉𝐶𝐵
✓ 𝐹0 𝐶𝐵0 − 𝐹𝐶𝐵 + 𝑉𝑘1 𝐶𝐴 − 𝑉𝑘2 𝐶𝐵 =
𝑑𝑡
Component ‘C’ balance
𝑑 𝑉𝐶𝐶
✓ 𝐹0 𝐶𝐶0 − 𝐹𝐶𝐶 + 𝑉𝑘2 𝐶𝐵 =
𝑑𝑡
Total continuity equation:
❖ 𝑀𝐴 𝐶𝐴 + 𝑀𝐵 𝐶𝐵 + 𝑀𝐶 𝐶𝐶 = 𝜌 = σ𝐶𝑗=𝐴 𝑀𝑗 𝐶𝑗
Problem 5. Fluid flowing down a tubular reactor in which the reaction
𝑘
𝐴 ՜ 𝐵 takes place. As a slice of material moves down the length of the
reactor the concentration of reactant CA decreases as A is consumed.
Density ρ, velocity 𝜐, and concentration CA can all vary with time and
axial position z. We still assume plug-flow conditions so that there are
no radial gradients in velocity, density, or concentration.
dZ
𝐶𝐴0 (𝑡) ʋ(𝑡,𝑧) 𝐶𝐴𝐿 (𝑡)
𝜌 𝑡,𝑧
𝐶𝐴(𝑡,𝑧)
Z=0 Z Z+dZ Z=L
𝜕 𝑣𝐴𝐶𝐴 + 𝐴𝑁𝐴
= 𝑣𝐴𝐶𝐴 + 𝐴𝑁𝐴 − 𝑣𝐴𝐶𝐴 + 𝐴𝑁𝐴 + 𝑑𝑧
𝜕𝑧
− 𝑘𝐶𝐴 𝐴𝑑𝑧
Divide both sides with 𝐴𝑑𝑧
𝜕 𝐶𝐴 𝜕 𝑣𝐶𝐴 + 𝑁𝐴
+ + 𝑘𝐶𝐴 = 0
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑧
𝜕 𝐶𝐴 𝜕 𝑣𝐶𝐴 𝜕 𝑁𝐴
+ + + 𝑘𝐶𝐴 = 0
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑡
𝜕𝐶𝐴
Substitute 𝑁𝐴 = −𝒟𝐴
𝜕𝑧
𝜕𝐶𝐴
𝜕 𝐶𝐴 𝜕 𝑣𝐶𝐴 𝜕 𝒟𝐴
𝜕𝑧
+ + 𝑘𝐶𝐴 =
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧
The units of the equation are moles A per volume per time.
Similarly
Component ‘B’ balance
𝜕𝐶𝐵
𝜕 𝐶𝐵 𝜕 𝑣𝐶𝐵 𝜕 𝒟𝐵
𝜕𝑧
+ − 𝑘𝐶𝐴 =
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧
2. Energy Balance Equation
The first law of thermodynamics puts forward the principle of
conservation of energy. Written for a general “open” system (where
flow of material in and out of the system can occur) it is
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 − 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑦
+
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑏𝑦 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
−
𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑃𝑉 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙,
=
𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
Problem 6. Consider the perfectly mixed tank, a chemical reaction takes
𝑘
place in the liquid in the tank 𝐴՜𝐵 . The CSTR system with a cooling
coil inside the tank that can remove the exothermic heat of reaction 𝜆
(Btu/lb . mol of A reacted or Cal/g. mol of A reacted). We use the
normal convention that λ is negative for an exothermic reaction and
positive for an endothermic reaction. The rate of heat generation
(energy per time) due to reaction is the rate of consumption of A times
𝜆.
𝑄𝐺 = −𝜆𝑉𝐶𝐴 𝑘
The rate of heat removal from the reaction mass to the cooling coil is -
Q (energy per time). The temperature of the feed stream is To and the
temperature in the reactor is T (°R or K).
Solution: Energy Balance Equation: 𝐹0
𝜌0
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐶𝐴0
𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 − 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑇0
𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑦 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑏𝑦 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
+ − 𝐹
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑃𝑉 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝜌
= 𝑉 𝐶𝐴
𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝜌 𝑇
-Q
𝐶𝐴
𝑇
𝑑 𝜌𝜈 𝑉𝜈 𝐶𝑃 𝑇 + 𝜆𝜈 + 𝜌𝑉𝐿 𝐶𝑃 𝑇
=
𝑑𝑡
Problem 8. To illustrate the application of the energy equation to a
microscopic system, let us return to the plug-flow tubular reactor and now
keep track of temperature changes as the fluid flows down the pipe. Assume
no radial gradients in velocity, concentration, or temperature (a very poor
assumption in some strongly exothermic systems if the pipe diameter is not
kept small). Suppose that the reactor has a cooling jacket around it as shown
in Fig.. Heat can be transferred from the process fluid reactants and products
at temperature T to the metal wall of the reactor at temperature TM. The
heat is subsequently transferred to the cooling water. For a complete
description of the system we would need energy equations for the process
fluid, the metal wall, and the cooling water. Here we will concern ourselves
only with the process energy equation. 𝑇
𝑀(𝑡,𝑧 ) Water
𝐶𝐴0(𝑡)
𝜈 𝑡,𝑧 𝐶𝐴𝐿(𝑡)
𝑇0 𝑡
𝑇𝐿 𝑡
𝑇 𝑡,𝑧
൞𝐶𝐴 𝑡,𝑧
𝜌 𝑡,𝑧
Solution: Energy Balance Equation:
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 − 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑦 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑏𝑦 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
+ −
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑃𝑉 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙,
=
𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
Flow of energy (enthalpy) into boundary at z due to bulk flow : 𝜈𝐴𝜌𝐶𝑃 𝑇
𝑓𝑡 𝑙𝑏𝑚 𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
with English engineering units of 𝑓𝑡 2
3 °𝑅 =
𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑡 𝑙𝑏𝑚 °𝑅 𝑚𝑖𝑛
Flow of energy (enthalpy) out of boundary at z + dz: 𝑣𝐴𝜌𝐶
𝑇
𝑃 𝑇 + Wat
𝑀(𝑡,𝑧 )
𝜕 𝑣𝐴𝜌𝐶𝑝𝑇 er
𝑑𝑧 𝐶𝐴0(𝑡)
𝜕𝑧 𝑇0 𝑡
𝜈 𝑡,𝑧 𝐶𝐴𝐿(𝑡)
𝐵𝑡𝑢
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ℎ 𝑇 = ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡, 2
Heat conduction into boundary at 𝑧 = 𝑞𝑧 𝐴
where qZ is a heat flux in the z direction due to conduction.
We will use Fourier’s law to express qZ in terms of a temperature driving
force:
𝜕𝑇
𝑞𝑧 = −𝑘 𝑇
𝜕𝑧
where kT is an effective thermal conductivity with English engineering units
𝐵𝑡𝑢
of
min 𝑓𝑡 °𝑅
𝜕 𝑞𝑧 𝐴
Heat conduction out of boundary at 𝑧 + 𝑑𝑧 = 𝑞𝑧 𝐴 + 𝑑𝑧
𝜕𝑧
𝜕 𝜌𝐴𝑑𝑧𝐶𝑃 𝑇
Rate of change of internal energy (enthalpy) of the system =
𝜕𝑡
Combining all the above gives
𝜕 𝑣𝐴𝜌𝐶𝑝𝑇 𝜕 𝑞𝑧 𝐴
𝜈𝐴𝜌𝐶𝑃 𝑇 − 𝑣𝐴𝜌𝐶𝑃 𝑇 + 𝑑𝑧 + 𝑞𝑧 𝐴 − 𝑞𝑧 𝐴 + 𝑑𝑧
𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧
𝜕 𝜌𝐴𝑑𝑧𝐶𝑃 𝑇
+ −𝐴 𝑑𝑧 𝑘𝐶𝐴 𝜆 + −ℎ 𝑇 𝜋𝐷 𝑑𝑧 𝑇 – 𝑇𝑀 =
𝜕𝑡
𝜋𝐷2
Divide both sides with 𝐴𝑑𝑧, where 𝐴 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 =
4
𝜕 𝑣𝜌𝐶𝑝𝑇 𝜕 𝑞𝑧 ℎ𝑇 𝜕 𝜌𝐶𝑃 𝑇
− − − 𝑘𝐶𝐴 𝜆 − 2 (𝜋𝐷) 𝑇 – 𝑇𝑀 =
𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧 𝜋𝐷 𝜕𝑡
4
𝜕 𝑣𝜌𝐶𝑝𝑇 𝜕 𝑞𝑧 4ℎ 𝑇 𝜕 𝜌𝐶𝑃 𝑇
− − − 𝑘𝐶𝐴 𝜆 − 𝑇 – 𝑇𝑀 =
𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧 𝐷 𝜕𝑡
Substitute 𝑞𝑧 from Fourier’s law then rearrange
𝜕𝑇
𝜕 𝜌𝐶𝑃 𝑇 𝜕 𝑣𝜌𝐶𝑝𝑇 4ℎ𝑇 𝜕 𝑘𝑇
𝜕𝑧
+ + 𝑘𝐶𝐴 𝜆 + 𝑇 − 𝑇𝑀 =
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑧 𝐷 𝜕𝑧
Equations of Motion:
Newton’s second law of motion says that force is equal to mass times
acceleration for a system with constant mass M.
𝑀𝑎
𝐹=
𝑔𝑐
where F = force, lbf, M = mass, lbm, a = acceleration, ft/s2
gc = conversion constant needed when English engineering units are
used to keep units consistent = 32.2 lbm ft/lbf s2
This is the basic relationship that is used in writing the equations of
motion for a system.
In a slightly more general form, where mass can vary with time,
1 𝑑 𝑀𝜈𝑖
= σ𝑁𝑗=1 𝐹𝑗𝑖
𝑔𝑐 𝑑𝑡
where 𝜈𝑖 = velocity in the i direction, ft/s 𝐹𝑗𝑖 = jth force acting in
the i direction
Equation says that the time rate of change of momentum in the i
direction (mass times velocity in the i direction) is equal to the net sum
of the forces pushing in the i direction.
It can be thought of as a dynamic force balance. Or more eloquently it
is called the conservation of momentum.
In the real world there are three directions: x, y and z. Thus, three
force balances can be written for any system. Therefore, each system
has three equations of motion (plus one total mass balance, one energy
equation, and NC – 1 component balances).
Problem 9. Figure shows a tank into which an incompressible (constant
density) liquid is pumped at a variable rate F0 (ft3/s). This inflow rate
can vary with time because of changes in operations upstream. The
height of liquid in the vertical cylindrical tank is h (ft). The flow rate
out of the tank is F (ft3/s).
Now F0, h, and F will all vary with time and are therefore functions of
time t. Liquid leaves the base of the tank via a long horizontal pipe and
discharges into the top of another tank. 𝐹0
Both tanks are open to the atmosphere. Let the
length of the exit line be L(ft) and its cross-sectional
area be AP(ft2). The vertical, cylindrical tank has a
h
cross-sectional area of AT (ft ).
2
F
L F
Solution: Assume plug-flow conditions and incompressible liquid, and
therefore all the liquid is moving at the same velocity, more or less like
a solid rod. If the flow is turbulent, this is not a bad assumption.
Mass equal to the volume of the pipe (APL) times the density of the
liquid (ρ). 𝑀 = 𝐴𝑃 𝐿𝜌
Velocity 𝜈 (ft/s) equal to the volumetric flow divided by the cross-
𝐹
sectional area of the pipe. 𝑣 =
𝐴𝑃
𝐹0
The amount of liquid in the pipe will not change
with time, but if we want to change the rate of
outflow, the velocity of the liquid must be changed. h
And to change the velocity or the momentum of the F
F
liquid we must exert a force on the liquid. L
The direction of interest in this problem is the horizontal, since the pipe
is assumed to be horizontal. The force pushing on the liquid at the left
end of the pipe is the hydraulic pressure force of the liquid in the tank.
𝑔
𝐻𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 = 𝐴𝑃 𝜌ℎ 𝐹 0
𝑔𝑐
The units of this force are
𝑓𝑡
32.2 2 h
2 𝑙𝑏𝑚
(in English engineering units):𝑓𝑡 3 𝑓𝑡 𝑠
𝑙𝑏 𝑓𝑡 = 𝑙𝑏𝑓 F
𝑓𝑡 32.2 𝑚 F
𝑙𝑏𝑓 𝑠2 L
The only force pushing in the opposite direction from right to left and
opposing the flow is the frictional force due to the viscosity of the
liquid.
If the flow is turbulent, the frictional force will be proportional to the
square of the velocity and the length of the pipe.
𝐹𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 = 𝐾𝐹 𝐿𝜈 2
Substituting these forces into equation of motion, we get
1 𝑑 𝐴𝑃 𝐿𝜌𝜈 𝑔
= 𝐴𝑃 𝜌ℎ − 𝐾𝐹 𝐿𝜈 2
𝑔𝑐 𝑑𝑡 𝑔𝑐
𝐴𝑃 𝐿𝜌
AP , L, and ρ are constants, so divide both sides with
𝑔𝑐
𝑑𝜈 𝑔ℎ 𝐾𝐹 𝑔𝑐 𝜈2
= −
𝑑𝑡 𝐿 𝜌𝐴𝑃
The sign of the frictional force is negative because it acts in the direction
opposite the flow. We have defined left to right as the positive
direction.
Problem 10. Petroleum pipelines are sometimes used for transferring
several products from one location to another on a batch basis, i.e.,
one product at a time. To reduce product contamination at the end of
a batch transfer, a leather ball or “pig” that just fits the pipe is inserted
in one end of the line. Inert gas is introduced behind the pig to push it
through the line, thus purging the line of whatever liquid is in it.
Solution: To write a force balance on Pig
Liquid
the liquid still in the pipe as it is Inert
gas
𝑃0 𝝂
Inert
𝑃0 𝝂
gas
𝑧 Pipeline
𝐿
A force balance in the horizontal z direction yields
1 𝑑 𝜌𝐴𝑃 𝜈 𝐿 − 𝑧
= 𝑃0 𝐴𝑃 − 𝐾𝐹 𝐿 − 𝑧 𝑣 2
𝑔𝑐 𝑑𝑡 Pig
Liquid
𝐴𝑃 𝜌
Divide both sides with and Inert
gas
𝑃0 𝝂
𝑔𝑐 𝑧 Pipeline
𝐿
𝑑𝑧
Substituting that 𝑣 = we get
𝑑𝑡
2
𝑑 𝑑𝑧 𝑃0 𝑔𝑐 𝑔𝑐 𝐾𝐹 𝑑𝑧
𝐿−𝑧 = − 𝐿−𝑧
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡 𝜌 𝜌𝐴𝑃 𝑑𝑡
Transport Equations:
We have already used most of the laws governing the transfer of
energy, mass, and momentum.
These transport laws all have the form of a flux (rate of transfer per
unit area) being proportional to a driving force (a gradient in
temperature, concentration, or velocity).
The proportionality constant is a physical property of the system (like
thermal conductivity, diffusivity, or viscosity).
For transport on a molecular level, the laws bear the familiar names of
Fourier, Fick, and Newton.
Transfer relationships of a more macroscopic overall form are also used;
for example, film coefficients and overall coefficients in heat transfer.
Table summarizes some to the various relationships used in developing
models.
Quantity Heat Mass Momentum
Flux q 𝑁𝐴 𝜏𝑟𝑧
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝐶𝐴 𝜕𝜈𝑧
Driving force
𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑟
Molecular transport
Law Fourier’s Fick’s Newton’s
Thermal Newton’s
Property Diffusivity (𝒟𝐴 )
conductivity 𝑘 𝑇 Viscosity(𝜇)
Overall transport
Driving force Δ𝑇 Δ𝐶𝐴 Δ𝑃
𝑔𝐷Δ𝑃
Relationship 𝑞 = ℎ 𝑇 Δ𝑇 𝑁𝐴 = 𝑘𝐿 ΔC 𝐿
𝑓=
2𝜌𝜈 2
Equations of State
To write mathematical models we need equations that tell us how the
physical properties, primarily density and enthalpy, change with
temperature, pressure, and composition.
𝐿𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 = 𝜌𝐿 = 𝑓 𝑃,𝑇,𝑥𝑖
𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 = 𝜌𝑣 = 𝑓 𝑃,𝑇,𝑦𝑖
𝐿𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑒𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑦 = ℎ = 𝑓 𝑃,𝑇,𝑥𝑖
𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑦 = 𝐻 = 𝑓 𝑃,𝑇,𝑦𝑖
Occasionally these relationships have to be fairly complex to describe
the system accurately.
But in many cases simplification can be made without sacrificing much
overall accuracy.
We have already used some simple enthalpy equations in the examples
of energy balances.
ℎ = 𝐶𝑃 𝑇
𝐻 = 𝐶𝑃 𝑇 + 𝜆𝜈
The next level of complexity would be to make the 𝐶𝑃 ‘𝑠 functions of
𝑇
temperature: h = 𝑇𝑑 𝑇 𝑃𝐶 𝑇
0
A polynomial in T is often used for 𝐶𝑃 : 𝐶𝑃 𝑇 = 𝐴1 + 𝐴2 𝑇
Then Eq. becomes
𝑇
𝑇2 𝐴2
ℎ = 𝐴1 𝑇 + 𝐴2 = 𝐴1 𝑇 − 𝑇0 + 𝑇 2 − 𝑇02
2 𝑇0 2
Of course, with mixtures of components the total enthalpy is needed.
If heat of mixing effects are negligible, the pure-component enthalpies
can be averaged:
σ𝑁𝐶
𝑗=1 𝑥𝑗 ℎ𝑗 𝑀𝑗
ℎ= σ𝑁𝐶
𝑗=1 𝑥𝑗 𝑀𝑗
where xj= mole fraction of jth component
Mj = molecular weight of jth component
hj = pure-component enthalpy of jth component, energy per unit mass
Liquid densities can be assumed constant in many systems unless large
changes in composition and temperature occur.
Vapor densities usually cannot be considered invariant and some sort of PVT
relationship is almost always required. The simplest and most often used is
the perfect-gas law : 𝑃𝑉 = 𝑛𝑅𝑇
where P = absolute pressure (lbf/ft2 or kilopascals) n = number of moles (lb.
mol or kg. mol)
R = constant = 1545 lbf ft/lb. mol °R or 8.314 kPa m3/kg .mol K
T = absolute temperature (°R or K) V = volume (ft3 or m3)
Rearranging to get an equation for density ρv (lbm/ft3 or kg/m3) of a perfect
gas with a molecular weight M, we get
𝑛𝑀 𝑀𝑃
𝜌𝜈 = =
𝑉 𝑅𝑇
EQUILIBRIUM
The second law of thermodynamics is the basis for the equations that
tell us the conditions of a system when equilibrium conditions prevail.
A. CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM. Equilibrium occurs in a reacting system
when
σ𝑁𝐶
𝑗=1 𝜈𝑗 𝜇𝑗 = 0
where vj = stoichiometric coefficient of the jth component with
reactants having a negative sign and products a positive sign, 𝜇𝑗 =
chemical potential of jth component
The usual way to work with this equation is in terms of an equilibrium
constant for a reaction.
For example, consider a reversible gas-phase reaction of A to form B at
a specific rate k1 and B reacting back to A at a specific reaction rate k2.
The stoichiometry of the reaction is such that va moles of A react to form vb
𝑘1
moles of B. 𝜈𝑎 𝐴 ֞ 𝜈𝑏 𝐵
𝑘2
Equation says equilibrium will occur when 𝑣𝑏 𝜇𝐵 − 𝑣𝑎 𝜇𝐴 = 0
The chemical potentials for perfect gas mixture can be written
𝜇𝑗 = 𝜇𝑗0 + 𝑅𝑇 ln 𝑝𝑗
where 𝜇𝑗0 = standard chemical potential (or Gibbs free energy per mole) of
the jth component, which is a function of temperature only
pj = partial pressure of the jth component, R = perfect-gas law constant,
T = absolute temperature
Substituting into Eq. 𝑣𝑏 (𝜇𝐵0 + 𝑅𝑇 ln 𝑝𝐵 ) − 𝑣𝑎 (𝜇𝐴0 + 𝑅𝑇 ln 𝑝𝐴 ) = 0
𝑅𝑇 ln 𝑝𝐵 𝑣𝑏 − 𝑅𝑇 ln 𝑝𝐴 𝑣𝑎 = 𝑣𝑎 𝜇𝐴0 − 𝑣𝑏 𝜇𝐵0
𝜈𝑏
𝑝𝐵 (𝑣𝑎 𝜇𝐴0 − 𝑣𝑏 𝜇𝐵0 )
ln 𝜈𝑎 =
𝑝𝐴 𝑅𝑇
The right-hand side of this equation is a function of temperature only.
The term in parenthesis on the left-hand side is defined as the equilibrium
constant KP and it tells us the equilibrium ratios of products and reactants.
𝜈
𝑝𝐵𝑏
𝐾𝑃 ≡ 𝜈𝑎
𝑝𝐴
B.PHASE EQUILIBRIUM: Equilibrium between two phases occurs when
the chemical potential of each component is the same in the two phases:
𝜇𝑗𝐼 = 𝜇𝑗𝐼𝐼
where 𝜇𝑗𝐼 = chemical potential of the jth component in phase I
𝜇𝑗𝐼𝐼 = chemical potential of the jth component in phase II
Since the vast majority of chemical engineering systems involve liquid and
vapor phases, many vapor-liquid equilibrium relationships are used.
They range from the very simple to the very complex. Some of the most
commonly used relationships are listed below.
Basically we need a relationship that permits us to calculate the vapor
composition if we know the liquid composition, or vice versa.
The most common problem is a bubble point calculation: calculate the
temperature T and vapor composition yj, given the pressure P and the
liquid composition xi.
This usually involves a trial-and-error, iterative solution because the
equations can be solved explicitly only in the simplest cases.
Sometimes we have bubble point calculations that start from known
values of xi and T and want to find P and yj.
This is frequently easier than when pressure is known because the
bubble point calculation is usually noniterative.
Dewpoint calculations must be made when we know the composition
of the vapor yi and P (or) T and want to find the liquid composition x,
and T (or P).
Flash calculations must be made when we know neither xj nor yj and
must combine phase equilibrium relationships, component balance
equations, and an energy balance to solve for all the unknowns.
We will assume ideal vapor-phase behavior in our examples, i.e., the
partial pressure of the jth component in the vapor is equal to the total
pressure P times the mole fraction of the jth component in the vapor yj
(Dalton’s law): 𝑝𝑗 = 𝑃𝑦𝑗
Corrections may be required at high pressures.
In the liquid phase several approaches are widely used.
1. Raoult’s law.: Liquids that obey Raoult’s are called ideal.
𝑁𝐶 𝑆
σ
𝑝𝑗 = 𝑗=1 𝑥𝑗 𝑃𝑗
𝑥𝑗 𝑃𝑗𝑆
𝑦𝑗 =
𝑃
where 𝑃𝑗𝑆 is the vapor pressure of pure component j.
Vapor pressures are functions of temperature only.
This dependence is often described by
𝑠
𝐴𝑗
ln 𝑃𝑗 = + 𝐵𝑗
𝑇
2. Relative volatility. The relative volatility 𝛼𝑖𝑗 of component i to
component j is defined :
𝑦𝑖
ൗ𝑥𝑖
𝛼𝑖𝑗 = 𝑦𝑗
ൗ𝑥𝑗
Outcome: By the end of the unit the student will be able to apply the
fundamental laws to develop a mathematical model for simple flow
systems.
THANK YOU
PROCESS MODELING
AND SIMULATION
UNIT -II
MATHEMATICAL MODELING-I
By
Mr. Koteswara Rao Maradana
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
ANIS
UNIT-II
Objectives:
1. To understand various chemical engineering systems.
2. To develop mathematical models for solving process problems.
Gravity flow tank:
Figure shows a tank into which an incompressible (constant density)
liquid is pumped at a variable rate F0 (ft3/s). This inflow rate can vary
with time because of changes in operations upstream. The height of
liquid in the vertical cylindrical tank is h (ft). The flow rate out of the
tank is F (ft3/s).
Now F0, h, and F will all vary with time and are therefore functions of
time t. Liquid leaves the base of the tank via a long horizontal pipe and
discharges into the top of another tank. 𝐹0
The only force pushing in the opposite direction from right to left and
opposing the flow is the frictional force due to the viscosity of the
liquid.
If the flow is turbulent, the frictional force will be proportional to the
square of the velocity and the length of the pipe.
𝐹𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 = 𝐾𝐹 𝐿𝜈 2
Substituting these forces into equation of motion, we get
1 𝑑 𝐴𝑃 𝐿𝜌𝜈 𝑔
= 𝐴𝑃 𝜌ℎ − 𝐾𝐹 𝐿𝜈 2
𝑔𝑐 𝑑𝑡 𝑔𝑐
𝐴𝑃 𝐿𝜌
AP , L, and ρ are constants, so divide both sides with
𝑔𝑐
𝑑𝜈 𝐾𝐹 𝑔𝑐 𝜈 2 𝑔ℎ
+ =
𝑑𝑡 𝜌𝐴𝑃 𝐿
The sign of the frictional force is negative because it acts in the direction
opposite the flow. We have defined left to right as the positive
direction.
𝑑𝑉𝜌
𝐹0 𝜌 − 𝐹𝜌 =
𝑑𝑡
𝑑(𝐴𝑃 ℎ)
𝐹0 − 𝐹 =
𝑑𝑡
SERIES OF ISOTHERMAL CONSTANT-HOLDUP CSTRs
The system is sketched in Fig. and is a simple extension of the CSTR
considered. Product B is produced and reactant A is consumed in each
of the three perfectly mixed reactors by a first-order reaction occurring
in the liquid. For the moment let us assume that the temperatures and
holdups (volumes) of the three tanks can be different, but both
temperatures and the liquid volumes are assumed to be constant
(isothermal and constant holdup). Density is assumed constant
throughout the system, which is a binary mixture of A and B.
𝑘
(𝐴 ՜ 𝐵)
𝐹0
𝐶𝐴0
𝑉1 𝐹1 𝐹2 𝑉3 𝐹3
𝑉2
𝑘1 𝐶𝐴1 𝑘2 𝐶𝐴2 𝑘3
𝐶𝐴3
With these assumptions in mind, we are ready to formulate our
model. If the volume and density of each tank are constant, the total
mass in each tank is constant.
The total mass balance(continuity) equation for the first reactor is
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒
− =
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝐹0
𝑑 𝜌𝑉1
= 𝜌𝐹0 − 𝜌𝐹1 = 0 (𝑜𝑟) 𝐹0 = 𝐹1 𝐶𝐴0
𝑑𝑡
𝑑 𝜌𝑉2 𝑉1 𝐹1 𝐹2 𝐹3
= 𝜌𝐹1 − 𝜌𝐹2 = 0 (𝑜𝑟)
𝑉3
𝐹1 = 𝐹2 𝑘1
𝐶𝐴1
𝑉2
𝑘2 𝐶𝐴2
𝑘3
𝐶𝐴3
𝑑𝑡
𝑑 𝜌𝑉3
= 𝜌𝐹2 − 𝜌𝐹3 = 0 (𝑜𝑟) 𝐹2 = 𝐹3
𝑑𝑡
Therefore
𝐹0 = 𝐹1 = 𝐹2 = 𝐹3 = 𝐹
where F is defined as the throughput (m3/min).
We want to keep track of the amounts of reactant A and product B
in each tank, so component continuity equations are needed.
If we arbitrarily choose A, the equations describing the dynamic
changes in the amounts of reactant A in each tank are (with units of
kg - mol of A/min)
Component A Balance:
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓
− +
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓
=
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑑𝐶𝐴1
𝐹 𝐶𝐴0 − 𝐶𝐴1 − 𝑉1 𝐾1 𝐶𝐴1 = 𝑉1
𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝐶𝐴2
𝐹 𝐶𝐴1 − 𝐶𝐴2 − 𝑉2 𝐾2 𝐶𝐴2 = 𝑉2
𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝐶𝐴3
𝐹 𝐶𝐴2 − 𝐶𝐴3 − 𝑉3 𝐾3 𝐶𝐴3 = 𝑉3
𝑑𝑡
The specific reaction rates 𝑘𝑛 are given by the Arrhenius equation
𝐸
−
𝑘𝑛 = 𝑘0 𝑒 𝑅𝑇𝑛 n = 1, 2, 3
If the temperatures in the reactors are different, the k’s are different.
The n refers to the reactor number.
The three first-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations given
are the mathematical model of the system.
The parameters that must be known are 𝑉1 , 𝑉2 , 𝑉3 , 𝑘1 , 𝑘2 , 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑘3 .
The variables that must be specified before these equations can be
solved are F and CA0.
“Specified”
does not mean that they must be constant. They can be
time-varying, but they must be known or given functions of time.
They are the forcing functions.
The initial conditions of the three concentrations (their values at time
equal zero) must also be known.
Let us now check the degrees of freedom of the system.
There are three equations and, with the parameters and forcing
functions specified, there are only three unknowns or dependent
variables: CA1, CA2, and CA3.
Simple system used for controller design and stability analysis, we will
use an even simpler version.
Ifthe throughput F is constant and the holdups and temperatures are
the same in all three tanks
𝑉
where 𝜏 = with units of minutes.
𝐹
The above equations become
𝑑𝐶𝐴1 𝑑𝐶𝐴1 1 1
𝐹 𝐶𝐴0 − 𝐶𝐴1 − 𝑉1 𝐾1 𝐶𝐴1 = 𝑉1 ՜ + 𝑘+ 𝐶𝐴1 = 𝐶𝐴0
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡 𝜏 𝜏
𝑑𝐶𝐴2
𝐹 𝐶𝐴1 − 𝐶𝐴2 − 𝑉2 𝐾2 𝐶𝐴2 = 𝑉2 ՜ 𝑑𝐶𝐴2 + 𝑘 + 1 𝐶𝐴2 = 1 𝐶𝐴1
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡 𝜏 𝜏
𝑑𝐶𝐴3
𝐹 𝐶𝐴2 − 𝐶𝐴3 − 𝑉3 𝐾3 𝐶𝐴3 = 𝑉3 ՜ 𝑑𝐶𝐴3 1 1
𝑑𝑡 + 𝑘+ 𝐶𝐴3 = 𝐶𝐴2
𝑑𝑡 𝜏 𝜏
There is only one forcing function or input variable, 𝐶𝐴0 .
CSTRs WITH VARIABLE HOLDUPS
Ifthe previous example is modified slightly to permit the volumes in
each reactor to vary with time, both total and component continuity
equations are required for each reactor.
To show the effects of higher-order kinetics, assume the reaction is
now nth-order in reactant
Total mass balance (continuity) equation:
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒
− =
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
Component Balance:
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
− +
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑗𝑡ℎ
=
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
Reactor 1:
𝑑 𝜌𝑉1 𝑑𝑉1 𝐹0
= 𝜌𝐹0 − 𝜌𝐹1 ՜ = 𝐹0 − 𝐹1
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡 𝐶𝐴0
𝑑 𝑛
𝑉1 𝐶𝐴1 = 𝐹0 𝐶𝐴0 − 𝐹1 𝐶𝐴1 − 𝑉1 𝑘1 𝐶𝐴1
𝑑𝑡 𝑉1 𝐹1 𝐹2 𝑉3 𝐹3
𝑉2
Reactor 2: 𝑘1 𝐶𝐴1 𝑘2 𝐶𝐴2 𝑘3 𝐶𝐴3
𝑑 𝜌𝑉2 𝑑𝑉2
= 𝜌𝐹1 − 𝜌𝐹2 = 𝐹1 − 𝐹2
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
𝑑 𝑛
𝑉2 𝐶𝐴2 = 𝐹1 𝐶𝐴1 − 𝐹2 𝐶𝐴2 − 𝑉2 𝑘2 𝐶𝐴2
𝑑𝑡
Reactor 3:
𝑑 𝜌𝑉3 𝑑𝑉3
= 𝜌𝐹2 − 𝜌𝐹3 ՜ = 𝐹2 − 𝐹3
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
𝑑 𝑛
𝑉3 𝐶𝐴3 = 𝐹2 𝐶𝐴2 − 𝐹3 𝐶𝐴3 − 𝑉3 𝑘3 𝐶𝐴3
𝑑𝑡
Our mathematical model now contains six first-order nonlinear ordinary
differential equations.
Parameters that must be known are 𝑘1 , 𝑘2 , 𝑘3 , and n.
Initial conditions for all the dependent variables that are to be integrated
must be given: 𝐶𝐴1 , 𝐶𝐴2 , 𝐶𝐴3 , 𝑉1 , 𝑉2 , 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑉3 .
The forcing functions CA0(t) and Fo(t) must also be given.
Let us now check the degrees of freedom of this system.
There are six equations. But there are nine unknowns:
𝐶𝐴1 , 𝐶𝐴2 , 𝐶𝐴3 , 𝑉1 , 𝑉2 , 𝑉3 , 𝐹1 , 𝐹2 , 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐹3 .
Clearly this system is not sufficiently specified and a solution could not be
obtained.
What have we missed in our modeling?
A good plant operator could take one look at the system and see what
the problem is.
We have not specified how the flows out of the tanks are to be set.
Physically there would probably be control valves in the outlet lines to
regulate the flows.
How are these control valves to be set?
A common configuration is to have the level in the tank controlled by the
outflow, i.e., a level controller opens the control valve on the exit line to
increase the outflow if the level in the tank increases.
Thus there must be a relationship between tank holdup and flow.
𝐹1 = 𝑓 𝑉1 𝐹2 = 𝑓 𝑉2 𝐹3 = 𝑓(𝑉3 )
The f functions will describe the level controller and the control valve.
These three equations reduce the degrees of freedom to zero.
It might be worth noting that we could have considered the flow from
the third tank 𝐹3 as the forcing function.
Then the level in tank 3 would probably be maintained by the flow into
the tank, 𝐹2 .
The level in tank 2 would be controlled by 𝐹1 , and tank 1 level by 𝐹0 . We
would still have three equations.
The reactors shown in Fig. would operate at atmospheric pressure if they
were open to the atmosphere as sketched.
If the reactors are not vented and if no inert blanketing is assumed, they
would run at the bubble point pressure for the specified temperature and
varying composition.
Therefore the pressures could be different in each reactor, and they would
vary with time, even though temperatures are assumed constant, as the
𝐶𝐴 ‘𝑠 change. 𝐹0
𝐶𝐴0
𝑉1 𝐹1 𝐹2 𝑉3 𝐹3
𝑉2
𝑘1 𝐶𝐴1 𝑘2 𝐶𝐴2 𝑘3 𝐶𝐴3
TWO HEATED TANKS
As our next fairly simple system let us consider a process in which two energy
balances are needed to model the system. The flow rate F of oil passing
through two perfectly mixed tanks in series is constant at 90 ft3/min. The
𝑙𝑏𝑚
density 𝜌 of the oil is constant at 40 ൗ𝑓𝑡 3, and its heat capacity 𝐶𝑃 is 0.6
Btu/lbm°F. The volume of the first tank 𝑉1 is constant at 450 ft3, and the
volume of the second tank 𝑉2 is constant at 90 ft3.
The temperature of the oil entering the first 𝐹0
tank is 𝑇0 and is 150°F at the initial steady 𝑇0
state. The temperatures in the two tanks
are 𝑇1 and 𝑇2 . They are both equal to 𝑉1 𝐹1
𝑉2
𝐹2
𝑑𝐶𝐴
𝑉 = 𝐹0 𝐶𝐴0 − 𝐹𝐶𝐴 − 2𝑉𝑘1 𝐶𝐴1.5 + 2𝑉𝑘2 𝐶𝐵 (5)
𝑑𝑡
The 2 in the reaction terms comes from the stoichiometric coefficient of A.
There are five equations that make up the mathematical model of this
system.
The parameters that must be known are 𝑽, 𝑪𝒗 , 𝒌𝟏 , 𝒌𝟐 , 𝑹, 𝑴𝑨 , 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝑩 .
The forcing functions (or inputs) could be 𝑷𝑫 , 𝝆𝟎 , 𝑭𝟎 , 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝑨𝟎 .
This leaves five unknowns (dependent variables): 𝑪𝑨 , 𝝆, 𝑷, 𝑭, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒚.
𝐹0
𝜌0 𝑉 𝑃 𝐹
𝑦0 𝑇 𝑦 𝜌 𝑃𝐷
𝑦
NON ISOTHERMAL REACTOR
NONISOTHERMAL CSTR
In the reactors studied so far, we have shown the effects of variable
holdups, variable densities, and higher-order kinetics on the total and
component continuity equations. Energy equations were not needed
because we assumed isothermal operations.
Let us now consider a system in which temperature can change with time.
𝑘
An irreversible, exothermic reaction 𝐴 ՜ 𝐵 is carried out in a single
perfectly mixed CSTR as shown in Fig.
The reaction is nth-order in reactant A and
𝐹0
has a heat of reaction 𝜆 (Btu/lb. mol of A 𝐶𝐴0
reacted). Negligible heat losses and constant 𝑇0 𝑉
𝐹𝑗
𝑇𝑗
densities are assumed. To remove the heat of 𝑇𝑗
𝑇
reaction, a cooling jacket surrounds the 𝐹𝑗 𝑉𝑗 𝐶𝐴
𝐹
reactor. Cooling water is added to the jacket 𝑇 𝑗0
𝐶𝐴0
at a volumetric flow rate Fj and with an inlet 𝑇
temperature of 𝑇𝑗0 .
The volume of water in the jacket Vj is constant. The mass of the metal
walls is assumed negligible so the “thermal inertia” of the metal need not
be considered. This is often a fairly good assumption because the heat
capacity of steel is only about 0.1 Btu/lb,°F, which is an order of
magnitude less than that of water.
A. PERFECTLY MIXED COOLING ACKET. We assume that the temperature
everywhere in the jacket is Tj. The heat transfer between the process at
temperature T and the cooling water at temperature Tj is described by an
overall heat transfer coefficient. 𝐹0
𝐶𝐴0
𝐹𝑗
𝑇0
𝑄 = 𝑈𝐴𝐻 𝑇 − 𝑇𝑗 𝑇𝑗
𝑉 𝑇𝑗
𝑇
where Q = heat transfer rate 𝐹𝑗 𝑉𝑗 𝐶𝐴
𝐹
𝑇 𝑗0
𝐶𝐴
U = overall heat transfer coefficient 𝑇
4 𝑑𝑡 4
1 𝑑𝑇𝑗2 1 𝑄 3 𝑇
𝑗3
4 𝑑𝑡 4 𝑄 1 𝑇
𝑗1
𝑇
𝑗0
1 𝑑𝑇𝑗4 1
𝜌 𝑉𝐶 = 𝐹𝑗 𝜌𝑗 𝐶𝑗 𝑇𝑗3 − 𝑇𝑗4 + 𝑈𝐴𝐻 𝑇 − 𝑇𝑗4
4 𝑗 𝑗 𝑗 𝑑𝑡 4
D. SIGNIFICANT METAL WALL CAPCITANCE: In some reactors,
particularly high pressure vessels or smaller-scale equipment, the mass
of the metal walls and its effects on the thermal dynamics must be
considered.
To be rigorous, the energy equation for the wall should be a partial
differential equation in time and radial position.
A less rigorous but frequently used approximation is to “lump” the
mass of the metal and assume the metal is all at one temperature TM.
This assumption is a fairly good one when the wall is not too thick and
Metal
the thermal conductivity of the metal is large. Process
Jacket
𝐹𝑗
𝑇𝑗0
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 − 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚
𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑦 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑏𝑦 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
+ −
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑃𝑉 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙,
= Process
Metal
𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 Jacket
𝑑 𝑉𝑇 −
𝐸
𝜌𝐶𝑃 = 𝜌𝐶𝑃 𝐹0 𝑇0 − 𝐹𝑇 − 𝜆𝑉𝑘0 𝐶𝐴𝑛 𝑒 𝑅𝑇 − ℎ𝑖 𝐴𝑖 𝑇 − 𝑇𝑀
𝑑𝑡 𝑇
𝑑𝑇𝑀 𝑇
𝑚 𝑗 𝑇
𝜌𝑀 𝑉𝑀 𝐶𝑀 = ℎ𝑖 𝐴𝑖 𝑇 − 𝑇𝑀 − ℎ𝑜 𝐴𝑜 𝑇𝑀 − 𝑇𝑗
𝑑𝑡 𝑖 𝑄 𝑄
𝑜
𝑑𝑇𝑗
𝜌𝑗 𝑉𝑗 𝐶𝑗 = 𝐹𝑗 𝜌𝑗 𝐶𝑗 𝑇𝑗0 − 𝑇𝑗 + ℎ𝑜 𝐴𝑜 𝑇𝑀 − 𝑇𝑗 𝐹𝑗
𝑑𝑡
𝑇𝑗0
where hi = inside heat transfer film coefficient
ho = outside heat transfer film coefficient, 𝜌𝑀 = density of metal wall
CM = heat capacity of metal wall, VM = volume of metal wall
Ai = inside heat transfer area
Ao = outside heat transfer area