Next Generation More-Electric Aircraft: A Potential Application For HTS Superconductors
Next Generation More-Electric Aircraft: A Potential Application For HTS Superconductors
6, October 2008
(ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9)
The published version of this manuscript appeared in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
19, No. 3, Part 2, 1055 - 1068 (2009)
MD-90-30
reduction from Stage 3 However, one technology that is definitely new, at least for
-10.0 use in aircraft engines, is a propulsion system design that uses
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 advanced superconducting, cryogenically cooled electric
Year of Certification
Fig. 2. Aircraft fleet average noise levels continue to decrease. (from F. generators and motors to drive a multitude of low noise
Collier, E. Zavala, and D. Huff, "Fundamental Aeronautics Program Subsonic electric fans. The obvious break-through that must be achieved
Fixed Wing Project Reference Document," NASA) for this to happen is a marked increase in the power to weight
ratio of electric generators and motors.
A brief discussion on the advantages of electric
aeropropulsion is presented next. Then to demonstrate the
potential of an electric propulsion system based on HTS
technology, we present a number of examples for propulsion
systems as well as for full aircraft of N+3 generation (first in
service circa 2030).
addition, any increases in an engine’s BPR must be i.e., the replacement of traditionally pneumatically and
accompanied by matching improvements in core specific hydraulically driven functions with electrically powered
output power so as to maintain fan pressure ratio (the ratio of components [2]. Overall, the electric propulsion scheme opens
air pressure in front of the fan to that after it) within a up the aircraft design space to many new possibilities in which
reasonable range. Prodigious advancement in specific power major leaps can be made towards achieving the performance
of engine core and material for the past several decades goals specified in Table I.
resulted in a significant increase in BPR. Recent engines such
C. Electrical Ducted Fan Concept
as the GE90 turbofan exhibit a BPR of 9:1. Nevertheless, the
practical upper limit to increasing the BPR of modern turbofan In order to take advantage of electrical propulsion, electrical
engines is fettered by the inherent coupling between propulsor “propulsors” have to be designed. We can take advantage of
operation mechanics and core thermodynamic cycle [1]. the high bypass ratio of current engine and replace the engine
core with an electrical motor. Thrust would then be generated
To Airplane
Hydraulic
System
To Airplane Bleed Air
System (Environmental
through the fan rotation only as shown in Fig. 6.
Control System, APU,
etc.)
Strut
To Fan Air-Cooled
Gearbox- Bleed air
mounted cooler
To ATS Fan produces
Hydraulic
Fan Pump
Pressure-
>85% of thrust
Regulating Valves
Exhaust
Nozzle
Jet produces
<15% of thrust
B. The Case for Electric Propulsion a. Conventional turbine and fan coupled on the same shaft
generator. This arrangement is anticipated to surpass other Fig. 6. Electrically driven propulsion system: electrical ducted fan
distributed propulsion concepts in many aspects, as will be
further discussed in section VII. Furthermore, this type of Such a system is feasible only if electrical motors can be of
hybrid architecture is intrinsically well-suited with the about the same size or better than aero turbines. Conventional
emerging and continuing trend towards more electric aircraft; motors exhibit a specific power up to 0.5 kW/kg, too low
ESNF, No. 6, October 2008; ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9
compared to turbine engine cores. Therefore conventional technology for turbo-electric aeropropulsion. Unfortunately
machines, which are limited by heat generation in copper fully superconducting machines using HTS conductors are not
windings, cannot be used for aircraft propulsion. A new yet practical, until low AC loss HTS conductors are fully
technology has to be considered to lift that specific power developed.
limitation. Superconducting machines offer the only hope of
E. Cooling Considerations
ever achieving electrical aeropropulsion.
Since superconductors require operation at cryogenic
D. High Temperature Superconductivity as Enabling temperature, the cooling system is a very important part of the
Technology to Electric Aeropropulsion aircraft architecture. The configuration and feasibility of the
Superconductors can carry very high current density with superconducting machine depends on the cooling system and
no resistance thus enabling very light machines. High specific mostly on the cooling power available.
power has been demonstrated in superconducting machines
1) Cryocoolers
since the late 60s. A few low temperature superconducting
machines have been built with both the stator and rotor Cryocoolers are an obvious choice as they represent an
superconducting thanks to the availability of NbTi low AC active source of cooling using a close loop of cryogen.
loss conductors. Cryocoolers are “plug and play” reliable systems and therefore
appropriate for airborne application. However, by today
100
Industrial motors Industrial motors standards, they are still too heavy for use on aircraft.
PEM Fuel Cells @ 2 kW/kg
Turbofan engines, w/o propulsors
Cryo generator tested, AF/Westing.
outweigh turbine engines
Cryo motor 5 M$ design, AF/Westing.
AF/Westinghouse cryo Al fit
by factor of 5 to 10. Off-the-shelf cryocoolers exhibit efficiencies of about 10-
10 Cryo designs (more elec. rocket Long)
HTS rotor & stator (approx.), AF/OSU 15% of Carnot efficiency, which correspond to about 70W/W
HTS gen. designs @ 10 krpm, Masson
All Bi2223 Masson, wi Fe, EM + 60% at 30 K. The lightest cryocoolers today weigh about 5 lb/HP-
W eight (klb)
1
Turbine engine core input (or 3 kg/kW-input) as shown in Fig. 8 (based partially on
data from Ref [3]). This is just for the cold head portion, the
associated compressors and ancillaries represent an overhead
0.1 All-Superconducting of about 5 times that weight. The use of packaged turbo-
motors may be lighter
by a factor of 3. compressors may reduce this overhead significantly, and
0.01
coupled with the development of much lighter cold heads, it
0.1 1 10 100 may be possible to reach the target of 3 kg/kW-input as overall
Shaft Power and Equivalent Shaft Power (kHP) specific weight for cryocoolers by the time N+3 aircraft come
into service (~2030-2035).
Fig. 7. Specific power of rotating machines compared to turbine engine core
2) Cryogen storage
Weights of Various Cryocoolers and Subcomponents
Another possibility (which has not been extensively studied
yet) would be to load enough cryogen at the airport for the
100000
Table of Cryocooler Performance and weight.xls
flight duration including a margin; the cryo-tank would have
to be refilled after each landing. This may lead to a minimum
10000
weight associated with superconductor cooling. If liquid
hydrogen is the cryogen, it could also be used as fuel and
burnt in the engine along with jet fuel after cooling the HTS
Weight, lb
1000
components (e.g., 95% jet fuel, 5% H2).
3) LH2 as fuel
0.83
GM Cold Head lb = 8.0 hp
If LH2 is available onboard as fuel, either for turbines or
100
fuel cells, then cooling of the superconducting machines is
APPROX. RANGE OF “free” as we need to warm-up the hydrogen before being used
CURRENT INTEREST
as fuel. An excellent synergy is obtained and fully
10
superconducting machines are usable with very liberal limits
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Input Power, hp on the AC losses created. However, dense hydrogen storage is
an issue; we may not see LH2-fueled aircraft in the N+3 time
Fig. 8. Specific power of commercially available cryocoolers frame (2030-2035), even though extensive studies of such
aircraft powered by conventional engines have been
Fig. 7 shows a comparison of the weight of electrical performed [4].
machines compared to turbine engine cores as a function of
power. As stated, conventional motors are too heavy to even IV. PAST AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENT OF
be considered. Current-day superconducting machines (with SUPERCONDUCTING MACHINES FOR AIRBORNE APPLICATIONS
resistive armature) are comparable with turbine engines in
Application of superconductors in propulsion was first
power density, while fully superconducting machines have the
potential to be 3 times lighter. HTS can be the enabling introduced in the context of ship propulsion [5], [6]. The first
ESNF, No. 6, October 2008; ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9
mention of this application for aircraft was done by Oberly in Superconducting generators have already been
1976 at the Applied Superconductivity Conference [7]. The demonstrated to exhibit power densities in the range of turbine
main thrust of the Air Force program since then has been for engines thus validating the feasibility of future ultra
high power density generators in the multi-MW range to lightweight machines for airborne applications.
power weapons or onboard equipment [8]-[10], very little
B. Superconducting Motors
research has been done until recently on the use of
superconducting motors for electric propulsion of aircraft. The case for superconducting electric propulsion of aircraft
has been examined in [11]-[17]. In the concept of turbo-
A. Superconducting Generators electric propulsion presented in Fig. 5, not only ultra-compact
Having windings rotate above 10,000 RPM is very generators are needed, but also motors to power the propulsion
challenging as large acceleration forces are applied on the fans. Motors for propulsion application represent a much more
conductors. One machine under development by LEI is a challenging application as rotation speeds are lower than
3MVA/15,000 RPM generator pictured in Fig. 9. Both the generators and therefore electromagnetic torque needs to be
stator and rotor are operating at cryogenic temperature, but higher. This application was recently investigated as part of
only the excitation coils are superconducting; resistive losses our URETI program, results and design examples are
in cryogenic copper being lower than AC losses in HTS presented in next section.
conductors at the high operating frequency.
Another development involves a generator with the same V. NASA-DOD URETI’S SUPERCONDUCTING MACHINES FOR
requirements as the previous example but based on a different AIRBORNE APPLICATIONS
configuration. To address the high rotation speed, General This section briefly reviews our work as part of a 5-year
Electric used a bulk piece of magnetic material at the rotor research project sponsored by NASA and DoD: the University
magnetized by a stationary superconducting coil. This Research Engineering and Technology Institute (URETI) on
configuration provides a very robust rotor able to spin at high Aeropropulsion and Power [12], [14]. The main objective of
RPM. The flux distribution is not optimal but the high rotation this program was to investigate the feasibility of more-electric
speed brings the power density to an impressive 7 kW/kg. A and all-electric airborne vehicles, and in particular, the
rendering of the machine is shown in Fig. 10. possibility of incorporating superconducting machines into
electric propulsion schemes for future aircraft. Multiple
applications and vehicle configurations were investigated. The
first case study is a propeller-driven Cessna 172 type aircraft
chosen as a low power application [16]. Increasing power
density of small machines is very challenging as they present
very little room for coil winding. The first task was then to
develop a non-conventional motor topology applicable to low-
power machines.
Stator windings
EM shield
HTS pancakes
Stator yoke
Fig. 11. Diagram of the superconducting motor
the axis and are used to trapped magnetic flux and concentrate equilibrate with the rest of the machine, thus trapping the
flux lines. Since the machine is expected to be conduction applied field. The current is then ramped down and reversed,
cooled, the superconducting inductor is stationary and the the YBCO plates will keep their magnetic flux constant by
outside copper air gap armature is rotating. The machine can means of undamped induced currents and the reversed flux
be small enough to fit inside a propeller hub, allowing the from the pancake coils is then concentrated between the plates
blades to be directly attached to its rotating armature, which giving a flux distribution such as that of Fig. 13, creating an 8-
collectively save the aircraft’s internal volume. pole machine. The machine operates synchronously and
exhibits the performance outlined in Table II.
1) Principle of operation
The presented topology is very promising and exhibits a
The generation of the eight pole excitation field is based on predicted power density in the same range as gas turbines
a 2-stage cooling system; the time evolution of the current in despite the low power level. The low power density of
the pancake coils is shown in Fig. 12 [17]. potential generation options (e.g., fuel cells) and cryocooler
overhead negates most weight gains and makes this concept
I field not practical yet.
Temperature sensors
Fig. 13. Flux distribution in the machine. Bi2223 pancake coils
Adjacent
The whole system is cooled down to about 90 K when coil @
heaters are activated to maintain the YBCO plates above 60K
critical temperature, but the rest of the motor (including the
coils) continue to cool down to about 30K. The current in the
coils is then ramped up and a radial flux penetrates the YBCO
plates (which are non-superconducting at this time). Once the
Fig. 15. Experimental validation of the 2-stage cooling system
current achieved its nominal value, the heaters are shut down
and the YBCO plates are allowed to cool down and thermally
ESNF, No. 6, October 2008; ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9
options studied, the most promising is pictured in Fig. 16, Stator coils
consisting of adding a squirrel cage to the inductor so that the Bulk HTS plates
described above could be scaled up to a larger engine. The Oswald TF62 536kW @110RPM Conventional
Oswald TF46 506kW @200RPM
turbine engines in a typical small business jet are about Oswald TF36 326kW @300RPM Gas turbine cores
Torque
1.5 MW. The concept described above is modular, and more Oswald TF26 210 kW @400RPM optimized
Oswald TF20 63kW @500RPM commercial
HTS coils/YBCO plates can be stacked axially to increase Oswald TF13 28kW @500RPM
power. The power density of this system was estimated to be Conventional 4 MVA @3600RPM
URETI cylindrical 1.5 MW @3000RPM HTS
6.6 kW/kg, comparable to that of state-of-the-art turbines [20]. URETI axial flux 450 kW @3000RPM
Designed for
airborne
URETI cylindrical 170 kW @2700RPM
applications
D. High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft GE HIA 5MVA @16000RPM
Siemens 4 MVA @3600RPM
The final case study is concerned with a High-Altitude, Siemens 400 kW @1500RPM Actual HTS
motors
Long-Endurance (HALE) air vehicle (e.g., a hurricane AMSC 3.7 MW @1800RPM
AMSC 5 MW @230RPM
tracker). This would be an unmanned aircraft, fully electric, AMSC 36.5 MW @120RPM
able to fly and loiter for up to 14 days without refueling or Torque density (Nm/kg) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Power density (kW/kg) Torque density (Nm/kg)
returning to base. For maximum efficiency, the
superconducting motor for the propulsor needs to be both Fig. 18. Comparison of concept designs and existing HTS machines with
extremely light and compact, but also have very low losses. respect to conventional motors and turbine engines in terms of power density
We chose a lead-less axial flux configuration (allowing for
higher trapped flux for compactness). The design concept, VI. PHYSICS-BASED SIZING MODELS FOR THE MORE/ALL-
described in [21] and shown in Fig. 17, is projected to achieve ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT DESIGN
an impressive power density of 7.4 kW/kg using conventional Of particular importance in the URETI program was the
HTS materials available today. development of physics-based models for superconducting
machines for integration into existing aircraft design tools
(i.e., realistic size and weight models for superconducting
components to use in aircraft system design studies).
ESNF, No. 6, October 2008; ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9
A. Aircraft Design Based on New Propulsion Technology B. Fully Superconducting Machine Sizing Model
Integrating a single disciplinary technology into aircraft An integrated electromagnetic/thermal model of
systems often results in an array of cross-disciplinary effects. superconducting rotating machines has been developed to be
This is particularly true in the case of the HTS machinery integrated into aeropropulsion system design/analysis tools
technology, because it will entail fundamental changes in not developed at Georgia Institute of Technology and NASA
only the propulsion system but also the subsystem architecture Glenn Research Center [31]. The model is composed of an
and airframe design. Such complex nature of aircraft systems analytical electromagnetic model and a lump-parameter
integration may disqualify a premature technology evaluation thermal model [32]. The model architecture is shown in Fig.
made solely relying upon its component level metrics such as 20.
power density and efficiencies [22], [23].
best states weight
In addition, the introduction of the HTS motor drive power GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION 1500
1250
system will usher in an uncharted design space that POWER
RPM ELECTROMAGNETIC
1000
750
encompasses revolutionary propulsion system architectures, MATERIAL MODEL
500
250
OPTIMIZATION
options to integrate them into an airframe. For instance, the THERMAL
MODEL MINIMUM WEIGHT
CONSTRAINTS OR VOLUME
generators and gas turbine engines in Fig. 5b can be
potentially replaced with any electric power source such as
fuel cells, high performance electric batteries, or ultra Fig. 20. Block diagram of a fully integrated electromagnetic-thermal model of
capacitors. Although they are not readily applicable to high a superconducting machine tied to an optimizer to achieve minimum volume
or weight
power systems due to their low power and/or energy density,
those technologies, providing a supplemental power, may 1) Machine Configurations
serve to facilitate the integration of a HTS motor drive Several machine configurations are possible such as radial
propulsion system. flux machines or trapped flux magnet excited machines. For
Therefore, the true value of airborne HTS applications need this study, we will limit the configuration of the
be evaluated at the air-vehicle integration level at least in light superconducting machines to radial flux and distributed
of the benefits from a synergistic integration of facilitating windings. The windings are usually made of racetrack coils
technologies. To this end, various combinations of aircraft that will be considered as continuous current distributions in a
configurations, technologies, and missions must be assessed in first approximation. Flux density in the backiron is limited to
terms of vehicle-level metrics such as aircraft weight, field 1.7T and the J(B) operating point of the conductor is
length, fuel burn, emissions, and noise through an aircraft calculated.
sizing and synthesis process at the appropriate level of fidelity
and engineering realism. Nevertheless, such revolutionary
Back iron
concepts are very likely to substantially deviate from a HTS field winding
historical trend, thereby necessitating the development of Stator winding
Physics-Based Modeling
and Simulation Sensitivity Analysis
Notional Design
Ind uced 2.72972
Technologies Impact of
CD0
2.417712
Drag ±0.0014
2.09899
0.00053
Parasite0.000237
Technologies es eis
r1
K
Probabilistic Drag±6.6e-6
0.00014
Risk
r2
and Statistical
1
1
-1
-1
-1
-1
0 0 0 0
AR
AR Taper Wing Sweep
Taper Ratio Sw eep Angle Wing Area Uncertainty
Techniques Ratio Area ro
rs
5 1
Jc/Jco (//ab ; 1 T)
Jc/Jco (//ab ; 2 T)
the dimension of superconductor that faces the flux (filament
PIT tape
3 0,6
c
β
Rew,ec
J f r2 sin p +1 p+ 2 2p
0
B =
2µ 0 2 r2 1 − r1 1 + r0 (5) Armature
Rg Ug Air gap
p + 2 r0 r2 rs
r winding
π I1
end parts
Rew,ia Uew,ia Armature
where Jf is the rotor current density, β is the winding aperture, R2 U2 winding
Ucv
p the number of pair of poles and µ 0 the permeability of TCu Icv
vacuum. The weight and volume of the machine can then be PCu
R1
Rcv
10
VII. AIRCRAFT DESIGN EXAMPLES and, as a result, an off-set inlet is required to duct the intake
air to the engine. Electric cables transfer energy to the fan
A. Application of Superconducting Machine Models to
Aircraft Design motors, and there would be cross cabling to the other side of
the aircraft to complete an electrical bus so that all motors can
Electric propulsion systems with superconducting draw from both generators.
technology can potentially be applied to any future aircraft,
manned or unmanned. But to have the maximum impact on
the critical issues of the environment, electric propulsion must
be introduced into subsonic transport aircraft designs of the
future. Two potential transport aircraft with electric propulsion
are discussed in this section: 1) a small regional transport
aircraft with a design having a conventional arrangement of
fuselage and high aspect ratio wing, and 2) a large
transcontinental or intercontinental transport having hybrid-
wing-body (HWB) design and short takeoff and landing
(STOL) capabilities. For both designs, electric power
production is obtained with turbine engines driving
superconducting generators, and propulsive thrust is
distributed on the lifting surfaces with multiple electric motors
driving single-stage fans.
Fig. 24. Super-Conducting Electric Propulsion
B. Small Regional Jet
Noise from the buried turboshaft engine will easily be
As described earlier, NASA has defined several future time-
attenuated, and the jet noise from these engines is essentially
frames in which technology measured by noise level,
non-existent. Tip speed for the fans is low and this noise from
emissions and mission fuel burn is successively reduced from
the fans is partially shielded from the ground by the wings.
levels of current technology (see Table I). A study is now
Although a full noise study for this aircraft has not been
being conducted to design short-field regional subsonic
completed, it is expected to be very quiet and meet the N+2
transport aircraft having a full payload of nominally 100
targets of Table I.
passengers [33]. These aircraft are for the N+2 time frame,
The engine design is patterned after that of the General
and the study has been extended to include a design having a
Electric T700 turboshaft engine with a single spool
superconducting electric propulsion system (for possible N+3
compressor having multiple axial stages followed by a single
introduction).
centrifugal stage. The major technology in this propulsion
In this design, two advanced turboshaft engines are buried
system is obviously with the superconducting generator. The
within the lower fuselage each with direct drive to an electric
generator is designed using the methodology outlined in this
generator. Electric power is transmitted to multiple motors
paper, and the result is truly remarkable. The diameter of the
each with direct drive to a single stage fan (see Fig. 24). Both
generator at 10.24 inches is half that of the maximum engine
generators and motors are assumed to be fully
diameter, and the light weight of the fully superconducting
superconducting. The fan-motor sets are mounted above and
generator yields a power to weight ratio of 40 HP/lb
toward the wing trailing edge in individual nacelles with a
(66 kW/kg). The generator rotates at engine rotational speed
total of ten (10) sets – five per wing. The turboshaft engines
resulting in reduced torque and very light weight (335 lb each
are relatively near term and the development of the fans will
generator, with each turbine engine at 894 lb).
not require a major new development although they may
Five fans per wing are installed above the wing with the
require either variable pitch blades or a variable area nozzle.
exhaust nozzle near the trailing edge. This nozzle is a two-
Thus it is the development of the superconducting generators
dimensional variable area design to match energy and flow
and motors that will enable and pace the future introduction of
requirements at both takeoff and cruise. Light weight, wide
such an aircraft. It should be noted that electric propulsion
chord composite fan blades are assumed using the technology
offers a level of safety in the event of the loss of an engine not
of current high bypass ratio turbofan engines. Advanced
available in current transport aircraft. Albeit at reduced power,
technology is assumed in the low value of hub-tip ratio at the
all ten fan-motor sets can be run with a single turboshaft
entrance of the fans and high inlet Mach number at the fan
engine. In fact, this may be a desirable mode of routine
entrance annulus. These parameters are selected to reduce fan
operation in some segments of the standard aircraft mission
diameter.
such as descent and landing.
As with the generators, major new technology is applied to
The engine, generator, motors and fans shown in the figure
the superconducting motors. The fully superconducting motor
are to scale, and, as can be seen, the integration of the
outside diameter at 7.24 inches is an excellent match with the
propulsion system into the aircraft does not pose any
hub diameter of the fan exit, and the light weight of the motors
significant problems. The generator is placed in front of the
is based on a power to weight ratio of 24.6 HP/lb (40 kW/kg),
engine to avoid having to insulate it from the hot exhaust gas,
a lower power density that the generators. The motors rotate at
ESNF, No. 6, October 2008; ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9
11
fan rotational speed, and the torque-power ratio is somewhat C. Distributed Turboelectric Propulsion for Hybrid Wing
higher in this case. Nonetheless, these light weight motors Body Aircraft
contribute to a very light weight propulsion system. Each Meeting future goals for aircraft and air traffic system
motor weighs 110 lb, and with cables included, the total performance may well require new airframes with more highly
turboelectric propulsion system weighs slightly more than integrated propulsion. Previous studies have evaluated hybrid
5100 lbs. wing body (HWB) configurations with various numbers of
The NASA aircraft design study of [33] is continuing, and a engines and with increasing degrees of propulsion-airframe
preliminary comparison of the aircraft described in this section integration. One recently published configuration [11] with 12
has been made with a similar aircraft designed with high small conventional engines partially embedded in a HWB
bypass ratio turbofan engines. These turbofan engines are aircraft (shown in Fig. 25) served as the airframe baseline for
assumed to be an advanced version of the new geared turbofan the turboelectric concept aircraft described below.
(GTF) engine now under development by Pratt and Whitney To achieve high cruise efficiency, this high lift-to-drag ratio
Aircraft. The design point bypass ratio of the engine is HWB was adopted as the baseline airframe along with
nominally 10 with a fan pressure ratio in the 1.45-1.5 range. boundary layer ingestion inlets and distributed thrust nozzles
The engines for this aircraft are placed above the wing to to fill in the wakes generated by the vehicle. The distributed
provide shielding to reduce noise. One can consider that the powered-lift propulsion concept for the baseline vehicle used a
electric propulsion system also represents a very high bypass simple, high-lift-capable internally blown flap or jet flap
ratio engine with the fan (bypass) flow displaced from the core system with a number of small high bypass ratio turbofan
flow through the turboshaft engines. In the design presented engines in the airframe. In that concept, the engine flow path
above, the equivalent bypass ratio is approximately 13. from the inlet to the nozzle is direct and does not involve
A preliminary comparison of the two aircraft is given in complicated internal ducts through the airframe to redistribute
Table III. Both aircraft are designed for short-field operation, the engine flow. In addition, partially embedded engines,
and, as a result, they have relatively high total takeoff thrust to distributed along the upper surface of the HWB airframe,
gross weight ratios. To accommodate the multiple fans, the provide noise reduction through airframe shielding and
aircraft with the electric propulsion system is designed with a promote jet flow mixing with the ambient airflow.
larger and higher aspect ratio wing. The result is a much
shorter field length capability for this aircraft. Range (nm) 3,000
The gross weight of the electric powered aircraft is Payload (lb) 40,000
approximately 5% lower than the turbofan powered aircraft Takeoff Gross Weight (lb) 189,000
primarily due to a reduction in the propulsion system weight, Landing Weight (lb) 152,000
but no comparison of the range of each aircraft has been made Total Fuel (lb) 44,100
yet. However, the electric powered aircraft does have higher Block Fuel (lb) 37,700
parasite drag due to the added surface area of the fan nacelles,
Block Time (h) 6.92
and this will have an effect on cruise aerodynamics and thus
Initial Cruise Altitude (ft) 39,000
on range capability. Also, note that the thrust specific fuel
Takeoff Field Length (ft) 2,450
consumption of the electric propulsion system is slightly
greater than that of the high bypass ratio turbofan propulsion
system. With the proper engine cycle for the turboshaft
engine, it is expected that the specific fuel consumption at Fig. 25. Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft used as baseline airframe for
cruise will be comparable for both aircraft. A complete turboelectric HWB.
evaluation of range will include operation of the aircraft. It is
anticipated that aircraft with an electric propulsion system will
be able to operate with a single engine operating at high
efficiency through the descent phase of the mission thus
offering further fuel savings.
TABLE III
COMPARISON OF AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE
N+2 Characteristic N+3
0.80 Cruise Speed (Mach) 0.80
36,000 Cruise Altitude (ft) 36,000
83.33 Wingspan (ft) 100
9.29 Aspect Ratio 10.36
81,650 Takeoff Gross Weight (lbs) 77,311
109 Takeoff Wing Loading (psf) 80
0.46 Takeoff Thrust-to-Weight Ratio 0.42 Fig. 26. Two views of a sixteen-fan hybrid wing body aircraft and a cross
4,644 Takeoff Field Length (ft) 2,415 section of one of the superconducting-motor-driven fans in its duct.
3,132 Landing Field Length (ft) 1,755
ESNF, No. 6, October 2008; ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9
12
To improve performance and to reduce noise and and efficiency comparisons are made in Table IV among three
environmental impact even further, a turboelectric propulsion propulsion systems: a 16-fan turboelectric propulsion system,
system was proposed for that vehicle. The turboelectric 16 independent small turbofan engines, and 2 large
concept aircraft [13] shown in Fig. 26 uses essentially the conventional turbofans. The turboelectric system weighs 5000
same airframe but employs a number of superconducting lb (2300 kg) more than the 16-engine system but has 9% lower
motors to drive the distributed fans rather than many small TSFC (Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption) including the 1%
conventional turbofan engines. The power to drive the electric electrical and refrigeration loss at takeoff. Weights exclude
fans is generated by two remotely located gas-turbine-driven propulsors (fans), which would have similar total weights in
superconducting generators (at each wing-tip). This all systems. TSFC values shown in Table IV are based on best
arrangement allows many small partially embedded fans while present-day values for the engine size. Refrigerator weight is
retaining the superior efficiency of large core engines, which based on 5 lb/HP-input (3 kg/kW-input) and 30% efficiency,
are physically separated but connected through electric power and HTS AC losses corresponding to a 12-µm filament. As
lines to the fans. Descriptions of the vehicle, the noted above, even with this optimistic assumption (about
superconducting system, and the propulsion system are equal to the weight of just the cold head in today’s
described in [13] with some "zeroth-order" weight and cryocoolers), the weight overhead of the refrigeration is such
efficiency comparisons to the multiple turbofan system. that the optimizer pushes the operating temperature of the
Preliminary analysis suggests that fuel savings might be superconducting components to a relatively high 49K (at the
greater than six percent for a turboelectric propulsion system expense of having larger and heavier electric machines) to
compared to the same frame with distributed discrete reduce refrigeration needs.
turbofans. To compare the turboelectric system with the 16-turbofan
Beyond fuel savings related only to the propulsion system, system, by balancing out the opposite effects of lower SFC and
however, turboelectric propulsion introduces a very high higher weight of the turboelectric system, the Breguet range
degree of aircraft design and operational flexibility as a result equation, sufficient to determine relative ranking, is applied to
of decoupling power production from power consumption, as both systems, with the requirement of equal aircraft range and
has been noted earlier in this paper. Lightweight approximating the entire flight as cruise. Solving for the
superconducting generators, motors and power cables allow a required change in fuel weight between the 16-engine case and
small number of efficient large turbo-generators to power an the turboelectric case, we find that the turboelectric aircraft
arbitrary number of propulsor units. Either can be placed would require 7%, or 3000 lb (1400 kg) less mission fuel. Thus,
practically anywhere and in various orientations on the the slightly heavier turboelectric aircraft would have a net fuel
vehicle. This flexibility opens up design possibilities not savings of roughly 7% on each flight, compared to the baseline
obtainable with discrete large turbofans or with distributed aircraft powered by 16 small engines. This estimate must be
propulsion systems that employ mechanical power distribution refined by a detailed mission analysis. Known omissions in
by gearboxes and shafts. Fuel savings resulting from this the weight estimates of the electric system include the
design freedom may be book-kept as drag reduction rather superconducting transmission lines (estimated at only 3% of
than under thrust production. Remembering that thrust must the turboelectric system weight) and other power management
equal drag in steady level flight, we may further note that and distribution components.
there is only a limited amount of fuel saving to be gained by A comparison between the turboelectric case and two large
engine improvement whereas fuel saving from drag reduction (presumably podded) turbine engines can also be made based
is more open ended. Large engines already extract half or on the numbers in Table IV. One can see that the entire
more of the fuel energy, very close to the thermodynamic refrigerated turboelectric system weighs 6300 lb (2900 kg)
limit. Drag reduction by boundary layer ingestion and wake more than two large turbofan engine cores of 42,000 HP each
filling are yet to be fully analyzed and exploited and will (with no weight allowance for podding) and would be ~1%
require engine/airframe integration and a distributed less efficient at takeoff because of the electrical losses. A
propulsion approach to be realized. liquid-hydrogen-cooled turboelectric system would weigh
In spite of uncertainty of the future level of refrigerator and 3600 lb (1600 kg) more than the large turbofan engine cores.
AC superconductor technology, we summarize some weight Thus, the propulsion system weight for an HWB using podded
and efficiency estimates from [13] that are based on the level engines would be significantly less than either of the two
of development that we expect for all-superconducting turboelectric systems discussed, with consequent
generators and motors. A sizing code [34] for fully accompanying reductions in fuel burn. However, the use of
superconducting motors and generators was used. two separate podded engines would provide no short take-off
Optimization was performed to minimize motor (or generator) capability and only limited noise reduction, no drag reduction
weight plus refrigerator weight. The refrigerator, even with and none of the other potential benefits and capabilities that
our aggressive 2030 assumptions, weighs ~70% as much as have been mentioned above. It is therefore still very
the motor or generator that it cools. Efficiencies, including the advantageous to switch to turboelectric propulsion, even with
refrigerator power, are at least 99.4%. The expected weight of the slight weight penalty.
a motor or generator with its cooler is considerably less than
the weight of a turbine engine core for equal power. Weight
ESNF, No. 6, October 2008; ASC Preprint 2AP01 conforming to IEEE Policy on Electronic Dissemination, Section 8.1.9
13
14
sustained for the next decade or more. It should be pointed out Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp 2150-
2153, June 2005
that the development of ultra-compact superconducting [19] P.J. Masson, P. Tixador and C.A. Luongo, “Safety Torque Generation in
generators and motors, and the associated lightweight HTS Propulsion Motor for General Aviation Aircraft,” IEEE.
cryocooling, could also be applied to other mass-market Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 17, No 2, pp 1619-
transportation applications such as trucks, busses, or even cars 1622, June 2007
[20] P.J. Masson, J.E. Pienkos and C.A. Luongo, “Scaling Up of HTS Motor
if compact enough. Realization of these applications could be Based on Trapped Flux and Flux Concentration for Large Aircraft
the next big opportunity for superconductivity to fully realize Propulsion,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 17,
its game-changing potential. No 2, pp 1579-1582, June 2007
[21] P.J. Masson, M. Breschi, P. Tixador, and C.A. Luongo, “Design of HTS
Axial Flux Motor for Aircraft Propulsion,” IEEE Transactions on
ACKNOWLEDGMENT Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 17, No 2, pp 1533-1536, June 2007
[22] D.P. Raymer, Aircraft Design, A Conceptual Approach (3rd Edition),
The authors thank Dr. Danielle Soban of ASDL/Georgia American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, 1999.
Tech for the helpful discussions on aircraft design, and Prof. [23] J.D. Anderson,. Aircraft Performance and Design, McGraw-Hill,
Pascal Tixador of Grenoble INP for his work on the sizing Boston, 1998
[24] T. Choi, T. Nam, and D. Soban, “Utilizing Novel Synthesis and Analysis
models. Methods towards the Design of Revolutionary Electric Propulsion and
Aircraft Architectures,” AIAA-2005-7188, Sep. 2005
[25] D.S. Soban and E.G. Upton, “Towards Electric Aircraft: Progress under
the NASA URETI for Aeropropulsion Power Technology,” SAE 2006-
REFERENCES 01-3097, Nov. 2006
[1] N. Cumpsty, Jet Propulsion, Cambridge University Press, 2002 [26] T. Choi, “A recourse-based solution approach to the design of fuel cell
[2] D. Blanding, "Subsystem Design and Integration for the More Electric aeropropulsion systems,” Ph.D thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology,
Aircraft," AIAA-2007-4828, 2007 2008
[3] H.J.M. ter Brake, and G.F.M. Wiegerinck, “Low-power cryocooler [27] T. Nam, “A Generalized Sizing Method for Revolutionary Concepts
survey,” Cryogenics, vol. 42, pp. 705-718, Nov. 2002 under Probabilistic Design Constraints,” Ph.D thesis, Georgia Institute
[4] G. Daniel Brewer, Hydrogen Aircraft Technology, CRC Press, Boca of Technology, 2007
Raton, FL, 1991. [28] E.G. Upton, “An Intelligent, Robust Approach to Volumetric Aircraft
[5] W.J. Levedahl, “Superconductive Naval Propulsion Systems,” Sizing,” Ph.D thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007
Proceedings of the Applied Superconductivity Conference 1972, May 1- [29] T. Nam, D.S. Soban, and D.N. Mavris, “A Non-Deterministic Aircraft
3, Annapolis, MD., USA, IEEE Pub. No. 72CHO682-5-TABSC, pp. 26- Sizing Method under Probabilistic Design Constraints,” AIAA-2006-
32, IEEE, 1972 2062, May 2006
[6] G.R.Fox and B.D. Hatch “Superconductive Ship Propulsion Systems,” [30] T. Nam and D.N. Mavris, “Multi-Stage Reliability-Based Design
ibid., pp. 33-40 Optimization for Aerospace System Conceptual Design,” AIAA-2008-
[7] C. E. Oberly, “Air Force Applications of Lightweight Superconducting 2073 Apr. 2008
Machinery”, IEEE Trans. Mag., vol. 13, No. 2, pp 260, January 1977 [31] NASA, Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) User Guide,
[8] S.S. Kalsi, K. Weeber, H. Takesue, C. Lewis, H.W. Neumueller, and Rev. 1.6.4Q. Cleveland, OH, November 5, 2006
R.D. Blaugher, “Development Status of Rotating Machines Employing [32] P.J. Masson, P. Tixador, J.C. Ordoñez, A. Morega and C.A. Luongo,
Superconducting Field Windings,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 92, No. 10, pp. “Electro-Thermal Sizing Model for HTS Motor Design,” IEEE
1688–1704, Oct. 2004 Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 17, No 2, pp 1529-
[9] P.N. Barnes, M.D. Sumption, and G.L. Rhoads, “Review of High Power 1532, June 2007
Density Superconducting Generators: Present State and Prospects for [33] “The Integrated Modeling and Verification of Hybrid Wing-Body, Low
Incorporating YBCO Windings,” Cryogenics, Vol. 45, No. 10–11, pp. Noise ESTOL Aircraft,” NASA NRA Contract with California State
670–686, Oct.–Nov. 2005 Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA., 2008
[10] C. Oberly, “Lightweight Superconducting Generators for Mobile [34] P.J. Masson, and P. Tixador, Superconducting machines sizing model,
Military Platforms,” Proceedings of the PES Meeting, Montreal, private communication.
Quebec, June 2006
[11] H.D. Kim, J.J. Berton, and S.M. Jones, “Low Noise Cruise Efficient
Short Take-Off and Landing Transport Vehicle Study,” AIAA–2006–
7738, Sept. 2006.
[12] P.J. Masson, D.S. Soban, G.V. Brown and C.A. Luongo, "HTS
Machines as Enabling Technology for All-Electric Airborne Vehicles,"
Superconductor Science and Technology, Vol 20, No 8, pp 748-756,
August 2007
[13] H.D. Kim, G.V. Brown, and J.L. Felder, “Distributed Turboelectric
Propulsion for Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft,” 9th International Powered
Lift Conference, London, United Kingdom, July 2008.
[14] P.J. Masson and C.A. Luongo, "HTS Machines for Applications in All-
Electric Aircraft," 1-4244-1298-6/07, Proceedings of the PES Meeting,
Tampa, FL, 2007
[15] G.V. Brown, A.F. Kascak, B. Ebihara, D. Johnson, B. Choi, M. Siebert,
and C. Buccieri, “NASA Glenn Research Center Program in High Power
Density Motors for Aeropropulsion,” NASA/TM—2005-213800, 2005
[16] P.J. Masson, D.S. Soban, E. Upton, J.E. Pienkos and C.A. Luongo,
“HTS Motors in Aircraft Propulsion: Design Considerations,” IEEE.
Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp 2218-
2221, June 2005
[17] P.J. Masson and C.A. Luongo, “High Power Density Superconducting
Motor for All-Electric Aircraft Propulsion,” IEEE Transactions on
Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp 2226-2229, June 2005
[18] J.E. Pienkos, P.J. Masson, S.V. Pamidi and C.A. Luongo, “Conduction
Cooling of a Compact HTS Motor for Aeropropulsion,” IEEE.